Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 11, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'
  • Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now

Matt Lauer on CNN: Katie’s Newscast Could Still Be a Smash....Like M*A*S*H

By Tim Graham | June 14, 2007 | 05:14

Change font size:  A |  A
Tim Graham's picture

On Wednesday night’s "Larry King Live," NBC’s Matt Lauer tried to play the politician in the middle of the Rather vs. Couric publicity feud, stressing his "great respect" for the disgraced Rather and how this is "inside baseball" that most Americans don’t care about. (Yeah, right.) But his attempt to please everyone grew ridiculous when he called Katie’s increasingly historic ratings lows part of a "normal feeling-out period" and that some times, it takes time for a program to be a big hit: "I mean look at the history of some of the shows in primetime that went on to become huge successes, like 'M*A*S*H' and 'Cheers,' and things like that, where in the beginning they were -- you know what, they fell flat."

Let’s hope Katie gives him credit to Matt for his willingness to look silly on her behalf, as the entertainment equivalents of her "Evening News" stint might be more like "Cop Rock." A flop.

Lauer went on the King show to plug NBC's upcoming overcoverage of the tenth anniversary of Lady Di's death, and he interviewed Prince William and Prince Harry, which he found odd, since he claimed he's not a royal-watcher. Here’s the relevant part of the transcript:

LAUER: You know I like Dan Rather a lot and I have always respected him. I was a fan of his when he was on the air. I'm not sure what the upside is for Dan Rather to be making comments about this. I don't know. I think it's a lose/lose situation. I think the words he chose in his original statement were probably poorly chosen. I don't think you use some of the words he did in connection with Katie or that broadcast. I think the controversy is an inside baseball controversy when it comes right down to it. I think we're interested in it.

KING: Ohio doesn't care?

LAUER: I don't think so. I mean I think you'll find it on a lot of media websites. I think you'll find it being talked about in this cafeterias in this building and at NBC. And it's clearly at CBS. But I don't think that what Dan Rather says or what Les Moonves says is going to make a difference to someone sitting in Middle America. I don't think so.

KING: Do you take offense that Dan would refer to the "Today Show" effect on the "CBS Evening News" as dumbing it down?

LAUER: No. I mean if that was his intention to relate dumbing it down to the "Today Show," then, you know, do I take offense? I go back to my original statement, Larry, is I'm not sure what the upside is for Dan Rather being removed from the situation right now to make that kind of comment. But again I have great respect for him. I'm not sure what caused him to do it.

KING: Do you think he still might be angry?

LAUER: I mean I think a lot of people who listened to the comments and who read the articles in the paper that both you and I have read might attach that meaning to it, that maybe there's bitterness there. But again I think it's time to move on. And I think, you know, enough has been said about Katie. You know she's a friend of mine and someone I worked with for, you know, more than 10 years.

KING: Terrific girl.

LAUER: Terrific. And you know I think there's something that's been unfair in dealing with this situation over there is -- and I spoke to Katie a lot before she left, but after it was known that she was going to CBS and I do not -- I never got the feeling from Katie that she thought she was going to go over there and change the game like this, that the playing field would just be turned upside down. I think she thought -- as a matter of fact she said this to me on a number of occasions, this was going to be a long process and there were going to be advances and setbacks. And so I don't think she ascribed to the hype that was attached to her move. And as a result I don't think she should be penalized for what is, I think, a normal feeling out period.

KING: Do you think CBS will stay the course with her?

LAUER: I don't know. I can't read their minds.

KING: You never know about management.

LAUER: You never do. And I hope they do and I hope they give the show a fair shot because any of us who works in this business, none of us wants to be the victim of a knee-jerk reaction. You know there's some things that just take time. I mean look at the history of some of the shows in primetime that went on to become huge successes like, "M*A*S*H" and "Cheers," and things like that, where in the beginning they were -- you know what, they fell flat.

KING: "60 Minutes."

LAUER: "60 Minutes." You know, let's give somebody a chance and let's not -- but above all, let's not make it personal.

Share this

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Dan Rather
  • Katie Couric
  • Matt Lauer
  • CBS
  • CBS Evening News
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)
  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.