So far, there has been a complete media blackout to the story of the BBC and CNN reporting, prior to the collapse, that buildings 7 had collapsed. As well, BBC claims to have LOST their tapes from 9/11. If this is true, that means that the BBC has broken british law since every citizen of the UK pays a tax for their existence thus they have certain rules and guidelines to abide by.
However, message boards, blogs, and popular "vote" sites such as digg.com have exploded with questions from millions who knew something was fishy with WTC 7. Even those uninitiated with 9/11 truth and those who disagree with it, are thrown for a loop and admit to not understanding how this could have been reported if their was not prior knowledge that WTC 7 was going to be demolished.
BBC Media Mgt Policy: http://911blogger.co...
3 min BBC/WTC 7 compilation: http://www.911truth....
Google, Digg censor Video: http://prisonplanet....
Did HBO cover up bomb blasts on 9/11 for their documentary?:
http://www.prisonpla...
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I have to ask. You pot-smok
March 1, 2007 - 16:44 ET by AvatarI have to ask. You pot-smoking clowns have been around since only months after 9/11, trying conspiracy after conspiracy to validate your hatred for America and it's government, and now, almost 6 YEARS later, you discover a time-index discrepancy from the largest media outlet in the world? I've got a conspiracy theory of my own...
"I saw it on the internet, therefore it must be true."
The Avatar
Gotta take more than just pot
March 1, 2007 - 16:52 ET by bigtimerGotta take more than just pot to make these jokers completely nuts....
Blonde - The Pentaverate and conspiracy theories
March 1, 2007 - 19:08 ET by Eric TurnerNext, you're gonna tell me that aliens didn't land at Roswell in '47.
rigggght!
The theories are all true. All of them.
Just check out the pentaverate - and the colonel (with his wee beedy eyes)
Damn, you got me there."
March 1, 2007 - 20:36 ET by AvatarDamn, you got me there.
"Come, EAT me chicken!"
The Avatar
Quite obviously logic is not
March 1, 2007 - 19:01 ET by DemonhunterQuite obviously logic is not your strong suit, but you must know someone who can think. Ask them, if they were going to blow up the WTC and blame someone else, would they let the BBC in on the conspiracy? Or any other news agency? Anyone not absolutely necessary to carry out the mission?
You idiots have constructed a scenario that requires a cast of thousands, and you think not one of them has spilled the beans? Hurry down to Wal Mart, I hear tinfoil is on sale. Use the garden supply entrance to avoid the black helicopters in the toy department.
If it's not the Crusades, it's the cartoons
I see you still haven't found
March 2, 2007 - 01:24 ET by Sua Sponte 75I see you still haven't found a girlfriend/boyfriend whose name doesn't end in .com or .jpg
"Stupid should hurt"
Even IF it was an inside jo
March 2, 2007 - 02:56 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveEven IF it was an inside job, what are you/we going to do about it? I'd watch my back if I were you because IF it was in inside job the ones responsible surely are watching your every move and I'm sure they'd love to keep you quiet.
Why are you so per-occupied with this? There are so many other interesting things to do/read/find on the internet.
How does trying to expose this (unevent) make the world better? How does it make your world better?
You might want to check with your doctor to see if it is safe to for you to smoke crack/pot, and take acid while you are taking your ritalin, prosac, and zoloft. I think you're having some serious drug interactions. If you're not taking medication or using illegal drugs you really need to see a psychiatrist....or at a minimum turn off your computer and spend some time outside....I'm sure the Vitamin D (resulting from exposure to the sun) will help with your chemical imbalance.
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Simple Questions
March 2, 2007 - 06:48 ET by UnsaneIf some conspiracy brought down the WTC towers (or even #7), and you have proof beyond a shadow of a doubt, you can answer these questions:
) How much explosive material was used to bring down the towers?
2) How was it placed in the building?
3) How much was used in what locations?
4) How long did this process take?
5) How many people were involved in that effort?
6) Where were they procured from? (That big an order for explosives had to attract attention and could not escape notice...)
7) Where were they stored before being staged (set up for application)?
8) Where did the staging take place?
9) How were those staged explosives transported to the towers and when?
10) What steps were taken to ensure no one noticed what was going on?
11) How were these explosives transported to the storage location?
12) How many transportation assets were used to accomplish this?
13) What modes of transport were used in all cases transport was needed?
14) Who handled these transportation arrangements?
15) You have to get clearances to transport these explosives no matter what mode is being used. Who secured them and with whom?
16) How long did it take to execute the planning for this operation?
17) When was the green light given for the go-ahead?
18) How long did it take to procure, store, stage, and deploy the explosives?
19) What steps were taken to ensure secrecy?
20) How on earth could you hide ALL OF THIS ACTIVITY from innocent onlookers, observers and passers-by at all stages of the conspiracy? "HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)