Weather isn't Climate - a month's data isn't the same as 30 years of data.

   Yes but out in the real world there is no global warming.  The temperatures may warm again.  Then again maybe not.  But the only place global warming exists right now is on the computers of the esteemed global warming alarmists.

There's no absolute proof, but nevertheless the
evidence is strong: this is really extraordinary

You want extraordinary?

Glaciers - They just keep growing, and growing . . .

1. Icecap.us - Southern Hemisphere Ice Cover Remains Well Above Normal
2. Antarctic Ice Growing (USA Today)
3. Mount Shasta Glacier are Growing: CBS13 - Mount Shasta Glaciers Defy Global Warming, Grow
4. Hubbard Glacier is Growing: USGS - Hubbard Glacier, Alaska
5. Glacier growing in Karakoram Range: JAXA - Glaciers in the Eastern Karakoram Range

PopularTech's Glacier Links:

1. Greenland - Deep Freeze in Western Greenland (2008) (Sermitsiaq, Greenland)

2. Greenland - ERS altimeter survey shows growth of Greenland Ice Sheet interior (ESA - European Space Agency)

4. Greenland - Fossil DNA Proves Greenland Once Had Lush Forests; Ice Sheet Is Surprisingly Stable (Science Daily)

5. Greenland - Greenland's Glaciers Have Been Receding for 100 Years (University of Aarhus, Denmark)

6. Greenland - Greenland’s Glaciers Take a Breather (The New York Times)

7. Greenland - Greenland Ice Sheet Changes Are Normal; No Evidence Of Long-Term Climate Changes (Science Daily)

8. Greenland - Greenland Temperatures Coldest in 60 Years (The Heartland Institute)

9. Greenland - Is Greenland really melting? (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Ecological Climatology)

10. Greenland - Latest Scientific Studies Refute Fears of Greenland Melt (US Senate Environment & Public Works Committee)

11. Greenland - Letter to the Editor: Greenland Ice Gain Since World War II (The Heartland Institute)

12. Greenland - Recent cooling in coastal southern Greenland and relation with the North Atlantic Oscillation (American Geophysical Union)

13. Greenland - Study Shows Greenland’s Ice Growing (CO2 Science)

14. Greenland - The Cold Truth about Greenland (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Ecological Climatology)

15. Greenland - Dramatic Ice loss in the Greenland seas in 1817 (A History of the Royal Society Archive)

16. Greenland - Current Melting of Greenland's Ice Mimics 1920s-1940s Event (Science Daily)

17. Greenland - Heat From Earth's Magma Contributing To Melting Of Greenland Ice (Science Daily)

18. Greenland - Magma may be melting Greenland Ice (MSNBC)

19. Arctic - Arctic Winter Ice 1979-2006 (Animation) (NASA)
20. Arctic - Arctic Atmosphere Very Clean This Year (2007) (Science Daily)
21. Arctic - Arctic Ocean Circulation Does An About-Face (Science Daily)
22. Arctic - Arctic Sea Ice Re-Freezing at Record Pace (The Daily Green)
23. Arctic - Dirty Snow May Warm Arctic As Much As Greenhouse Gases (Science Daily)
24. Arctic - North Atlantic Warming Tied To Natural Variability (Science Daily)
25. Arctic - Reports of Record Arctic Ice Melt Disgracefully Ignore History (NewsBusters)
26. Arctic - Scary Arctic Ice Loss? Blame the Wind (Science)
27. Arctic - Winds, Ice Motion Root Cause Of Decline In Sea Ice, Not Warmer Temperatures (Science Daily)

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

"These propositions, Mr Chamberlain submits (and I accept), are
supported by a vast quantity of research published in peer-reviewed
journals worldwide and by the great majority of the world's climate
scientists. Ms Bramman explains, at paragraph 14 of her witness
statement, that:

"The position is that the central scientific
theme of Al Gore's Film is now accepted by the overwhelming majority of
the world's scientific community. That consensus is reflected in the
recent report of the IPCC. The role of the IPCC is to assess on a
comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific,
technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the
scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential
impacts and options and adaptation and mitigation. Hundreds of experts
from all over the world contribute to the preparation of IPCC reports,
including the Working Group I report on Climate Change 2007: The
physical Science basis of climate change, published on 2 February 2007
and the most recent Mitigation of Climate Change, the Summary for
Policy-makers published by Working Group III on 4 May 2007. A copy of
both documents are annexed to the Witness Statement of Dr Peter Stott.
The weight of scientific evidence set out by the IPCC confirms that
most of the global average warming over the last 50 years is now
regarded as "very likely" to be attributable to man-made greenhouse gas
emissions.""

Errors are listed as 'errors' in the findings - and discussed.

1. I have no doubt that Dr Stott, the Defendant's expert, is right when he says that:

 

"Al Gore's presentation of the causes and likely effects of climate change in the film was broadly accurate."

Mr Downes does not agree with this, but to some extent this is
because the views of the Claimant's expert, Professor Carter, do not
accord with those of Dr Stott, and indeed are said by Dr Stott in
certain respects not to accord with the IPCC report."

 

 

1 - attempt at rhetorical question?

2. I don't know, why are you assuming I've watched it? - I'm guessing you are attempting a setup for some point of one of your arguments, so again, perhaps this is a rhetorical question. But I imagine a qualified scientist would have the best information and research available to develop and create any needed presentation. And that Al Gore, as well as most any interested person of average intellegence can read and learn from the reports and studies.

I see you didn't attempt to debate anything that Danbo linked in his post.  In a debate, that is generally considered to be a concession of the point.

You haven't been willing to debate any science with me either.  Why is this?  Could it be that you really don't know any science?  This would be good for you.  It might even cure you of your AGW hallucinations.

Let's see how much you really understand about this hogwash the Alarmists are spreading.   Explain the functionality of IR radiation absorption with increasing concentration of the absorptive species in a gaseous medium.  This is simple science.  It has been around literally for centuries.  You should be able to find many decent explanations online.  Once you have a grasp of how this works, we xcan continue.  Alternatively, I will expalin the theory behind this.