NY Times: For the Umpteenth Time, Beware the Housing Bubble

Photo of Ken Shepherd.

The media can't really deny the economy is doing great. But all good things come to an end,so what the heck, why not float the prospect of a looming recession? That's essentially what The New York Times did in today's paper.

Staff writers Eduardo Porter and Jeremy W. Peters turned to a Clinton economic adviser to suggest that the current economy is driven by a housing bubble similar to the tech bubble that drove the smokin' hot economy of the late 1990s.

“In both situations we had overinvestment, now in housing, then in fiber optics,” the Times reporters quoted Joseph E. Stiglitz, Clinton’s "chief economic adviser from 1995 to 1997."

[I guess those silly 2001 and 2003 tax cuts that have resulted in record tax receipts from a growing economy and its resultant jobs growth have nothing to do with it.]

Porter and Peters persisted in peddling a discredited media meme: it's the housing "bubble" driving the economy, but in fact:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

...economic growth outside of the housing sector is strong, arguing against the view that the slowing in the housing sector points to larger problems for the economy.

"The U.S. economyoutside of the housing sector continues to expand at a healthy pace. Job growth remains good, and this has lifted consumerconfidence and spending. The weakness in housing has dampened the demand for commodities, and inflation has subsided,” Gary Thayer, chief economist for A.G. Edwards, noted in his January 2007 outlook.

Thayer is not alone in his assessment. “The economy appears to be weathering the downturn in housing with limited collateral effects, and inflation appears to be easing with the aid of lower energy prices, well-anchored inflation expectations, and competitive labor and product markets, Federal Reserve vice chairman Donald Kohn told the Atlanta Rotary Club in a January 8 speech.

For more of my article, read here.

For our report from November 2005 popping the media's bubble on housing, check here.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How many years have the MSM been decrying the housing bubble?

How many years have the MSM been decrying the housing bubble?

I know you cite 2005, but it seems to me that its been going on for about 6.15 years?

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

Since around mid-to-late 20

Since around mid-to-late 2001. Paul Krugman, as a matter of fact, was a driving force behind the media focus on it, as the 2005 BMI study reported. I noted that point in my article also linked from the blog post.

C'mon acaiguana, they're sett

C'mon acaiguana, they're setting up 2008 for the 'worst economy in 50 years' spin again. It worked for Bill and Hill, and it panicked the uninformed in 2006.

(I know you know that, I just felt like posting something here!)

If I vote for Obama, then I can be accused of dissing a woman. If I vote for Hillary, then I can be accused of dissing a black man. Waaaaaaa! - A liberal quagmire

I believe in the coming reces

I believe in the coming recession.  It will come after two years of the Hillary/Osamabama administration. 

And its will be blamed on the

And its will be blamed on the Bush administration tax cuts and mismanagement and illegal war and resulting debt.  No word about the Democrat congress involved. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

This guy is an economist? A

This guy is an economist? All I can say is OMG! Does that nitwit not see the difference between a stock and a house? I'll give him a hint.....you can live in one of them. A home will always have value whereas a stock may not. We can handle a "burst of the bubble" for that very reason. To have someone that intellectually stunted being a part of government scares the hell out of me.

We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism, and they don't want to fight it. They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States. Ann Coulter

A home will always have val

A home will always have value whereas a stock may not.

Hey slow down. That's a really complicated argument.

You'll be telling us that natural population growth plus huge immigration to the US is exceding house building growth, thus creating even more demand for homes!

That's nuts.

"Our readers don't give a rat's ass about what you think. They want facts."

Elmore Leonard, 'The Hot Kid'.

Root of the Bubble(s) or is it Bubble(ic)

Root of the Bubble(s) or is it Bubble(ic). 

Let's quote a favorite economist of the liberal media - well, a favorite when he is marching to their drum beat. The progressive economist, Dean Baker of CEPR, in a May 2003 piece while reflecting back at the last gasps of the Clinton era, explained (emphasis throughout is mine): 

The Clinton boom was built on three unsustainable bubbles. One of them, the stock bubble, has already burst. The other two bubbles—the dollar bubble and the housing bubble—are still with us. The dollar bubble is starting to deflate, and the housing bubble is perhaps just now reaching its peak. These bubbles created the basis for the 2001 recession and the economy’s continuing period of stagnation...

The triple bubble economy of the late ’90s presents the most difficult set of economic problems since the Great Depression.

 This dangerous triple bubble economy  - the hallmark of the Clinton years of prosperity - were comprised of:

Stock Market Bubble - The stock market bubble added more than $8 trillion of paper wealth to the economy. This stimulated the economy in two ways. First, when families see the value of their stock portfolios rise, they spend more, since they feel less need to put money aside for retirement or their kids’ education. Just as the textbooks would predict, consumption boomed and savings fell through the floor in the late ’90s and 2000...  The bursting of the bubble threw this process into reverse... The ’90s stock bubble is also partially responsible for other recent problems. One is the switch from surpluses to deficits at both the federal and state levels. The federal government collected almost $120 billion in capital gains tax revenue at the peak of the stock bubble in 2000, most of which came from gains on stock sales. When stock prices plunged, capital gains revenue did also. It is now projected at $51 billion in 2003. Many states, especially California, were similarly affected by the stock crash.

The wave of corporate accounting scandals was also an outgrowth of the bubble.. 

The Housing Bubble – As was the case in Japan in the ’80s, the stock market bubble of the late ’90s was accompanied by a housing bubble. The rise in home prices since 1995 has outpaced the overall rate of inflation by more than 30 percentage points. This sort of run-up in home prices has no precedent in the post-war era. The surge in home prices has created more than $3 trillion in new housing wealth, as compared to a situation in which home prices had just kept pace with inflation.

Like stock wealth, housing wealth also spurs consumption. Families see the rising value of their homes as a source of wealth that they can draw upon to meet their needs. They have been drawing on this wealth with a vengeance in the past two years, as plunging interest rates have led to an unprecedented surge in mortgage borrowing. As a result, the ratio of mortgage debt to home equity is at near-record highs.
This situation is frightening for two reasons. First, as a short-run matter, if housing prices fall sharply in some of the areas where the effects of the bubble are largest (for example the Boston, New York, Washington, and San Francisco areas), new home buyers (and those who recently refinanced their mortgages and took money out) could find they have negative equity in their homes. If someone borrows $270,000 to buy a $300,000 home, and the price falls by one-third, this leaves them owing $70,000 more than the home is worth. When this happens, there is a huge incentive to just let the mortgage holder foreclose on the home. If this were to happen on a large scale, the survival of many banks and financial institutions would be at risk.

The current high levels of mortgage debt are a problem for another reason. The population is aging, and many families are getting near retirement. With the front end of the baby boomers approaching 60, many homeowners should be near to paying off their mortgage. The demographics indicate that mortgage debt should be lower than it has been in prior decades. But on the contrary, many baby boomers are likely to hit retirement––after having just lost much of the wealth in their 401(k)s due to the stock market crash––and discover that their homes are worth much less than they had expected. These older baby boomers really need to be saving to ensure themselves a sufficient income in retirement, but the illusory wealth created by the housing bubble is preventing them from recognizing this fact.

While the housing bubble has its own logic, it is an outgrowth of the stock bubble. It began as a result of people using their newly created stock wealth to purchase better homes. This started home prices on an upward path, leading people to buy homes in anticipation of continually rising prices. The bubble will persist as long as people expect home prices to rise. When they lose this expectation, housing prices will fall back to more normal levels.

The Dollar Bubble -  To make matters worse, a third bubble from the ’90s is also still with us––the dollar bubble. The Clinton administration deliberately pursued a “strong dollar” policy. This had the desirable short-term effect of restraining inflation and raising domestic living standards by making imports cheaper for people in the United States. (An undesirable short-term effect was the devastation of U.S. manufacturing.) However, in the long-term, the strong dollar policy is unsustainable. As a result of its massive bill for imports, the United States is currently borrowing more than $550 billion a year from abroad

A note to the media: In your continuing effort each and every year to predict your gloom and doom and to blame it all on the Bush administration, why don’t you do your homework, and follow the bouncing ball as to how the recent history actually played out. The MSM likes the economics of Dean Baker. Why don’t you explain his views to the public when it rains on your parade?

 Once again:

The triple bubble economy of the late ’90s presents the most difficult set of economic problems since the Great Depression. The solutions are neither simple nor painless, but—just as was the case with the New Deal—big problems can open the door to big solutions. 

Question to the media: So how did President Bush do with this “most difficult set of economic problems since the Great Depression,” which he inherited from the Clinton era?

Gary,"just as was the ca

Gary,

"just as was the case with the New Deal—big problems can open the door to big solutions. "

Yah ... the big solution was to cut Americas taxes for one and all. It does not take an economic genius to figure that one out. But yet the Democrats still think that cutting taxes is a sin. The only sin to them in this world.

Ray Rio

I just turned off my subscr

I just turned off my subscription to garbage from NewsMax because they have been reporting an impending housing crash non-stop for months, and now they've added a prediction that buying gold will be the only way to hold your own in the impending crash of the dollar and worldwide recession. I read a book about 6 years ago, which was written in 1981, by an author who was absolutely certain that by the end of the 1980's, the US would be swallowed up by triple-digit inflation and anyone not holding gold would be starving to death because they wouldn't be able to afford a slice of bread. It was quite funny, reading that in 2000! There was no room for doubt, in that book. Yet here we are. There are a large contingent of folks out there whose living depends on making the public believe the warm light shining down on you is a falling meteor, for any number of possible reasons, Global Warming not the least.

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Hillsboro, Oregon

I have enough money to last me the rest of my life. Unless I buy something.