Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 10, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion
  • MRC Study: ABC and NBC Anything But Fast and Furious On Gunwalking Scandal
  • Bozell Column: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty

Now It’s ABC News and the Washington Post’s Turn to Skew Poll Numbers

By Noel Sheppard | November 03, 2005 | 23:16

Change font size:  A |  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

As NewsBusters has been reporting the past 24 hours here, here, and here, CBS News released a poll yesterday depicting President Bush’s declining job approval numbers that were based on a sample that was in no way reflective of the country’s population. Just hours ago, some new poll numbers were released by the Washington Post and ABC News, and they too have over-sampled Democrats and Independents.

As stated at the ABC News website:

“An increasingly unpopular war, an ethics cloud, and broad economic discontent have pushed public opinion of the Bush administration from bad to worse, infecting not only the president's ratings on political issues but his personal credentials for honesty and leadership as well.

“George W. Bush's approval ratings for handling his job, Iraq, terrorism and the economy are all at career-lows. Sixty percent of Americans disapprove of his work in office overall, a level of discontent unseen since recession chased his father from office.”

Yet, the breakdown of the respondents once again showed an over-sampling of both Democrats and Independents, and, as a result, a significant under-sampling of Republicans. As stated at the Washington Post website, the breakdown is as follows:

            Democrat     Republican     Independent     Other     No op.

11/2/05        31            27              38           3         1

9/11/05        31            27              34           8         1

9/2/05         32            31              31           5         2

8/28/05        32            29              33           5         1

6/26/05        34            28              32           5         1

6/5/05         30            31              34           4         *

4/24/05        35            28              32           5         *

However, when one looks at the political leaning of the respondents, the skew becomes even more apparent:

901/904 Leaned Party:

               Democrat     Republican     Independent     Other     No op.

11/2/05           52            41               6           1         *    

9/11/05           48            39              10           3         * 

Without going through the boring statistics again, the point here is that it is not difficult for a polling agency to create a representative sample of the population. In fact, for their poll to be viewed in any serious fashion, a poll MUST represent a fair and accurate portrayal of the population, or else it is worthless. And, according to the 2004 exit polls, the current population is 37 percent Democrats, 37 percent Republicans, and 26 percent Independents. As a result, any poll that deviates from these percentages is not accurately reflecting the views of the population.

So, how does a polling agency ensure such an accurate reflection? Well, by calling more people on the lists they have. After all, there are many, many millions of registered voters who have identified party affiliation with their registration, correct? If the targeted sample size is 1202 people, there are more than enough Americans out there who are registered to vote and have telephones to ensure that they include 37 percent Democrats, 37 percent Republicans, and 26 percent Independents. Think about it -- this means only 445 Democrats, 445 Republicans, and 312 Independents. A good telemarketing division should certainly be able to accomplish this in two days.

Moreover, as we are twelve months away from a national election, there really isn’t any urgency in releasing poll results, is there? As such, wouldn’t it be more important to try to get this sample right than get the results out as fast as possible? After all, from the above numbers, this polling agency hasn’t been able to accurately replicate the 2004 exit poll numbers since at least April 24 of this year.

Share this

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Media Bias Debate
  • ABC
  • Washington Post
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)
  • CNN suspends Roland Martin (Big Journalism)
  • Birth control mandate is unconstitutional (National Center)
  • Obama's Catholic 'problem' (S.E. Cupp)
  • Debt crisis not inevitable for America (Williams)
  • Catholic 'Obamacan' says he may have to reconsider in 2012 (CNA)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • "Poor man's Ed Schultz"
    1 min 7 sec ago
  • You can well imagine where the world would be
    1 min 36 sec ago
  • I would like to think that
    3 min 57 sec ago
  • Tolerance
    5 min 3 sec ago
  • I disagree with your historical analogy
    5 min 36 sec ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Gov. Perry Tells NewsBusters He's Just 'Fighting on a Different Front'
  • Jay Leno Pines for More Socially Liberal Republican Party
  • Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides
  • Cornel West Scolds Al Sharpton: 'Tell the Truth About the White House'
  • Politico: Is Nancy Pelosi A 2012 Asset, or Not?
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.