Yes, easily
10% (308 votes)
Possibly
56% (1763 votes)
Almost impossible
35% (1102 votes)
Total votes: 3173
Can Hillary Clinton Get Dem Nomination?
 |
|
Blogs
Ace of Spades
American Thinker
Anchoress Online
Betsy Newmark
Biased BBC
Bill Roggio
Black Five
Bluey Blog
Classical Values
Conservative Grapevine
Ed Driscoll
FreeRepublic
Gateway Pundit
Hot Air
Inhofe EPW Blog
Instapundit
Jewish World Review
Jim Romenesko
Junkscience.com
La Shawn Barber
Little Green Footballs
Lucianne.com
Media Bloggers Association
Media Shift
Mickey Kaus
Michael Yon
Michelle Malkin
Next Right
NRO Corner
Olbermann Watch
Outside the Beltway
Patterico
Power Line
Protein Wisdom
Radio Equalizer
Reason Hit & Run
Red State
RightBias
Right Wing News
Sister Toldjah
Small Dead Animals
Townhall.com
TVNewser
Villainous Company
Organizations
Accuracy In Media
America Supports You
American Conservative Union
Capital Research Center
Cato Institute
Heritage Foundation
Minding the Campus
Pew Research Center
Young America's Foundation
Talk Radio
Neal Boortz
Tammy Bruce
Sean Hannity
Laura Ingraham
Rush Limbaugh
Steve Malzberg
Michael Reagan
Editor
Matthew Sheffield
Editor at Large
Brent Baker
Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes
Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd
Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard
Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Mark Finkelstein
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
April Mickelson
Seton Motley
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Robin Boyd
Lynn Davidson
Paul Detrick
Kyle Drennen
P. J. Gladnick
Greyhawk
Stacy L. Harp
D. S. Hube
Sharon Hughes
Michelle Humphrey
Warner Todd Huston
Stuart James
Tom Johnson
Kristine Lawrence
Vivian Lee
Justin McCarthy
Kathleen McKinley
Richard Newcomb
Jeff Poor
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Dan Riehl
Julia A. Seymour
Jason Smith
John Stephenson
Terry Trippany
Scott Whitlock
Brad Wilmouth
Publisher
Brent Bozell
[ Home | Blogs |
Forum |
About |
Contact
]
Copyright © 2005-2008 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.
Comments Policy
It depends on the definition...
April 23, 2008 - 05:16 ET by Semper Fi_USAShe can only win if she cheats... But wait, her name is Clinton...
Devil Dog
Amen
April 23, 2008 - 06:16 ET by philhoeyYour comment says it all
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
hillary
April 23, 2008 - 06:05 ET by DontabIf you think for a moment she doesn't have a truckload of dirt on bami she's hasn't used yet I got a bridge I want to sell you!
easily.
April 23, 2008 - 06:51 ET by sentforth5I mean, we are talking about possibly the filthiest, dirtiest, low-down black-hearted-est, pure evil-est empty soul in politics. You betcha she can win easily.
Obama is just a socialist chump who found himself in the middle of a chance of a possibility. For him it's been right place, right time, but the clintons are practiced cold-hearted MURDERERS.
Yeah...I'd say easily.
For just everyday selfish Ego Evil..
April 23, 2008 - 07:40 ET by Mearlineoh yes, Hillary wears that crown. But in my opinion, for deep down 'bring on the end time/apocalypse' evil, secret evil, hate america evil...then Obama and his buds have it. Don't get me wrong, both democrat candidates are bad. But the one that can really show us something about evil is NOT getting the nomination. She has it all sown up.
Sure she can
April 23, 2008 - 07:50 ET by 10ksnookerLie, cheat, steal, say anything, do anything, it's what Democrats do all the time during elections.
When they win, raise taxes, fund socialsim and gun control -- It's all they know in the end.
Possibly
April 23, 2008 - 08:22 ET by HelenSI seriously doubt, however, that she'll give any credit to Operation Chaos! She'd prefer to think she did it herself.
Ha!
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
Exit polls
April 23, 2008 - 10:44 ET by ChaitealoverI heard several exit polls described on last night's newscasts. They divided voters into the usual groups [blacks, single women, union members, little old ladies, etc], but didn't mention Operation Chaos voters at all. Have you heard anything about what the impact was?
Chai
Just let me eat my waffles - Barack Obama
I haven't heard.
April 23, 2008 - 13:42 ET by HelenSI haven't heard. Yesterday, a couple of Operation Chaos front-line troups called Rush and shared their voting exit-polling experiences but I haven't had a chance to listen to him today so don't know if he has an official report or not.
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
I think beacuse Obama has
April 23, 2008 - 08:29 ET by Dan The Man 2I think beacuse Obama has the majority of delegates he will get the nod. I don't discount Hillary doing all that she can to sink Obama and in the process wounding him, but look out if Obama don't win. Look for the backlash from all those who really bought into the majority rules crap and the black vote will be soured.
In all this is a gift to the GOP for without this Democrat squabble we would have a harder time of winning.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Pennsylvania...
April 23, 2008 - 08:47 ET by heldmywThe 10-point margin of victory seems to be showing a bit of "buyers remorse" from the Obamaniacs.
Hillary keeps scratching away at his messianic grandeur and he keeps looking sour and petulant, his wife keeps opening her capacious piehole, and the conga line of derelicts, terrorists, loonies, bigots, antisemites, and democrats just keep on a-comin'.
Obama's really aquiring a foul odor, and the heap o' 'bad' that sticks to him like poop to a barn wall is making it possible for even the most diehard to feel ok about dumping him without being tagged as a 'racist'.
It's not his race, the guy's a lightweight ultraliberal weenie with some BAD associates and a totally "non-first-lady" harridan for a wife.
It's Jawn Kerry II... this time in black.
A storm in a teacup?
April 23, 2008 - 08:54 ET by angryafricanIt’s a bit of a no show isn’t it? Drawing fake lines in the sand and claiming they are this or that. Not a real fight. More like a bit of glove slapping across the face. I am not sure whether any of the three candidates actually offers anything substantially different. Even those who fell out were not extreme left or extreme left. Just a nudge to the one side or the other. Less Rumble in the Jungle more Wrestlemania. A little bit of fireworks and a laser display. But a show none the less. http://angryafrican.net/2008/04/22/storm-in-a-teacup/
AA, I know you have a
April 23, 2008 - 10:15 ET by Dan The Man 2AA, I know you have a liberal view of the world especially from your background, however there is a world of difference in the impact a Dem admin will have and a GOP admain will have. I understand you are not a cirtizen and will not vote but you really need to study the system the USA has and the impact of ideologies in power.
One major impact you possibly dont see is the 20 year run of a judge the President appoints. The next President has the possiblity of appointing 2 of them and no matter what anyone says SCOTUS seems to set policy for law in this country. They have enormous power.
So for that reason alone we should look at our choices of President. I would rather have a constitutionalist than one who will look beyond teh borders of teh USA for matters of law. And If you cant understand that then ... well you need to.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
"constitutionalist"?? McCain???
April 23, 2008 - 10:24 ET by sarcasmoMy mind reels with sarcastic replies involving McCain's deep and abiding respect for amendments 1 and 2, and that's just for starters...Britcom is right, it's 2 socialists & a statist at this point, so let's please try to tell it like it is around here. After all, this ISN'T the MSM, and it's not like they'll be honest about it any time soon.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Sarc...I fail to read where
April 23, 2008 - 10:41 ET by bassndudeSarc...I fail to read where he said McCain was a constitutionalist. He said he would rather have a constitutionalist. However, Mac has said he would appoint constitutionalist judges.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Sarc, it's all relative. Of the three McCain is more of a
April 23, 2008 - 10:51 ET by Dee Bunkconstitutionalist. McCain is likely to nominate in a range of O'Connor to Roberts whereas Obama Will nominate someone in a range of Ginsberg and further left. Clinton will nominate within a range like O'Connor to Ginsberg.
As far as damage to the Country long term. Obama will do the most damage by far and he'll probably have 8 years and a Democrat Congress to wreak maximum havoc because the Press will continue to adore him no matter what.
I just can't see the coauthor of McCain Feingold
April 23, 2008 - 11:17 ET by sarcasmoBeing described with that particular c-word. They all look damaging to me at this point, and I doubt the fight between the Democrats is damaging them as much as some people think/hope. Fiscal conservatives' best hope is probably, as usual, a divided government to slightly limit the unsustainable spending.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
They are all damaging just some more than others
April 23, 2008 - 11:20 ET by Dee BunkObama is by far the most damaging
McCain-Feingold
April 23, 2008 - 11:44 ET by scamoramaNo one who had ANYTHING to do with McCain-Feingold is fit to be President.
Now, this will sound like heresy, but I hope Hillary gets the nomination AND wins in November. Obama would take this country down one road to disaster, and McCain will take us down another path to the same end -- Hell, McCain makes Mussolini look liberal.
Clinton will be so hamstrung she won't be able to accomplish squat.
Yeah scamorama I kind of agree
April 23, 2008 - 11:50 ET by Dee BunkI go back and forth thinking who would be worse, Hillary or McCain. If it ended up between those two I'd have to think about it more.
I don't think Hillary is going to pull it off though and Obama is by far the worst - short term and long term. I won't have to think about a choice between McCain and Obama that one is clear. I'll definitely vote for McCain. Obama is probably going to win anyway and it's not going to be good.
Hillary will not get the nod
April 23, 2008 - 08:58 ET by DelsaFor the first time in Democrat history, to use a phrase from recent new cycles, the Democrat "chickens have come home to roost"!
The delegates cannot dis their BLACK candidate. In their party, "white", "woman", "hispanic" and "all their other groups, do not trump color.
The super delegates will not throw the Obama man under the Balkinized bus.
Obama will have more pop votes and more pledged delegates. Most places where Obama has won or will win have cross over voting. Clinton has won in closed contests.
The delegates will go with the stronger vote getter and they will NOT cut Obama off at the knees.
Something MAJOR will have to happen to stop him.
My opinion? For Hillary it not happen. Obama gets the nod over riots.
He wins their nomination.
My the best yes man/women win! Then ... lose.
April 23, 2008 - 09:26 ET by CrashIt depends on the rule de jour in the Democrat-Communist party
I think it is very possible Hillary will win the nod...
April 23, 2008 - 10:45 ET by R D Helm...as it appears that the more people learn about the real Barry O, the less they like him.
It seems the dems are stuck between a rock and a hard place with their two offerings for '08.
What a shame. :-)
Theme for Election '08: Who cares?
R D Helm, I think you are correct to the extent
April 23, 2008 - 11:05 ET by Delsathat general election voters will begin to like him less.
As for the hard core primary voting democrats, he is right up their ally.
Hillary actually looks to conservative/moderate in their eyes and that is where the importance of all this rests.
This is all up to the Democrats and in some cases independents right now.
That is why she can't over take him and is why, I think, she will not get the nod.
Hope
April 23, 2008 - 10:48 ET by ChaitealoverI kind of hope Clinton does pull it out, because we all know that when Obama loses, the Dims will blame it on racism. I'd rather they look at their own brand of it than take cheap shots at everyone else.
Chai
Just let me eat my waffles - Barack Obama
Yeah but you forget that
April 23, 2008 - 16:46 ET by ladyrvtYeah but you forget that Dims NEVER blame their failures on their own ineptitude, heck they never even admit failure! It's ALWAYS someone else's fault when they lose.
A revelation for the Dems
April 23, 2008 - 11:12 ET by LibraryLadyMy favourite part of the Democratic primary has been watching the Dems realize that the Clintons are just as dirty and conniving as Republicans said they were.
I used to live in Arkansas, this pair will do ANYTHING to achieve their goals.
Anyone see the Hillary Ad on NewsBusters?
April 23, 2008 - 11:59 ET by ChrisMillsCouldn't help but notice a Hillary ad on a NewsBusters page? Coincidence or is NewsBusters pushing forward Rush's ingenious Operation Chaos?
Seems to me the msm and the
April 23, 2008 - 13:07 ET by bigtimerSeems to me the msm and the dems behind the scenes are going to have Obama one way or the other...here is another endorsement for Obama even after last night....
Going to be fun for me though....Operation Chaos continues....
The dems are going to defeat themselves...you got to love it.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
I had a Dream
April 24, 2008 - 00:21 ET by RevolvrOddly enough about a week ago I had a short dream one night. All I remember was a short glimpse of Clinton accepting the nomination. Weird. So even though it seems like a long shot I voted above for Hillary.
We'll see if this prophesy stands.
_____________________________________________
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum