http://www.reuters.c...

========Headline : Bush ex-strategist says loses faith in president====================

Oh yeah, Reuters. YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!! WHOHOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'd bet that makes your anti-bush willies get off really good by publishing that headline eh? You'all are bunch of sick b***ards, you know that?

============Last paragraph: The Times said Dowd cited Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois as the only 2008 presidential candidate who appeals to him but said the idea of mission work also was attractive as a way to "re-establish a level of gentleness in the world."===============

So you idiots over at reuters knew full well the same thing that I know.

The last paragraph negates the entire article. Go ahead. Now you try. Read this.

==========BUSH EX-STRATEGIST SAYS LOSES FAITH IN PRESIDENT

But Matthew Dowd cited Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois as the only 2008 presidential candidate who appeals to him but said the idea of mission work also was attractive as a way to "re-establish a level of gentleness in the world.==========

The third from the last paragraph isn't much better.(the one which mentions his son's deployment) The guy is an anti-war activist now. But don't expect *that* level of honesty from reuters.

It makes me wonder if the media actually has an anti-bush quota of articles that they have to fill in order to make their liberal corporate bosses happy. What do you think?