|
|
|
|
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam LiptakPapers Play Up 'Bold' Turn to the Right at High Court, Suggest Sotomayor Can't Stop the TideThe Washington Post and The New York Times published similar Supreme Court "analysis" pieces on their front pages Wednesday offering the theme that the court under Chief Justice John Roberts is moving boldly to the right, and the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor will have no effect on this bold shift. It sounded like two newspapers trying to cool down the controversy over judicial liberalism as the Sotomayor hearings approach. The Post headline was "Term Saw High Court Move to the Right: Roberts-Led March Likely to Continue." Reporter Robert Barnes argued:
While conservatives were unhappy with the incrementalism of some Roberts opinions, Barnes wrote: The NY Times Presents: John McCain, Disqualified at Birth -- the SequelHere they go again: Today the New York Times ran yet another flaky story questioning the presidential eligibility of John McCain, born in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone, where his Navy father was stationed. Back on February 28, Congressional reporter Carl Hulse wrote a big story on the "controversy," even though Hulse himself admitted little was likely to come of it. The Senate later approved a resolution declaring McCain eligible for the presidency. Law reporter Adam Liptak's story today, which led the paper's National Section, ran under the hopeful headline, "A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue," and detailed findings from a Democratic college professor allegedly showing McCain unable to satisfty the constitutional requirement of being a "natural-born citizen." |
|
|
[ Home | Blogs |
Forum |
About |
Contact
]
| |
Recent Comments
2 sec ago
1 min 25 sec ago
2 min ago
2 min 18 sec ago
4 min 57 sec ago
5 min 7 sec ago
5 min 16 sec ago
5 min 33 sec ago
5 min 47 sec ago
6 min 22 sec ago