|
|
|
|
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam FeistCNN's Sam Feist Attacks Michelle Malkin As A Fox Stalking HorseThe St. Petersburg Times, the "hometown newspaper" for the CNN-YouTube Republican debate, published an interesting story on CNN’s reactions to conservative criticism. Their list of excuses was extensive, and ridiculous. As far as conservatives are concerned, CNN has two choices: either they were extremely cynical in knowingly placing Democratic supporters into a Republican debate, or they were extremely unprofessional in failing to do five minutes of work to prevent the publicity fiasco of allowing Hillary supporters to try and embarrass her opponents on national TV. CNN is responding by attacking their critics (Michelle Malkin by name) for being stalking horses for Fox News. In their report, Wes Alison and Eric Deggans asked if there wasn’t enough time for vetting (when they’ve been receiving questions for three months?): CNN Defends Debate, Says Vetting Was 'Focused on the Questions'CNN is defending its job in vetting questions for last night's debate, reports Politico's Kenneth Vogel:
There might be something to that approach. As our own Brad Wilmouth reported, the questions largely pressed the Republican field from the right.: |
|
|
[ Home | Blogs |
Forum |
About |
Contact
]
| |
Recent Comments
28 min 59 sec ago
1 hour 6 sec ago
1 hour 11 min ago
1 hour 12 min ago
1 hour 27 min ago
1 hour 36 min ago
1 hour 48 min ago
1 hour 49 min ago
2 hours 9 min ago
2 hours 16 min ago