Jon Stewart Finds Bush 'Contempt for Democracy' As Russert Carps About Interviews

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

Tim Russert was Jon Stewart’s guest on The Daily Show Tuesday night. The main course on Stewart’s menu of questions: Bush-bashing. Don’t the Bush people have an “open contempt for democracy” when they don’t submit to the All-Powerful Russert on Meet the Press? How do they “get away with their belligerence?” And when David Gregory dances behind Karl Rove at the White House correspondents dinner, why doesn’t he lean in with a microphone and assert “you lied to everybody!”

Stewart made his "open contempt for democracy" outburst after Russert complained he hasn't interviewed President Bush since 2004, Vice President Cheney since last September, and didn't interview Defense Secretary Rumsfeld in the last three years of his tenure. But Bush has submitted to plenty of other interviews (including with NBC anchors Brian Williams and Matt Lauer) not to mention press conferences. The same goes for Rumsfeld. Russert insisted to Stewart that our leaders "cannot make tough decisions unless you're willing to answer tough questions." But when has Russert submitted to a tough, adversarial TV interview about his role in the Plame-Wilson war on the White House? Never.

Now consider the booking data for Meet the Press in the second Clinton term. A Nexis search suggests that President Clinton granted an interview to Russert for the show's fiftieth anniversary on January 9, 1997, and never returned in his second term. Vice President Gore appeared to make his first appearance of the second term on September 16, 2000 when he was a presidential candidate, and Hillary Rodham Clinton never submitted herself to Russert in that term, even as she ran for the Senate. Did Stewart whine that they had an "open contempt for democracy"? Were they belligerent?

Let's not forget that when some people interview Bill Clinton, they go a little soggy. Two of the lamest, softest touches interviewing Clinton in the last Global Initiative go-round last fall were...Jon Stewart...and Tim Russert. But the self-satisfied Russert was happy to equate himself with democracy "with a big D" and the First Amendment as well on the comedy channel: 

STEWART: Let me ask you a question, because you've met these guys. How does Karl Rove not have to come on your show on the CBS show, the ABC show, how does he get away with not being interviewed by anybody in the press? He's clearly at the center of so many political decisions at the White House. How do they keep him away from you guys?

RUSSERT: They just refuse. He just won't come on.

STEWART: Seriously. He'll just go (silly mumbling noise).

RUSSERT: You know, I think the problem is when the president said if he found out who was was the source of the leak about Valerie Plame, Joe Wilson's wife and the whole Scooter Libby trial that resulted from that, it is now very open that Novak had two sources, Richard Armitage from the State Department and Karl Rove at the White House. That's an area they don't want to go near. But it's interesting, Jon, because it's harder and harder to get someone from the administration to come on. I interviewed the President in February of '04. That was the last time.  Vice President Cheney, not since last September. Donald Rumsfeld, not the last three years that he was secretary of defense.

STEWART: But these guys will call you at 2:00 in the morning on super secret probation background and give you that kind of information.

RUSSERT: I wish they did.

STEWART: An anonymous -- Isn't that how, isn't this whole thing happened, that they called Matt Cooper and all these guys at midnight and went, “Joe Wilson's wife, C.I.A., Don't put my name down but that's what's going on,” but they won't speak out in, in public. Shouldn't they have to?

RUSSERT:  The First Amendment's interesting. [Stewart laughs.] Because you don't have to speak.

STEWART: But don’t they have –

RUSSERT: When I think of a responsibility of a public official – Yes, of course.

STEWART: Because they won't speak to congress either. You know, you see Gonzales. It’s as though they’re --

RUSSERT: Well, he has to because he was confirmed. But Rove....

STEWART: But he doesn't speak. He goes if front of congress. They say so this meeting that you had where you fired these eight attorneys, tell me about it. I don't remember that meeting.

RUSSERT: [Laughs.] I'll say. Gonzales won't come on Meet the Press.

STEWART: But isn't that just open contempt for-- what do they call it there? -- Democracy? At some level –

RUSSERT, effusing like Ed McMahon: With a Big D! With a Big D!

STEWART: At some level, isn't that contempt? ( Cheers and applause )

RUSSERT: All through history-- and Meet the Press has been on 60 years now. I've read every transcript, watched every show. 

STEWART: Back when it was an actual Gutenberg press. It was years ago.

RUSSERT: But you you cannot make tough decisions unless you're willing to answer tough questions. If you duck and bob and weave and avoid, then you're in a position where you try to do some things because you haven't gone out and tried to talk to people. One of the first things that someone who I've known all my life told me is that you just don't send an army to war. You gotta bring a country to war. That's what the disconnect is now. The vast majority of the american people do not believe Iraq has been worth the price we've paid in soldiers dying and in money.

STEWART: I think they believe that... ( cheers and applause ) That we've been... I honestly think too if they felt like we had been talked to as intelligent, sentient creatures that could help make that decision or learn it, there would not be this animosity and raw emotion. There would be more understanding.

Is there anyone outside the floating orbit of Jon Stewart super-fans who believes he would be more magnanimous to Bush if Bush groveled about how wrong he was? Russert sketched the scenario:

RUSSERT: Say, these are our judgments going in. And if they were proven to be true, starting with the weapons of mass destruction, then go out and talk to the American people as grown-ups and say, you know what? We missed it. Big time. Colossal intelligence failure.

STEWART: So how do they get away with their belligerence? Is it because they feel like our accountability moment is the election. Once that's over, everyone else is agin’ us, and we just have to circle the wagons and fight?

RUSSERT: Pretty much, I think that's the view. When the president’s at 28 percent approval,  they're in a position of hunkering down. And they don't think they can turn that around over the next 18 months. And so now the president has simply said, i think I'm right about this. And I'm going to see it through.

STEWART: And history 40 or 50 years from now when everyone is dead will judge me. That's whathe was saying. I have to show you thi clip though becauseis the part thais t most galling this is from the correspondents dinner from this year. This is Karl Rove... [Jumping around to a goofy rap, saying he’s “M.C. Rove.”]

Now, when you look at that, doesn't it make you crazy? First of all, David Gregory, your colleague, is standing behind him. Can't Gregory just lean in with a tape recorder and go, ‘Hey, man, you lied to everybody. What do you have to say about that?’ As he’s dance – At those dinners do you want to just....

RUSSERT: I try to miss the dinners. But i think Gregory did lean in with a microphone.

STEWART: Did he try to get him to answer something?

RUSSERT, kidding: I think they have it on tape. No.

STEWART: I didn't think so. Dammit! I hope you guys get the chance.

RUSSERT: So do I. I think it's really important for the country. It really is. ( Applause ) We keep making requests. (Cheers and applause)

He also said most of the 2008 contenders are afraid to come on for an hour and discuss the issues. Stewart didn’t want to change the subject:

STEWART: Bush, Cheney, Rove, those guys should have to sit down. And there should be like one of them jerry lewis telethons just 24 hours and we all should get to walk up to the mike and literally just – “What the (beep), man?” (Cheers and applause.)

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's troubling that one of Am

It's troubling that one of America's leading journalists, Tim Russert, would sit there and not challenge one thing that comes out of Stewart's mouth. I know that Jon Stewart says things like "no one should get their news from the Daily Show" and "it's comedy not news" ... I fail to see anything funny about his behavior. To me he is about as funny as Bill Moyers or Phil Donahue (and about as politically ignorant too).

That is because Tim Russert i

That is because Tim Russert is not a journalist. He was a political operative who, like Chris Matthews, slipped into the role of a journalist. He, like Matthews, is a propagandist for the Democratic Party. And Jon Leibowitz is a fundamentally ignorant small time stand-up comic.

And remember, Tim Russert, du

And remember, Tim Russert, during the Plame investigation, WOULD NOT testify in front of a grand jury but he would only give an interview in his lawyers office, WHAT UP WITH THAT?

Right, Tim.  The president's

Right, Tim.  The president's guys should all answer your questions, no matter how stupid, repetitive, or redundant they are.  If they don't, they're engaging in what you would call 'secret presidential powers'.  The news is whatever you want it to be, Tim.  You fit everything into your template.  No matter what conservatives say, it's all 'blah blah blah' until you interpret it into whatever YOU say it is in your template.  How depressing.

My dad keeps saying we need to pray to the Blessed Virgin for hope and enlightenment.  He keeps saying our prayers will be answered through her to Jesus.  My dad has more faith than I.  I think there's something dark and evil at hand wthin the media and the Democratic Party.  What their desired outcome is, I can't imagine.  But I think they're hoping for the downfall of American ideals and the downfall of American in general.  What other explanation is there?

I'll continue to read the many sites I bookmark.  But I feel there's no hope as long as TV, movies, and news in general are controlled by people who don't wish for America to prevail.  People need to open their eyes and see each side for what it is.  Americans know more about who Brittany Spears is sleeping with than which countries are under Muslim rule and what it means to Americans.  Scary.

Tonight's a bad night for me.  I'll check in again.  But I pray personally for my family, and generally for America.  I always pray for good to triumph over evil.

I sure hope I feel better tommorow after my coffee.

No one trusts anyone anymore,

No one trusts anyone anymore, so no one wants to have to answer questions from anyone.

Stewart believes that the administration should be accountable for their actions by explaining them to America.

They talk to the press every

They talk to the press every day.  This is just self-important whining.  This little interchange is just one more confirmation to me of the fact that the Media think they are or should be running this country.

mattm, I couldn't agree more.

mattm, I couldn't agree more.

Whining that the president won't do their show ... A little hissy fit, isn't it?

Then, slowly, it morphs into the idea that not doing their show means they don't want to talk to the people. (I must have missed the vote where we allowed this profit-seeking corporation to speak for us. If so, I want to vote on their news reporters and anchors ... and especially their opinion mongers on MSNBC.) And since Bush doesn't talk with them, the president must be (1) hiding something (2) afraid (3) hunkered down. Then, having made Karl Rove into Rasputin, they demand the privilege to cross-examine presidential aides, using only their prejudices to guide them.

The day that the chief executive of the United States, the leader of the free world, and the commander in chief during wartime is expected to answer a media subpoena from a Sunday morning talk show ... that's officially the day we shouldn't be taken seriously as a sovereign nation.

OK Tim---

OK Tim---  this is the church, these are the people,this is the grass , this is the steple-----

And how many interviews has

And how many interviews has Hillary given outside her comfort zone of Larry King and other Clinton loving members of the MSM?

Russert insisted to Stewart

RUSSERT: But you you cannot make tough decisions unless you're willing
to answer tough questions. If you duck and bob and weave and avoid,
then you're in a position where you try to do some things because you
haven't gone out and tried to talk to people.

Fox debates for dems any one?

dems on fox

Inconceivable

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.   

RUSSERT: But you you cannot

RUSSERT: But you you cannot make tough decisions unless you're willing
to answer tough questions. If you duck and bob and weave and avoid,
then you're in a position where you try to do some things because you
haven't gone out and tried to talk to people. One of the first things
that someone who I've known all my life told me is that you just don't
send an army to war. You gotta bring a country to war. That's what the
disconnect is now. The vast majority of the american people do not
believe Iraq has been worth the price we've paid in soldiers dying and
in money.

Couple of questions for Tim

How long did it take for Viet Nam to pass the body count in Iraq of US soldiers?

Which war surpassed the other in inflation adjusted dollars and when did they do it?

RUSSERT: One of the first t

RUSSERT: One of the first things that someone told me is that you just don't send an army to war. You gotta bring a country to war. Thankfully, myself and my always anti-war comrades in the MSM were successful in their determined goal of dividing the country on the war, starting in 2002.

Okay, okay, I took some liberties with Tim's words :p

Dems' open contempt for democracy

By the same logic, don't the Democrats have an open contempt for democracy when they refuse to have their debates on the Fox News Channel?  You gotta wonder if an Edwards White House <shudder!> would grant press credentials to FNC or let them in their news conferences.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised if a circus breaks out.

David Gregory, your colleag

David Gregory, your colleague, is standing behind him. Can't Gregory
just lean in with a tape recorder and go, ‘Hey, man, you lied to
everybody. What do you have to say about that?’

That's right, Jon, a White House social event is a perfect opportunity to dance up to Rove, shove a mic in his face and start a fight. That's why they love Jim Webb; because he went to a reception at the White House and was rude to the President. That's their idea of tough guys.

No class, all ass.

This pair of phonies gets h

This pair of phonies gets high sniffing each other's flatulence. Russell is a mama's boy and Stewart a smarty pants---schoolyard pariahs.

I used to like Jon Stewart,

I used to like Jon Stewart, back when he appeared on The Larry Sanders Show. Now, his (limited) success has turned him into an unfunny, strident, partisan. His “comedy” now consists of mugging to the camera, after reciting some tired liberal cliché.

Somehow, he thinks his bachelor’s degree in psychology gives him unique foreign policy expertise. The arrogance of this man is unsurpassed, as he relentlessly denigrates his intellectual superiors in the Bush administration. The truth is, while Condi was giving lectures on Tocqueville at Stanford, Stewart was studying spit-takes from Mel Brooks.

Define "limited." I don't th

Define "limited."

I don't think Stewart has ever claimed to have ALL the answers, but he does have a lot of questions as well as opinions.

Limited= Ratings on a niche

Limited= Ratings on a niche cable channel, lower than O’Reilly, but higher than Olbermann.

I’m not saying the guy’s devoid of talent-he’s quick on his feet, and able to improvise better than most comedians, without reverting to prepared shtick. He made a business decision to consistently piss off 49.4% of his potential clients, and I happen to be one of them. A comedian who adopts a liberal point of view is about as original and courageous as a banker who decides to wear Allen-Edmonds wing tips.

good point

Jon Stewart gets his ass kissed by the MSM like he's some sort of political genius, but the truth is that he's just another lib hack comedian who thinks he's way smarter than he really is. All he does like previously mentioned is repeat whatever the latest lib talking point is and make a face to the camera. Oooooh, you're so edgy Jon! I'd love to see Mark Levin tear him apart in a debate on foreign policy.

You must not watch the show.

You must not watch the show.

no, I used to

Wrong-o...I used to watch periodically up until around 2003 when Jon got a bad case of BDS. Then the show just turned into a non-stop conservative bash fest. I remember watching the night after the 2004 election and poor 'ol Jon was all pissed off that Bush was re-elected. Too bad.

Gotcha. I think originality

Gotcha.

I think originality in comedy is overrated and extremely rare. How many truly original comedians are out there? Steven Wright? Robin Williams?

The best part about the show I think is when he makes fun of not politicians but the media. I think that gets lost sometimes amongst all the political shots.