"Interview with former Boston Center Air Traffic Controller and pilotsfor911truth.org member Robin Hordon. Visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org for latest analysis into the events of Sept. 11, 2001"
Well, Here's just one more blatant piece of new evidence pertaining to the staged events of that day. This is a 30 minute interview with this guy detailing what should of happened and why it didn't. Please, feel free to learn the truth (yet once again) or go about your robotic business and deny deny deny...


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Here's betting your precious
December 15, 2006 - 14:28 ET by UnsaneHere's betting your precious "witness" cannot answer my questions either, just as you can't.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
HAHA!! Your responses lately
December 15, 2006 - 21:00 ET by ThoughtPoliceHAHA!! Your responses lately have been beyond comical, to the point of laughter!
You've been beaten now not once, not twice, but THREE times! (Let me remind you: FBI foreknowledge and help of 1993 WTC bombings, the Anthrax being of US military grade, and now this, all to which you have absolutely no logical response.)
Please, stop posting just to post. You can't answer three different posts with the same thing! It makes no sense! Look, I know your upset that your thought process has been interrupted, but it's OK! We are supposed to think out of the box...
Good luck getting a grip once you realize We are right and you are wrong....
ThoughtLess is back!
December 15, 2006 - 21:02 ET by Free StinkerThoughtLess is back!
(is it Friday again, already?)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"One thing that seperates liberals from conservatives is that liberals are craftier and work without the hinderance of a conscience." --Lynn Wooley
I beg to differ, Unsane CAN a
December 15, 2006 - 22:18 ET by AvatarI beg to differ, Unsane CAN answer three different posts with the same answer. Primarily because your thoughtless little scheme to try and implicate Bush in the 9/11 Terrorist attacks is complex beyond possibility. Unsane's queries cut right to the heart of you knuckleheads' conspiracy theories. Of course now, you will proceed to 'debunk' me by saying i'm 'denying' or 'being blind to the truth', but the FACT is you cannot answer Unsane's points about a 'cover-up' of this magnitude being IMPOSSIBLE to keep hidden. That coupled with your little set of convenient circumstances in order to make 9/11 a conspiracy, and TA-DA! Brain-death has occured.
You rank at LEAST a two on the Liberal Stupidity scale, more than likely higher.
see: http://newsbusters.org/node/9193
The Avatar
Ok Sure, let's think about th
December 16, 2006 - 12:27 ET by ThoughtPoliceOk Sure, let's think about this for a second. Let's completely take 9/11 out of the equation. Now what is your response to the '93 WTC bombing evidence? Now what is your response to the anthrax attacks of '01 being of U.S. origins? Forget 9/11. You see, if we do that you can't say, "oh, but why can't you answer these "simple" questions. I mean, you must know the technology used, how long they've been planning, and their modus operandi without doubt!" (a laughable assumption in its own right.) Because if we do that, which should have been done in the first place, you CANNOT answer. Why? because doing so would implicate that the evidence is of course right and you are of course wrong.
Second, in answering UNsane, the same rules apply.
Third, to MisterBill: Maybe you should get your facts straight about 9/11, because you obviously have NO FREAKING CLUE what you are talking about. Yes, this ATC is from Boston because that is where FLIGHT 11 TOOK OFF FROM!! Thus, they would be the ones to track flight 11, and thus he would be one to come forward saying that what happened wasn't like what we are told.
I used to think some people on this site were well informed and generally intelligent. My opinions have completely changed...
Looks like thoughtpolice is h
December 16, 2006 - 13:00 ET by AvatarLooks like thoughtpolice is having a 'pay no attention to that man behind the curtain' moment.
The Avatar
Please, as i've told Unsane b
December 16, 2006 - 15:13 ET by ThoughtPolicePlease, as i've told Unsane before, do not post just to see your own thoughts on a website. If you post, post something thought provoking and if you make a claim please have evidence to back it up. I can't take much more of everyone's "maybe if i call thoughtpolice a name, or completely change the subject, he might think we're winning" strategy, because, it is not a strategy at all.
Thanks,
from those who like to have logical arguments.
TP, you should really take yo
December 16, 2006 - 21:07 ET by UnsaneTP, you should really take your own advice.
A simple "I can't prove my little conspiracy and therefore can't answer your questions" will suffice. I so hate to see on-screen groveling.
Thanks,
From all those who can critically think and ENJOY it
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
So if....
December 16, 2006 - 15:25 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasSo, if as you imply (let me quote your words "I used to think some people on this site were well informed and generally intelligent. My opinions have completely changed". More than an implication but in the least an implication and I provide a quote of what you said to avoid the ... duh...I didn't imply that game) there is no one left here that is well informed and generally intelligent, what does that say about your level of intelligence for staying and arguing? Do you super-libs always walk right into your own badly constructed trap after setting it? Geesh.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.
Thought Police -appropriate name
December 18, 2006 - 11:59 ET by misterbillThought Police -appropriate name--although I like Dickhead for you better. You are trying to force your radical, insane thoughts on those who come to this site. You totally missed my intention in my comment re: ATC and Boston. I come from Boston originally. It is a hotbed of intense liberal thinking. I wouldn't go back if given a tax-free mansion. I would not be surprised to hear anty insane words coming from Boston. SO.TO SHOUT LIKE YOU,YOU SICKMINDED BUTTHOLE, your conspiracy theory reeks of incertitude and you had better get back on your lithium soon. PS Look behind you, there are federal agents following you everywhere you go.
PS check the wiring in your car and look under the driver's seat before you get in. We all know that the government of GW Bush is following you and wants to eliminate you. NOOOOOT!!!!
Anthrax attack? No one has
December 20, 2006 - 03:11 ET by NL207Anthrax attack? No one has positively identified the point of origin of the anthrax culture used beyond that it was the Ames strain and was cultured somewhere in the Northeastern United States and no earlier than two years before the attack. It is thought that this could have been the work of one individual using about $2500 worth of equipment. The other interesting thing is that the three separate mailings of this stuff all came from the same post box near Princeton University and represented at least two and possibly three different grades of preparation, strongly indicative of very small batch production.
It is a wild leap for you or anyone else to assert the anthrax attacks were any kind of government operation. There is simply no evidence to support any such theories.
Wasn't there also some sort
December 20, 2006 - 03:28 ET by sarcasmoWasn't there also some sort of scientist who "wasn't a suspect" but later became "a focus of the investigation" because a dog kept smell-alerting on his property/clothing/etc.? He ultimately lost his job and hired a lawyer, but then I never heard about him again.
JMR
Yes. Dr. Steven Hatfill. Th
December 20, 2006 - 03:38 ET by NL207Yes. Dr. Steven Hatfill. There is insufficient evidence to make a case against him. In fact, I suspect there is exculpatory evidence, one point of which is the Dr's blood. There are assertions his blood shows no trace of antibodies to anthrax, something he would likely develop were he ever in contact with the pathogen. There is also a lack of any demonstrated connection between himself and the Princeton letter box where the anthrax was mailed. The government has been unable to demonstrate that he had the opportunity to commit the crime.
Hmm. Brings to mind that Ri
December 20, 2006 - 03:49 ET by sarcasmoHmm. Brings to mind that Richard? Jewell guy, who was a security guard at the Atlanta Olympic Park bombing which was perpetrated by Eric Rudolf. The FBI tried to railroad Jewell so they could finally look halfway-competent for once (facts be damned!) in the wake of Waco & Ruby Ridge, and I think Jewell sued & got a big settlement from US taxpayers. (Thanks, Fibbies!)
JMR
How can you claim victory whe
December 15, 2006 - 23:11 ET by UnsaneHow can you claim victory when you simply cannot answer ANY of my questions?
Thanks for the laugh of the day. You are beating yourselves and you don't even know it. If you have any credibility, instead of posting such hollow tripe as that, you'll sit down and answer my very simple, painless, easy questions.
Until such a time that you can complete this task, and verifiably so, victory is 100% mine.
(Maybe we should start something like the James Randi Million Dollar Challenge for these conspiros on NB...)
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
LOL! It's hard to believe y
December 16, 2006 - 15:39 ET by libertyordeathLOL! It's hard to believe you clones used to frustrate me, when I get such a kick out of your childish, sore loser-y, whiny arguments! Unsane relies on some questions requiring technical data that could only be acquired with a subpoena in an actual criminal investigation. What this really proves is that you and your precious "conservative" establishment gods are AFRAID of a real investigation. Ignoring vital evidence that warrants a criminal investigation is a criminal offence itself. The true nature of your character is quite obvious when you cover for your heros in politics at every turn, no matter if it means turning a blind eye to even the idea of corrupt behavior. Hey know-it-alls, show me where one single person in this adminstration or in organizations directly involved with the complete intelligence and national defence BREAKDOWN was fired, or even demoted. After you fail miserably to produce a name, imagine me as I sit here laughing in your face, much as I should have done after the complete stomping of your precious party in the recent elections.
Then, take a few minutes, go back to some earlier posts/threads, and show us where you "proved" any information and sources we provided related to 9/11, OKC, the '93 WTC bombings, etc., as false, so I can laugh some more.
lod....I see you and tp esca
December 16, 2006 - 15:44 ET by bigtimerlod....
I see you and TP escaped again for the week-end....pretty please check in early tomorrow on the buddy plan, and say hello to Nurse Ratchet as you take your med's...
Two perfect nutcases.
"Once the coffers of the federal government are opened to the public, there will be no shutting them again." - Grover Cleveland
Isn't it time for "The F
December 16, 2006 - 16:28 ET by libertyordeathIsn't it time for "The Factor", clone? Grab your lotion and tissues and pull up a seat!
Clones listen to the Jim Rome
December 16, 2006 - 21:04 ET by UnsaneClones listen to the Jim Rome radio program and are huge fans thereof. If you can't prove your conspiracy theory, at least get some terminology straight.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
Just answer my questions, ple
December 16, 2006 - 21:03 ET by UnsaneJust answer my questions, please. You and your buddy TP have ALL the answers! This should be a SNAP!!! It should require NO BRAINPOWER!
What is so damn technical about asking where the explosives were stored? Or how they got there? I could care less what an air traffic controller has to say. A commercial real estate agent that controls some prime warehouse space...maybe I'll entertain.
The more you avoid my simple questions, the more you show yourselves without a leg to stand on, or even a crutch.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
I think LOD gave a pretty goo
December 16, 2006 - 21:59 ET by ThoughtPoliceI think LOD gave a pretty good answer as to why that is impossible. Until there is a true independent global investigation into why our gov't either let it happen or did it, we can't be 100% sure, i'll be the first to admit that. When will you admit that 19 hijackers weren't the only ones involved?
Do they know why WTC 7 fell yet? Because the last time I checked (today), they still haven't. Quite interesting they can't figure it out 5 years after the fact.
p.s. Did you see the 2nd video they released of "something" hitting the pentagon. Conveniently, this vid doesn't show any plane either. Hehe...
Actually, he gave a lame excu
December 16, 2006 - 22:15 ET by UnsaneActually, he gave a lame excuse as to why that's impossible. I'll give you a better explanation:
Both of you can't prove it because your conspiracy did not happen. If it did, you would be able to answer my little questions quite easily. They really are quite simple and do not require much thought or research...if what you say is true.
Therefore I think I'll just keep asking them.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
No, whats lame is you beating
December 17, 2006 - 13:43 ET by ThoughtPoliceNo, whats lame is you beating around the issue purposely not answering the tough questions. Yea, you can say what you want, but anyone reading this can see your just avoiding the issues.
The funny thing is, I actually wrote a decent answer to your question a while back only to find you criticizing my answers once again. See, I can't answer your questions because nothing would be good enough. Example, If I said security was pulled and the bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the WTC buildings weeks before the collapse, you would come back and say "well that doesn't mean anything. They do that all the time in 100 story buildings with some of the most wealthy businesses in the world. Whats so weird about that."
Or the fact that there were entire floors of the towers that had absolutely nothing in them. Employees heard loud bangings and strange noises coming from floors that were supposedly empty. I would say this is how they got to the core of the buildings. You would say either that is not true, or if it is they were doing routine maintenance.
So you see, nothing would ever be good enough. So, please, stop with the nonsense.
I agree. My questions are m
December 17, 2006 - 14:37 ET by UnsaneI agree. My questions are much too tough for you. Therefore the only thing you can manage is hollow smack. ANYTHING for you to not deal with them.
You might be surprised at just how receptive I would be to logical, coherent, verifiable answers. So do me a favor, instead of running juvenile smack, and second-guessing how I will react to answers to questions...just put that energy into ANSWERING them.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy." -Sir Winston Churchill, British statesman (1874-1965)
PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN
December 18, 2006 - 11:13 ET by AvatarPAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
Oh, and, don't lecture me about posting to be seen. Between the two of us, I don't post here very often, and of the two of us, I'm the only one who can get a complete thought out with actual substance, intelligence, and truth behind it.
The Avatar
not in total agreement
December 18, 2006 - 11:48 ET by tumbler_2007I somewhat agree with you, avatar (an avatar of josef f, johnbo, haysie. Whom?)
Between the two, you toss off better boilerplate; in finer form and substance. Even a trace of devious intelligence.
But with "truth behind it"---??? Not much trace, mon enfant terrible. You are full of merde.
This administration isn't the
December 20, 2006 - 03:25 ET by NL207This administration isn't the one that was responsible for allowing the 9-11 attack to be planned, staged and mounted. That was singularly the work of the Clinton administration, which failed miserably to do anything about OBL when it could have. The terrorist leafders were already in the US training in flight-ops when Bush took office. Mohammed Atta [flight 11] entered the US in June of 2000, as did the pilot of flight 175, Marqwan al-Shehhi. Bush's team was not promptly seated, thanks in large part to the Democrats and Clinton. And, Bush had to deal with the asinine intelligence rules created by Jamie Gorelick under Clinton, which allowed the terrorists to escape detection. Last, Bush had to accept Clinton holdover leadership in the FBI. It is patently clear that this leadership is what prevented Agent Rowley in Minneapolis from searching Zaccarias Mousaoui's computer and unmasking the whole plot in August of 2001. Think about that, LoD. Moussaoui had data on his laptop computer that would have exposed the entire plot had these feckless Clinton holdovers had the balls to search it.
Lets have at it, nut case. I'd love to destroy some more of your bogus arguments.
conspiracy
December 16, 2006 - 00:10 ET by misterbillthe reason pilots for tooth believe it is a plot is because they know all of them would have required three passes before they hit their target. Get lost you creeps.
Also, why am I not surprised the ATC guy is from Boston? Probably the same a$$h**e that said Romney was hiring illegals.
Fellow NBers, sorry for the nastiness, but I have suffered enough fools for one day.
Any conspiracy vast enough,
December 18, 2006 - 12:03 ET by lnthompAny conspiracy vast enough, secret enough, and willing to sacrifice the lives of 3000 American citizens wouldn't hesitate to make their critics disappear to keep themselves secret.
To me, the very fact that people are out there publicly pronouncing that there was a conspiracy, and living to continue their pronouncements, is proof enough that THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY.
Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence. Napoleon
LNTHOMP previously posting as LEENT. U.S. Navy (ret.)
I have enough money to last me the rest of my life. Unless I buy something.