BBC reporter says "WTC 7 has collapsed" BEFORE IT COLLAPSED


Huge breaking news. A reporter from the BBC is reporting in NYC on 9/11. They are talking about the "Saloman Brothers building", aka WTC 7. They are reporting that the building has also collapsed along with the Twin Towers. It is estimated that this was reported roughly 23 minutes before the building actually did fall. For those of you saying, "well, duh, isn't this report AFTER the building fell?" NO! THE BUILDING IS STILL STANDING IN THE BACKGROUND! HAHAH! The BBC screwed up BIGTIME!

http://www.prisonpla...

9/11 was an inside job! What do you people have to see to realize that!


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How many people do you thin

How many people do you think it would take to install explosives all over the WTC?

Now how long would it take those people to install said explosives and wiring?

Now ask yourself how many people/workers/inspectors may have identified the explosive materials or otherwise questioned the materials that were being installed over the minimum of several months it would have taken?

How come nobody has come forward to say they were involved?--or know someone that was involved? You would think somebody would be dying to blow the whistle.

Ever been at the scene of a disaster? It's chaos...rumors abound, claims are made, truth is uncertain...reality paints a completely different picture once the dust settles and truth begins to come to light.

Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)

Gene, unfortunately we're dea

Gene, unfortunately we're dealing with pure unadulterated asshattery here of which the playing field doesn't dictate common sense and the only reply is more links to anti-Semitic anti-US sites.  This person along with the other Truthers are paddleing chickenwire canoes and are about as useful as football bats.  The same government in which they believe is all screwed up and can't do anything right is the same one in which they magically believe pulled this off without a hitch.  As always, my suggestion to them is to take off the spock ears, step away from the computer in their mom's basement and attempt to find a girlfriend/boyfriend whose name doesn't end in .com or .jpg.

"Stupid should hurt"

Sua, I love your 'chickenwire canoes' analogy. ACA

Sua, I love your 'chickenwire canoes' analogy.  ACA

I'd like to introduce 'truth' to my old Top Sergeant's 'favorite hole' in the ground.

ACA

...

Quoted from:  'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)

Thanks AC, and darn it, it ju

Thanks AC, and darn it, it just fits sooo well with these types.  They will paddle that damn thing for all it's worth.

"Stupid should hurt"

weren't the building closed

weren't the building closed down a day or two before this happened, and everyone was sent home?

TP, here's something our gove

TP, here's something our government has known about for many many years and are keeping it quiet, surprised you haven't been touting this.

Dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted thousands of people every year. Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO, but the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide do not end there.

 

Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. Symptoms of DHMO ingestion can include excessive sweating and urination, and possibly a bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance. For those who have become dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death.

 

Dihydrogen monoxide:

 

· is also known as hydroxl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.

· contributes to the "greenhouse effect."

· may cause severe burns.

· contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.

· accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.

· may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.

· has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.

 

Contamination is reaching epidemic proportions!

 

Quantities of dihydrogen monoxide have been found in almost every stream, lake, and reservoir in America today. But the pollution is global, and the contaminant has even been found in Antarctic ice. DHMO has caused millions of dollars of property damage in the midwest, and recently California.

 

Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:

 

· as an industrial solvent and coolant.

· in nuclear power plants.

· in the production of styrofoam.

· as a fire retardant.

· in many forms of cruel animal research.

· in the distribution of pesticides.

· as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.

 

Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.

 

Companies dump waste DHMO into rivers and the ocean, and nothing can be done to stop them because this practice is still legal. The impact on wildlife is extreme, and we cannot afford to ignore it any longer!

 

The American government has refused to ban the production, distribution, or use of this damaging chemical due to its "importance to the economic health of this nation." In fact, the navy and other military organizations are conducting experiments with DHMO, and designing multi-billion dollar devices to control and utilize it during warfare situations. Hundreds of military research facilities receive tons of it through a highly sophisticated underground distribution network. Many store large quantities for later use.

"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"

I saw an episode of Future

I saw an episode of Future Weapons on the Discovery Channel where they currently use DHMO to detonate terrorist bombs.

You're right it's pretty lethal stuff.

Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)

I COULD believe that 9/11/01

I COULD believe that 9/11/01 was an inside job, if some basic, simple questions could be sufficiently answered, or at least considered:

If some conspiracy brought down the WTC towers, and you have proof beyond a shadow of a doubt, you can answer these questions:

1) How much explosive material was used to bring down the towers?

2) How was it placed in the building?

3) How much was used in what locations?

4) How long did this process take?

5) How many people were involved in that effort?

6) Where were they procured from? (That big an order for explosives had to attract attention and could not escape notice...)

7) Where were they stored before being staged (set up for application)?

8) Where did the staging take place?

9) How were those staged explosives transported to the towers and when?

10) What steps were taken to ensure no one noticed what was going on?

11) How were these explosives transported to the storage location?

12) How many transportation assets were used to accomplish this?

13) What modes of transport were used in all cases transport was needed?

14) Who handled these transportation arrangements?

15) You have to get clearances to transport these explosives no matter what mode is being used. Who secured them and with whom?

16) How long did it take to execute the planning for this operation?

17) When was the green light given for the go-ahead?

18) How long did it take to procure, store, stage, and deploy the explosives?

19) What steps were taken to ensure secrecy?

20) How on earth could you hide ALL OF THIS ACTIVITY from innocent onlookers, observers and passers-by at all stages of the conspiracy? 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

The government doesn't even k

The government doesn't even know that much about the official story.

If this were some ballyhooed

If this were some ballyhooed conspiracy, ALL of those questions can be EASILY answered.

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

I did the 9-11 job! I admit i

I did the 9-11 job! I admit it. I'm the one that set all the explosives and blew it all up. Here's how I did it. (I can say this because I'm still anonymous on this thread and no one can trace this alias to my real identiy here on my own private island I bought with all the money I made)

to answer all you wacko's out there who think it was an inside job, here's how I did it.

I posed as a fire inspector. I went around every floor to do the yearly inspection on all the fire extinguishers. I take a few saying they need to be re-charged, fill them with high explosives from the military (how else would I get it- duh! but I won't tell you WHOSE military!) then take them back. It only took me a month. I didn't have to do any wiring. Modern technology let me do it all with nice cute little wireless remotes like this one:

http://www.theatrefx.com/store/commerce.cgi?product=wizard_fire

That way the explosives were all around the buildings, on every floor, in plain sight, no wires, no one thought anything of it. There, I've said it. now give it a rest will ya?

I see that everyone jumpe

I see that everyone jumped to attack the messenger on this one. Did you watch the video? 20 minutes before wtc7 collapsed, the reporter and the anchor both say that it has collapsed. While this is being said, with a live stamp in the corner, wtc7 is standing in the background. Then they lose her feed, when they go back to that shot, the building is gone and they report on it again. (You can watch everything on the Internet Archive if you are wondering about funny editing)

Now dance around that all you want, but before you do, go watch the building COLLAPSE. The video is only 9 seconds, and you need it all to see the collapse.

Another strange fact in this story: It has been reported that when Larry Silverstein said he decided to "pull it," it meant pull the firemen and everyone out. If you stand by that, then you have to reason that no one was in the building, meaning no rescue effort was necessary. In that case, wouldn't they want to investigate the collapse instead of removing debris quickly?

I'll be here drinking my kool-aid while you wrap your head around a witty response...

P.S. After this video came to light, the BBC posted this, claiming that they have lost their 9/11 tapes, so they, unfortunately, cannot clear anything up for us.  And they apperently don't have the time to watch a short clip on YouTube.

Have you read City In The Sky

Have you read City In The Sky

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Come on now, Unsane. Serio

Come on now, Unsane. Seriously, watch the reporter, watch the collapse, use your critical thinking skills, and then come back and reply.

Try answering my questions fi

Try answering my questions first...

How did the WTC towers collapse? Two 767s flown into buildings 1 and 2, which started catastrophic fires that did not stop until 18 December 2001.  The End. 

Sometimes it sucks to be a realist, or, as a close friend described me, "the ultimate realist".

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

So, you refuse to watch the

So, you refuse to watch the videos? I just want to be clear.

And you already answered your question for me, now address mine about WTC7, not WTC1 and 2.

The reporters were probably just wrong, WhichWay

WhichWay, I'm not going to get into this arcane discussion because to take it seriously you have to be either very young (the young love conspiracy theories), older but still immature, or just out and out nutty.

My comment is this: action "news" reports notoriously have a high percentage of innacuracy.  It's not unlikely that the reporter and the anchor, caught up in the emotion of the moment were just wrong.   BBC is reluctant to admit even their proven mistakes in reporting incidents in the middle east.  It's doubtful that they would be any more willing to admit this error.

That's it.  I'm done.  Rave on.

So that's your explanation

So that's your explanation of an anchor leading into a story with the line "And now more about another collapsED building" and then a reporter saying that the "Salomon Brothers building HAS collapsed" and all the while the building IS IN THE PICTURE?? Or did you even watch the report? Or the video of the collapse, which took place 20 minutes AFTER the report?

Why are you willing to jump to conclusions before looking at the evidence I've provided? Why are you and Unsane so afraid to watch these clips and address their contents??

Disprove them, please. No one on this thread has answered to the evidence, why do you think that is?

WATCH and THEN reply. Its not a tough formula.

You're starting to make sense, WhichWay

OMIGOD, WHICHWAY, I WATCHED THE VIDEO AND I'VE SEEN THE LIGHT!  YOU'RE RIGHT, THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY AND OUR GOVERNMENT WAS REPSONSIBLE FOR BLOWING UP THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS AND ALL THE BUILDINGS AROUND THEM.  HAVE YOU LOOKED INTO THE CONNECTION OF THE MAN WITH THE CIGARETTE?   I'M SURE HE'S INVOLVED SOMEHOW, PLEASE CHECK.

OH, LORD, WON'T YOU BUY ME A COLOR TV?  DIALING FOR DOLLARS IS TRYING TO FIND ME.  I'LL WAIT FOR DELIVERY EACH DAY UNTIL THREE, OH LORD WON'T YOU BUY ME A COLOR TV?  OOPS, SORRY.  I WAS CHANNELING JANIS JOPLIN THERE FOR A MINUTE....WHERE WERE WE?  OH, RIGHT....ANYWAY CHECK INTO THAT CIGARETTE MAN, WHICHWAY.  I JUST KNOW HE'S PART OF IT.....

 

Thank you Janis Joplin!

Thank you Janis Joplin!

hee hee

"hee hee ...that's it!" -Janis

Wing, You must be new here.

Wing, You must be new here.

Talking reasonably with these people is like trying to have an intelligible conversation with george bush: you can't. Unsane is particularly good at skipping over any evidence and asking blindly those same questions, the ones he posted above, all the while maybe or maybe not realizing that only the people who committed the crime could answer. (I hope he realizes that for his sake)

Not only is the evidence for WTC 7 so blatanly obvious that it was demolished, but trying to argue this fact will only make you realize that it was an inside job. Thus, they don't argue. They attack the messenger and go back to hating islamofascists and those arabs who "committed" this crime. O'reilly does this as well as Hannity. I think they're taking lessons from them...which is OBVIOUSLY a mistake ....

Oh yea, have you seen the video of WTC 7 on fire before either tower fell? I'll make a new post about it, check it out...

ThoughtPolice...Hey, you guys

ThoughtPolice...

Hey, you guys still holding Big Foot hostage in your spaceship?

Just wondering!

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

Thought Police

Thought Police if I may affectionately nickname you TP. Well, you know what I use TP for. Tata!

I beg your pardon, TP

I beg your pardon, TP (love the initials), I consider myself to be extremely "intelligible."  But here's a question for you:  if you don't consider usn's to be intelligible, why do you keep coming back, me bucko?    ;^>

Unsane just likes to critical

Unsane just likes to critically think; if WhichWing and TP were SO right, they can address my simple questions with EASE.  Instead, they'd rather prove me right by throwing temper tantrums on the board. 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

I think you suffer from a c

RJ, I think you suffer from a common disorder among people who can't refute a legitimate piece of evidence. I call it "sticky caps lock." If you don't want to address what has been posted, then why respond at all?

I also forgot to mention that

I also forgot to mention that you married your first cousin...

Dang...Which Wing...

I just can't seem to keep my mouth shut!!

See what you get for telling me you deepest secrets?

More to come...

The soap opera continues....

Bob and weave.

Bob and weave.

"legitimate?"

"legitimate?"  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  Oops, sorry....those darn sticky cap keys....heeheehee (is that better?)

Kneel and bob.  Oops. 

Kneel and bob.  Oops.  Bob and weave.

Really? Where are your answer

Really? Where are your answers to all 20 questions I have?  They apply to WTC7 as easily as they do to 1 and 2.

Why should I watch a video that eminates from a source I cannt evaluate?  At least I can evaluate the book I recommended you read.  I do not visit sources that I cannot evaluate.  In fact, the number of links I have checked while at NB are extremely low; the Internet is NOT 100% trustworthy as you seem to believe. 

Hell, do you even know what "source evaluation" IS?

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

So now we can't even trust

So now we can't even trust the BBC? Are you implying that a fake video has been posted. I did provide a couple different places that it could be viewed.

I also don't understand why you would enter this post about WTC7 and demand answers to your questions before you address those that were asked.

Let's make a deal, you address the contents that started this thread, and I'll do my best to address your questions. Honestly, no ploy here.

And I would again like to point out, that still, no one has answered to the contents of the original post. Bob and weave I guess, gotta be good at something.

WTC7 conspiracy debunked

You want answers? Here you go, quite a few pages in this acclaimed mythbusting. Let's see if you really want the truth.

D


A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.

I'll offer you the same deal

I'll offer you the same deal I offered Unsane, address the contents of this post, then I'll look at yours. This video only came to light a little over a month ago, so we'll have to wait for Popular Mechanics to debunk it for you.

On a side note, isn't it interesting that Popular Mechanics spent more time investigating 9/11 than the US Government did? Or that the gov't spent more money on the Monica/Bill fiasco than they did investigating 9/11? Also spent more on the Columbia Shuttle disaster investigation.

No, not really whichwing

No, not really whichwing. The government knew and determined the cause rather easily.

 Popular Mechanics spent time debunking you people, and all your numerous crazy ideas, something the government doesn't want to waste tax dollars doing,or probably more correctly is too embarrassed to have sane government servants going on a wild goose chase for a small portion of our populace that suffers mental illness.

 Half the government spent time investigating Monica because it was a political fight, and as you see (and do) that's 24/7/365 spare no expense.

 The government spent time investigating the C. shuttle because there was only one left and it had to attempt to prevent a similar future disaster. So, isn't it strange that the government has spent a lot more time and money trying to prevent a 911 future disaster(called WOT - dummy) ? No, it's not strange at all, but it is strange that you ask the wrong question with the wrong ideas in mind.

 Got any other stupidity you want to spew ? This is fun proving how stupid you are.

You are an impressive speci

You are an impressive specimen. "Dummy."

Source evaluation

Instead of trying to order me around, why don't you try to figure out what "source evaluation" means? 

Unlike you I really don't trust the Internet blindly.  It keeps me out of trouble and keeps me from embarrassing myself. 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

I don't see how "let's

I don't see how "let's make a deal" could mean that I'm ordering you around. And you keeping talking about the source, which is the BBC. Am I missing something about the BBC? Are they not a trustworthy news source?

If you don't trust having to watch the clip at YouTube, and can go to Archive.org. They have a collection, from the TelevisionArchive.org, of just about every minute of news coverage from Sept. 11th, 12th and 13th; with coverage from ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, FOX and NBC. It is arranged by network and time, mostly in 41 minute blocks. The clip is from BBC at 4:54 pm on Sept. 11.

I'm not asking you to trust anything blindly, I'm asking you to watch a video from reputable sources and comment on it.

The unquestionable BBC

So, if the BBC tells you...ANYTHING, it MUST be true, because it is from the BBC?

Here is a lesson in history. Back in 1986, shortly after the Soviets were more or less forced to admit that the nuclear accident in Chernobyl ocurred, a video surfaced shortly thereafter that reportedly showed the reactor burning.

Well, as it turns out, a short time later, the video was proven a fraud, and was shown to depict not Chernobyl but rather a fire at an Italian cement plant.  

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Did the video look fake to

Did the video look fake to you? Are you claiming the video is a fake? Have you even watched the video yet? Have you been arguing for a week without even seeing the video? Are you laughing off the 9/11 conspiracy while promoting your own BBC conspiracy? Or are you just trying to muddy the waters so you don't have to acknowledge the video?

No that is not what he said,

No that is not what he said, the BBC is notorious for flagrant lapses in their reporting and then not correcting them different speech laws help them a lot

The hottest places in hell are oft reserved for those who in times of moral crisis remain neutral

So what is the final stance

So what is the final stance on this video? We are running out of messengers to attack.

WhichW

WhichWing, I watched the video and it proves nothing.....except that naive and gullible people will believe anything. BFD!!!! BFD!!!!!

I used to think that rhayes was the dumbest NB poster~ then along came BillAdkins

The only thing I believe ba

The only thing I believe based on this video is that that report stated that the building had already collapsed while it was still standing behind her. Now that could lead to other somewhat logical thoughts, but you'd first have to admit the contents of the video are real.

I will say, this is one of the best dance contests I've ever seen.

Think dummy whichwing

Think dummy whichwing,the BBC probably wants the fools who have their footage - to send it to them, so they can sue them. Theconvenient way of making that occur is by claiming their footage is cocked up.

 You think it's their way of covering up - but I think it's their way of luring idiots into their trap - and they won't have to jump the pond till they have the goods. 

 I guess Alex Jones and prison planet never did cough it up to them. Alex is probably smarter than you, since he has who knows how many credit card dollars from your lenders,for those screaming nutcase videos you collect.

LOL

You are amusing to me. I m

You are amusing to me. I mean, I haven't been called "dummy" since my sister called me that in 3rd grade. I think you should understand that the implication is not that the BBC was in on anything. The implication is that someone who was, released a report to the BBC a little too early.

And to your final, and may I say brilliant, statement, the "screaming nutcase video" came from the BBC, which I thought was a reputable source, until you all set me straight.

Why, If It Is On The BBC, It

Why, If It Is On The BBC, It MUST Be TRUE!!!

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

1 The truth is not an attack.

1 The truth is not an attack.                                                                                         2 did it ever occur to you that the BBC might have been told that the building had been damaged and would likely fall and thenreported that it had by mistake?                                                                                

The hottest places in hell are oft reserved for those who in times of moral crisis remain neutral

James,http://www.youtube.com/

James,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9LWdzuyahI

the only shot of  wt7 from wtc tower side, check out the HUGE GOUGES. only a second of the view on the tower side, smoke and all.

OH, LORD WON'T YOU BUY ME A M

OH, LORD WON'T YOU BUY ME A MERCEDES BENZ?

MY FRIENDS ALL DRIVE PORCHES, I MUST MAKE AMENDS

WORKED HARD ALL MY LIFETIME, NO HELP FROM MY FRIENDS

OH, LORD, WON'T YOU BUY ME A MERCES BENZ?

(Am I too early?  Isn't this the Janis Joplin psychic hour?)

What part of "I won't wa

What part of "I won't watch videos from sources that I cannot evaluate" do you NOT understand?  Why do you go out of your way to NOT understand that I won't automatically believe something just because It Is On The Internet? 

I don't even click on 99% of the links I see on this board, just because of my lack of ability to properly evaluate the source. 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

You are so full of it, its

You are so full of it, its probably starting to tickle the back of your eyeballs. Why did you bother to join in this conversation if you weren't able/capable/willing to look at what was being talked about?

Because this video upon which

Because this video upon which you hinge everything in your life is the basis for a tired conspiracy theory that can be exposed for what it is by just answering the 20 questions I have listed above.  Note the last two sentences in the post that began this whole thing. 

Learn to evaluate sources, critically think...and learn to NOT trust everything on the Internet.  Doing the above steps will keep you from embarrassing yourself at the minimum.

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

"Yadda yadda yadda, I

"Yadda yadda yadda, I will not look at the clip, but I will insult you and your intelligence. I will give you advice and then insult you again."

If you don't want to discuss this subject, just go away. If you are willing to look at this video clip, and offer an opinion, I'd be glad to hear it. But if you want to yammer on and on about "evaluating sources," then we have nothing more to discuss.

I realize you are deeply anno

I realize you are deeply annoyed at my discussing the subject because your life won't be complete until we can prove that 9/11/01 was an evil government conspiracy, but I am in fact discussing the subject.  I'm just doing it in a way you do not want to deal with, for it will pour cold water all over your parade.

I'm not going away anytime soon, I'm afraid.

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Yes, Unsane, ignorance is b

Yes, Unsane, ignorance is bliss. You must be ecstatic!

Well, hello there, my little

Well, hello there, my little Socialist, do YOU believe this was some sort of ballyhooed conspiracy as well?

If you truly believe that, I then direct you to the same 20 questions the conspiracy loons all seem to run away from like Dracula running from the cross.  You will find them on the same page.

As for ignorance, I leave that to the Socialists like yourself who believe government should be a gigantic United Way. 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Keep this in mind too, folks.

Keep this in mind too, folks. The government gave you the official conspiracy story within 24 hours of 9/11. Its amazing what 5 years of research will turn up.

Which Wing...I made a mistake

Which Wing...

I made a mistake earlier...I just said the village idiot...correction here folks...

World idiot!

I just can't seem to keep a secret...

Btw...he is related to TP!

Possibly razey too!...

Heck...throw in lillie-pad for the fun of it!

I know you are trying to thro

I know you are trying to throw stones, but my ISP does not allow me to accept them. I have asked them politely to fix this on numerous occasions, but to no avail.

Yeah whichwing

Yeah whichwing, 24hours is about right, since they had how many warnings ? Didn't you come here and scream about the PDB Bush "should have read and acted upon" ?

Well, it's not too difficult after the fact, 19 muzzie names on the airline flight list, telephone calls from the Penn.plane. That sews it up right there.

 Heck , I could have announced in 3 or 4 hours, wouldn't have taken me 24 hours.

How many warnings did they

How many warnings did they have? If they had so many warnings, why were they so unprepared? A warning is not to be used to come up with a theory after an attack, its to be used to prevent an attack, or at least be prepared when an attack comes. Neither of which was done.

Why don't you go ahead and post the link where you can see the "muzzie" names on an airline flight list? The lists released by the airlines contained no "muzzie" names at all.

And in answer to your question, no, I have never mentioned the PDB.

I also think your hatred and racism is sickening. All your posts are endless dribble, full of name-calling, and lacking in substance.

thanks WhichWay

"your posts are full of endless dribble....lacking in substance...."

hahahachucklehaha!     

Coming from you, WhichWay, that's really funny.  Thanks for the morning chuckle on April Fools Day!

You gave me a chuckle too.

You gave me a chuckle too. I come on here and attempt to answer every post directed towards me, and all you are capable of doing is chiming in with an insult once a week. I look forward to next weeks comment.

April Fool, WhichWay...and May...and June...and

hahaha.   April Fools Day is a great day to read your funny attempts to appear rational, WhichWay. 

That was quick, you taking

That was quick, you taking next week off?

always wings it

I suspect your ISP keeps common sense out of your fruit bowl as well.

Its amazing what 5 years of

Its amazing what 5 years of research (sic) will turn up.

Yeah. Creeps like you. And the c++t* who runs this thread.

*Please note that my apt and relevant usage of the Anglo-Saxon (if somewhat edited) epithet is solely my own decision and in no way involves the management. Thank you.

The answer is socialism. But only if the question is:

"What's the fastest way to impoverish, enslave and destroy people?"

I'm sure your friends appreci

I'm sure your friends appreciate you coming in to help avoid the question. You should all get together and have a dance party.

LOL 5 years of research

LOL 5 years of research yields a BBC reporter from overseas not knowing which building is the Salomon building...LOL

 5 freakin'years of research, and this is the result.

 Yep, you boys oughta have this case cracked by 2755 AD.

It's even more amazing what a

It's even more amazing what a little imagination and a lot of spare time can accomplish as well.

My twenty questions are just waiting for some 9/11/01 conspiracy theorist to answer them...

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

I'd answer them if it was

I'd answer them if it wasn't for these two reasons:

1.) You wouldn't take me up on the deal I offered you.

2.) I'd have to click a bunch of links that I can't evaluate.

Sad to see that you are so de

Sad to see that you are so dependent on the Internet to do everything that you cannot even apply common sense, which is ALL that is required to answer many of my questions. 

I don't do deals with Leftist posters; they tend to wind up as one-sided as the SALT treaties of old, and favoring the Leftist. 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

As I said before, you addre

As I said before, you address the subject that started this thread and then I'll do what I can to answer your 20 questions, but no until then.

Or you can go on whining about sources, internet, leftists and treaties.

I know that, being the good L

I know that, being the good Leftist that you are, you think you can bark orders at me on here, but you will fail every time. 

What you perceive as "whining" are in fact legitimate concerns...but to you, it is whining, because you so desperately want 9/11/01 to be some sort of government conspiracy.  It is too bad that WANTING it to be so does NOT make it so.

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Question for Deranged Lunatics

Thought Police.......or any other similar deranged lunatic will do -

So the question seems to be; was "911 an inside job"? 

Please answer my one simple little question and I won't take up any more of your time.

Who would you have us give the credit to, for snuffing out the 3000+ "little Eichmans" on 911?

Ward Churchill seemed to think it was the terrorists but you seem to imply it was the US government.

So who snuffed out the 3000+ "little Eichmans"?  The outsiders (terrorists) or the insiders (US government)?

And if it's not asking too much - just a short follow-up.  Are we supposed to be happy about the dead "little Eichmans" or not?  I mean, the thought did occur to me that getting rid of "little Eichmans" would be a good thing to the left, so why do you want to give credit to the US government for doing a good thing?  Wouldn't that be kind of counter-productive -  much like your conspiracy theory?

Hello

Hello.  No takers?  Was 2 and a half hours not enough time to get the talking points; re my question?  Tip - You could try and put your own thought together instead of waiting for the next video to find a response - or better yet, ask Rosie.   I'll check back in with you tomorrow. 

Wow, I'm sorry that I could

Wow, I'm sorry that I couldn't respond to your post in a timely manner, but 12 hour shifts make it difficult to get on the pc every 2 hours.

This thread is over a month old, and no one has offered a legitimate explanation as to why the BBC could report a collapsed building 20 minutes before it collapsed. You can say "well, they knew it was in danger of collapsing," but the BBC just aired a 9/11 documentary in February that said the collapse was unexpected. So which is it? Then you can say "well, they made a mistake, so what if they didn't know which building it was?" But its right outside the window she is reporting from! Who goes on international television with a report before checking out what they are saying, especially when all you have to do is TURN AROUND.

You all want to change the subject and rant on and on and on and on, but no one wants to address the topic at hand. This thread has been a sad display of conservatives dodging the issue.

I will not answer questions raised by any of you until you answer my own.

I await further insult.

Stop, WhichWay, you're killing me!

hahalolhaha!  Stop, WhichWay!  You're killing me here! 

Reading the posts of an obvious nutjob who is attempting to pose as a calm rational person is the best comedy on this board! 

Perhaps you could get a pet

Perhaps you could get a pet or something to play with, the adults are trying talk here.

Nah, you're too much fun.

Nah, you're too much fun. Sometimes I'm in the mood for slapstick comedy. ;^>

RJ...You have to admit it is

RJ...

You have to admit it is more fun playing with them instead of treating them like a grown-up. Grown-ups usually don't fall for all the conspiracy clap trap.

This is the same group of folks that have Big Foot hidden on a UFO far out in space.

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

I agree CT

I agree CT.  That is why I was such a fan of Seinfeld humor.  Much like this conspiracy, it was all about nothing.

adult convo

Play with this... islamic