After our big party, I found this joke pretty appropriate for this week's joke:
One night a man got really drunk one night in his local pub. The barman refused to serve him any more alcohol and told him he should be heading home. The man thought this was a good idea so he stood up to leave but fell over straight away. He tried to stand up again but only fell over again. He thought if only he could get outside and get some fresh air he'd be grand.
So he crawled outside then tried to stand up and fell over again. In the end after falling over lots more he decided to crawl home. When he got back to his house he pulled himself up using the door handle but as soon as he let go he fell over again. He had to crawl up the stairs and managed to fall over onto the bed and fell asleep. When he finally woke up the next morning his wife asked him what he was doing at the pub last night. He denied it but she thought differently...
"I know you were there..." she said. "The bartender rang to say you forgot your wheelchair again...."
Comments Policy
I'll say it again, "cue Godfather Soundtrack."
March 30, 2007 - 10:44 ET by sarcasmoHere's why. I think we're seeing a dying RINO, folks! :) And for the recent-history impaired, this is the same loser responsible for the initial "success" of Iraq's police "force."
JMR
Gee, Sarcasmo, Compared to i
March 30, 2007 - 11:04 ET by JayTeeGee, Sarcasmo, Compared to issues during 8 years of Clinton as President, this is a Non Event.
The only "Ending" in site is General Pelosi is setting herself up as a great thinking General.......I'm waiting for Pelosi to tell us how she derived the "Withdrawal" date. I'm sure a lot of thinking and plotting went into arriving at "Fall of 2008"........I'm sure It wasn't just an arbitrary date connected to politics, as ALL the Generals have "Victory" and the "Troops" in mind, when planning these things.
I mean..you dont' wanna withdraw troops until after you win...do you ? And you don't just look at a political Calendar and pick a date based upon Politics..do you ?
At Times like these, it becomes more than just a Moral Obligation to express ones opinion, it becomes a Pleasure.
I disagree. And saying “B
March 30, 2007 - 11:22 ET by sarcasmoI disagree. And saying “Bernard Kerik has acknowledged his violations, but this should be evaluated in light of his service to the United States of America and the city of New York" is just excuse-making for criminality, in my book. No dice.
JMR
As much as I know how every
March 30, 2007 - 10:45 ET by DyneAs much as I know how everyone on this site loves to defend President Bush's policies, this is something that any American who loves the Constitution needs to know about regardless of political affiliation: Good-bye United States, hello North American Union
Also, we'd expect the MSM to attach to something like this like a leech. Where's the outrage?
The choice between being among most of the Republicans or Democrats within the government today is a choice on what you'd rather sell your soul for: money or power.
The MSM (and the far-left) wi
March 30, 2007 - 11:06 ET by SouthJersey1953The MSM (and the far-left) will continue to ignore this subject because they are IN FAVOR of it and know tht it can only move forward if the general public is kept in the dark.
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for. - Will Rogers
Where is the MSM
March 30, 2007 - 11:33 ET by dallas7107Where is the MSM on the following story?
Here is the link http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/009536.php
How long will it take the MSM to pick this up?
I doubt they will.
I've been disenchanted with
March 30, 2007 - 12:19 ET by The Wicked ConservativeI've been disenchanted with Bush for some time now regarding his desire to see a united Meximericanada. But more frustrating than anything is his lack of a spine in the face of the lib***ls. I just wish someone besides Ann Coulter had the sauce to attack them properly. Start with a joint session of congress and open with "Who the hell do you people think you are?" Then proceed to highlight the hipocrisy of the left in America. Sure it would take a couple weeks but I think it would be worth while. In the right forum the media would have to cover it in some form or another.
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realizes that it bears a very close resemblence to the first.
- Ronald Reagan
Somewhere in Crawford
March 30, 2007 - 12:51 ET by misterbillSomewhere in Crawford, about 2 years ago, the President tried to vault over a barbed wire fence. He did not make it all the way and left two important parts of his anatomy hanging on the fence.
He should go back, find them, and see if they can be rejoined to his body.
I was with him all the way on Iraq and still am. I think he is selling us out to a "vision". I do not ever want to be a citizen of Mexamericanada. We are a distinct and great society. We come from men and women of freedom and valor (excluding cut and run Libs , of course). We are surrendering our Great Society without a struggle. 75% of our public are uninformed and apathetic. They do not understand the gravity of cut and run or of open borders. They are sitting on their butts watching reality shows as their country is slowly dieing.The other 25% are fighting a valiant but losing fight. I may not live to see it happen because of my age. But, I damn sure will go down fighting. That means anyone , including GW, if necessary.
We need another Revolution to restore our Republic to its former status. The orruption of an effeminate Western Europe permeates our public officials.
Where ’s the coward that would not dare to fight for such a land?
Sir Walter Scott
Those fences can be tricky,
March 30, 2007 - 13:04 ET by The Wicked ConservativeThose fences can be tricky, heehee. You're damn right this is a distinct and great society. Despite everything MSM tells us more peolpe want to come to America than leave. From now on let it be understood when the term "American" is used as a noun it shall henceforce be understood to exclude liberals. I believe the country is far better off than 25% American. I think liberalism would be regarded as merely a cult were it not for the complicit MSM.
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realizes that it bears a very close resemblence to the first.
- Ronald Reagan
wicked---the 25%
March 30, 2007 - 13:18 ET by misterbillwicked---the 25% I referenced are those who know what is happening, There are a lot of good Americans in the other 75%. Some of them are just lazy, some are young. When I was in my 20s I never watched the news. My fear is that of the old saying, "you never miss the water until the well runs dry." Most of what the young folks see/hear is so Lib biased and they just accept it. As i would, if I hadn't got interested in seeking the truth. And , God help us, the young ones in school (esp college) hear radical lib ideas all the time. When you have something good that is yours, there is always someone who wants to take it.
And within America there are a large number of self-loathing people who would give it all away. (At least, that's what their professors taught them to do.)
Where ’s the coward that would not dare to fight for such a land?
Sir Walter Scott
very cute
March 30, 2007 - 13:30 ET by tumbler_2007misterbill thinks everybody buys his dump on our President; crude insinuations about W's manhood. But we're proud of him. He's as gutsy as any public official in our United States currently.
I always wonder about the courage of a man who defames another one when he's not there to defend himself. Cowards are always brave in front of their friends. It's a real man who can hold his head high in the presence of his enemies. Bush is twice the man misterbill ever was, IMHO. Cheap shots at Bush's testicles are kid stuff.
Alexander the Great said: "I am never afraid of an army of lions led into battle by a Lamb. I fear more the army of lambs who have a Lion to lead them." This is precisely why, with all his faults our President is head and shoulders above his detractors. He's a lion leading our country's muttonheads.
Tumbler, please concisely a
March 30, 2007 - 13:38 ET by The Wicked ConservativeTumbler, please concisely and in a rhetoric free way explain why every person living in our country illegally is not a criminal. Why do they deserve the benefits automatically bestowed upon them for breaking our laws. Please explain. I ask because this is the issue MrB and I take up against El Presidente and imagine that's why you're running to his defense at this moment.
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realizes that it bears a very close resemblence to the first.
- Ronald Reagan
wicked conservative, You ca
March 30, 2007 - 13:42 ET by John in CAwicked conservative, You cannot ask Tumbler questions. If you do you are cross-examining and interrogating him, and he won't put up with it.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
just shut up about Bush
March 30, 2007 - 14:05 ET by tumbler_2007I have never said illegal immigrants deserve all the benefits of legal citizenship. They have entered illegally and that's technically a criminal offense. Nevertheless, they should not be demonized for doing something out of dire necessity. They're living from day to day in this country. Not a single one puts up any resistance to the immigration authorities whenever they're captured. They go through the hopeless disappointment and humiliation without a fight. WHY ?
They love life in the United States. Many have spent years dreaming about it.
Should I care ? Maybe not. But I will not tolerate a constant drumbeat of hatred and false indignation on the part of our nastier American citizens. I'm a native-born hispanic American and I feel compassion for the poor. So does George W Bush , God bless him !
That isn't a fault, it's a virtue. I'm not an enemy of my country, as a few @ss-wholes here tell me I am. I love America, but I will never look down on impoverished Mexicans. If anyone thinks I ought to, they can go to hell. (As concise and calm as I can say it.)
"Technically a criminal offense?"
March 30, 2007 - 14:10 ET by RJ"Technically a criminal offense?" Bwahahahahahahaha!
Yeah, well George Bush should accept his technical responsibilities as Commander In Chief and protect our borders. Until he does that, he's technically derelect in his duties.
correct, sherriff
March 30, 2007 - 14:19 ET by tumbler_2007That's all. bwaaachuckle chuckle.
It must be, otherwise they'd be prosecuted & sent to prison.
George Bush should accept his technical
March 30, 2007 - 14:31 ET by RJAnd, if George Bush accepted his technical Constitutional responsibilities as Commander In Chief, he would stand up and protect our borders. Until he does that, he's technically derelict in his duties.
P.S. Has anyone else wondered why Tumbler is the only poster taking the liberal position on illegals? Perhaps the leftists are satisfied with his effort on their behalf?
listen, who cares?
March 30, 2007 - 15:50 ET by tumbler_2007Who cares what you think about George Bush ? You're a mere cipher in the overall attention of millions of good Americans, nobody knows you.
I'm more interested in what Wicked Conservative says now, after seeing my concise self-revealing answer to his challenge. He hasn't come back to bash me, so it might be OK. I hope so, I tried to be courteous and friendly to Mr. Wicked.
"Techniclly a criminal offense" example..
March 30, 2007 - 14:27 ET by bassndudehttp://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyid=2007-03-30T183926Z_01_N30263335_RTRUKOC_0_US-CRIME-IMMIGRANTS.xml&src=rss&rpc=22
This is technically a criminal offense..Tumbles, your not gonna like this at all. And no, I am not advocating this type of behaviour.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
probably a rival gang
March 30, 2007 - 16:26 ET by Ten7sThat was probably perpetrated by a rival gang of coyotes/smugglers. Mexican gang violence is getting bad on the border. "The Law of Lead and Silver"- I think they call it. Not pretty.
Ah Crap...
March 30, 2007 - 14:12 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasHere he goes again...someone get this man his meds!
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
meds for art & tom & guy
March 30, 2007 - 14:23 ET by tumbler_2007He needs a magic elixir, in fact. GAT has multiple personalities. Or, as they said in olden times, he's a three-headed hydra.
And here he comes again to scream at old Tumbler.
"Not a single one puts u
March 30, 2007 - 14:20 ET by florida_chad"Not a single one puts up any resistance...................."
You make such large, stupid generalizations that you cannot possibly back up. DUMB.
thanks, chad from boca
March 30, 2007 - 14:46 ET by tumbler_2007Well, it appears that you read my whole post. Thanks; it's nice to have faithful readers. I'm flattered, my friend.
wicked-- we have an apologist
March 30, 2007 - 15:01 ET by misterbillwicked-- we have an apologist. I do not have artistic skills , but I was thinking of a comic book character. I title him "The Lurker". He, like a hungry vampire, can be seen sitting in the dark at his monitor. He keeps his claws sharpened, he waits until he smells blood, in terms of anything that will , in his opinion reflect on all the illegals he adores.
The Lurker reads , he leaps, he goes into ad hominems (Nazi, racist). If that doesn't work, he falls back on God, he accuses anyone of hating theses gentle beloved friends of his. He rushes to declare his standing with us on removing theses illegals. Then he refutes any evidence regarding the illegals impact on us and our economy. He persists in calling them Mexican (only about 40% of illegals are Mexican). He also keeps saying they are of another race. He will then tell you that you have no love in your heart.
Next he will again bring God into the discussion and deny you heaven if you are not a Catholic. He then slinks back into his corner, licking the warm salt liquid from his whiskers. In his mind, The Lurker has drained the blood of his victim, but it is only his tears that have fallen on his whiskers. A classic example of a psychotic personality.
You will never win an argument in his opinion. It will not matter how much proof you bring to the table. He is balmy.
He is the danger from within. More deadly to our country than any Liberal.
Where ’s the coward that would not dare to fight for such a land?
Sir Walter Scott
I 'm picturing someone...Th
March 30, 2007 - 15:17 ET by The Wicked ConservativeI 'm picturing someone...The Lurker
The age seems about right...just kidding around Tumbles with out a voice like yours around here how would we know how well off we all are to possess faculties like reasoning.
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realizes that it bears a very close resemblence to the first.
- Ronald Reagan
as curly would say----------
March 30, 2007 - 15:37 ET by misterbillPoifect! (He left his sombrero at home!)
listen to misterbill
March 30, 2007 - 15:39 ET by tumbler_2007Please; pay attention to everything misterbill tells you. He's never known to fight dirty; as Tumbler has, every time he told the truth.
He's telling it well; Tumbler is a fervent Catholic, he isn't ashamed of it. He speaks about his faith from the cyber-housetops. Unlike those cafeteria Catholics we all know, such as Teddy Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, John Freakin Kerry, and-- Misterbill; who pay LIP SERVICE to their faith. YET-- notwithstanding their hypocrisy, Tumbler has never consigned them anywhere except to God's everlasting love and mercy. Every one of them. -- It's imperative we should all pray for them, and most of all misterbill. he is no longer capable of even rising from his seat. Life is ebbing slowly for MB and he needs our prayers.
In your infinite mercy and wisdom, God Almighty; remember your servant (?) called misterbill;
Grant him the gift of final perseverance and forgive him his offenses, we entrust to You his immortal soul. In time we all hope and pray we can be together at the banquet table of our King and Redeemer, Jesus Christ, where all our past troubles shall be forgotten through His grace; Our Lord Jesus Christ, who lives and reigns with You in the union of the Holy Spirit, forever and ever. AMEN.--
I may be wrong. But I don't think Jesus would ever say Tumbler's balmy. Feisty, yes. Not balmy. Better quit now. R J will be cursing, It's all about YOU. So, enough about me.
Once again, your deep, intens
March 30, 2007 - 22:27 ET by UnsaneOnce again, your deep, intense refusal to even begin to understand the history and culture of Canada and Mexico is on display.
If this is such an apple-pie easy thing to accomplish, a fait accompli:
1) Why the the Canadians THROW A FIT over the SUGGESTION of a harmonization of customs laws and procedures in the wake of 9/11/01?
2) Why did Mexico come 380,000 votes shy of voting in an isolationist?
Well?
Do me a small favor, and run this by the people in Ottawa and Mexico City and watch their reaction...
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
dear unsane:
March 30, 2007 - 22:55 ET by tumbler_2007Who are you speaking to ?
Whose deep, intense refusal were you addressing ? Just asking.
Have you tried reading?
March 31, 2007 - 10:27 ET by Unsanedyne, and his laughable comments on a "North American Union". I am getting a little tired of conspiracy theories, as well as people who don't want to read.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Usane, sorry but I have to wi
March 30, 2007 - 23:19 ET by mandrakeUsane, sorry but I have to go with tumbler on this one. Who in Canada is throwing a fit? Are you talking about the fact that it recently went from ten days to two months to get a passport? Well, we will get over it..we canadians are a patient folk.
Tumble & Mandrake, I th
March 30, 2007 - 23:30 ET by John in CATumble & Mandrake, I think Unsane was responding to a comment waaaaay down the list from Dyne with charges of the coming North American Union.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
In the fall of 2001 I seem t
March 31, 2007 - 10:35 ET by UnsaneIn the fall of 2001 I seem to remember the Liberal government of the time throwing a fit over the suggestion from this country that Canada and the United States should harmonize customs laws/procedures, and criticism from the United States over its liberal immigration policies.
See, dyne and too many others (they would probably endure violent spasms and seizures if I were to as much as push them over the 49th Parallel, much less have them go anywhere else in the world) seem to think that come 2010, we are all going to wake up one morning and find a country that stretches from Nome to Merida. They ALL think it is apple-pie easy and a big fait accompli. What I am pointing out is that his little conspiracy theory is anything but.
Once upon a time, when I was visiting Ottawa, I mused to myself a thought I cannot help but believe is horribly unoriginal. There are two countries in the world that owe their existence to the Declaration of Independence signed on 4 July 1776. One nation is a reaction in favor (the United States). One is a reaction against (Canada).
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Unsane, I do wish you would e
March 31, 2007 - 14:34 ET by mandrakeUnsane, I do wish you would expand on this rather odd notion that Canada was created as a reaction against the Declaration of Independence. Canada has always been a British colony...still is. We have a portrait of the queen on our money to prove it.
I get the feeling that you think Canadians dislike Americans...nothing could be further from the truth. We love Americans..it's why we let you win at hockey :)
No, Canadians don't dislike A
March 31, 2007 - 18:12 ET by UnsaneNo, Canadians don't dislike Americans - or else I wouldn't have been welcome there on the occasions I have visited there. In particular, some people I ran into in Ottawa flipped out (in a positive way) because I told them I was there "just to see it". However, Canadians in general still want a separate identity from Americans, and on that point I think you would agree.
Your point about Canada's present linkages to the crown is exactly my point. When the Declaration was signed, it was clear (after quite a few battles and a bit of luck to go with it, of course) that there was a segment of British North America that had no desire to be led by the Parliament in London any longer. When the war ended with the existence of the United States being assured, many in the United States still loyal to the crown headed north into Canada.
If Canada was about independence separate from the crown, why did they not take advantage of the Revolutionary War to separate from the crown all on their own? Why did it take Canada until 1867 to form a confederation - and even then, still with a connection to the crown that persists to this day?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Would Iran be parading arou
March 30, 2007 - 10:57 ET by JDWWould Iran be parading around such as they are if the dems were not in control?
JDW
Wounded skier, beware of mistakes.
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
What great Americans these Democrats be!
March 30, 2007 - 11:14 ET by RJProbably not, JDW. And speaking of Iran, Republicans attempted to bring a Resolution (#267) to the floor today, offering symbolic support to Britain and the kidnapped sailors.
Nancy Pelosi, on the eve of her Spring Break, refused to allow it to come to the floor. What great and principled Americans these Democrats be!
She has done it all week.We
March 30, 2007 - 11:29 ET by JDWShe has done it all week.
We have a war which requires immediate attention, Bush must delay the break until congress adresses the issue. People must realize the gravity of the overall back-ups which will result if the financing is denied. The current programing is working, why wreck it?
JDW
Wounded skier, beware of mistakes.
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
So much for the Dems' desire
March 30, 2007 - 11:33 ET by HypocriteHaterSo much for the Dems' desire to become liked again in the world. Let's snub our greatest ally. That's some brilliant foreign relations for ya!
Jesus
March 30, 2007 - 11:06 ET by PeterDSo here in NYC, a "controversial artist outraged city Catholics yesterday with plans to display a nude 6 foot chocolate Jesus during Holy Week. Cosimo Cavallaro's anatomically-correct candy, titled 'My Sweet Lord'..."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/03/30/2007-03-30_choc_full_o_anger_.html
So I have one question. Where is the anatomically correct life size nude figure of Muhammad?
Ali?"I have been through
March 30, 2007 - 11:13 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarAli?
"I have been through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened." Mark Twain
Chocolate Jesus display cancelled
March 30, 2007 - 15:21 ET by RJShow shut down after Catholic outcry.
"A Manhattan art gallery cancelled plans Friday to exhibit a life-sized naked Jesus http://www.cosimocavallaro.com/ made out chocolate during the Easter season after news of the exhibit ignited anger among the Catholic community.
"The media have reported that a so-called 'work of art,' manifestly intended to offend the Christians of our community, will be displayed during Holy Week in the Roger Smith Hotel in Manhattan," Cardinal Edward Egan, archbishop of New York, said in a statement."
"As a result of the outcry, the hotel shut down the show, which led the Lab Gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, to submit his resignation."
RJ,Any word on the number o
March 30, 2007 - 15:27 ET by MightyMouthRJ,
Any word on the number of fires started or people killed as a result of the Catholic outcry?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
RJ...GOOD!I heard about this
March 30, 2007 - 15:33 ET by bigtimerRJ...
GOOD!
I heard about this early this morning..was upset then...glad to see the outcome!
Thanks so much for the info!
Good Golly
March 30, 2007 - 11:23 ET by tumbler_2007--And my wife argues with me that capital punishment is wrong. This artist out to be drowned in hot chocolate. He won't, of course.
However, the Big Apple is no place to be pushing his envelope too recklessly. There are silent gennilmen in that city who might take a mind to kneecap Cosimo for this. Or, he could end up sleeping with the fishes. They might be on the wrong side of the law; some of the boys. But for most of them, Jesu is still "famiglia," you doan mess with Jesu. Hear ?
suspended by a tiny, fragile thread
March 30, 2007 - 11:59 ET by Ten7sTime is short. Repent. Our lives in this world are suspended by a tiny, fragile thread. Soon we will all have to answer. Blasphemy, vile insults against the only possible Advocate we might have in the Next World is NOT a good plan. Instead, put your soul in His Hands, accept what He has freely given.
One day every knee shall bo
March 30, 2007 - 12:29 ET by The Wicked ConservativeOne day every knee shall bow before Christ. Will you accept his advocacy on your behalf before the All Mighty. Or will you scorn him with chocolate and call it art. I pity this fellow. More than he is culpable I blame the liberal mindset that has created this buffoon through their lies and constant systematic removal of God from our nation.
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realizes that it bears a very close resemblence to the first.
- Ronald Reagan
Jesus
March 30, 2007 - 11:38 ET by PeterDI don't live too far from the gallery. I may stand outside and wear my Muhammad ( aka Muhammed, Mohammed, Mohamet) cartoon t-shirt. It's a fun shirt to wear around Manhattan to get threats. And when I do get threats, I get right back in their faces and tell them to be thankful they live in a country that allows free expression. Of course I also have difficulty getting a taxi...
Ha ! Cabbies !
March 30, 2007 - 11:52 ET by tumbler_2007I was living in San Diego back when I last rode a cab. The driver was Islamic. He said Pakistani; an OK guy.
He had a rosary of sorts. I asked him politely, what prayers go with the beads;
He said there are just a few variations. He says real quickly repeating at each bead: "Mohammed," next bead, Mohammed, next bead, Mohammed. Next bead, Mohammed ad infinitum. Requires no large vocabulary, I guess.
And now, today's Shrub Report
March 30, 2007 - 11:42 ET by Roger the ShrubberAnd now, today's Shrub Report®:
On this date, 26 years ago, John Hinckley Jr professed his love to Jodie Foster. Oh yeah, he shot the President, too.
If you don't change your phone service, I mo kill you!
Wasn't inflicting Battlefield Earth upon us bad enough? Do we really have to hear Vinny Barbarino lecture us on Global Warming, too?
Justice is served in Bangladesh.
The Fast Ed Story of the Day!
You just know he'll get 99% of the vote next election, right? And here is another reason why Africa will remain a Third-World country and a drain on our tax dollars (via foreign aid) for years to come. And here is another reason why the UN remains a castrated, ineffective bunch of weenie bureaucrats. The UN also just can't muster up the courage to condemn Iran. Meanwhile, England capitulates.
Once again, AP sounds disappointed that the economy is not tanking.
Some fun with AP headlines:
6:53am: Wall Street Moves Toward Lower Open
9:07am: Wall Street Moves Toward Higher Open
Prophets, aren't they?
Here is a great column about illegal immigration.
A Religion of Peace update.
A Culture of Corruption update. A piece of information left out of the article: Aragon is a Democrat(ic).
It looks like my reporting yesterday that the women and children of the Sudan might be safe from rapes and murders was premature, unfortunately.
And, finally: today's West Virginia joke. (Hint: look at the t-shirts).
Russia takes another step backwards towards Totalitarianism…
Thanks for the Mugabe updates
March 30, 2007 - 12:00 ET by Carl KolchakNo mention that Mugabe is a hard core left winger in those reports. I guess the left wing MSM is too busy reminding us that Pinochet was a right winger, to mention Mugabe is a hard core left winger.
"Well I got nothing against the press, they wouldn't print it if it wasn't true" 'Sunday Papers'
serious question, roger
March 30, 2007 - 13:13 ET by tumbler_2007About this one:
"Here is a great column about illegal immigration--"
What exactly are the new statutes which the Illegal Immigration Relief Act is going to pass?
It's understandable you feel this is a "great column" since it pressed all your booster buttons. Everybody likes the tough rhetoric, the overconfidence and the easy answers to all of it. That pleases you, and it would please me, if they accomplished something.
What are the provisions of the Illegal Immigration Relief Act? Let us hear the marvelous news.
Must I do all the legwork for
March 30, 2007 - 13:43 ET by Roger the ShrubberMust I do all the legwork for you, Grandpa?
Try GOOGLE. It takes mere seconds to find information ON YOUR OWN, and without the necessity of someone more capable and brighter having to hand your hand.
Read this, and have a sh*t fit, El Guapo.
"Tell us we will die lik
March 30, 2007 - 13:45 ET by Airforce_5_O"Tell us we will die like dogs."
"You will die like dogs&
March 30, 2007 - 13:54 ET by Roger the Shrubber"You will die like dogs"
I was wondering when someone
March 30, 2007 - 14:08 ET by Airforce_5_OI was wondering when someone would finally get that.
"dat's a good trick too&
March 30, 2007 - 19:32 ET by"dat's a good trick too"
Rog, the column proves the illegal apologists have other goals
March 30, 2007 - 13:58 ET by RJThanks for the column, Roger. These quotes are particularly relevant, and they make it clear that LaRaza, the Bush Administration, and the leftist apologists are interested in something OTHER THAN THE WELFARE OF THE ILLEGALS.
TWO-TIERED SYSTEM OF RULES EMERGING
Those who settle here illegally – who do not go through the proper channels to become Americans – do not have birth certificates. This may preclude them from registering to vote, obtaining a driver’s license, marriage license and a Social Security number.
So, what kind of life is it if they cannot marry the person of their dreams, choose their elected officials, join the work force legally and collect Social Security when they retire?
I understand that many of the stories of illegal immigrants are tragic ones. After all, they risk life and limb to get here....But, that can’t – and shouldn’t – be a defense for breaking the law. Because once you ignore lawlessness, it just gets worse. Overlook one law, then why not another? Before long, law and order is an impossible goal.
oh, can it BS R J
March 30, 2007 - 14:13 ET by tumbler_2007Once more you preen here about heading 'em off at the pass.
Go lecture the kindergartners; "The policeman is our friend, etc.," --What a morbid @ss.
Say, Tumbler, here's an idea
March 30, 2007 - 14:22 ET by RJSay, Tumbler, here's a new idea: try responding rationally instead of spouting more of your standard irrational hatred for anyone who doesn't walk your line...
R J B S peels off a layer of hatred
March 30, 2007 - 14:42 ET by tumbler_2007I'm sorry you caught me telling it like it is. That's the new idea you need most.
I have no hatred, BTW. --That's your layer upon layer.
Why is Tumbler the only poster pushing the leftist view?
March 30, 2007 - 14:55 ET by RJYou are incapable of responding civilly because it's all about YOU, Tumbler, and not about the illegals you pretend to champion.
P.S. Has anyone else noticed that Tumbler has been the only one taking the leftist position on illegals? No liberal posters have joined in. Why is that? Could it be that they're satisfied with his work in their behalf?
Maybe its because even the le
March 30, 2007 - 15:00 ET by florida_chadMaybe its because even the lefties see that tumbler is a crazy man.
Wow, R J
March 30, 2007 - 15:20 ET by tumbler_2007I detect a lot of anger there, BS RJ; you should get help.
Yes; I take the leftist "position" that a Mexican (or any nationality) illegal immigrant is eligible to be incarcerated, processed for deportation and then shipped out of the country. In fact, that's what we've always done; I approve.
Also, the leftist position that all employers hiring an undocumented worker are liable to fines and even imprisonment. No exceptions.
Also, the leftist position that we all have freedom of speech no matter what our positions or party; unlike some bull-shuitters who hang around NewsBusters molesting whoever doesn't fall into lockstep with the fringe element of our GOP, some of which is dedicated to white supremacy. It leads them to constant Mexico-bashing, denigration of a minority and even the babies born in that group, without exceptions. No room for argument; fall in step behind them, or you'll be ostracized and called vile names, among them "racist"-- "demented" drug-addicted, evil and stupid. It comes with the territory, Pals.
But in fact; I've always been a right-of center Reagan Republican, Pro-Life, anti-gay pride, favor a strong military, tax cuts, school vouchers, I'm a faithful Catholic-- --and I admire Rush Limbaugh, Cool Ann, George W Bush and all red states conservative leaders.
I detest Hillary Rodhorns Clinton, Algore, Barbara Boxer, Geo Soros, Choam Nomskrew, O'Donnells (Laurence and Rosie) Obscuremann, Michael Moore, George Clooney, Cher and Madonna, and the whole damn shooting match on the LEFT. (Whew !) Just setting the record straight on this Open Thread Friday ! ! ! H'raaaay!
Heck, Tumbler, its obvious that you're just projecting
March 30, 2007 - 15:44 ET by RJAnger? Heck, no, Tumbler. It would be a waste of my time and emotions to become angry at you. Might as well be angry at a post. But if you do "detect" anger, you must be looking into a spittle-flecked mirror, listening to your own rantings, and projecting your fury onto others.
But I notice in your long, long self-justification that there's a lot of "me-me-me" and "I-I-I". That's the entire story, Tumbler...it's all about YOU. Your irrational anger shows that you're just projecting your own race hatred for the gringos.
very good, R J
March 30, 2007 - 16:01 ET by tumbler_2007Glad you aren't angry. I don't fleck, and I don't rant.
I laugh whenever you're amusing. Yes, Tumbler's saying I a lot. Bad habit, forgive me. Now; should I happen to object at all, to those other nice things you say of me (in public; hate to see the private things) it might seem defensive. Take your pleasure, RJ BS. I won't be offended. Fleck away at old Tumbler. He's put on cyber-goggles. Lol! Spray like mad, Dude.
P.S. R J BS
March 30, 2007 - 16:06 ET by tumbler_2007P.S.
What about my "Leftist Positions--? You never read them, did you? I explained the "leftist positions" that you were denouncing me for. Have you figured out which ones are left-slanted ? Try, Boy; don't disappoint your friends.
Sure. Here's a few of your leftist supported positions
March 30, 2007 - 16:29 ET by RJSure. Here's a few of your leftist supported positions, just for starters:
amnesty for the illegals...no border fence to stop or slow the illegals...illegals aren't harming our economy...illegals aren't harming our culture...illegals don't deliberately come to America to have "anchor babies"...illegals should be given various kinds of "assistance" that American citizens get...illegals shouldn't be called illegals....Americans have no more right to be Americans than Mexicans (that's a paraphrase)....how'm I doin'?
Did I forget any? Is there anything above that you don't support?
*SMACK*
March 30, 2007 - 16:44 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasThat smack upside Crumbler's head was so loud I think even a few illegals heard it and are now scampering back across the border.
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
Sure, Guy, but next will come the lie/denial
March 30, 2007 - 17:12 ET by RJSure Guy, but next will come the lies, the denials or the obfuscating. Doesn't matter, though. We've all read him saying every one of those things and more.
sure looks angry to me
March 30, 2007 - 17:03 ET by tumbler_2007I expressed my "positions" to Wicked Conservative. You've invented these to fit your HATE agenda. But OK,
amnesty for the illegals.. Tumbler: I don't lobby for that. I stated honestly that it may become an option as things stand. It probably will.
.no border fence to stop or slow the illegals...Tumbler: Sorry; I stated we can't keep them away with a boondoggle, insulting fence. Is that a "liberal" stance--? It's TRUE. Yours is the simpleton's solution that won't pay off. // illegals aren't harming our economy...Tumbler: They don't. Our economy is booming, Doofus. illegals pay taxes. Illegals buy American products just as we do. By the billions of dollars. --aren't harming our culture...Tumbler: They aren't. Liberals say so too ? They ought to, it's common sense. Our culture is sicker than Mexico's, Pal. You ought to look at our culture before you preach. Silly punk; "our culture !"
-- illegals don't deliberately come to America to have "anchor babies" Tumbler: They do, but only in your paranoid dreams. That's a stupid claim. //..illegals should be given various kinds of "assistance" that American citizens get...illegals shouldn't be called illegals..Tumbler: Not for being illegals, for WORKING in the U.S.-- I myself call them illegal immigrants, Putzie. ----Americans have no more right to be Americans than Mexicans Tumbler: I never say that, even in a paraphrase. And, actually, they're prouder to be called Mexicans. They're PROUD to be Mexicans, R J. And I'm proud to be an American without racial prejudice. (that's a paraphrase)... No, it's BS, R J.
Hahahahaha, hehehehehehe! Hel
March 30, 2007 - 17:10 ET by Clear thinkerHahahahaha, hehehehehehe! Help me I can't stop laughing...tumbler say he's proud to be American...hohohoho, hehehehehe....
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Paranoid too?
March 30, 2007 - 16:17 ET by RJI've told you before that I have no need to discuss you "privately", Tumbles, and I don't do so. You don't rate high enough in my thoughts to be bothered with that. Everything I have to say about you is right here.
Actually, the accusation of talking "privately" about you seems a little Schoolgirlish to me. Interesting that you keep bringing it up (kidding). ;^>
Seriously, though, I really think you're a little paranoid as well as being a gringo hater....maybe they go together...
R J told me before
March 30, 2007 - 16:29 ET by tumbler_2007Shucks. R J once told me, I guess. nothing to be paranoid about, (double shucks, a disappointment). Yeah; and he repeats the little slander he's been hoping would stick. The old Goebbels strategy, say it enough, it strikes the whole world as truth.
But there I go again. Reminding poor paranoid R J of those Nazi characteristics he can't hide. My baaaad. He forgets my question: what about those so-called "Leftist Positions" you see in my posts? Find out where I slipped and show me. Putz. Stand up like a man.
Well, tumbles you've reverted to the old Nazi stanby
March 30, 2007 - 16:41 ET by RJWell, Tumbles, it was inevitible. You've reverted to the old Nazi standby. Apparently that's all you've got, so I'll stop now. Besides, I've reached my boredom quotient for today. ta-ta
P.S. I did answer your leftist question, you gringo-hating old man. It's up in the thread.
it can't be avoided, R J
March 30, 2007 - 17:25 ET by tumbler_2007You have the Nazi propaganda schtick down exactly ! (You stepped in the c a c a... !)
Goebbels was the Nazi minister of propaganda; you have his tactics down pat. How can you deny it?
He pushed The Big Lie; and sometimes it worked. Tell a horrendous lie repeatedly, every day, everywhere. Say it so often and repeat it and finally; everybody accepts it for TRUE !
Over and over you've TRIED--- (not successfully) to say ***I'm a racist.*** I hate white people.*** and, "It's about You, It's about You," repeat, repeat, say it to death. And you'll say it tomorrow, just as you did yesterday. You're just another Goebbels; spouting the Big Lie. You suckered yourself, BS RJ !
As usual, we have to educate
March 30, 2007 - 18:31 ET by Roger the ShrubberAs usual, we have to educate the biggest mouths.