Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 11, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Michael Rule's blog
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'
  • Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now

CBS Terrorism Analyst Notes 'Huge Progress' In War On Terror

By Michael Rule | June 16, 2006 | 16:31

Change font size:  A |  A

On this morning’s "Early Show" CBS terrorism analyst and former FBI agent Christopher Whitcomb told co-host Hannah Storm that he believes the seized al Qaeda documents are believable, i.e. the ones where al Qaeda admits it’s losing in Iraq, and that the United States is making significant progress in the overall war on terrorism.

Ms. Storm began her interview of Mr Whitcomb inquiring about the authenticity of these al Qaeda memos:

"The Iraqi government has released a document it said was found at the site of the bombing when al Zarqawi was killed. Actually, the U.S. government says it was found a few weeks before on a hard drive. But the bottom line is this document says that al Qaeda's weakening. It's an al Qaeda document, supposedly. Do you buy it? Can we take it at face value?"

In reply, Whitcomb gave a positive assessment on the progress being made in the fight against al Qaeda:

"I do buy it, and I'll tell you this. Behind the scenes, what people don't know is that we have made great strides fighting al Qaeda. We've disrupted their communications, we've disrupted their fund-raising, their recruitment, their training, all of their operations around the world. We've seen nothing since 9/11 here in the United States and pretty much around the world."

Storm later inquired about the insurgency in Iraq. She noted that since Zarqawi’s death the military has pulled off a series of raids killing insurgents, but she wondered if this is effective:

"U.S. officials say over 100 insurgents have been killed since al Zarqawi's death in this series of raids. Is that an effective way to shut down the insurgency?"

Whitcomb was unequivocal in his response:

"Yeah, it certainly is. You've got to disrupt by chopping the head off the organization. We know al Zarqawi is out. That he was doing most of the operations in Iraq. Getting rid of that is a big part. But actually stopping the operational planning, their ability to communicate, their fund-raising, disrupting all of those things is going to stop part of the insurgency..."

Taking all this into consideration caused Hannah Storm to ponder:

"So we are making progress in the war on terror?"

Again Whitcomb was unequivocal in his response:

"Huge progress. Anyone you talk to will tell you the same thing. That we know of very little money that they have that we've disrupted their recruiting, their operations in every way. Al Qaeda, as most people understand it, is not an effective organization now. It's not the organization it was at 9/11. It's certainly not even the organization it was a year ago."

But once again, while other news outlets are trying to bury the story about the seized al Qaeda memos and the progress being made in the war on terror, CBS is highlighting it’s importance.

In a separate issue, earlier in the program, CBS News Capitol Hill Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson referred to the debate in Congress regarding whether troops should remain committed in combat areas until victory is secured or if a set time table for withdrawal should be outlined instead and the vote on the underlying resolution as not a real debate but:

"The framework of this debate on the war more than three years after the first missiles were fired, was decided by Republicans who were anxious in this election year to force Democrats to come down officially on one side or the other. Think of it not so much as a real debate with a real chance of changing anything about the war in Iraq, it's more of a political dare..."

With the progress Christopher Whitcomb noted in the war on terror, it would be folly to set a timetable for withdrawal until total victory is completed. The resolution being referred to Ms. Attkisson, is not a so much a political dare, but a statement of support for continued success in the overall war on terrorism.

Share this
  • Iraq
  • War on Terrorism
  • Hannah Storm
  • CBS
  • Early Show
  • Michael Rule's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)
  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.