From WND (HT Hot Air), following up on a story blogged here last week, this one names someone willing to be quoted:
TEL AVIV – A key Hamas official has confirmed reports from last week the terror group held meetings with "important Democrats."
Ahmed Yousuf, chief political advisor to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, told the Maannews Palestinian news website that Hamas officials met recently with high-ranking American figures, "especially members of the Democratic party."
Last week's post was triggered by the disappearance of two paras from a Jerusalem Post report that had been posted previously about this very topic. WorldNetDaily stuck to their story; the naming of a name quoted in another publication would appear to tentatively vindicate them.
And, if anyone cares -- There are a few laws against meeting with a recognized terrorist group, or, if you want to claim that the Palestinian Authority is a real government, against citizens negotiating with foreign governments. Start with the Logan Act and work up from there.
In the week since the JPost story broke, and un-broke, there has been no curiosity or apparent attempt at follow-up relating to this possible (emphasis: still not really confirmed) meeting, which is also said to have included European representatives, in the so-called Mainstream Media.
_____________________________
UPDATE: Last week I said that "Maybe Hamas is in discussons with the Democrats about Palestine becoming the USA’s 51st state. Or maybe Hamas wants to be the next NATO member." OK, probably not. IMAO speculates how awkward such a meeting might be.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Probably Jimmy Carter
December 12, 2006 - 00:47 ET by exLibProbably one of them was Jimmy Carter. His new book seems to be an abomination. And Plagaristic. By ANY measurement GW Bush is head and shoulders above Carter as far as Presidential performance is concerned.
exlib
December 12, 2006 - 00:49 ET by misterbillsarc have to disagree with you.. Jimmy Carter was never an "important Democrat"
sarc off In all probability you are correct!
Misterbill
December 12, 2006 - 01:00 ET by exLibCarter must be an important democrat, he got to sit next to Michael Moore at the DNC.
Hey now
December 12, 2006 - 01:02 ET by misterbillSarc
Hey now--I don't like the man but that may be going too far. Would anyone like to sit next to the next James Bond (Moore)? I doubt it.
exLib..When Carter was elect
December 12, 2006 - 00:53 ET by ww thumperexLib..When Carter was elected; he was said to be one of the "smartest" people in the country... we couldn't tell by his Presidential performance..and he seems to be gitting dummmer every day now...! .....Political correctness when dealing with Islam will kill america....ww .....
Carter not that bright
December 12, 2006 - 00:58 ET by exLibAl Fraken bragged in a SNL 25 anniversary special how he ripped all the Presidents (mostly Republicans) in the worst way, but he thought it was so clever that he had Jimmy Carter giving people "advice" on a Talk Radio call-in show. Like how to handle an acid trip...
Well, there's a difference between intellgence and widsom. I don't think Carter is that bright but he certainl is lacking in Wisdom. He never misses a chance to diss the US.