How Long Have You Been Right-of-Center?

As long as I can remember
34% (817 votes)
1-5 years
3% (69 votes)
5-10 years
6% (153 votes)
10-20 years
12% (303 votes)
20-30 years
17% (406 votes)
30-40 years
10% (254 votes)
40-50 years
6% (157 votes)
50+ years
7% (170 votes)
I'm not right-of-center
4% (98 votes)
Total votes: 2427

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What Happened?

I guess no one moved to the right between 1968 and 1978, or is there some other reason that 30 to 40 years is missing? Of course, Tricky Dicky could account for the first half of that span, but please...Mr. Peanut drove people right in droves!

V/R
Clyde

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

heyyyy mannnnn

if you remember those years, then you weren't really there, maannnnnn.....

Well......Some of Us Didn't Do Drugs

ROTFLMAO

While your comment may be true for large numbers through those years, there are those of us who both spurned drugs, yet were liberals throughout many of them. Of course, I suppose it could be argued that we simply were declaring our incipient conservatism by not using, but...

V/R
Clyde 

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

Mr Peanut

Like you Jimma Carter helped push me to the right. When Bill Clinton come along, he pushed me to the far right-farther than my hero Jesse Helms.

“A debate is a conflict which clarifies a position. A dialogue is a conversation which compromises a position.” –John E. Ashbrook, The New Neutralism II, P. 7

September 11, 2001. On that

September 11, 2001. On that day I told a few of my then-liberal friends on an email discussion group that I understood my father's feelings when he said he felt the strong urge to enlist on December 8, 1941, and right the wrong that happened to America. I was then told that I was a 'murderer,' that my mindset had killed all of those people in the WTC, that my cold-war mentality was the problem with our country, and that I should join up in the hopes that I'd be killed and my hateful mindset wouldn't sully up the world.

I told all of them to f-off, unsubscribed from the list, never spoke to any of them again, and have never looked back. Salt's bad for you, ya know.

mister joseph...you really

mister joseph...you really had liberal "friends" with such a warped view of the world and reality that they would spout such unadulterated nonsense immediately after 9/11? 

Whom were you hanging out with?  I have many friends and acquaintenances across the political spectrum--including a fair number of liberals and fellow Democrats--and none of them expressed that sort of garbage.

Jer

 "I was then told that I

 "I was then told that I was a 'murderer,' that my mindset had killed all of those people in the WTC, that my cold-war mentality was the problem with our country, and that I should join up in the hopes that I'd be killed and my hateful mindset wouldn't sully up the world."

Wow mj, with friends like those it almost sounds like you were a former "Woods Fund" boardmember. : )

 

 "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

                               " The Cake is a lie."   

left of center

but still center

shawn, you're to my left?

as is well documented i am the center, why everywhere i go and look around there i am right in the center of it!!

Support our Troops    

????????

Sorry Bruce, as usual your humor is above my liberal head ;-)

hey, Shawn!

Didja know that LEFT is a latin derivative that means "sinister"?

It's funny that Shawn thinks he's Center

Most left wingers think they are center

at least someone gets my

at least someone gets my joke

Support our Troops    

Oh yeah Bruce

I got it. It was a good one.

Well Dee

I don' believe in

: affirmitive action

: pulling from Iraq

: Gay marriage

: mortgage bailout

: giving birth control to 6th graders

: amnesty for illegals

I also want us to build more refineries and drill for more oil in our backyard, so I guess that might make me closer to the center than most libs.

If you really believe all that Shawn - then you'd support

Republicans and you don't. So sorry I just don't believe you.

Used to Be Liberal, Now a Proud Conservatve

I am 13. My parents raised me as a left-wing nut. In my old school's 2000 and 2004 "mock vote" I voted for Kerry and (I hate to say this now) Gore. I don't necessarily like George Bush, as I don't find him to be a true conservative. He got us into this pointless war of which we are stuck in, and we have to stay there for a very long time (I don't care what Obama or Clinton say). I am a Huckabee supporter, but now I have to support McCain because, as we all know, Huckabee lost. In March 2006, I started watching the news. It was NBC News (scary). In July 2007, when I declared to my father that I didn't believe in global warming, he called me a "conservative Republican." Eventually, before the primary season started, I started to watch cable news, not MSNBC, but FOX News and CNN. Now, I consider myself a moderate conservative.

Thats great roadgeek9

Most kids your own age are more interested with texting and VH1 than spending time on a political board.

You and your parents must have lots of interesting political debates.

My Father and I

Every night, my father and I cannot watch the news together. I watch "Special Report with Brit Hume" and he watches "NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams." You would never want to live with the Chief Editor of moveon.org (my dad) when you are basically the (in his words) chief editor of FOX News. For example, we would be arguing about immigration, and he calls me a racist (same for my history teacher) for not wanting the illegal immigrants in this country. We also argue over other things, like global warming and election coverage. Recently, though, he said that as long as I watch one episode of "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" (I did and I hated it), he would watch an episode of either "Glenn Beck" (my favorite political commentator) or "The O'Reilly Factor."

rg9... So did your dad

rg9...

So did your dad watch one of those shows you mentioned and what did he say?

I can already guess, but just curious...by the way, I like Beck better than BOR too.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

I have no doubt that you

I have no doubt that you will have him converted in no time at all. : ] 

 

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

roadgeek9

Your probably too young, unless you watch older shows, but you sound like Alex P Keaton from family ties. He was a conservative in a a liberal family

A 13 year old this informed

A 13 year old this informed and interested?  Bravo and good luck teaching your father the error of his ways. 

Reminiscing

When I was your age, I remember watching the Bush-Dukakis debates while going through bowls of popcorn.  I remember thinking then that I badly needed Bush to win because Dukakis was just going to kiss the Soviets' collective asses for 4 years. 

Even then I was putting foreign policy at the top of my agenda.

Needless to say, I am geeked to see that I wasn't alone!!!  (I got my voter's registration card before I got my driver's license.  And I remember well when some idiot state Senator mailed me a gushing form letter congratulating me for splitting the atom, I mean, graduating from high school, and encouraging me to become a registered voter.  Yeah, how many of those who participated in that last school play voted in an election before going?  I'll bet I was the only one who did, as a special election was held that day...)

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Good to see another 'defector' like me ;)

Though you made the jump a heck of a lot earlier then I did. I was more along the Lieberman route in that I was very supportive of the war, the troops and the military since the beginning but was liberal on a few things. Of course after 9/11 all of a sudden supporting the war and the troops became especially hard-core Republican like, and after pissing everyone in the young democrats off and getting booted out, I joined the republicans and haven't looked back since.

I'm probably more John McCain like then I'd like to admit but I don't like his stances on global warming and the border (I'm in San Diego, I think I know SOMETHING about this), but I'm somewhat liberal on abortion and gay marriage.

I have only ever made one prayer to God, a very short one: O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it - Voltaire

how?

How did you come to decide that you didn't believe in the global warming hoax?  I'm curious about this because I'm in the middle of a huge debate on youtube with a bunch of pinheads and I'm shocked at how deeply they believe this stuff.  What led you to "clean" yourself of this junk?

Just alot of the information out there, and the lack of debate

But the big kicker with me was when I asked those global warming morons about the sun's role in heating up the planet, they'd give me this dumbfounded look. There's global warming on mars and even on some of jupiter's moons (I think), and there have been cycles of ice ages and global warming throughout human history. But when you mention the cycle of the sun in its influence on our weather or past ice/warming trends, they had no idea what's going on. You'd swear that these enviro-nuts think the earth was always a perfect temperature until Nixon-Reagan-Bush I-Bush II when all of a sudden it started to heat up.

Not to mention the past predictions (oh the joy of studying history) of environmentalists who up to 3 decades ago were screaming about the coming ice age and 3 decades prior about global warming and 3 decades before that the ice age. God almighty we can't tell accurately what the weather will be like ONE WEEK from today, yet somehow we can predict that Nevada will have beachfront property in 20+ years? Come on!

 

I have only ever made one prayer to God, a very short one: O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it - Voltaire

NOTA choice needed, again.

I've been a libertarian since before I knew of the word. This means fiscally I'm to the far right of the vast majority of you, but "socially" I probably am if anything to your left. Much like the antilibertarian-biased news media, this NB poll makes no distinctions, so as usual I'm politically homeless.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

I'm fairly sure there are

I'm fairly sure there are many other libertarians among the NB'ers.  Even on the issues where I slant left, the utterly ridiculous suggestions of the left keep me forced to position my vote to the right. 

In response to the poll itself, I only said 1-5 years.  I had zero interest in news and politics before I turned 18, so I'm unsure whether any prior years could truly count.  I could probably say I've been ideologically on the right most of my life (excluding a romantic fascination in middle school with communism that was quickly snuffed by reason).  I was raised by conservative parents and my siblings are all left-leaning. 

As for feeling politically homeless, I understand how that goes.  I may be right leaning, but I will argue either side of an issue to find the merits(as some on these boards have already witnessed).  I wish that we could more often divide politics into either individualism and collectivism.  It'd make choosing sides far easier.

Libertarian

I too, a libertarian, am politically homeless. While dealing with other people's money the responsibility of our government is to be prudent. A concept long lost. On the other hand, individual freedom is what we are promised in these United States. The libs prefer to believe that governing with your heart on your sleeve is right and proper. If you are not on board with this concept, they seek to force you, as they know better what is right and proper. But neither do I believe that I be forced to accept the pap handed us by our "moral" government concerning the use of illicit drugs. As a teenager in the sixties I, along with many of my friends, realized the government was lying to us about the absolutly addictive qualities of those drugs not prescribed, regulated and taxed. Nothing has changed in 40 years save that we are lied to more frequently about more things. The redistribution of wealth is the greatest evil perpetrated on the American people as it robs them of their self-reliance. Government intrusion into our personal freedom in the name of being progressive through regulation remains the precursor to group-think. Nope ... the poll just doesn't do the concept justice.

right-center-left-up-down?

It would be interesting if NB could post a quiz to determine where its readers are on the political spectrum. Is there such a quiz available on the web?

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

Yep.

In fact, I'm pretty sure The Advocates would give the source for theirs to Matthew, if they haven't given it out to everyone already. The "World's Smallest Political Quiz" (the pre-web version fits on a business card) is an old, imperfect (but getting better) outreach tool created by the microscopic Libertarian 501c3, which uses the quiz in what's called "Operation Politically Homeless."

It was originally meant to be a tool used to identify which people are worth sending snail mail about much-smaller government. Rush Limbaugh took it and scored on the right, so it's sometimes pretty accurate. I score 100/100 on the current version, so I like it. :)
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

sarcasmo, thanks

I took the World's Smallest Political Quiz - nice, short, issue-driven, simple to understand.

Then I did a search on other quizzes. I was on the first page of a multi-page quiz, when I was supposed to answer this question:

 our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.

Huh??? Why is a question like this on a quiz, and how is the answer scored? Does a yes answer place one as a Dixiecrat or a Nazi? That quiz is a waste of cyberspace.

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

Was that on

The Advocates site? Presumably, they might link to lots of quizzes online, which might change over time, and I don't have any reference from the material you present. I'm pretty sure they're actually very religious folks, at least the founder is/was (I hope he's still alive!) so I don't think they're racists. So, where was your search of other quizzes?? Racism, because of its collectivist nature, is the opposite of libertarian...
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

here's the link

The test  with the race question is on The Political Compass site.

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

Ok, but please note

It has nothing to do with the Advocates WSPQ site I linked-to originally. I'd also note your non-Advocates quiz doesn't say WHICH race (human? 'Cuz I'm totally with the Earthling team, all the way!) is being compared to which other races, so you might not want to get offended too quickly. Anyway, race is consistently more heat than light, just like the simpleminded left-right line I'm fighting. That's why my point isn't about race; it's about the plain as day fact that a one-dimensional left right line is a very stupid way to try to measure something as complex as human political diversity..
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Sarcasmo, please reread my post

When I mentioned "then I did a search on other quizzes", I meant on other web sites, not on The Advocates site. Sorry if I didn't make that distinction clearer.

Also, the second quiz I found on the net has an FAQ regarding the race question:

Does "our race has many superior qualities" refer to my particular race or the human race?

"Race" can only refer to the human race or to one of its subdivisions. The proposition, in comparing one's race with other races, can therefore only be referring to the latter.

Like I mentioned before, I don't think the question is relevant regarding a conventional political spectrum, so I'm not impressed by that 2nd quiz.

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

Ok, but my point is

That it has nothing to do with the WSPQ, or my point. Race and racism shed plenty of heat but 0 light. They're not even scientifically valid concepts -- it's all culture and fight, and humans are apparently hard-wired for that fight.

Therefore, I want to avoid the race issue entirely, and instead focus on how stupid trying to map humanity's political diversity on a line can be. Left-right line stupidity marginalizes libertarians like me & gores my personal ox, so I'm not particularly interested in the race question of the other quiz, even though long online experience tells me that once it's brought-up, the race issue is likely to totally dominate any conversation...
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Oddly enough, this quiz

Oddly enough, this quiz decided I was an authoritarian left-winger.  Too bad the quiz isn't worded properly at all.  There's alot of things I believe should be done for the better good, but don't believe it's the right of anyone to do them.  The problem is that the quiz doesn't clearly discern between personal morality and political ideology.  The questions are all slanted or completely ridiculous(questioning your belief in astrology in political identity? I suppose that's just to ask if you're a gullible leftist twit).

Relatively Worthless Quiz

 "...I'm pretty sure The Advocates would give the source for theirs to Matthew, if they haven't given it out to everyone already..."

LOL I'm sure they would, since their goal is to convince everyone they're really a libertarian, but just don't know it. The World's Smallest Political Quiz is a perfect example of a skewed poll/quiz/survey. While seemingly innocuous, it is designed to drive anyone not in the fringes of lunacy to thinking they are a Libertarian. It does these by reducing the answers to only three choices, and it is the maybes that create the bias.

There is no way to measure everyone's position on the political spectrum, outside of a very long, self-correcting survey. Anything short, or simple will have a hidden agenda.

V/R
Clyde

"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC

Count me 100% back in with the libertarians, as the repubs...

...are screwing this country into the ground even faster than the dems have been.

Guess you could say the prodigal son has returned, as I have sinned a great sin by voting for George W. Bush in '04. That was one hideous mistake I do not plan on repeating.

Sorry, McCain, but you are SOL come November. :-)


BOB BARR IN '08!!!!!

There is no England anymore.

BOB BARR IN '08!!!!!


BOB BARR IN '08!!!!!

Wasn't it Jody Miller who said "Great! It's Ron Paul, but without the charisma" ?

 

"Don't forget to vote this fall. Not for McCain, not ever, but there might be a Conservative Rep or Senator that Needs Your Vote" --Free Stinker

Right and Left is a misnomer.

"You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down -- up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order -- or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." - Ronald Reagan, 1964

Let's contrast 2 quotes

And everyone can see if y'all see a problem in the fact that one speaker's dead, and the other one's not only alive, but in office as a Republican.

"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of
conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as
liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the
Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be
the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less
centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description
also of what libertarianism is.

Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the
present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say, because I
think that like in any political movement there are shades, and there are libertarians who
are almost over at the point of wanting no government at all or anarchy. I believe there
are legitimate government functions. There is a legitimate need in an orderly society for
some government to maintain freedom or we will have tyranny by individuals. The strongest
man on the block will run the neighborhood. We have government to insure that we
don’t each one of us have to carry a club to defend ourselves. But again, I stand on
my statement that I think that libertarianism and conservatism are travelling the same
path." -- Ronald Reagan

 
=============================

"One of the criticisms I make is to what I refer to as more of a
libertarianish right. You know, the left has gone so far left and the
right in some respects has gone so far right that they touch each
other. They come around in the circle. This whole idea of personal
autonomy, well I don’t think most conservatives hold that point of
view. Some do. They have this idea that people should be left alone, be
able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes
down and keep our regulations low, that we shouldn’t get involved in
the bedroom, we shouldn’t get involved in cultural issues. You know,
people should do whatever they want. Well, that is not how traditional
conservatives view the world and I think most conservatives understand
that individuals can’t go it alone. That there is no such society that
I am aware of, where we’ve had radical individualism and that it
succeeds as a culture." -- Rick Santorum

In a way the Santorum quote's actually refreshing -- I'd rather have statist honesty than the continued theft of libertarian words accompanied by statism.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

"And everyone can see if

"And everyone can see if y'all see a problem in the fact that one
speaker's dead, and the other one's not only alive, but in office as a
Republican."

Which one's alive and in office? ;)

Oh, that's right

Didn't Santorum get defeated? I never keep track of them all, I'll admit. I do know he started NOT as a Republican but with the Perot people...
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Santorum was with Perot? Citations, Please

Where did you pull this out of?

Didn't Santorum get defeated? I never keep track of them all, I'll
admit. I do know he started NOT as a Republican but with the Perot
people...

Got any citations to back up your claim?

It appears I was mistaken again

I thought I'd recalled Santorum was originally with "Reform" before becoming a Republican, but it must have been another RINO. My apologies.
JMR

PS What did that sinker taste like??

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Whatever Santorum means by

Whatever Santorum means by "radical individualism" I don't know.  But he seems, like a lot of republicans, to miss the point of what freedom is.  Freedom is based on the idea that each person must govern himself and that no person has the right to rule over another person. 

All of our rights stem from this concept.  Freedom of association, religion, speech, property rights, rights involving civil and criminal issues, right to redress grievances, right to alter or abolish the government, etc.  This means that the only legitimate role of government is to assure that those rights are protected.

The whole thing was summed up by Jesus Christ 2000 years ago: "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you."  That, to me, is the essence of "radical individualism."

Where's center, anyway?

I guess I didn't get the memo...   ;-)

-

My grandmother was a union organizer for the ILGWU and my mother felt that FDR was the greatest president ever, so I grew up very left of center. The inept and incompetent administration of Jimmy Carter cured me of my Liberalism.

 

“Come on out and fight, ye filthy slobs!” Corporal Flannigan

Buckley and Chambers and Reagan

Three things caused be to go from being a liberal to an EVIL rightwinger. One was Bill Buckley's National Review. I started reading that journal when still a liberal just to LAUGH at what I thought were close-minded conservatives. Strange thing is that I noticed that the articles were well written and on the mark as well as being very humorous. Also reading Whittaker Chamber's fantastic biography, "Witness." Finally the advent of Ronald Reagan who sealed the deal for me.

I have been an avid reader

I have been an avid reader of Buckley and National Review, was enormously impressed by Chambers and his remarkable book Witness, and deeply admire Reagan...but none of it changed my center/left views. 

Jer

Nothing center about Jer either

If he can be an avid reader of Buckley and the National Review and still be a leftist then he understands the positions of the right and rejects them. Most "center" people don't understand either the left or the right or both.

Dee, if you are going to

Dee, if you are going to define me politically, try being a little more coherent in presenting your analysis.  Your post is nothing but a modest helping of intellectual mush.

Jer

You define yourself with Mush

I didn't do that. I was perfectly clear, and any conservative can understand what I said. Only a leftist who thinks he's a centrist wouldn't.

Okay Dee...

I have consistently described my political views as "center/left".  Give me a few reasons why you think that description is inaccurate.

Jer

As you said - you always vote Dem for President

and you would vote for Obama over McCain. No true centrist would consider voting for Obama over McCain unless they didn't understand thier records and positions. I think you understand.

because i'm center and you

because i'm center and you disagree with me

Support our Troops    

exactly Bruce - I always say that it's not a line it's a circle

We are all points on that circle and anyone who disagrees with us is either to the left or the right.

botg... Are you one of

botg...

Are you one of those "centrists" who Dee says understands neither the left nor the right?

What are the major issues about which you believe we disagree?

Inasmuch as the conservatives are in the majority on the Supreme Court, are you in favor of a judicial moderate being appointed to fill the next vacancy?

Jer

 

No moderate would see the SCOTUS as conservative

it's moderate now. A couple picks by Obama would make it far left.

It's been too far left for too long that you people see any conservative change as a "conservative court". Right now there are four very liberal judges (Ginsberg, Souter, Bryer and Stevens) and only two very conservative judges (Scalia and Thomas). Alito, Roberts and Kennedy are all moderates with conservative leanings. You need one liberal judge to be replaced by a strong conservative or two far left ones to be replaces by left leaning moderates for the court to remain moderate.

With McCain you are going to most likely get a moderate (left or right leaning who knows). Obama will turn the court far left. The only chance for the court to remain anywhere near moderate is if McCain is elected.

agreed Dee

With people like Ginsberg running the show and debacles like the Terri Shiavo case, it's a hard sell that SCOTUS needs any more lefties.

exactly Dee

and that is why we can't let your kids and grandkids pay for us not liking McCain.

Support our Troops    

Dee...Find me one neutral

Dee...Find me one neutral scholar/observer of the Supreme Court who doesn't agree with my statement that its current composition is predominantly conservative.  In fact, disregard the word "neutral".  Produce one judicial scholar who says otherwise.  See you in a couple of years.

Breyer "far left"?  Flabbergastedly absurd!  Have you ever read a single Supreme Court decision in your life?

Jer

You obviously don't read them Jer

Breyer is a liberal. Don't take my word for it - take his in his own book! Flabbergastingly absurd is what you are. If a liberal judicial scholar calls Bryer a liberal - so would you, irrespective of anything he actually says or does. Man you are so brainwashed

The title of his book "Active Liberty" should give you a clue. Get a clue Jer

 

Dee...

Get a clue?  Thanks, but I already have plenty.  Would you like to borrow a few?  Here's one:  Why don't you toss aside the gigantic chip you have been carrying around on your shoulder the past few weeks.   I think you would find life considerably more enjoyable.

By the way, a "liberal" is not a "far left"ist...just as a "conservative" is not a "far right"ist.  Or is the distinction lost on you?

Jer 

~

Dee: 1

Jer: 0

 

"Don't forget to vote this fall. Not for McCain, not ever, but there might be a Conservative Rep or Senator that Needs Your Vote" --Free Stinker

No...say it ain't so, Free.

No...say it ain't so, Free.  You mean I have lost...to...Dee?!

It is truly the darkest day of my life.

Jer

And from the looks of it,

And from the looks of it, Dee didn't have to work very hard.

 

"Don't forget to vote this fall. Not for McCain, not ever, but there might be a Conservative Rep or Senator that Needs Your Vote" --Free Stinker

jer

Dee called Breyer very liberal --- you brought in far-left are you fighting your own strawman?

you seem to trying to defend the proposition that Breyer is a moderate???  It's not defendable.

Support our Troops    

botg...  "...you brought

botg...

 "...you brought in far-left are you fighting your own strawman?"

Now that's funny!

"Abstain from McCain"

strawman or tar-baby?

ah no brer bear don't ah throw me in tha breyer patch

Support our Troops    

botg...you're correct.  I

botg...you're correct.  I did, in part, mischaracterize Dee's ideological labeling of the justices, and for that I apologize--especially to Dee.

However, it doesn't change my view of the philosophical make-up of the Supreme Court, nor does it alter my opinion that Dee's assessment is fundamentally flawed.

She states the following:

it's moderate now.  A couple of picks by Obama would make it far left.

There are four liberal justices--or liberal leaning justices--and five conservative--or conservative leaning justices.   The only certain vacancy within the next four years will be Stevens, a liberal, so his replacement will not change the balance of power which is and has been held by the conservatives for some time.  The Dems have appointed exactly two justices in the past forty years, while the Repubs have appointed a dozen or more.  What would otherwise have been complete conservative dominance was mitigated by the leftward drift of Blackmun, Stevens, and Souter (and to a lesser degree, O'Connor).  But, presently, Scalia and Thomas are solidly conservative, Alito and Roberts, thus far, appear firmly in the conservative camp, and Kennedy most often sides with them.  So the conservative bloc is in control.

It's been too far left for too long...

Nonsense.  It hasn't been "left" in decades.

Right now there are four very liberal judges (Ginsberg, Souter, Bryer and Stevens) [my emphasis]

Nope.  Souter and Stevens are Republicans appointed by Republicans but have been fairly reliable liberals.  Ginsberg [recommended by Orrin Hatch] is liberal.  Breyer is  pro-business but liberal leaning.  I am not, as you suggest, claiming Breyer is a moderate or centrist.  But he is not "very liberal". 

You need one liberal judge to be replaced by a strong conservative or two far left ones to be replaced...[my emphasis]

There's that "far left" claim again.  To whom is Dee referring?

Jer

 

 

jer

i have no idea what if any judges may be replaced, no one does with O'Conner leaving the SCOTUS has a right lean to it after years of leaning left

when is the last time any decision supported the "enumerated powers" (or States rights) clause?

Has Roe v. Wade been overturned?

What about school prayer?

These three would happen with a right leaning SCOTUS.

Say Alito or Roberts (right moderates) or Thomas (right) fall ill and get replaced by a Ginsberg clone, the court will continue its left (activist) rulings which it has been on since 64.

if all you are worried about is the 'far' part well okay delete it and make it left leaning.  These things are done gradually anyway.

Support our Troops    

Thanks for stepping in Bruce, Free, Clear, Candance and

anyone else I forgot. I lost track of this thread and forgot about it. Thanks for making my points.

I know Jer is obsessed with the chip I have on my shoulder against liberals but he just doesn't get that I don't agree with them and I don't think he is a moderate.

I feel no more obligation to be touchy feely nice with liberals here but I don't disagree just to disagree. In fact I'm remaining unfriendly with all of them so that none of them take it personal. I'm not going to let them bully me into giving them respect when they don't give it back to people. I will never think that they have the right to criticize and admonish conservatives on this site. I'm glad to make myself their target so as to keep them from doing it to others.

I disagree strongly with the things they say. Jer is not a moderate neither is Shawn and neither is Balboa neither is Jason. We (the conservative regulars here) are the moderates.

Yes, that's a very moderate

Yes, that's a very moderate view...sheeesh.

sounds as strange to you as you being moderate sounds to me

sheeesh - you'll never get it.

If "it" makes me as bitter

If "it" makes me as bitter as you, I don't want to.

sheesh

the playing dumb gets old Bal

Support our Troops