|
|
|
|
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlie RangelABC's 'Name That Party' December 'Scandal' Montage Updated to Include Party IDs of All Except Bill Clinton
In a December post (at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog), I reviewed ABC's online "The Faces of Political Scandal" slideshow, which featured mini-profiles of 14 politicians in recent years who have been tainted by scandal and/or crime. At the time, I noted that:
Well, glory be, sometime in the past couple of months, ABC has made changes to the montage. Now each profile except for Bill Clinton's (which is excusable) identifies the politician's party. Additionally, two factual errors at the original profiles have been corrected. The year of Clinton's Lewinsky scandal which ultimately led to his acts of perjury and impeachment has been changed from 1995 to 1998, and an incorrect statement that sex-scandalized Florida Democratic Congressman Tim Mahoney had conceded to GOP opponent Tom Rooney before Election Day last year has been removed. Here's the lineup of the "Faces of Political Scandal," and how their status changed: Media Attacked Bush Over Baseless Conscription Fears, Ignores Conscription Calls From Obama And Other Dems Since U.S. troops have been in Iraq, the media instilled baseless fears around college campuses that President Bush would bring back the draft. The Washington Post reported in 2004 the following:
The news, however, remains silent as President-elect Barack Obama rolls out his own plans for conscripting America’s youth. Obama will have help pushing this agenda from his new chief of staff appointment, Rahm Emanuel. Emanuel proposed conscripting young Americans in his 2006 co-authored book, The Plan: NYT Talks Around Charlie Rangel's Big Tax HikeA big individual income tax hike is being pushed by Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel, chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee, but New York Times economics reporter Edmund Andrews failed to capture the import in a slanted front-page business section story Thursday. The Times manages not to spell out precisely where Rangel's tax-hike proposal would begin to bite on "the wealthy."
|
|
|
[ Home | Blogs |
Forum |
About |
Contact
]
| |
Recent Comments
17 min 16 sec ago
20 min 36 sec ago
30 min 24 sec ago
1 hour 5 min ago
1 hour 25 min ago
1 hour 26 min ago
1 hour 28 min ago
1 hour 31 min ago
1 hour 31 min ago
1 hour 40 min ago