The president ignored a question about whether Friday's airstrike on a remote Pakistani village was appropriate. Pakistani officials said at least 17 people were killed the attack, but not the apparent target — Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden's top lieutenant. The strike sparked anti-American protests throughout Pakistan.Because, you see, it is seemingly necessary that all AP stories include criticism of the President, and there wasn't anything obviously racist, sexist, mysogynistic, fascist or otherwise disconcertingly dictatorial about his actual MLK day activities. Given that, they needed to reach for something unrelated to criticize him. And what an item! He blew up innocents in Pakistan and won't own up!
OK, it doesn't actually say that he blew them up. But this is a story about the President's activities on MLK day. The inclusion of anti-American riots in Pakistan, which the AP has certainly covered, is irrelevant. It accomplishes one thing, and one thing only - it drags a critical tone into a story which would otherwise be neutral-to-positive about President Bush.
I've said it before, I'll say it again - the AP is very good at what it does. It's just a shame that unbiased news reporting isn't it...
Lyflines - Lyford's other blog…



















Editor at Large
Recent Comments
2 min 18 sec ago
6 min 46 sec ago
13 min 10 sec ago
14 min 4 sec ago
14 min 48 sec ago
15 min 1 sec ago
21 min 28 sec ago
23 min 29 sec ago
26 min 31 sec ago
28 min 14 sec ago