Time’s cover story on Don Imus this week is authored by TV writer James Poniewozik, and he appeared on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal on Friday morning to plug it. I haven’t seen the whole hour, but just caught the end, when a caller from Manteca, California said that while the Time writer had suggested Imus was for the white elites, he said it seemed to him like a show for liberal elites, so "I kind of feel it’s the left eating their own."
Poniewozik had an interesting response to the caller: "I don’t know if I would go so far as to call every journalist who regularly appeared on Imus liberal off hand, but I think he makes an excellent point. I mean, frankly, in a lot of the major media, there’s this knee-jerk immediately dismissive attitude toward Fox, that among a lot of the same people in the same circles that would go on Imus and shrug all the stuff that he did off. That general point, I think the caller has absolutely right."
Poniewozik, not to be mistaken for a conservative – who worked for the left-wing website Salon.com before his hiring at Time -- explored the Imus issue and its strange lack of standards in comparison to rap or movies like Borat, but the weirdest passage was when he used the word "conservative" in the same sentence as "Jon Stewart," which is word play at its loosest:
Punditry and gonzo comedy have become less and less distinguishable. (And I'm not talking here about The Daily Show, whose host Jon Stewart is, ironically, one of the most conservative defenders of the idea of sober, evenhanded news — see his 2004 tirade against Tucker Carlson.)
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
"it seemed to him like
April 16, 2007 - 12:25 ET by JDW"it seemed to him like a show for liberal elites, so "I kind of feel it’s the left eating their own"
The dems have probably just realized the same.
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
If you are going to whine about spelling... get a life
Imus not pro-Hillary
April 16, 2007 - 13:22 ET by kwStrange that they took this lefty out like they did...but then again he was not pro-Hillary. He might have been pro-Kerry, but definitely not pro-Hillary.
The news media is spinning
April 16, 2007 - 16:36 ET by JDWThe news media is spinning the Obama/sen Clinton race, he ain't close.
She was behind retiring Imus but for very different reasons. She simply wants complete and total media control.
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
If you are going to whine about spelling... get a life
I saw that segment. His respo
April 16, 2007 - 13:20 ET by winston smithI saw that segment. His response to the caller was suprisingly not the standard nasty send off you'd expect from a liberal "TV writer". To be sure, he did manage to get off a couple of cheap shots on Ann Coulter.
It seems every time I watch C-SPAN they're interviewing liberal writers, politicians, "entertainers", and news people. It would be nice to see a conservative media expert like Brent Bozell invited for commentary once in a while. Add the daily lunatic fringe callers to Washington Journal along with Chuck Todd of HotLine providing strategy for Nancy Pelosi and C-SPAN essentially becomes another misinformation outlet for the DNC.
C-Spam
April 17, 2007 - 07:13 ET by kiwikitI no longer can stomach watching this network. When first I retired from work as a senior software designer, (1989) I watched daily. Then they instituted their politically correct phone lines with every line bringing in another DNC Seminar screecher: the Dem line, of couse, and the GOP line, with liars pretending to have recently joined the liberals due to the awful Republicans. That got old quite soon, and boredom is something I can't tolerate, so Washington Journal moved from 'must see' to 'never watch.' I moved on to sites like this one and will never go back. Can anyone tell me the difference between C-Spam and NPR/PBS? A pretense of fairness doesn't make it so.
Forgive this aside:Can some
April 16, 2007 - 14:42 ET by kevcadForgive this aside:
Can somebody ask Brian Lamb why is CSPAN televised liberal NPR? It seems that they will always showcase Democratic or leftist events, gatherings, etc., but when it comes to the other side, it doesn't get as much coverage.
kev,They are getting asked th
April 16, 2007 - 16:46 ET by bigtimerkev,
They are getting asked that more and more, including Lamb... among other things like there obvious phone banked calls, they deny it all...uh-huh right we are all nuts out here...
I have been watching C-Span for well over fifteen years, it is obvious.
Period.
I have got to the point I do not care if I miss the Washington Journal at times like I used to...they have become an arm of the DNC years ago, they just did it incrementally, it is just obvious now and they do not care.