Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 11, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Michael Rule's blog
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'
  • Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now

CBS's The Early Show Joins Impeachment Choir

By Michael Rule | December 21, 2005 | 12:45

Change font size:  A |  A

Substitute co-host Russ Mitchell of CBS’s The Early Show interviewed legal scholar Jonathan Turley about the "spy scandal" on Wednesday in the 7:00 half hour. Mitchell used the interview to have Turley explain why those opposed to the President are legally accurate, and why impeachment proceedings against President Bush may be appropriate. Windows Media or Real Player

From the very beginning, this segment took a negative tone against the President and his administration, and like many interviews and stories, was completely one sided. Mitchell framed the story, as many media outlets do, in a way to give the impression that the government is spying on everyone at all times, "As we said, Capitol Hill is buzzing about the President's admission to spying on Americans without obtaining warrants," but he ignored the limited nature of the program in that it was limited to international communications and one of the parties must have known ties to terror.

After introducing Jonathan Turley, Mitchell asked him a question designed to defend the critics of the administration and their arguments on the law, "Let me ask you something, those opposed to the President, do they have any legal ground to stand on at this point?" Turley took advantage of this opportunity to accuse the administration of committing a crime, "This operation was based on a federal crime, it is a crime to engage in surveillance, to order such surveillance without having a court order from a judge..." The question and answer again provide an impression that the "domestic spying" is widespread, rather than in specific and limited circumstances. Turley downplays the legal position of the administration, saying "For those who are supporting the President, they are really going back to a familiar theme with this administration, they are arguing that the President has the inherent authority to effectively circumvent the federal law."

Instead of following up with a question about what the administration is arguing legally, Mitchell asked a question about the Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act (FISA) and ended his interview talking about impeachment. In his last question, Mitchell inquired, "Jonathan, very quickly, down the road do you see this leading to impeachment proceedings against the President?" Turley, responded in a way that left little doubt that he believed the President ought to be impeached, "Well Russ, what I can tell you is that I do believe this is a federal crime and it would constitute an impeachable offense, the remaining question is whether that crime was committed and whether there is a political will to actually look into whether this is a high crime and misdemeanor."

The transcript of the interview follows:

CBS

The Early Show

December 21, 2005

7:13

Russ Mitchell: "As we said, Capitol Hill is buzzing about the President's admission to spying on Americans without obtaining warrants. The administration says the President is within his legal right as Commander in Chief. But, Republican and Democratic Senators are calling for hearings saying they believe the President has violated the law. Jonathan Turley is a Constitutional Attorney, Jonathan good morning to you. Let me ask you something, those opposed to the President, do they have any legal ground to stand on at this point?"

Jonathan Turley: "Well for those who are opposing the President, this seems a very clear question. I mean in my view quite frankly, the federal law is quite clear. This operation was based on a federal crime, it is a crime to engage in surveillance, to order such surveillance without having a court order from a judge, either under the traditional process of Title 3 or the so called "secret court." So on its face, the federal law seems quite clear. For those who are supporting the President, they are really going back to a familiar theme with this administration, they are arguing that the President has the inherent authority to effectively circumvent the federal law."

Russ Mitchell: "Let me ask you something, we've heard about a lot of acts and laws in the last few days. The Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act, what is it and are Americans affected by it?"

Jonathan Turley: "Well that's right. The FISA law is indeed the secret court, and calling it a court sort of dresses is it up a bit. I went into this court as a lowly intern during the Reagan administration with the NSA, and it makes a traffic court look grand in comparison. It's basically a judge sitting in a special room that can't be penetrated by enemy surveillance and he or she signs these secret applications. Now the law, the FISA law, gives that judge virtually no ability to turn down an application, that's why there's been 19,000 or so applications, only 4 have ever been denied."

Russ Mitchell: "Jonathan, very quickly, down the road do you see this leading to impeachment proceedings against the President?"

Jonathan Turley: "Well Russ, what I can tell you is that I do believe this is a federal crime and it would constitute an impeachable offense, the remaining question is whether that crime was committed and whether there is a political will to actually look into whether this is a high crime and misdemeanor."

Share this
  • Congress
  • Political Scandals
  • War on Terrorism
  • CBS
  • Early Show
  • Michael Rule's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)
  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • It can be argued that the
    7 min 28 sec ago
  • NL...
    29 min 18 sec ago
  • I would say something to this troll but I am busy.
    31 min 50 sec ago
  • left wing?
    43 min 34 sec ago
  • You must be from Gwinnett Co., Georgia, troll
    55 min 46 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
  • Newt Gingrich: As President I'll Repudiate 40% of Obama's Government on Inauguration Day
  • Ann Coulter's Full Address to CPAC
  • NYTimes Reporters Packing in 'Conservative' Labels at CPAC
  • Full Video of Rick Santorum at CPAC
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.