|
|
|
|
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John BroderNYT: Al Gore Making A Fortune Spreading Global Warming Hysteria
For years I have personally challenged mainstream media outlets to admit how much money Nobel Laureate Al Gore HAS and WILL make by spreading global warming hysteria. On Tuesday, the New York Times will feature a front page story that discusses exactly that. Readers are strongly encouraged to strap themselves in tightly, for the Times' John Broder is about to take them on a journey beyond their wildest dreams: NYT's Ted Kennedy Obit Avoids the Jesse Helms TreatmentNews of Sen. Ted Kennedy's death late Tuesday night didn't make the Wednesday print edition of the New York Times, but a 6,000-word obituary by John Broder was posted on nytimes.com this morning: "Edward Kennedy, Senate Stalwart, Dies." Broder's obituary left room for the lowlights of Kennedy's career, including Mary Jo Kopechne's death at Chappaquiddick and Kennedy's ruthless personal attack on conservative Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork. But the opening paragraph offered a sharp contrast with another ideologically polarizing senator, Jesse Helms of North Carolina, who died on Independence Day last year. Broder's opening paragraph:
Chicago Sun-Times: Obama 'Tries To Avoid Talking About Race'The Chicago Sun-Times today includes Mary Mitchell's column, "We can deny it, but race slithers into campaign." The subheadline reads "Obama, his campaign trying to transcend it -- but can't." The article makes a startling assertion about Senator Barack Obama: Obama tries to avoid talking about race, as do his surrogates, staffers and supporters. Say what? Obama's recent remarks that he "doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills" clearly referred to his race. Even his chief strategist admits that. And it was hardly the first time he introduced the subject. In June, Mitchell's colleague Lynn Sweet mentioned a pool report from the New York Times's John Broder: Joe Lieberman's 'Lurch to the Right' Since 2000 Loss?New York Times reporter John Broder's front-page Week in Review story was titled "Gore-Lieberman: A Hyphen Apart? Try Poles." Much like the story itself, Broder's lead was a lazy attempt at provocation. (NewsBuster Warner Todd Huston also dissected the piece on Sunday.)
NYT's Failure to Understand Our Times Now Complete
To show how pathetic The New York Times and John Broder are at analyzing the current political climate, all one has to do is read "Gore-Lieberman: A Hyphen Apart? Try Poles." Here the Times clearly reveals that they see but two types of American politician: the good guys against the war, and the evil ones for it. That's it. To the Times there is no other issue, no other divide, no other substantive thought, no other thing that separates our leaders one from the other. There is only the war and nothing else. In this empty piece, the Times posits that should Al Gore had won in 2000 instead of George W. Bush, the second Gore administration would have seen a dump Lieberman movement that would have resulted in a different Gore vice-president in 2006. |
|
|
[ Home | Blogs |
Forum |
About |
Contact
]
| |
Recent Comments
15 sec ago
2 min 9 sec ago
2 min 21 sec ago
2 min 51 sec ago
4 min 41 sec ago
6 min 11 sec ago
6 min 23 sec ago
8 min 29 sec ago
10 min 31 sec ago
11 min 24 sec ago