
I think I might know the reason that Karl Rove didn’t want Sheryl Crow touching him. He’s read her blog, and he knows where her hand has been. What is it with these environmentalists and scatology? First there was “The Year Without Toilet Paper” in the New York Times, and now this. Muzak-friendly pop-rocker, Sheryl Crow and “An Inconvenient Truth” producer and private-jet aficionado Laurie David are on a cross-country college speaking tour to promote the idea of anthropogenic global warming. Crow is blogging her experiences at the Huffington Post, and this time, she really came up with a Duesey (emphasis mine throughout).
Apparently, Crow wants to save the Earth one toilet paper square at a time. She proposed “a limitation be put on how many squares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting” and perhaps “just washing that one square out.” She doesn’t seem to want to pass a law, just culturally berate us into obedience. Here is Crow’s “easy way” to be part of the solution to anthropogenic global warming:
Although my ideas are in the earliest stages of development, they are, in my mind, worth investigating. One of my favorites is in the area of forest conservation which we heavily rely on for oxygen. I propose a limitation be put on how many squares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don't want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. When presenting this idea to my younger brother, who's judgment I trust implicitly, he proposed taking it one step further. I believe his quote was, "how bout just washing the one square out."
I’d like to say she was kidding, but based on other global warming “solutions,” it is hard to tell. Wacky ideas abound. A man-made volcano shooting sulfur into the air, giant “space umbrellas” and even getting rid of toilets so we can compost our own waste in a box underneath the sink.
So, when Crow said that instead of paper napkins, we use a detachable “dining sleeve” on specially designed clothes to wipe the mouth:
I also like the idea of not using paper napkins, which happen to be made from virgin wood and represent the height of wastefulness. I have designed a clothing line that has what's called a "dining sleeve." The sleeve is detachable and can be replaced with another "dining sleeve," after usage. The design will offer the "diner" the convenience of wiping his mouth on his sleeve rather than throwing out yet another barely used paper product. I think this idea could also translate quite well to those suffering with an annoying head cold.
Sounds nutty, but it is any different than space suits keeping cow farts from killing Mother Earth or counting on UFO's to prevent global warming?
It’s too hard to tell when environmentalists are kidding. I’m not even sure if they know. One thing I do know is that the recent push of environmentalism into common culture is no accident. David told the Guardian that after the 2004 elections, she vowed to devote a year to “changing the national debate about global warming.” She exposed her methods with one revealing quote from a conversation with Robert F. Kennedy Jr, “We need to infiltrate popular culture!” That they did. I just hope that while they are infiltrating, they use hand sanitizer.
(h/t Daily Gut)



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
It is a good thing to limit
May 6, 2009 - 21:34 ET by Jackie BhenIt is a good thing to limit the use of toilet tissue if we care for the environment.I remember using portable toilets and seen how it was designed to limit the use of tissue paper.
Portable Toilets
June 5, 2009 - 17:18 ET by tshellI don't see what the big fuss is... portable toilet paper that is actually paper free can now be purchases all over the nation. In fact portable sanitation companies that are green offer this for environmentally friendly events.
Crow made her comments on
October 8, 2009 - 14:42 ET by debratrotterCrow made her comments on her blog last week, and Rosie took a moment on this morning's "The View" to express her incredulity at the supposedly enviro-friendly suggestion. "Have you seen my ass?!" bellowed Rosie, and Barbara Walters was good enough to warn viewers not to use their sleeves, another of Crow's helpful suggestions. Really funny :)
Thanks,
russian night vision goggles
Sheryl Crow should stick to s
April 23, 2007 - 05:51 ET by Dave RSheryl Crow should stick to singing, as she apparently possesses all the intellect of a jar lid.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
Sheryl Crow should stick to s
April 24, 2007 - 16:16 ET by Lynn DavidsonSheryl Crow should stick to singing, as she apparently possesses all the intellect of a jar lid.
But a jar lid that has instant media access to get her message out and can influence millions of the 25 and under set.
She posted it on April 19th
April 23, 2007 - 06:17 ET by sarcasmoShe posted it on April 19th, but I'm still left thinking this must be some form of April Fool joke and I'm somehow not-getting it... And she also can't be serious when she's saying paper napkins are from virgin forests instead of tree farms meant for paper, either. Maybe she's on "our" side, and is saying progressively more outrageous stuff on the Huffblog until others figure it out??
JMR
Why not set an example
June 2, 2009 - 13:10 ET by mikeseWhy not set an example Sheryl if your not happy about how much toilet paper being used go buy some adult reusable cloth diapers and go to the bathroom in your pants then just carry a diaper bag with you and change your self each time you need to? There's an option? I'm certainly going to clean my self thoroughly and not worry about how much toilet paper is being used. I even got a double flush elongated toilet to keep things efficient. Some of the comments celebrities make really surprise me.
I read it several times trin
April 24, 2007 - 16:36 ET by Lynn DavidsonI read it several times tring to find a little ackknowlegment that it was a joke. To my initial disbelief, I found none. I read it and found no indication that she was being silly. That is why I included the statement that she could be kidding; there is still a part of me that can't believe she is serious.
So many environmentalists seem to think that indoor plumbing is an unethical luxury, which if we really, really cared about Gaia, we would do without. I don't know about you, but I'm not a fan of e.coli.
Now that environmentalists have gotten people's attention, and the attention has been positive, I think we will see them relax and reveal their true, hardcore beliefs and ideas. It goes way beyond just keeping the rainforest from being cut down, they literally want Americans to compost their own human waste instead of using indoor plumbing. We're going to see more and more of these bizarre ideas and statements as they grow more comfortable.
On being touched by Sheryl Crow
April 23, 2007 - 06:32 ET by whodatNo thanks, I'll hover.
Toilet-paper, Global-Warming... leftists are on a roll!
April 24, 2007 - 16:05 ET by PlaceboIs this the best this leftist warbler can come up with? I realise these woollen-headed leftists are more astute than the average schmuck, or so they say; but this “woman” is a log or six short of a load.
I wish the amount of toilet paper used in my home, and others, was all I have to be concerned about. Crow should check out Pelosi and her gaggle’s toilet paper usage… they likely go through more than California and the state of New York.
I wish the amount of toilet p
April 24, 2007 - 16:55 ET by Lynn DavidsonI wish the amount of toilet paper used in my home, and others, was all I have to be concerned about.
That exactly right. To Crow and the other celebrities who are hyper-environmentalists, this kind of thing is at the top of their list for importance--at least that's what they say. It definately shows a divide between most Americans who worry about less chic things like their kids' health, paying a bill and concentrating on getting a promotion or raise.