Looks like Senator Kerry knows all about it. Maybe he should elaborate next time?
(Yes I Know, his incredible liberal bias, left leaning ideas MADE him say this. Maybe the fact that he has been blue so long is an indication that he is going senile and doesn't know fact (9/11 truth) from fiction (official story)?)
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
You're going with THAT!Sena
April 23, 2007 - 09:29 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveYou're going with THAT!
Senator Kerry told both questioners he hadn't previously heard of those claims. This proves nothing other than a couple of people that believe in the conspiracy theories asked Senator Kerry what he knew about the theories...and that he doesn't know jack! Kerry saying, "I haven't heard that" and "I'll look into it" could also be a polite way of trying to end a conversation on a topic that he knows has zero credibility.
I can't believe you wasted your time posting this, unless of course you thought that we wouldn't watch it.
Why don't you just give up? You can be much more productive with your time working for a living.
"When life gives you lemons, make lemonade, and then toss it in the face of the person who gave you the lemons until they give you the oranges you asked for in the first place!" --Bill McNeal, NewsRadio episode 3.17
Once again, TP confuses 'innu
April 23, 2007 - 10:00 ET by NL207Once again, TP confuses 'innuendo' with 'evidence'. Questions about a WTC conspiracy directed at John Kerry, who does not believe in this conspiracy, by a couple of nuts who do, does not constitute evidence of anything except that Kerry does not give these charges any credibility and the two kooks do.
"I do know that that wal
April 23, 2007 - 11:04 ET by ThoughtPolice"I do know that that wall was in danger and they made a decision based on that danger that it had of destroying other things that they did it in a controlled fashion.."
Yea, that sounds like innuendo to me...
And what, pray tell, is his b
April 23, 2007 - 11:46 ET by NL207And what, pray tell, is his basis for this knowledge? None whatever that is presented in this video. Therefore, this is heresay, mere innuendo.
Still wrong, Thoughpolice.htt
April 23, 2007 - 15:46 ET by AvatarStill wrong, Thoughpolice.
http://www.popularme...
The Avatar
Avatar..Just thought I would
April 23, 2007 - 15:59 ET by bigtimerAvatar..
Just thought I would throw in same kind of link too...help out some.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=1
The more, the merrier, BT.
April 23, 2007 - 16:11 ET by AvatarThe more, the merrier, BT. The sad thing to me, is that it's no longer suprising to see americans so readily believe that this country is evil because of some screwball theory that has been thoroughly bleached.
The Avatar
TP...You guys still holding B
April 23, 2007 - 16:06 ET by Clear thinkerTP...
You guys still holding Big Foot hostage on that spaceship?
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Lol, you guys are funny whe
April 23, 2007 - 17:46 ET by ThoughtPoliceLol, you guys are funny when you get mad. You all come out in droves and pull the same tactics (like you have from day 1).
In response to Pop Star Mechanics, please stop posting them as a reliable source. They didn't do anything but propagate the already self destructed NIST and FEMA reports. They took their reports and said, "See, NIST says towers 1 and 2 collapsed due to damage/fire." However, if one were to look at what "research" NIST did, they would notice they said their investigation went only as far as the building was "poised" to collapse. This means that if indeed collapse had occured, thats where they stopped. Nothing after this "poise." If that is the case, which it is, NIST didn't show how UNIVERSAL collapse ensued.
Thats like me throwing a rock at a house and the house collapsing. I say, "Well, obviously When I threw the rock there was a potential for the house to collapse. Now, once the rock hit, the house collapsed. How? I don't know..."
If you want to see a rather ravage raping of the 9/11 Commission/FEMA/NIST reports, watch Kevin Ryans video here.
As well, if you want a "debunking" of 9/11 debunking, check out Dr. David Ray Griffins new book here.
Now I bet that some of you will come back and huff and puff (pun anyone?) about how none of this is true and its a figment of Elvis' imagination. Except, it is true.
John Kerry saying WTC 7 was brought down in a controlled fashion is only 1 iota of the amount of total evidence that points to its demise being CD.
So let me get this straight..
April 23, 2007 - 18:39 ET by AvatarSo let me get this straight...
You don't want us to cite Popular Mechanics, whose contributing editors, scientists, and engineers, have not only earned their degrees, but have DISTINGUISHED themselves in the field, whose IQs are higher than the entire membership of 911truth.org. At the same time, you expect us to take your sources (prisonplant, 911truth), who can barely find someone to whom the term 'expert' applies, as the definitive source? Did you read the article? Ever taken a 'Strength of Materials' course? Evidence suggests that you DON'T know what you are talking about. I am going to put my trust and my facts in with PEOPLE THAT KNOW, as well as the WELL ESTABLISHED publication for which they write, rather than a knee-jerk organization, looking to trash America and it's President for a theory so absurd, that it defies HUMAN reason.
The Avatar