Did Time's Joe Klein Have John Kerry 'Craving His Approval' As An Adviser in 2004?

Photo of Tim Graham.

In Monday's Washington Post, media reporter Howard Kurtz relayed that Time columnist Joe Klein may have succumbed big time to the stickiest temptation of a national political writer – advising the liberal standard-bearer on how he should win the presidency. (When he doesn't, deny you were ever an adviser, even unofficially.) Klein, renowned back in 1992 as a Clinton toady, reportedly had Kerry eating out of his hand, playing the guru to Kerry at his own abode:

Were some pundits advising John Kerry's presidential campaign while critiquing it for the public? In his new memoir "No Excuses," veteran Democratic consultant Robert Shrum says Time columnist Joe Klein doubled as a "sometime adviser," and that the Massachusetts senator "craved his approval."

Klein "would chastise Kerry on the phone when he didn't like a speech, counseling both Kerry and me about what the candidate should say and what our strategy should be," down to the kind of health care plan the senator should propose, Shrum writes. There were "several long evenings at Joe's house where he importuned me with his ideas for the Kerry campaign."

This raises the old George Will controversy: can a journalist advise a candidate, and then go out on television and sing his praises? (In 1980, Will helped prepare Ronald Reagan for a debate and then praised him for his performance. Liberals pounced on the revelation as "Debategate" when it came out.) It's still interesting to wonder how much Klein helped advise Kerry on his convention speech as he praised the candidate on CNN:

"People who served with him in Vietnam said, ‘You can't believe what he's like in battle. He just changes. He gets this look over him.' And when I saw him walking down the aisle tonight on the way into the speech, I said, ‘Oh yeah, there's that look.' And I just knew at that point that he's going to nail this, and he did. I have never seen the man speak so well." — Time's Joe Klein on CNN's NewsNight, July 29, 2004.

It should not be surprising that Klein would ooze praise over Kerry since he was an unpaid adviser. (And since Klein lied his face off, even to his Newsweek bosses, about being the "Anonymous" author of the faux-Clinton best-selling novel Primary Colors, who would believe him if he denied advising Kerry?) 

In responding to Kurtz, Klein trots out an incredibly lame line that he's not "advising" the candidate when they come to his house for long hours of advice, he's having "issue arguments" with the candidate (the man who apparently "craves his approval"):

Klein says Shrum is getting even for the columnist's criticism of him in an earlier book. "I never, ever give political advice to these people," he says. "I have issue arguments with them. If they ask how the horse race is going, I tell them."

Kerry once asked him if he should fire his first campaign manager, Jim Jordan, and Klein says he responded that he had no idea. He says that he pleads guilty to kicking around universal health care with Kerry but that he has been having such conversations with politicians, such as Hillary Clinton, for years.

For how many seconds would Klein tolerate the notion that when Dick Cheney talked to old friends in the oil industry about an energy strategy, that the oil industry is not "advising" Cheney, they were merely having "issue arguments"?

Klein's desire to be a booster/adviser for a Democratic candidate is long-established. Back in 1992, we noted that Klein was scorned by other liberals for his flagrant boosterism for Bill Clinton among the press corps (see "Clinton's Conformity Cops"):

Howell Raines, the departing Washington Bureau Chief of The New York Times, told the Columbia Journalism Review that "he made it a main job to warn against and protect his younger campaign reporters from the `Conformity Cops,' specifically [former Washington Post reporter Sidney] Blumenthal and Joe Klein of New York magazine and since the spring, of Newsweek." Since writing an adoring profile of Clinton in New York last year, Klein was not only added to the Newsweek staff, but to CBS News as a consultant as well. Warned Raines: "When reporters go around campaign planes criticizing reporters who refuse to cheerlead, that's unhealthy. That's part of what we've seen this year."

Kurtz also reported that Shrum claimed former Clinton toady Paul Begala, criticized Kerry on CNN for doing the things that Begala recommended to him. Begala, who vaguely told CNN that he was informally advising Kerry, is not in the Joe Klein category because he's never really pretended to be a disinterested observer in the campaign process.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Classic conflict of interest.

Most professions have a code of ethics that are required to be followed when even possible conflicts of interest arrise. Apparently journalism has none. In medicine or law or almost any respected profession, this behavior would be enough to fire the individual and ruin their career. In "journalism" it is apparently a career booster.

It's no wonder that more and more people are disbelieving what they hear from the MSM. They are increasingly looked on as pundits and propagandists, not journalists.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

Joe Klein

I agree.  The professional journalist no longer has an ethics code.  When the journalist is in bed with those that he is supposed to report on and observe he cannot be trusted.  It doesn't matter what political affiliation they subscribe to, they cease to be an observer when they join the ranks of the group.  If any newspaper or magazine wants to hire Joe Klein, fine, but label his work as that of a partisan and for which group.  The same goes for all, even George Will.  Don't lie to me and tell me you are impartial then go have tea with Queen Hillary and giver her marital advice on how to deal with the Bill problem.

These people are scum because they lie and pretend they aren't lying.  Like I said, no ethics.  The journalism schools should be scrapped and overhauled because they are obviously broken.

Klein and ilk

Don't 'Opinion Writers" fall into a different class of journalist than "News reporters"?  Ernie Pyle didn't promote the Nazi standpoint. Ben Stein didn't promote Socialism equally with Capitalism.  George Snuffleupagus tries to hide his bias, but not too hard.  And George Will has espoused Conservative ideals as far back as I can remember.

We need partisan pundits.  "Middle of the road" is pablum.  We also need News reporters. (too few of them)

We cannot interchange "reporter" and "opinion writer" even though both are journalists.

I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.

RO, you are certainly right t

RO, you are certainly right to suggest that we need pundits that have opinions, even firm ideologies. In this "Debategate" case, it was not the offense that Will was pro-Reagan, but that he failed to disclose his own involvement in the debate, which certainly would give a profound sense to the viewer of his own personal involvement in the performance evaluation. The same goes for Klein. So it's a disclosure issue, not a bias issue.

It's not that Klien is a reporter or opinion writer...

It's that he was trying to work as a 3rd party newspaper writer and as a campaign advisor at the same time. I have no problem with doing one or the other, but not both at the same time. Pick one. If he wanted to work for and advise the Kerry campaign, then fine, take a leave of absence from the newspaper.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

Dumb Shrum

The tidbits coming from Shrum about Kerry and company are quite revealing, and further confirm why we should all be glad he is not president.

However, does anyone have the slightest notion as to how Shrum manages to keep getting the gigs he does while sporting one of the longest losing streaks in the history of politics?

Now one might argue that the pathetic candidates he has been stuck with have been far less than ideal, but at some point one might actually take a step back and take a hard look at whether they would want to employ this perpetual loser.

It's very much like how Susan "Giganto-Head" Estrich continues to get talking head gigs on the major networks with the Dukakis campaign at the top of her resume.

Please help me out here.

Um, better still, what the

Um, better still, what the h-e-double hockey sticks is George Stephanopulous doing acting like a non-partisan bystander?

These guys go from political adviser to journalist, or pundit, or whatever, and frankly, it stinks. Shows that use them should be required to run a "full disclosure" banner under them at all times, e.g. for Stephanopulous "worked as a political adviser for President Clinton"

Yes, indeed...

...

One can more or less accept the fact that Begala and Carville are partisan hacks extraordinaire, but when George The Marvelous casts a doe-eyed look into the camera lenses, feigning objectivity, it should be done with a scarlet CLINTONISTA tattooed to his mammoth forehead.

That should be required for anyone who ever worked for HILLBILL...including that opportunistic freak Dick Morris...who knows where he will be when the political tides start to turn.

Don't trust him, never will.

The difference is that Bega

The difference is that Begala and Carville have never pretended to be anything other than what they are. Stephanopoulos expects us to believe he is now non-partisan.

And the grilling he gave Edwa

And the grilling he gave Edwards takes care of that.  He's not just partisan, he's candidate-specific.

Precisely.

Precisely.

There is always hypocrisy whe

There is always hypocrisy when it comes to accountability when getting caught with your hands in the cookie jar if you have a 'D' behind your name.

I realize a lot of people do not know that some of these political hacks posing as journalists who are really working for a candidate behind the scenes one way or the other...never ever claim the simple fact that they are....and rant on and on as if they are non-partisan.

The only satisfaction I have is that the likes of Shrum and the rest of his ilk are for the most part losers.

Joe Klien....Mr. Anonymous...is one of them.

I wonder if the old George Wi

I wonder if the old George Will story is old-enough that Mr. Klein didn't ever comment on it? It might be worth doing a search for a media research group with, say, Lexis & Westlaw access. And if anyone can track him down, it might be fun to ask about Klein's Kerry help in terms of Will's debate help -- especially if the questioner can quote his take at the time on the issue.
JMR

Joe Klein isn't any better at

Joe Klein isn't any better at journalism than Shrum is managing campaigns.  Klein's bias is always apparent, andin the interest of openess, he ought to reveal work for political candidates.  Shrum, on the other hand, is not only  biased toward the party he works for, but he is one of the strange Washington creatures that defy political Darwinism:  He's a consistent loser.  This guy is something like 0-8 in national campaigns, yet he's invited to participate in panel discussions and pundit shows as if he has even the faintest grasp of what's going on.  The standard rule of thumb must be to listen to what Shrum recommends, and then do the opposite.   

It's to bad we no longer have Walt Kelly's Pogo comic strip around these days.  He would certainly have included 'the Shrum' in his array of political-parody characters.

Yes, yes...I suppose we ought

Yes, yes...

I suppose we ought not look a gift horse in the mouth when it comes to his constant involvement in national presidential campaigns.

My new piece of sage advice to the next Dem nominee will come in the form of a question, and is the title of one of my favorite movies:

WHAT ABOUT BOB?

It is also great comfort to know that as long as there are people willing to keep hiring this bastion of loserdom, the rest of us should never worry about getting work. The downside, of course, is that we would have to work for a Dem.