Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 09, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Brent Baker's blog
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion
  • MRC Study: ABC and NBC Anything But Fast and Furious On Gunwalking Scandal
  • Bozell Column: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty
  • Even Chris Matthews Questions Obama's 'Frightening,' Birth Control Decision
  • CBS, ABC Highlight Obama 'Flip-Flop' on Super PACs; NBC Punts
  • Media Thrilled Over 8.3% Unemployment in 2012, Despondent With 5.6% in 2004

Mike Wallace Saw “Chaos,” Reveals Rather Didn’t Watch Memogate Story Beforehand

By Brent Baker | November 28, 2005 | 22:13

Change font size:  A |  A
Brent Baker's picture
In a taped interview aired Monday night on FNC’s The O’Reilly Factor, Mike Wallace of CBS’s 60 Minutes, agreed that the Bush National Guard story should not have aired if the memos could not be authenticated “beyond a reasonable doubt,” revealed that the weekend Mapes and her colleagues were putting the story together “was chaos” inside the 60 Minutes offices and that Dan Rather has “acknowledged to me that he did not see the finished piece before it went on the air.” Contradicting earlier reports that he and Rather got into an argument at a urinal, Wallace maintained that “I had a pleasant, sensible discussion with Dan. I said everybody who was involved with you in this thing, everybody got fired. Why didn't you go with them?” Wallace soon resisted Bill O’Reilly’s characterization of the Memogate story as a “fiasco.”

Moving on to Iraq, Wallace contended that “Iraq is becoming a kind of Vietnam” and asserted that “we should never have gone into Iraq. We were sold a bill of goods.” Wallace, however, suggested Bush may not really have been in charge and thus may not be to blame: “Now, whether the President was sold a bill of goods or whether Dick Cheney was sitting in the chair at that time, I don't know.” (Transcript follows, as well as a look back at Wallace’s May of 2004 attack on Bush and the war.)

Earlier in the day, Wallace appeared in a taped segment on MSNBC’s Hardball, but Chris Matthews didn’t raise Memogate.

The June 1, 2004 MRC CyberAlert recounted, with an accompanying RealPlayer clip, how “Mike Wallace, at a Smithsonian Institution ‘National World War II Reunion’ event on Friday shown later by C-SPAN, denounced the war in Iraq. ‘This is not, in my estimation, a good war,’ Wallace declared a panel event, on ‘World War II veterans as journalists,’ held in a tent on the Capitol end of Mall the afternoon before the dedication of the World War II Memorial. ‘I don’t know how we got into a position where our present Commander-in-Chief and the people around him,’ the 60 Minutes correspondent lamented, ‘had the guts to take our kids and send them on what seems to be -- it sure is not a noble enterprise.’”

I corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide this transcript of most of the interview, taped off-site from FNC, which Wallace sat down for to promote his new book, Between You and Me: A Memoir.

Bill O’Reilly: “Mary Mapes. I had her on the broadcast. Did an extensive interview with her [NewsBusters item on that interview]. Millions of people watched it. She came off as very unsteady. Her main thesis was well, they haven't proved the documents about Bush National Guard weren’t real, were not real. That was her thesis. I said as an investigative reporter, you’ve to use the same threshold you use in a court of law. Beyond a reasonable doubt. If there’s one doubt, you can't put them on the air. How do you feel about it?”

Mike Wallace: “I think you're right. Simple as that.”

O’Reilly: “Did you tell her that?”

Wallace: “Did I tell her that? I had nothing to do with it.”

O’Reilly: “No, but you're in the same building over there at 60 Minutes.”

Wallace: “Never met her.”

O’Reilly: “Really?”

Wallace: “Never met Mary Mapes.”

O’Reilly: “She’s been at CBS for 28 years.”

Wallace: “I know that. Me, I’ve been there since 1963. I have never met her. She lives in Texas. I’ve read a couple of things about it. Look, I was there the weekend they were putting it together. It was chaos.”

O’Reilly: “Chaos?”

Wallace: “Yeah, it was. I didn't know what they were doing, but it was -- they didn't want us to know what they were doing. Dan Rather is my friend, remains my friend. I have nothing but respect for him. Nonetheless, truth to tell, he has acknowledged to me that he did not see the finished piece before it went on the air.”

O’Reilly: “Is that right? Too busy?”

Wallace: “Yeah. Busy. One thing or another.”

O’Reilly: “But in a report that's going to denigrate the President of the United States, you would think that you would want to see it.”

Wallace: “That's your view.”

O’Reilly: “You would want to see it, would you not?”

Wallace: “Damn right.”

O’Reilly: “Did you tell Rather that he screwed it up?”

Wallace: “I wondered -- I had a pleasant, sensible discussion with Dan. I said everybody who was involved with you in this thing, everybody got fired. Why didn't you go with them? Or did it never occur to you along the way?”

O’Reilly: “You said that to Rather?”

Wallace: “Of course. Everybody, everybody got fired. And Dan didn't. Okay. He had a contract, whatever. And I told this to Dan. Perhaps if you had said, ‘hey, if they go, I go,’ the whole thing would have been perceived as somewhat different.”

O’Reilly: “You think he could have saved all those people?”

Wallace: “I don't know about that.”

O’Reilly: “Do you think he should have been fired?”

Wallace: “You don’t fire a man like Rather who’s been with the company forever and has done extraordinary things forever, no.”

O’Reilly: “Bottom line, the whole thing was a fiasco, the Bush National Guard story and CBS News, just a fiasco.”

Wallace: “That's your view.”

O’Reilly: “Is it yours?”

Wallace: “I don't know enough about the piece, honest.”

O’Reilly: “But if they cannot prove the documents were real and they can't, isn't that the definition of a journalistic fiasco?”

Wallace: “Well, apparently, I’ve not -- as I say, I’ve never met Mary Mapes.”

O’Reilly: “You're dancing.”

Wallace: “I am dancing a little bit.”

O’Reilly: “You're doing the lambada here, Mike.”

Wallace laughs: “Look, if I’d been there, I wouldn't have gone on the air unless I was certain.”

O’Reilly: “Beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Wallace: “Yeah.”

O’Reilly: “Is Iraq Vietnam?”

Wallace: “Say again?”

O’Reilly: “Is Iraq Vietnam?”

Wallace: “Well, you know, 58,000 people were killed in Vietnam. It's a mere -- can you imagine, Iraq is becoming a kind of Vietnam. We should never have gone into Iraq. We were sold a bill of goods. Now, whether the President was sold a bill of goods or whether Dick Cheney was sitting in the chair at that time, I don't know.”

O’Reilly: “Well, it was Bush who made the decision. Cheney encouraged it.”
Share this

About the Author

Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Brent Baker on Twitter.
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Mary Mapes
  • Mike Wallace
  • Brent Baker's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • CNN suspends Roland Martin (Big Journalism)
  • Birth control mandate is unconstitutional (National Center)
  • Obama's Catholic 'problem' (S.E. Cupp)
  • Debt crisis not inevitable for America (Williams)
  • Catholic 'Obamacan' says he may have to reconsider in 2012 (CNA)
  • Occupy DC plans to 'occupy' conservative conference (Foundry blog/Heritage)
  • Eastwood ad was bad history (Lowry @ NRO)
  • Newt's ties to Fannie, Freddie deeper than suspected (Hot Air)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Yeah, but Lennon would
    1 min 31 sec ago
  • Agreed 100%
    2 min 14 sec ago
  • Leno appears to be going the way of Letterman...
    2 min 18 sec ago
  • "The greatest heroes are often the most flawed."
    5 min 16 sec ago
  • So, Now It's YOU Who Determines My Politics?
    6 min 49 sec ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides
  • Cornel West Scolds Al Sharpton: 'Tell the Truth About the White House'
  • Politico: Is Nancy Pelosi A 2012 Asset, or Not?
  • CNN Demeans Republicans as Drag Queens
  • Democrat: Fox News Is 'The Enemy,' Hates 'Working Men and Women'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.