Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Forums » Off-Topic Discussion
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
  • Rachel Maddow Trumpets Inane 'Amish Bus Driver' Analogy for Obama Contraception Rule
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate

Most influential battle of all time

  • Login or register to post comments
28 replies [Last post]
Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:58pm
Carl Kolchak
Carl Kolchak's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 04/20/2006
I got into a pretty good discussion with my sister the other day, and I am fascinated by the ways certain battles change history. In my opinion the Battle of Hastings and Stalingrad are the 2 most influential battles of all time. I had argued with her that I thought Stalingrad beat out Hastings, but barely. I knew there were many many reasons that Hastings could be the most influential, but I took Stalingrad, because it marked the decline of the German offensive on the Eastern Front. They lost 250,000 soldiers to death or capture. The Germans were instructed to fight to the death, but 90,000 surrendered, of which only 5,000 survived the conlusion of the war. The Germans launched another offensive later called Operation Citadel, which was a huge undertaking in which the battle of Kursk took place. For those who like tanks I would suggest researching about this battle. It is the largest tank battle ever. This offensive failed as well, and they were in retreat afterwards. After the defeat of Stalingrad, the Germans had to continue to send many men and supplies to the Eastern Front. If Stalingrad had been a victory for them, they could have used many of the men and supplies they were sending to the Eastern Front, to the Western Front, and this would have created much more difficulties for the Allies in the West. Their defense in the West could have been much more formidable with those extra troops and supplies, and the outcome of the Western Front could have been much different. I think Stalin's paranoia would also affect the Soviets, because if he lost the city named after him, I think serious heads would have rolled at the Kremlin. The Battle of Moscow is also a very significant battle on the Eastern Front as well, as that also stopped the German offensive. So in the end I barely pick Stalingrad over Hastings, based on my opinion that WW2 takes on a whole new outlook if the Germans are victorious there. I thought I would open up this forum for those who are intersted in listing what you might think the most influential battle of all time is and why. You can really go back as far as you want, and say if this battle hadn't occured and these people been victorious, then you never even would have had a Stalingrad, and I concur with that, but I think the Germans have a very good chance of controlling Europe if they win at Stalingrad. I won't steal any of the thunder one might have for all the reasons why Hastings is the most influential, but for those that pick Hastings and think I'm crazy, just remember I only picked Stalingrad by a hair over Hastings. So feel free to list your most influential battle of all time if you wish, and the reasons why.
Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.