As a Conservative, I find Michael Savage to be little more than an embarassment to our party. I believe that most Republicans, except for Savage actually respect people with disabilities.
Savages brother was severely retarded growing up. You think he doesnt
respect people with disabilities???? STOP drinking the coolaid and
think for yourself!
The whole deal against Savage is left wing propaganda, taking his
quotes out of context and smearing him because he dare speak his mind.
If you are a lefty extremist or an Islamic jihadist, you are free to say whatever you want.
This is why the Founders put the Freedom of speech as our first specifically enunciated right in the Bill of Rights. The first thing that a tyranical government tries to control is the speech of it's citizens. The second thing it does is take away their arms to leave them defenseless.
This is why, in 25 years, there will be no Britain as we know it. It's a goner. Between unbridled immigration from Muslim countries, high birth rates within those communities, and ultra-liberal enablers like this idiot, there will be a crescent moon flying over the Union Jack by 2034. And, ultra-libs like this will be the first victims of sharia law - too. At least we have those beheadings to look forward to....
Also, a quibble with the poll question: it's not just that the UK is too strict with who's on their airwaves. That's not even the issue here. Michael Savage isn't even on over there. No, he's being banned from entry because they don't like what he says OVER HERE. A whore like Madonna can live there without a problem, but Savage can't even spend the night in London? Lunacy. Sheer lunacy.
Beware America, this type of thinking is running our country now too.
That's the irony of liberals supporting rights for fanatical muslims that I can't ever understand! You're absolutely right, they would be the first to go under sharia law!
Also, a quibble with the poll question: it's not just that the UK is
too strict with who's on their airwaves. That's not even the issue
here. Michael Savage isn't even on over there. No, he's being banned
from entry because they don't like what he says OVER HERE. A whore
like Madonna can live there without a problem, but Savage can't even
spend the night in London?
You make a good point. I stand by my "Other" vote. But have reconsidered the reasons.
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
I don't know if you have seen this link, but your post reminded me of this...it is well worth the watch to all...I have put this here and there over the last few days.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Heads up people. The U.K. is a great example of where the U.S. is currently heading with the Fairness Doctrine.
I regularly listen to Michael Savage while prepping dinner. I think he can be a little unreasonable at times, but then I always have the option to employ my right to reach over and change the station.
I find it interesting that they are silencing the dissenting voice of a Jew with the same laws that were probably designed to protect his people from Nazi-esque skinhead rantings and the like that are common over there.
Other. I don't give a hoot what the standards are in Britain. Whether or not he deserved to be banned is up to the British. The question is more relevant as it relates to how Savage is treated in the U.S.
Edited to add: After reading later posts, have reconsidered. See above.
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
I do not like Michael Savage at all. He is way, way, way too far to the right for me. Not only that, he is a very angry individual. The type of anger that I have rejected from the left and which the right should also reject.
All this being said, it is pathetic, ridiculous, embarrassing and speaks tons of the piece of garbage England has become!!
Michael Savage has God given right to speak his mind and those that agree with him, whether in England, the USA or some where else, have the RIGHT to listen to him.
As a many of my British friend say, they are ashamed of what England has become. A political correct, get drunk all day nation. People are more interested in alcohol, sex and other pleasures than fighting for their nation. Whole neighborhoods in England are being over taken by poor, radical Muslims and England sleeps.
England is more worried about keeping Michael Savage out than keeping radical Islam out.
I say it is time to boycott England and English products.
Hmmmmm....shoot, you are right. Besides English chocolates or English Tea, England doesn't produce much. Well, they do make movies, bad ones, but they do. They have English soccer, I am going to stop watching any and all of their matches!
England is in trouble. Even Liberal friends of mine say so. My very Liberal boss who is married to an English goes to visit her husband's parents every year during Christmas. She admits that she has seen England change radically. Her mother-in-law's neirghborhood has been over taken by Muslims and the up keep of the neighborhood has gone down.
Off the top of my head I would say only some music, (Radiohead, Coldplay, etc.) and the EPL (The Premier League(soccer) is really the best in the world without a doubt) Although SkySports news is a nice change of pace from ESPN.
It's kinda pathetic when music, sports and TV are your noteable exports.
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you.
Liberallies, what your friends are describing is what happened to Russia with Communism. Since the government provides(meagerly) what the people need, and there is no chance for self improvement with their tax laws and political correctness in regard for the English people(no incentive to work never mind opening a new business) the people become hopeless. They may even support the politically correct socialism, but become hopeless anyway, blaming it on any capitalism still left.
This is what we have to look forward to in the United States unless we can vote out the socialists we have presently in the White House, Senate, House, and soon to be Judiciary.....
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said, "If you can't live by the rules that we live by ... we should exclude you from this country and, what's more, now we will make public those people that we have excluded."
Not a very hopeful message coming out of (Socialist) Great Britain these days, is it?
it is hopeful in a way - this kind of governing toppled the soviet union - but it did take a few decades - and a few million of the opposition tortured and killed - so cheer up komrade!!
England has very serious problems, I don't know how it will end there. What they have become is truly frightening. I proudly join Mr. Savage in this ban, I ban myself from England, I'm sorry to say that because my roots are from there. God Save the Queen, it looks like they're going to need it.
Any nation that prohibits free political speech is guilty of censorship. Any nation that practices censorship is not free. Britain is not free. Canada is not free. On the Continent, many "democracies" prohibit political parties, books and symbols. None of those places are truly free soil.
Savage is to my mind uncouth, but how much more detestable is he than say, the Islamists Jihadists that Britain allows to speak freely? The sole criteria for prohibiting Savage appears to be his political viewpointm, which challenges 'progressive orthodoxy'.
Free Speech doesn't exist anywhere in the EU, Britain included. The Left control the press through regulation--exactly what our ruling class have in mind for us. That is, when your radio or television license is up for renewal, your performance is reviewed. If the committee judges your station to be diverse, inclusive, and just enough, your license is renewed--or not. It's left up to them--heavy on the Left.
Typical of the in bred bad tooth society they call England. That is why our familyies came to America, to get away from the idiots running the British government. Even as much as I love golf, I will never take a trip to the British Isles to play their links because I can't stand the stupidy of these people who protect terrorists and would stifle free speech.
And in about 15 or 20 years, there REALLY WON'T be an England anymore.
The timing of this is interesting, given the congressional hearings that are about to get cranked up here regarding radio content.
As for us, we are about 90 days away from most probably seeing legislation passed that will essentially take Rush, Sean, Neal, Michael, and a host of others, off the air.
Should that happen, and I am thinking it has a 50/50 chance of passing, maybe a little better, actually, it will essentially ensure the statists will be successful in their takeover of our country.
Once they get rid of conservative talk radio, they will be coming after us, next.
Statists tolerate no dissention of any kind.
-Dave
This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.
of Michael Savage...he's generally too far to the extreme right for me. And like it or not, it is up to the Brits who they allow in their country or on their airwaves. That said, I do think there is a double standard at work here...It does appear that those expressing extreme leftist views are okay in the UK, but the reverse is not true for those on the right...I think some parity is needed across the pond...
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
My good buddy Colin, lives in Cardiff, Wales. And while he may live in Wales, he's a dyed in the wool Englishman from Southampton on the south coast of England. He's also a standard liberal who's backed Labor all his life. But he has become a hawk when dealing with these Islamofascists. He is very proud of his English heritage and is absolutely sickened by what's happening to his country. Here's the email he sent me recently:
Goodbye to my England, So long my old friend
Your days are numbered, being brought to an end
To be Scottish, Irish or Welsh that's fine
But don't say you're English, that's way out of line.
The French and the Germans may call themselves such
So may Norwegians, the Swedes and the Dutch
You can say you are Russian or maybe a Dane
But don't say you're English ever again.
At Broadcasting House the word is taboo
In Brussels it's scrapped, in Parliament too
Even schools are affected, staff do as they're told
They must not teach children about England of old.
Writers like Shakespeare, Milton and Shaw
The pupils don't learn about them anymore
How about Agincourt, Hastings , Arnhem or Mons ?
When England lost hosts of her very brave sons.
We are not Europeans, how can we be?
Europe is miles away over the sea.
We're the English from England , let's all be proud
Stand up and be counted - Shout it out loud !
Let's tell our Government and Brussels too
We're proud of our heritage and the Red, White and Blue
Fly the flag of Saint George or the Union Jack
Let the world know - WE WANT OUR ENGLAND BACK !!!!
Maybe now that they have banned Micheal Savage, Great Britain will soon change their name to Oceania and have the Thought Police apprehend Savage and send him to Room 101 at the Ministry of Love.
Our initial wording was inaccurate. Savage isn't allowed entry into the UK. We changed the wording accordingly and wiped the old votes to reset the poll.
The UK is a soveriegn country and can decide on its own rules. However, I wonder why he is banned as there are much more dangerous people around such as Obama whoose thuggery forced PW to withdraw from its rightful claims to money from Chrysler.
all the liberal anti-American, anti-2nd Amendment folks who write for theregister.uk love hating on Wacki Jaqui whenever she does something that infringes on their porn, paedophilia, or pot. But when she does something as ridiculous as this, she's considered to be some sorta genius.
But have her crack down on terrorists, or illegal immigration, she's hated. Have her put up streetcorner cameras, and universal ID cards and she's "crazy". Have her ban guns and demand other nations do the same, she's Queen Mum.
Same attitude from either native Limeys or wannabe @rse-kissers out of San Francisco who got onto the Register's writing staff, who think their Anglophilia makes them more "sophisticated"...to go with the Aprilia/Lamborghini-consortium's Vespa Scooter they ride and the pseudo-euro coffe crap outts *$ (*-Star, $-Bucks)carried in their left hand (no clutch, and who needs to use the brake? )
I fear for my British brethren. Besieged by a socialist big brother government, stripped of their defenses, hassled by chavs, ruled by consortiums and threatened by Muslims in critical masses.
(that's what ya get for Lucas electrics and Stromberg waxjet carburetors! :P)
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)
The actions of the British government make very little sense. What business is it of theirs what an American talk show host says to an American audience? It is no crime here, at least not yet. But we should pay attention to what is happening in Britain because we are both travelling down the same road to serfdom– they are just a little further along that road than we are at the moment, but that may change. Gradually, ever so slowly, they are exchanging their freedom for some illusory security. Soon the leftists will have turned Britain into a sad, sickly nanny-police state with cameras and busybody social workers on every street corner. How prescient George Orwell was?
A country has a right to set up its own border control measures and control who is allowed to enter.
Just because the U.S.of A. has no substantive standards doesn't mean that every country out there has to follow our lead.
What little I've heard from Savage was generally loud and obnoxious and that in itself shouldn't result in a ban from entering a country but, I will reiterate that a country has a right to control its own borders.
Entertainers like Savage are needed to frame a ridiculous side to political events. He is funny. But there are those that have no sense of humor. They want his style of satire banned. If he is shut down darkness follows. The British Government has become anti-Savage and the ultimate censor.
Savages brother was severely retarded growing up. You think he doesnt respect people with disabilities???? STOP drinking the coolaid and think for yourself!
The whole deal against Savage is left wing propaganda, taking his quotes out of context and smearing him because he dare speak his mind.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Free Speech
May 5, 2009 - 10:29 ET by FranksamThe UK, and the EU in general portray our future if political correctness and the fairness doctrine are allowed to gain strength.
As a Conservative...
May 5, 2009 - 16:05 ET by Dustin JolleyAs a Conservative, I find Michael Savage to be little more than an embarassment to our party. I believe that most Republicans, except for Savage actually respect people with disabilities.
It doesn't matter...
May 6, 2009 - 09:03 ET by heldmywIt's their country.
If, in their infinite wisdom, they do not wish to allow red-haired rosicrucians, or left-handed vegans, who are we to say 'nay'?
It does strike me as ridiculous that England will tolerate hate-spewing, fanatic muslims and other foulmouthed clowns while barring a 'shock jock'.
But hey! It's their house, and their rules.
Like it or lump it.
Muslim Population
May 6, 2009 - 09:09 ET by JimboGreat Brittan is closer to sharia law than they think
wrong, tard - as
May 6, 2009 - 19:05 ET by TruthMongerwrong, tard - as usual
government is the communists capitalism
Savages brother was
May 6, 2009 - 18:47 ET by DCC1Savages brother was severely retarded growing up. You think he doesnt
respect people with disabilities???? STOP drinking the coolaid and
think for yourself!
The whole deal against Savage is left wing propaganda, taking his
quotes out of context and smearing him because he dare speak his mind.
vicis pro insurgo est propinquus
Get ACTIVE
Only conservatives are banned in Britain
May 5, 2009 - 10:31 ET by c5thenIf you are a lefty extremist or an Islamic jihadist, you are free to say whatever you want.
This is why the Founders put the Freedom of speech as our first specifically enunciated right in the Bill of Rights. The first thing that a tyranical government tries to control is the speech of it's citizens. The second thing it does is take away their arms to leave them defenseless.
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Absolutely true!
May 5, 2009 - 10:38 ET by StogieGuyThis is why, in 25 years, there will be no Britain as we know it. It's a goner. Between unbridled immigration from Muslim countries, high birth rates within those communities, and ultra-liberal enablers like this idiot, there will be a crescent moon flying over the Union Jack by 2034. And, ultra-libs like this will be the first victims of sharia law - too. At least we have those beheadings to look forward to....
Also, a quibble with the poll question: it's not just that the UK is too strict with who's on their airwaves. That's not even the issue here. Michael Savage isn't even on over there. No, he's being banned from entry because they don't like what he says OVER HERE. A whore like Madonna can live there without a problem, but Savage can't even spend the night in London? Lunacy. Sheer lunacy.
Beware America, this type of thinking is running our country now too.
That's the irony of liberals
May 5, 2009 - 10:46 ET by PewahThat's the irony of liberals supporting rights for fanatical muslims that I can't ever understand! You're absolutely right, they would be the first to go under sharia law!
and so it begins... now i
May 5, 2009 - 10:52 ET by TruthMongerand so it begins...
now i remember why we kicked the english outta here in 1776...
liberal definition of hate speech: anyone who disagrees with them
government is the communists capitalism
you know you're a geek when..
May 5, 2009 - 13:00 ET by UndercoverConservativeyou see "and so it begins.." and hear it as the opening of the credits to "Babylon 5"!
(real scifi not that crappy PC "new" BG stuff!)
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)
and so it begins... now i
May 5, 2009 - 10:52 ET by TruthMongerand so it begins...
now i remember why we kicked the english outta here in 1776...
liberal definition of hate speech: anyone who disagrees with them
government is the communists capitalism
Stogie, thanks for pointing
May 5, 2009 - 10:50 ET by QueenMumStogie, thanks for pointing this out:
Also, a quibble with the poll question: it's not just that the UK is
too strict with who's on their airwaves. That's not even the issue
here. Michael Savage isn't even on over there. No, he's being banned
from entry because they don't like what he says OVER HERE. A whore
like Madonna can live there without a problem, but Savage can't even
spend the night in London?
You make a good point. I stand by my "Other" vote. But have reconsidered the reasons.
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
Sg... I don't know if you
May 5, 2009 - 16:15 ET by bigtimerSg...
I don't know if you have seen this link, but your post reminded me of this...it is well worth the watch to all...I have put this here and there over the last few days.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Heads up people. The U.K. is
May 5, 2009 - 10:33 ET by PewahHeads up people. The U.K. is a great example of where the U.S. is currently heading with the Fairness Doctrine.
I regularly listen to Michael Savage while prepping dinner. I think he can be a little unreasonable at times, but then I always have the option to employ my right to reach over and change the station.
I find it interesting that they are silencing the dissenting voice of a Jew with the same laws that were probably designed to protect his people from Nazi-esque skinhead rantings and the like that are common over there.
Has Savage ever suggested
May 5, 2009 - 10:38 ET by mattmHas Savage ever suggested to people that they engage in acts of violence or other illegal activity.... I haven't heard it.
From what little I know, he has received more threats than he has ever made.
The UK is basically banning thought and speech. - and they're liberals..... hmmmmm
p.s. send your complaints to: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
he refuses to approve of
May 5, 2009 - 10:54 ET by TruthMongerhe refuses to approve of the gay lifestyle - isn't that enough?!?!?
or do we need to ban you mister...?
government is the communists capitalism
Other. I don't give a hoot
May 5, 2009 - 11:07 ET by QueenMumOther. I don't give a hoot what the standards are in Britain. Whether or not he deserved to be banned is up to the British. The question is more relevant as it relates to how Savage is treated in the U.S.
Edited to add: After reading later posts, have reconsidered. See above.
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
I do not like Michael
May 5, 2009 - 10:38 ET by LiberalliesI do not like Michael Savage at all. He is way, way, way too far to the right for me. Not only that, he is a very angry individual. The type of anger that I have rejected from the left and which the right should also reject.
All this being said, it is pathetic, ridiculous, embarrassing and speaks tons of the piece of garbage England has become!!
Michael Savage has God given right to speak his mind and those that agree with him, whether in England, the USA or some where else, have the RIGHT to listen to him.
As a many of my British friend say, they are ashamed of what England has become. A political correct, get drunk all day nation. People are more interested in alcohol, sex and other pleasures than fighting for their nation. Whole neighborhoods in England are being over taken by poor, radical Muslims and England sleeps.
England is more worried about keeping Michael Savage out than keeping radical Islam out.
I say it is time to boycott England and English products.
What English products?
May 5, 2009 - 10:41 ET by sherylsimsWhat do they even produce?
i believe their fastest
May 5, 2009 - 10:57 ET by TruthMongeri believe their fastest growing product is the al-queda terrorist - chiefly for the US market
Correct
May 5, 2009 - 12:38 ET by JDWOne must recognize all of the liberties al-Qaeda now enjoy in Britain.
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny. When government fears the people there is liberty.
Sherylsims, Hmmmmm....shoo
May 5, 2009 - 10:58 ET by LiberalliesSherylsims,
Hmmmmm....shoot, you are right. Besides English chocolates or English Tea, England doesn't produce much. Well, they do make movies, bad ones, but they do. They have English soccer, I am going to stop watching any and all of their matches!
England is in trouble. Even Liberal friends of mine say so. My very Liberal boss who is married to an English goes to visit her husband's parents every year during Christmas. She admits that she has seen England change radically. Her mother-in-law's neirghborhood has been over taken by Muslims and the up keep of the neighborhood has gone down.
Well, there's "Dr Who"
May 5, 2009 - 13:05 ET by UndercoverConservativetho Im not sure how the new "emo" one is gonna work out.
then there's "spotted dick", and "Horlick's"
used to be some real nice shotguns.
Is Royal Enfield still in England or is that built elsewhere now?
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)
Only a couple of things...
May 5, 2009 - 13:36 ET by HillbillyKingOff the top of my head I would say only some music, (Radiohead, Coldplay, etc.) and the EPL (The Premier League(soccer) is really the best in the world without a doubt) Although SkySports news is a nice change of pace from ESPN.
It's kinda pathetic when music, sports and TV are your noteable exports.
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you.
Don Marquis 1878-1937
Drunk all day nation...
May 5, 2009 - 11:59 ET by adamsmithLiberallies, what your friends are describing is what happened to Russia with Communism. Since the government provides(meagerly) what the people need, and there is no chance for self improvement with their tax laws and political correctness in regard for the English people(no incentive to work never mind opening a new business) the people become hopeless. They may even support the politically correct socialism, but become hopeless anyway, blaming it on any capitalism still left.
This is what we have to look forward to in the United States unless we can vote out the socialists we have presently in the White House, Senate, House, and soon to be Judiciary.....
This kind of thing is
May 5, 2009 - 10:45 ET by EvokeThis kind of thing is typical of Eurabia, nothing to see here...
If the thief is found breaking in, and he is struck so that he dies, there shall be no guilt for his bloodshed. Exodus 22:2
From the Article Posted by Yahoo
May 5, 2009 - 10:46 ET by BondPlainBondNot a very hopeful message coming out of (Socialist) Great Britain these days, is it?
Yahoo! Article
it is hopeful in a way -
May 5, 2009 - 11:00 ET by TruthMongerit is hopeful in a way - this kind of governing toppled the soviet union - but it did take a few decades - and a few million of the opposition tortured and killed - so cheer up komrade!!
government is the communists capitalism
Savage
May 5, 2009 - 10:48 ET by SemusEngland has very serious problems, I don't know how it will end there. What they have become is truly frightening. I proudly join Mr. Savage in this ban, I ban myself from England, I'm sorry to say that because my roots are from there. God Save the Queen, it looks like they're going to need it.
what we're seeing here is
May 5, 2009 - 11:01 ET by TruthMongerwhat we're seeing here is just the armpit - it's not the whole country...
government is the communists capitalism
Any nation that prohibits
May 5, 2009 - 10:48 ET by NL207Any nation that prohibits free political speech is guilty of censorship. Any nation that practices censorship is not free. Britain is not free. Canada is not free. On the Continent, many "democracies" prohibit political parties, books and symbols. None of those places are truly free soil.
Savage is to my mind uncouth, but how much more detestable is he than say, the Islamists Jihadists that Britain allows to speak freely? The sole criteria for prohibiting Savage appears to be his political viewpointm, which challenges 'progressive orthodoxy'.
Free speech doesn't exist anywhere in the EU...
May 5, 2009 - 10:48 ET by ThalpyFree Speech doesn't exist anywhere in the EU, Britain included. The Left control the press through regulation--exactly what our ruling class have in mind for us. That is, when your radio or television license is up for renewal, your performance is reviewed. If the committee judges your station to be diverse, inclusive, and just enough, your license is renewed--or not. It's left up to them--heavy on the Left.
Typical
May 5, 2009 - 11:05 ET by Ozark_SunshineTypical of the in bred bad tooth society they call England. That is why our familyies came to America, to get away from the idiots running the British government. Even as much as I love golf, I will never take a trip to the British Isles to play their links because I can't stand the stupidy of these people who protect terrorists and would stifle free speech.
Savage is right: There is no England anymore
May 5, 2009 - 11:09 ET by R D HelmAnd in about 15 or 20 years, there REALLY WON'T be an England anymore.
The timing of this is interesting, given the congressional hearings that are about to get cranked up here regarding radio content.
As for us, we are about 90 days away from most probably seeing legislation passed that will essentially take Rush, Sean, Neal, Michael, and a host of others, off the air.
Should that happen, and I am thinking it has a 50/50 chance of passing, maybe a little better, actually, it will essentially ensure the statists will be successful in their takeover of our country.
Once they get rid of conservative talk radio, they will be coming after us, next.
Statists tolerate no dissention of any kind.
-Dave
This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.
I am not a particular fan...
May 5, 2009 - 13:00 ET by PrairieSkyof Michael Savage...he's generally too far to the extreme right for me. And like it or not, it is up to the Brits who they allow in their country or on their airwaves. That said, I do think there is a double standard at work here...It does appear that those expressing extreme leftist views are okay in the UK, but the reverse is not true for those on the right...I think some parity is needed across the pond...
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
Losing England?
May 5, 2009 - 11:16 ET by easygoerMy good buddy Colin, lives in Cardiff, Wales. And while he may live in Wales, he's a dyed in the wool Englishman from Southampton on the south coast of England. He's also a standard liberal who's backed Labor all his life. But he has become a hawk when dealing with these Islamofascists. He is very proud of his English heritage and is absolutely sickened by what's happening to his country. Here's the email he sent me recently:
Subject: Proud to be English
Isn't this the absolute truth????
From The Queen's Royal Lancers Website:
Goodbye to my England, So long my old friend
Your days are numbered, being brought to an end
To be Scottish, Irish or Welsh that's fine
But don't say you're English, that's way out of line.
The French and the Germans may call themselves such
So may Norwegians, the Swedes and the Dutch
You can say you are Russian or maybe a Dane
But don't say you're English ever again.
At Broadcasting House the word is taboo
In Brussels it's scrapped, in Parliament too
Even schools are affected, staff do as they're told
They must not teach children about England of old.
Writers like Shakespeare, Milton and Shaw
The pupils don't learn about them anymore
How about Agincourt, Hastings , Arnhem or Mons ?
When England lost hosts of her very brave sons.
We are not Europeans, how can we be?
Europe is miles away over the sea.
We're the English from England , let's all be proud
Stand up and be counted - Shout it out loud !
Let's tell our Government and Brussels too
We're proud of our heritage and the Red, White and Blue
Fly the flag of Saint George or the Union Jack
Let the world know - WE WANT OUR ENGLAND BACK !!!!
Regards, Colin
Tell him it is the standard
May 5, 2009 - 12:11 ET by Dan The Man 2Tell him it is the standard liberals who have perpetrated this farce on themselves and now the new liberals are going to really bollick it.
love that refrain. It's
May 5, 2009 - 13:10 ET by UndercoverConservativelove that refrain. It's just like not being allowed to be "proud" to be American, or white.
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)
The Beginnings---Rudyard
May 5, 2009 - 13:36 ET by ConservativeRexThe Beginnings---Rudyard Kipling
It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the English began to hate
They were not easily moved,
They were icy willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.
Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show,
When the English began to hate.
It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.
It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When shall count from the date
That the English began to hate
Maybe Great Britain will soon be called Oceania
May 5, 2009 - 11:31 ET by Carl KolchakMaybe now that they have banned Micheal Savage, Great Britain will soon change their name to Oceania and have the Thought Police apprehend Savage and send him to Room 101 at the Ministry of Love.
Oceania brilliant Carl
May 5, 2009 - 11:47 ET by CTDoes the British dhimmi Home Secretary Jacqui Smith wear a Burqa?
Oceania brilliant Carl
May 5, 2009 - 11:47 ET by CTDoes the British dhimmi Home Secretary Jacqui Smith wear a Burqa?
sorry about the confusion
May 5, 2009 - 11:36 ET by Ken ShepherdOur initial wording was inaccurate. Savage isn't allowed entry into the UK. We changed the wording accordingly and wiped the old votes to reset the poll.
Sorry for the inconvenience and our error.
http://www.guardian....
The UK is a soveriegn
May 5, 2009 - 11:53 ET by Dan The Man 2The UK is a soveriegn country and can decide on its own rules. However, I wonder why he is banned as there are much more dangerous people around such as Obama whoose thuggery forced PW to withdraw from its rightful claims to money from Chrysler.
If Winston Churchill was alive and took a vacation,
May 5, 2009 - 12:18 ET by upcountrywaterhe could not get back in...he's so full of fight, you know..
Winston Churchill
Reagan VS 0bama
I guess the Nazis won the
May 5, 2009 - 12:49 ET by robert108I guess the Nazis won the Battle of Britain after all.
and they try to say "Wacki Jaqui" is "right wing"!
May 5, 2009 - 12:56 ET by UndercoverConservativeall the liberal anti-American, anti-2nd Amendment folks who write for theregister.uk love hating on Wacki Jaqui whenever she does something that infringes on their porn, paedophilia, or pot. But when she does something as ridiculous as this, she's considered to be some sorta genius.
But have her crack down on terrorists, or illegal immigration, she's hated. Have her put up streetcorner cameras, and universal ID cards and she's "crazy". Have her ban guns and demand other nations do the same, she's Queen Mum.
Same attitude from either native Limeys or wannabe @rse-kissers out of San Francisco who got onto the Register's writing staff, who think their Anglophilia makes them more "sophisticated"...to go with the Aprilia/Lamborghini-consortium's Vespa Scooter they ride and the pseudo-euro coffe crap outts *$ (*-Star, $-Bucks)carried in their left hand (no clutch, and who needs to use the brake? )
I fear for my British brethren. Besieged by a socialist big brother government, stripped of their defenses, hassled by chavs, ruled by consortiums and threatened by Muslims in critical masses.
(that's what ya get for Lucas electrics and Stromberg waxjet carburetors! :P)
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)
Britain is our future
May 5, 2009 - 13:19 ET by OhioladThe actions of the British government make very little sense. What business is it of theirs what an American talk show host says to an American audience? It is no crime here, at least not yet. But we should pay attention to what is happening in Britain because we are both travelling down the same road to serfdom– they are just a little further along that road than we are at the moment, but that may change. Gradually, ever so slowly, they are exchanging their freedom for some illusory security. Soon the leftists will have turned Britain into a sad, sickly nanny-police state with cameras and busybody social workers on every street corner. How prescient George Orwell was?
Soon the leftists will
May 5, 2009 - 13:28 ET by Jack BauerNot soon.. ALREADY, already!
And the socialists led by Gordon Brown are probably going to lose big in 2010.
Unfortunately the former ad guy "conservative" leader David Cameron, is a slightly more charismatic John McCain. And he hearts Obama. Groan.
Border Control
May 5, 2009 - 23:18 ET by DustBunny01A country has a right to set up its own border control measures and control who is allowed to enter.
Just because the U.S.of A. has no substantive standards doesn't mean that every country out there has to follow our lead.
What little I've heard from Savage was generally loud and obnoxious and that in itself shouldn't result in a ban from entering a country but, I will reiterate that a country has a right to control its own borders.
British Censorship.
May 6, 2009 - 07:45 ET by melpolEntertainers like Savage are needed to frame a ridiculous side to political events. He is funny. But there are those that have no sense of humor. They want his style of satire banned. If he is shut down darkness follows. The British Government has become anti-Savage and the ultimate censor.
http://www.associate...
Well if they dont want
May 6, 2009 - 17:34 ET by general companyMike, then they sure dont want me.
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Savages brother was
May 6, 2009 - 18:47 ET by DCC1Savages brother was severely retarded growing up. You think he doesnt respect people with disabilities???? STOP drinking the coolaid and think for yourself!
The whole deal against Savage is left wing propaganda, taking his quotes out of context and smearing him because he dare speak his mind.
vicis pro insurgo est propinquus
Get ACTIVE