Media just a scapegoat?

Photo of shawn228.
By shawn228 | February 16, 2008 - 23:59 ET

Hello Nbers

Blonde asked me a question the other day and I would like to answer it. She asked me what I have learned since I have been on this site. I will say that, yes I do now admit there is a media bias The msm does not show good news as often a bad news, Republicans are not treated as fair as Democrats. I learned that there are some very intelligent people on this thread. The moderators are awesome, Noel especially. I find Warner Todd Houston a very intelligant man, but he is by far the most bias writer on NB. I question some of their bannings, but it is not for me to say. Made many good friends and respect alot of their opinions.

What? Why are you putting this in the woodshed shawn? Ok I might recieve some flames after this one. I also believe your using the media as just a scapegoat. Republicans are responsible for what is going kafloooie with their party Hollywood and msm are but a small part.


The awful strategy in Iraq"in the beginning"


Attorney firings


Immigration debacle


30 percent rating for Bush


9 trillion debt


Tom Delay debacle


Bill Frist debacle


Duke Cunningham


hitting over 100 per barrel "now down slightly"


Scooter Libby Debacle


Larry Craig still not resigning


Runaway spending

There is more, but it will take to much space. I mean some people here blame the media for everything. Take for example what many people say. Why is the media not reporting that price of oil is not going down. Wow it dropped to 69 dollars. per barrell? Then 3 months later why is the media not reporting oil is dropping it is at 89 dollars a barell. Duh.....oil was only 39 dollars 5-6 yrs ago.

Hollywood is not responsible for the conservative ills. Liberal themed movies are not what is wrong. Republicans have to take some of reponsiblity. In my troll days, I have heard so many times, wait till 08 were going take the house and the Presidency, You libs are going down, your party will voted out of congress when they see how pathetic you guys are. There is pretty much no way to say this without it sounding like neener neener, but I have not heard anyone say anything that cocky for a very long time, including to some of the much more Liberal posters than myself. The confidence has been shattered. There is a popular member on this site that can't seem decide to stay or leave the GOP. There are many that are not voting for either nominee in November. I would love for some Republicans to accept some reponsibilities for the breakdown in the GOP right now.

UPDATE......I TOOK THE SUPERDOME TALKING POINT OUT OF THE POST BECAUSE MANY JUST WANT TO TALK ABOUT HOW I WAS WRONG FOR BLAMING BUSH. NO PROBLEM THAT IS YOU POV, I GET IT AND RESPECT IT. NO MORE KATRINA TALK FROM ME.

Topics:

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Jason Leon, Bal, Sirius maybe sarc

I would actually love for some of our more liberal posters comment on this as well Jason, Leon, Bal Sirius maybe Sarc?

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

shawn

i'm glad you editted the 'bring it on Stupid' subject line  : )

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.

i said bring it on, stupid

i said bring it on, stupid is jus the beginning of my tagline

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

i know that

that kinda thing happens to me too!!  i usually laugh and leave it

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.

Taking 5 days to get water

Taking 5 days to get water to the Superdome?

My my....Katrina...Katrina...Katrina.

Nagin and whats her name ...Blanco or Blankhead had no part of that? Personal responsibility by each individual to leave when they had plenty of warning and they did not....on and on....

Not our fault. 

LOL...

bigtimer

It does not matter whose fault it it. Naglin and Blanco were not blameless. The thing it is reported that there is a militay plan that can set us up to go to war withing days. I would not have been easy not getting swarmed, but how how hard can it be to send in some helicopters with water? Do you remember the picture of the sufferring. The Bush administration and GOP leadership could have done something sooner, they just decided not to.

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

shawn... I do remember

shawn...

I do remember everything very well, heck ol' Shep and Jerry Rivers should of flown in water instead of trying to incite a riot at vaious times.

...anyway...have fun with this thread, I'm not rehashing Katrina, sorry kind of that I brought it up...believe me this site had plenty of go 'rounds for months about all of that.

Yeah that awful ol' Bush administration likes to see nothing but sufferin'...that's their job, that's what they do.

Hope you get the posters you want here that you were hoping to post here for ya' though friend...

...later.

bt

thank you for responding. Actually I have seen a huge change in you the past year. Not just to me but to Libs in general. I love the sarcasm, that is the way I enjoy debating, but you are no longer mean about it at all. Anyways thx again for responding:-)

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Hey shawn... Crack me

Hey shawn...

Crack me up... 

I always give as good as I get...

No changes there whatsoever.

....have a good evening... 

BTW 5 days is incorrect. I

BTW 5 days is incorrect. I know many Firemen (SIL was there) and Police who were there the next day, sure items were limited, but the State didnt issue a State of Emergency for 3 days, Feds cant help without it. Sorry you didnt see that on CNN, guess they were more concerned with the 250-400 dead in the Dome. The rest of your list is pretty shoddy as well.

 

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain

general company

Again Katrina is not the main point of this thread. I have said I agree to disagree on this one more than once.Bigtimer is right, I should not have even brought it up.

Is the media responsible for the current state of the GOP or is their own party. 

 

Scapegoat

I do not blame the media for the present condition of the Republican party. We the voters are responsible for the people that we elect. I have not seen any evidence of posters on this website  blaming the media for the present situation of the Republican party. I have seen lots of evidence pointing out the different treatment by the media given to the Democrats versus Republicans. This website is proof that the bias in the media adds to the deception that Democrats are good, Republicans are bad.

I will reply to 2 of items on your list. Maybe later I will reply to others. Do not like long comments.

1: Attorney firings: President has authority to replace U.S. attorneys anytime he wants to. Story was media driven.

2: $100.00 a barrel for oil. 1 trader purchased a 1000 barrels and instantly sold it for less than $100.00 per barrel. Said he wanted to be the only person ever to pay $100.00 a barrel. Democrats running for office in 2006 claimed that they could do something about $2.50 per gallon of gas. They have! It is now over $3.00. Even they now admit that it is supply and demand.  

Jerry Mack

Jerry thank you for admitting the msm and liberals are not the only thing wrong with the GOP right now.

The attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. I get that. Nowhere in history have they been let go of mid term. If he said it was nobodys business I get that. The administration said it was non policical and you know how it ended right? Gonzo and his deputy AG is no longer there.

On your second point. I never said the Dems were not blameless, but we are not talking about them right now. We are talking about the Republican party. If the feds keep dropping the rates the more the dollar drops and it increases the price of oil. I have always said I support the troops and there is way too much invested to pull out right now, Yes I was one of the ones that thought they had WMD.but I believe invading Iraq was the wrong thing to do. Instablity in Iraq is another reason for the price of oil.

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Drilling

Lets talk about the Republicans. We are the ones that want to do off shore drilling and drill in Alaska. We are the ones that want to build nuclear power plants. The price of oil is set by supply and demand. The price of oil jumped to a high of $104.00 per barrel today because Opec is going to cut back on production. The instability of Iraq has nothing to do with it.

Instablity in Iraq

I won't deny supply and demand have a lot to do with it but the instablity in Iraq does have something to do with it.

So the fact that the price of oil goes up everytime a pipeline is set on fire nothing to do with it?

If Israel bombed Iran, would that not effect the price of oil? This is related because Iran is arming the insurgents and the drum roll of war with Iran is a possiblity as well.

Rocky and Apollo BFF!!

Instability

Do not want to get into hair splitting with you. A waste of time. But here is my view: Insatability means something could happen. Of course when the supply is decreased by any means the price goes up. Supply and Demand.

 

Wow, Shawn

I guess you learned here, the same thing I did.

That the media is biased.   Unbelievably so.  To the point of absurdity.

Having said that, though, the real enticement of this site, as we all know, is the community of posters here.

I post, and have a good time doing it....but I read, and some of the stuff I read has expanded my education, totally.  For instance, I had no clue about GLOBAL WARMING...other than what I heard on the media....but with the informed posters here, I've had an education, and formed my own ideas on the topic.

So....NB's is a site we all visit, to learn, converse, and maybe change our world view.  It's a very, very good thing.

Nice forum topic, Shawn. 

So thanks.

 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Shawn - this is ridicuious - you admit that the media are biased

but then you assume it has no affect on all of the stories you mention
For every single thing you mention - they are problems because of the media framing. Every single one could have just as negative of an impact on the Dems if the media gave equal treatment to their faults.
It would take me forever to go through every single one with arguments that would be needed because you've never heard them in the media but I'll just list all of the Dem Debacles that were glossed over by the media with some brief explanations.

Debacles By the Democrats - ignored by the media

Iraq Strategy in the beginning- the dems voted for the war and then undermined it at every turn. There is no way of knowing how things would have gone with a united country and the Terrorists not having so much encouragement. All of the communist organized rallies and anti war protests were reported as grass roots.

Attorney Firings - Political appointees serve at the pleasure of the President and that is why Clinton fired 93 - not 8. The crap about when it happened in the term is a dem excuse. If anything Bush should be commended for giving them a chance.


Immigration Debacle
- The dems blocked a centrist proposal. The Dem rank and file don't favor doing nothing about the problem.


26% rating for Dem congress

Debt - reduced quicker than Bush predicted due to tax cuts that Dems apposed.

Delay political persecution by Dems - Dems used political office to take down a powerful Republican for doing what dems do all the time when they get control. IL dems gerrymandered all of our districts so that Republicans will not be able to compete fairly. Tom Delay was persecuted for nothing more than being a Republican and people should be outraged by that

Tom Dashle and Harry read and debacles - to many to mention. From unprecedented filibustering to declaring that we lost the war to voting for the war to trying to expel one of their distinguished members for disagreeing with them on one issue (Leiberman).

Duke Cunningham? What about William (Freezer) Jefferson? At least Republican criminals are expected to resign - Dem criminals are welcome to stay.


Oil Prices?????
The party in power has no control over oil prices except for the taxes they impose and Republicans have added no new ones. Dems have advocated raising them. The prices are high because of supply and demand and largely due to China and India rising out of poverty. Should we put a stop to that? Nuke China? What do you want to do?


Water to Superdome
- The debacle and problems getting water to the superdome were nothing new and wouldn't have been any different under a dem in the White House. The Feds were not responsible for the way states ran themselves.
Now it appears people want the Feds to control the states -new rules.

Scooter Libby was railroaded and the media have ignored the true leaker


Larry Craig was railroaded
and shouldn't resign. People should be outraged that someone can get arrested for tapping their foot in a bathroom stall. It's crazy.

Runaway Spending is occurring on the Dem side as well and not reported

I could go on and on and bring up many more things that the media an Hollywood have ignored about the Dems and yet place sinister status on Repubs for same or lesser offenses.

Dee

Thx for responding. It will take me a while to respond to all our points so I will post it soon. Really quickly though on a few of your points.

We are not talking 26 percent rating for Dem congress, Harry Reid or Tom Dasche.....for once I would like to not deflect talk of Republican wrong doings to the evil Democrats unless a evil Democrat is directly involved k?

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Shawn the whole point is the media attention and framing

The reason the Republicans are "in trouble" is because of how their indiscretions and mistakes are portrayed in the media. The Dems would be in trouble too if their mistakes and crimes were treated the same.

When talking about the influence of Hollywood and the media you have to bring up how the stuff is portrayed on both sides. It's not deflecting - it's central to the argument. /p>

Dee

You can talk about the msm all you want, it is not deflectling That is what this post is about. I said don't bring up the hypocricy angle. ie What about what Clinton did 11 yrs ago, What about what Willam Jefferson and Sandy Berger did?

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Shawn - but the hypocrisy is the whole point.

If they ignored our scandals like they do the Dems than we wouldn't be in trouble. I've brought up recent things that are in the same time period as what you have brought up.

Dee

Look at the implosion in the Republican Party right now. Are you trying to say watching the "The Bourne Supremecy" and movies like it are what is behind it?

McCain was voted in by republicans not msm. You can make your case about bias msm coverage, but Bush was elected in 2000 and re elected in 04. The GOP has lost their base and faith from voters, it is their own doing.

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

→ Shawn

Good point, Shawn.

If all we have to offer this election season is John McCain, it's because we were unable to:

  • Field a better candidate

  • Educate Republicans better to the control of the MSM.

♣ a seal

Shawn and Cool - nothing wrong with Bourne Supremecy

It wasn't political
It's the News casts every day On ABC, NBC, CBS, local affiliates and Fox (not FNC), MSNBC and CNN

T.V. - Boston Legal, West Wing, Commander in Chief, Brothers and Sisters, and a multitude of other shows that portray Republican conservative positions as evil.

Movies -

Docs Fahrenheit 911, Sicko, No End in Sight, An Unreasonable Man, Iraq In Fragments, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, Walmart: The high cost of low prices; Jesus Camp

Drama - Charlie Wilson's War, In the Valley of Ellah, Jar Head, Michael Clayton, Grace is Gone

As I'm doing this I realize that it would take me all day to list all of the movies and T.V. shows that disparage Republicans so I think I'm going to start a forum topic on it and you can counter with what Conservative ones are out there that are promoted by the MSM

The whole reason McCain was able to win is because of this barrage - It's not cool and popular to be a conservative. The whole Brothers and Sisters show is exactly the kind of Republican that we are getting now - the kind that they see as acceptable.
John McCain = that Calista Flockheart type of Republican on Brothers and Sisters.

Dee

Well a NB writer and some posters disagree with you on the Bourne movie. West Wing has been off the air since before the 06 elections. Fahrenheit 911 was in theaters well before the 04 election and the other movies and tv that you name with the exeption of Sicko and Boston Legal have made hardly any money, which means not many people saw them.

Are you those movies and shows bias?. Yes I would say so. Did they have anything to do with losing the 06 election. I would say hardly at all. Ditto for McCain getting the nomination.

I don't agree with every newsbuster on everything

A case could definitely be made about the Bourne movie being anti-government but I don't think there are any references to Republicans that I can remember. I don't care. It doesn't have the type of bias that concerns me which is much more blatant and propagandized in many other movies.

Any movies and shows that have happened since Sept 11 2001 are relevant in my opinion. This has been a long barrage and it's the repetition over a long period of time that wears people down.

I've started my list in the forum section and it's going to take me a long time to complete it. Feel free to add any conservative counter balance ones you can think of.

 

I thought conservatives

I thought conservatives stood for personal reponsibility. Your pretty much saying it is all the msm fault. You don't see much wrong doing in the republican party?

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Shawn & Dee Bunk


Any movies and shows that have happened since Sept 11 2001 are relevant
in my opinion.

Totally. It's what has framed this administration and the many fabricated "failings".

This has been a long barrage and it's the repetition
over a long period of time that wears people down.

Totally. It's all about repitition. Play a bad song over and over, and next thing you know it's a hit.

I've started my list in the forum section and it's going to take me
a long time to complete it.

Yes, the list of all things Republican-hating is indeed endless, in practically all mainstream news AND entertainment. In these circles, it is simply "not cool" to be conservative.

Every day when I turn the news on, it's "are we in a recession?", "the envrionmental crisis", "oil prices", "our poor standing in the world", "wire tapping", "waterboarding", Iraq mentioned only when bad stuff happens, Bush administration this or that -- only negative of course.

Literally, just a daily barrage of bad, bad, bad, with nothing positive in sight -- at all. Yet, my life is okay, I feel safe, I've certainly felt as free this past decade as I've always felt. News was NEVER nearly this gloomy and fear-mongering in the 90's. That's right, THEY'RE the ones promoting fear... every day. I laugh when I hear about this "Bush's climate of fear". What a joke.

Shawn, we're just trying to drum home to you this very blatant MSM manipulation of the perceived bad condition of everything.

Apparently, our repitition is not as successful as the MSM's :p

 

We bid a fond farewell to Professor Talking Points & Cheetos

You've gotta admit

You're on shaky ground, at best, when it comes to Larry Craig, unless the evil MSM have somehow infected the Senate Ethics Committee...He said he'd resign, and now he won't resign, but the facts (like that "guilty" plea) haven't changed one bit. The ethics-wrist-slap didn't help either his reputation or the Republican Party.
JMR

If this is winning, I think I'd rather lose...

sarc

I cannot agree more, he was the one that pleaded guilty and Dee is trying to make him out to be a victim. I'm not sure how big that stall was, but he would have to have crouched like a sumo wrestler to tap this guys foot.

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Hi Sarc - I didn't really follow the whole Craig thing

because it made me sick from the start. His guilty plea (or wasn't it no contest?) was to avoid publicity. I can't believe that he would have been found guilty. If he would have then it would have been outrageous beyond belief that foot movements could be cause for arrest let alone conviction. Wanting to have Gay sex in public is not a crime even if they could prove his movements meant he wanted it! Actually having sex (Gay or not) in public is a crime and they didn't catch him doing that.

If you shoplift something in a store, they can't even get you until you leave the store because you may have not gone through with it. Craig could have been just seeing what would happen and if he got a favorable response he could have suggested they go somewhere else or chickened out all together. There is no way of knowing.

Yes I think it's likely that he wanted to solicit sex but what I think and what anyone else thinks doesn't matter. He didn't do anything illegal.

I find it especially ironic how intolerant liberals are when this is an obvious discrimination against Gay people. One that matters. Gay marriage doesn't. No rights are denied by not allowing Gay marriage but this is ridiculous. With prostitution they have to exchange money or be caught in the act, but when it comes to consensual gay sex that isn't for profit you can be arrested for thinking about it? It's frightening in my opinion.

The senate ethics committee wouldn't have taken this up if it were not for the partisan media and Dems making an issue of it.

Dee

This is an example of when the hypocricy angle should be used. Larry Craig is very much against gay marriage and gay rights. Mark Foley ironically helped write many of the laws that almost took him down.

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Shawn - you don't think Gay people should be allowed to be

against Gay Marriage? What about the hypocrisy of the left and the media treating Gay sex as a guilty thought that needs to be punished? Where do hetero's get punished for thinking about having sex in public?

Have you ever had sex in public? If not have you ever thought about it? Are you a hypocrite?

Dee

Sure I have though it. Even if someone caught me in the act of the mile high club it would not make me a hypocrite because I was never against it in the first place, sorry I do not get your point on this.

The msm is amused as I am that these two lawmakers are actually trying to pass laws through congress that they do not do themselves.

Oh and also. Little different thinking things out and acting them out Dee

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Well shawn - you seem to be against it when Larry Craig does it

that is the hypocritical part. To say I'm not against public sex when I do it only when someone else does it is kind of silly. You really don't care if people have sex in front of your child? I think most of us have had some form of public sex and we are still against sex in public.

Of course there is a difference between thinking about things and acting them out. He didn't act anything out! He didn't have sex in public.

again Dee

I never said i am against people having sex in public. Ever see my rants on free speech?

I could care less if he wanted to get some starfish action going, I don't like the fact that he tried to create laws that a prejudice towards gays. That is a total double standard.

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Dee, it's not "the left" that did this...

It's a cop who probably didn't want to be involved in a spectacle like this along with the Senate Ethics people, who are rightly concerned when a Senator exhibiting questionable behavior pulls out a card and says, "do you know who I am?" Not good, especially in view of the guilty ("no contest" = "guilty-looking enough that I ain't even gonna fight it" in legalese) plea. I know of a LOT of consensual "crime" defendants who'd like to change their pleas, but they're not Republican politicians, and I doubt most Republicans would defend their right to do-so.

Try, if you will, to imagine your own reaction to this incident if only the name in question had been changed from Larry Craig to Barney Frank...Do you really think it would be the same??? I've got a pretty-good imagination, but I'm sorry, I don't see it happening. You're biased. It's nothing to be ashamed-of, I'm biased on a number of issues, too. But it's important around here to admit it...
JMR

If this is winning, I think I'd rather lose...

Sarc - I know no one believes me but I really don't care

If people are gay or not. I could care less that Barney Frank is gay. Running a prostitution ring in your home is another thing and voting for Gay Marriage as opposed to civil unions is another. I wouldn't support Barney Frank in unrealistic Gay agenda items, but what he does legally isn't my concern.

I'm biased in favor of Gay people but not to the extent that it infringes on children or gives them special rights. This is clear discrimination against Gay people and the left is silent accept for a few in the ACLU.

Everyone is biased - I biased about my opinions for sure. I don't agree with Republicans on this issue because most of them think he should resign. So in this case I'm against both Dems and Reps and would be considered Libertarian on this issue. I'm surprised you aren't Sarc.

Oh, but I _AM_

Right-up to the guilty-plea. If you are willing to allow every pot defendant in the USA to rethink his/her plea, then I'll think differently. I don't think you're willing to take that position, so as things stand what's sauce for the weed-tokin' geese should be sauce for the closeted-homosexual gander. 1 standard. Larry may not have gotten to screw around with that undercover officer, but he screwed the pooch with that plea he took.
JMR

If this is winning, I think I'd rather lose...

Sarc - I'm not saying he should be allowed to change his plea

only that he should never have had to make it. It's disgusting that cops can patrol bathrooms and arrest you based on your foot movements. They can leave his plea but if I lived where that happened I'd want to make sure something was done about this invasive and unconstitutional practice of arresting people for their thoughts.

He made a stupid mistake by pleading no contest and only did it to avoid publicity because it's wasn't a serious crime.

The serious story here from a Libertarian perspective is not that he wants to change his plea it's that he had to make it in the first place. I think many men would have done the same thing to avoid their wives finding out. No I don't excuse cheating on one's wife, but I don't agree with criminalizing it either.

Well, like I say...

It's that plea that was the problem for Larry. My suggestion WRT letting everyone contest drug pleas would literally bring the legal system to its knees if implemented, so it wasn't entirely serious.

It's probable Larry's police officer was in the airport mensroom because of complaints which would never have been an issue in a truly-free sex-market. I don't believe that there was any conspiracy to target a gay Republican Senator that day.

If you want to talk "in general" instead of Larry Craig, I think sexual behavior in front of kids would be reduced (but not eliminated -- no utopia!) if prostitution were re-legalized. I feel the same way in general about drugs being re-legalized and keeping the bad-stuff away from kids. I think a free marketplace would lead to weaker/safer drugs than the black market yields, and it would probably hide sexual behavior better from the eyes of young kids.

But this is what's a bit amazing to me about your position. You seem to fear the foot-tapping police invading our privacy, but (unless my memory fails me again) you don't seem to say much about this nation's failed drug prohibition policy. This is strange because of the drugwar's historically much-higher fiscal and freedom costs than the war on mensroom-sexuality. If you agree with me about this contentious issue, then welcome aboard!! But so-far, your privacy concerns seem to be a bit fixated on a single closeted homosexual (ok, maybe Larry's BIsexual) politician.
JMR

If this is winning, I think I'd rather lose...

Sarc - I don't think there was a conspiracy to get a Republican

senator. I think the media barrage was because it was a Republican senator. If it had been any well known liberal, they would have taken the right side which is that you shouldn't arrest someone for thinking about or wanting to have Gay Sex.

I have mixed feelings about legalized drugs. Marijuana should be legal in my opinion but narcotics and highly addictive synthetic drugs are a different story. It's not something I care to argue about because I'm not really sure where I stand. I can see positives and negatives to both positions.

I admit - I care more about sex than drugs ; )

Me too, Dee.

The problem with this kind of media barrage is that due to the politics of the various parties involved, a good analogy (like a hypothetical Democrat owning an offshore tax-haven) often sounds weird. IMO.

And in my political scenario, I rely on a hungry and out of work product-liability bar to fight it out in courtrooms across the nation. I believe the eventual result of the fight would probably lead to something obvious and relatively-noncontroversial, like "the natural forms of these substances seem a lot safer than when man concentrates them" or "it's probably best if the sex industry keeps to one part of town."

The free market and the legal system tend to work in ways that make drugs less-unsafe and less-likely to fall into the hands of young people. Same for prostitution -- that Dennis Hof guy may have recently become infamous for thinking like me politically, but I'd bet good money (if I were allowed by our masters to gamble on the internet, that is...) there's no way any minor could ever get into his legal Nevada whorehouses. Legalizing all this garbage just makes sense.

For some folks, it's also an excuse to tax the hell out of "sin," but for me taxes are quite sinful-enough as it is, so I don't like that argument so much. I can pretty much rely on taxes being high without encouraging it!! I wonder just how much Mr. Hof (not to mention every girl he employs!) pays in taxes to the Nevada and Federal governments?
JMR

If this is winning, I think I'd rather lose...

Iraq Strategy in the

Iraq Strategy in the beginning

I never denied the Dems did not vote for the war. Bottom line is Rumsfeld ignored warnings from many top generals and did not go in with enough troops to secure the peace, even the President said the original plan was flawed. I fail to see how the msm covering the a few protest had anything to do with this. I remember Bush quite popular right down to the moment of the "mission accomplished" poster

Attorney Firings

I will repeat what I said to another poster. He had every right to fire them. Again firing attorneys mid term has never happenned in our countrys history, yes Clinton fired all the attorneys, but so did Reagan. If he said was nobodys damn business why he fired them I would not have liked it but would have accepted it. He instead chose to say the firings were not political and we know the job fallout from that don't we?

Immigration Debacle.

From what I remember Kennedy said the Dems were ready to sign Amnesty bill, it was the republicans that blocked it. Rightfully so I might add, but I believe you actually take the Liberal side of this argument.


26% rating for Dem congress

No arguments from me here, they suck.

Delay and Bill Frist

Delay was indicted and had a mug shot taken, that does not deserve media coverage? Bill Frist is being investigated for Stock Fraud, which is a serious offense.

Duke Cunningham

He is in jail Dee, and so is Bob Ney are the msm reponsible for them having to be careful not to drop the soap?


Water to Superdome
-

The States screwed up, but I believe as a POTUS, he should not take a nonchalant not my problem attitude, he should have sent in help right away and don't tell me he could not, he is after all the most powerful man in the free world.

Scooter Libby was railroaded

The msm has nothing to do with Scooter getting convicted Dee. A judge and Jury did that.


Oil Prices?????

Yes worldwide demand has alot to do with it, but the power of our dollar has alot to do with it as well. Cutting interest rates and instabilty in the Middle East has some to do with it as well.

Debt

Come on Dee, reducing taxe in a time of war with have it paid off sooner? I am not a economist, but I would like you to back that up.


Larry Craig was railroaded

Well perhaps he should not have pleaded guilty huh?

Anyways Dee, these are just some examples of what is going on. McCain the Rhino only has lukewarm support and he is the presumed nominee. The chances of taking back congress are slim and some are openly predicting the GOP will not be back until 2012. You are trying to pin this soley on Hollywood?

Yes Shawn - Hollywood and the MSM - there is no other

logical explanation for why people would think it's okay to just pull out of Iraq and let the terrorists take over and not care

You are naive if you think the constant day in day out Bush/Republican hate on every news cast, many sitcoms and many movies had no impact.

Bush was popular up until the Mission Accomplished banner because there was no spinning that type of decisive success. It was on our T.V. screens as it happened.

The turning point was all of the protest that were made to look like a groundswell of grass roots support when they were orchestrated by hostile governments and communist. Most people are followers and they want to be on the winning team. They saw night after night of these protests and saw it as the way the country was going despite the fact that it wasn't. Pro troupe events were given little if any coverage.

The media and Hollywood turned Americans against the war along with Communist and other governments hostile to the U.S. That is the sad truth. Not even half the country would be against it if there would have been fair coverage. Not one of those war protests was exposed for what they were.

Just like the illegal immigration protests. I'm on the other side of the issue and I can still see the bias. The bias is so far left on the immigration debate that the compromise position is portrayed as an extreme right racist position. Outside groups are organizing and paying for these protests also.

You are right Shawn - you are not an economist and I don't blame you for not realizing it because it wasn't reported prominently by the MSM but the treasury took in more money after the tax cuts than before them and Bush reduced the deficit.

Here is one article

 

Deficit

As to the rest, I'm not going to keep going over and over it. You don't see the impact that the media has had on the issues but I do. You don't think that the media can taint a jury pool, I do. Tom Delay was arrested by a partisan person who declared at a dem fund raiser that he would take Delay Down. If that isn't enough for you then nothing will be.

And if you believe Kennedy's characterization as the correct one then there is nothing I can say to you on that either. Yes there were Republicans against it, but there were enough of them for it that it would have passed if the Dems supported it. Hillary didn't support it. Obama didn't support it. It was too right wing for them. So if you side with most Newsbusters on that issue then you should be frightened about Obama or Clinton getting control of the issue.

 

Dee

I said nothing about the deficit, I was talking about the national debt. I also never said the msm has nothing to do with it, but only a small part.

Many people are against the war becaue they see footage of Americans getting blown up night after night. They don't like the fact that they are in the middle of a war between Sunni and Shia. They do not like the fact that our military is stretched thin. They do not like the fact this war might cost a trillion dollars after it is finished, we are a little over halfway there now. Before you accuse me of a being a cut and runner, I believe there is too much invested to leave now. I am just saying it is not the msm fault

Look around you Dee, there is much infighting, lots of conservatives staying home election day, slim chance for taking back congress. This is all the msm fault?

Also there are many things I do not like about Obama and Clinton as well, I have also commented about how much whining the Clintons are doing re: the msm, so this is not a vast left wing conspiricy.

 

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Yes it is the medias fault Shawn - Republicans are not immune

to brainwashing by the media.

Well then Dee

If what you say is true. Republians are not as smart as you give them credit for huh?

Stupid writers strike now I have to wait till 2009

Advertising works on almost everyone

Advertising works on almost everyone. The media have had a long hard adverstising campaign against the war, and agains Republicans.

 

Double

double

5 days without water

I believe that if a person is denied water for 5 days they will die. I heard of no one dying from dehydration in the superdome or being treated for it after the disaster.

water to the superdome

Don't know how long a person can go without water, but obviously they must had to make due with what supplies they had. From what I remember there was no working water or electricity.

I did not know that how long a person can make it without food or water had anything to do with getting 5 days to get help.

Rocky and Apollo BFF!!

The point that you posted

The point that you posted said that it took 5 days to get water to the superdome. If they did not need to be supplied with water for survival why is it so important that they did not get it for 5 days.

Are you now changing your position from it took 5 days to get them water to it took 5 days to get them help?

"Are you now changing your

"Are you now changing your position from it took 5 days to get them water to it took 5 days to get them help?"

Nope not at all, I said they had to make due with what supplies they had. Water was only one of the things that were needed at the superdome. I used water as a example.

Just like your earlier thread today, I really don't want to split hairs with you. If you disagree with me on the Katrina thing that is fine, my main point is that Republicans are responsible for losing the house and senate, Republicans are responsible for McCain being the nominee, Yes the msm are biased, but it is certainly not all their doing.

Rocky and Apollo BFF!!

Shawn - maybe the local

Shawn - maybe the local governments (City & State) had their heads stuck up their arses?

Giulliani had earth moving equipment & cranes at ground zero the morning of Sep 12th. That in a situation he had no advance notice of.

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

FS

Nagin and Blanco did not do a very good job of evacuating people in time and were slow in their response

Guiliani did a magnificant job, he showed great leadership. The thing is unlike Katrina, the USA had just been attacked on its own soil. The military was there within hours. Also the city of New York had working electricity and water. NO did not have these luxuries and many had to live on rooftops for days.

George Bush could have sent in people with help. I felt he had the power of sending in help sooner, but he chose not to do so in a timely manner. 


Shawn

Get a grip.

Hurricane preparedness is a function of the state and local governments.  New Orleans officials and citizens took the position of having their heads in the sand and their a**es in the air....dreaming and HOPING that Katrina would change course and blow on by.

They didn't even suggest evacuation in a timely manner, much less get "a" shelter (the SuperDome) open.  Furthermore, it is a state function to provide immediate disaster relief after a hurricane.  Every year in June all of the local municipalities, in conjunction with the State of Florida, do hurricane disaster planning...prepositioning supplies, planning evacuation routes, etc.

Trust me, I've been through a few in 2004 - 2005.   In fact, a Cat 3 (just like Katrina) blew right over my house. 

The libs screaming "Katrina" ad nauseum is sickening.  Those idiots in NO deserved everything that happened to them.  Notice I didn't say Louisiana....the rest of the state apparently had the foresight to plan for a Cat 3 hurricane.  It's called Personal Responsibility.

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

well absolutely B

iirc the National Guard had to wait two days to be 'invited' by the locals and the invite was only extended after pressure by the feds.

No poofdas

Precisely, B.

It makes me want to tear off liberal heads when I hear them whine about the "Bush Administration's" lack of response to Katrina.

Sheesh.  School Bus Nagin deserves a majority of the blame, as does the Gov. 

IIRC, Jeb Bush offered aide and assistance to NO the following day, even though Katrina had blown through Broward & Dade counties several days previously.

True story...Katrina headed in all day exactly at my latitude, I didn't leave work until 4:00 that day....Katrina swung south and made landfall at 6:30 thirty miles south on the Dade/Broward line as a Cat 1 (fortunately).  Many downed trees and power outages.  A mere inconvenience, as the citizens and officials in Florida know how to plan. 

If I never read the words "Hurricane Katrina" again...it will be too soon.  I am SOOOO over the whining. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

and B where

are the newsclips from the night before it hit NO?  I remember the interviews live from the French Quarter, you know with the ijits saying "If it hits I'll die in this bar drinking a beer"!!

No Poofdas 

Sorry, Bruce

I haven't a clue....as I said, Katrina came ashore here in Florida several days before it swung north towards NO....I was without power for about a week, IIRC.  My mom had just arrived, and I was like "Mom, we're having a hurricane tomorrow".  LOL.

I do recall seeing Katrina (at work, where we have a monster generator) as a monster Cat 5 out in the Gulf, heading into NO.  Those people must have been galactically stupid to take their chances staring THAT down, and hanging out drinking beer.   Cat 1, no worries.....Cat 3, I'm thinking of evacuation....Cat 4 or more....color me gone!

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

the point B

these people were laughing and refusing to leave or even prepare!  (i guess Bush made them stoopid)

No Poofdas

Galactically stupid, apparently

Had to use that again....I just love that phrase.

Good one, B. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Shawn #2

First off, Blonde, nicely done as always... and hi :)

Secondly, Shawn:

Will you and the hypnotized masses of Bush = Evil/Bad ever snap out of it? Are you simply unable to disengage from this utterly irrational, knee-jerk temptation to view Bush through this mythical prism the MSM -- and divisive left-right politics -- have evidently succeeded in building? Bush is just another president, and a pretty decent one, and a VERY decent human being.

I urge you to watch Fox News' (yup, that "evil corporate empire" -- hardy har -- and it's only them because no one else will dare to put a real, pure face on any Bush profile) interview with Bush... can't remember who did it, but it was on TV the other week. I admire and respect him even more now. He has true integrity and conviction in his beliefs... oh, and YES, a truckload of compassion as well. It's disgusting how he's been torn down from all sides during his tenure.

And this...

Nagin and Blanco did not do a very good job of evacuating people in time and were slow in their response

Again, get off the "Bush juice" and do a little more than make a passing, page 22, "oh-by-the-way" comment of the local and state people involved here. They were -- and are -- miserable in their jobs. Like Blonde pointed out, that city had lived with this threat for decades, and yet seemed so ill-prepared for what happened.

George Bush could have sent in people with help. I felt he had the
power of sending in help sooner, but he chose not to do so in a timely
manner.

Do you truly believe -- if in fact he did not respond in the timely manner you see as sufficient, which is perfectly fine to believe -- that he CHOSE not to??

Is there some manufactured, bottled BDS juice, like Gatorade, that's been in stores since 2001 that everyone's been sucking down the last 7-8 years, and I just never saw it on the shelves?

 

We bid a fond farewell to Professor Talking Points & Cheetos

Hey Shy,

Back atcha & thx for the kind words.

You should include a link (in your tag) to the collaborative vid you did with Jack Bauer....Sox (you could have put him behind the wheel like Toonces...just a thought).

I laughed...that was excellent!   

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Toonces??!!

the driving cat, there's a blast from the past.

No Poofdas

The "Old" SNL Rules

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Hey B

Yeah, I'll definitely put the Socks-Cat link below, as my new signature. I have to find out from Dave if he's posted it to YouTube.... but wait, sounds like you saw it - ?

Sorry I'm not on Y, but I'll try to log on later :)

 

We bid a fond farewell to Professor Talking Points & Cheetos

Shawn - Your BDS is relapsing

Shawn, I was six blocks away when it happened.

At approx 5pm when we left to catch a tugboat across the Hudson to NJ, the only military presence I noticed was overhead fighters, and we onlyknew about that from the news.

NYC had tugboats brought in to get people off the island. Tugboats. Not Navy destroyers. Not Coast Guard cutters, Tugboats. Ones that the city got to come pick people up and bring us across to Hoboken Terminal.

 

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

Blonde, botg, freestinker and Mr Shy


Blonde and Freestinker,

I understand both your POV, and I
guess I have to agree to disagree with you guys on this one. I regret
even bringing up Katrina. This thread more deals with how the
Conservatives want to blame so much on the msm, when much of their
destruction came from their own hands


botg

I remember toonces the driving cat as well. Waynes World and Sprockets was also some of my favorites for the eightys.


Mr Shy


As
for you
Mr. Shy, I would have to say you are one the worst post and
runners I have ever seen. Every time you post a cheap shot and I
respond, all I hear are crickets. So when 3 members are posting against
me, you figure it would be fun for you to jump in. I did not realize
how good of a judge of character Free Stinker is:-)

 

Acute BDS

(very loud sigh)

louder sigh.

All I said was I see your POV and we will have to agree to disagree, how is that Acute BDS?

 

Please see below.

Please see below.

Shawn

I apologize for my hit-and-runs. I have not been engaging with users of late on NB due to being too busy and my computer being slow and clumsy, so it takes forever to post things.

As for a debate on my character with regards to FS, well, we'll just have to open a new forum for that one, won't we ;) (joke!! gosh, I so have no desire to debate w/ anyone on my character, or my music, or anything... I'm just here to pull you poor BDS souls out of your hypnotic malaise... :p)

And so, with all that said... you have my ear now. Please respond to my Bush lovefest rants :) (They're not lovefests, they're just defenses of a decent man -- and I've had it to here with the endless nonsense thrown at his doorrstep.)

 

We bid a fond farewell to Professor Talking Points & Cheetos

Mr. Shy

Good morning.

It is a little past five in the morning here on the West coast and I am actually motivated to go the gym this morning, but looks like there were many late owls caus I tooks like there are some post I have to respond to.

First of all thank you for showing character for at least giving an explanation and acknowledging the post and runs. I am glad to know you have had computer problems instead of doing what many on this site can't stand from liberal trolls.

Second of all, I never said the President was not a decent man and this thread is not about the President it is about the GOP in general. As you can see by the many of the people that are not going to vote for the GOP nominee, one of the their main reasons is their pledge not to vote for a RHINO again. I emphasize the word again. Who do you think that word refers to? They are obviously very disapointed by this man in the Oval office right now.

I have to head to the gym and respond to few more post before I leave, so I will catch up with you later.

shawn - Item by item

  • The awful strategy in Iraq"in the beginning" - you mean the decision to invade, eh?
  • Attorney firings - They serve at the pleasure of the president. Another BS charge.
  • Immigration debacle - Fair criticism, butg forgets that the Dmeocrats are exactly alike. Both parties suck on this one.
  • 30 percent rating for Bush - Relevance?
  • 9 trillion debt - So let's shutdown HHS . . .
  • Tom Delay debacle - BS
  • Bill Frist debacle - Huh? He has been out of the Senate since 2006.
  • Duke Cunningham - Thank you for noting that the GOP gets rid of their bad apples. How's William Jefferson doing?
  • Hitting over 100 per barrel "now down slightly" - So you agree we shoudl drill in ANWR? Now a valid criticism would be "Why did Bush ban Fla drilling?"
  • Taking 5 days to get water to the Superdome - [Handled]
  • Scooter Libby Debacle - He said she said case of Scooter's word vs. the word of reporters (such as Russert) who have said they wanted him in jail. No reason for them to lie . . .
  • Larry Craig still not resigning - Speak to Craig about that, after Barney Frank resigns.
  • Runaway spending - Fair criticism.

 

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

Ok Free now we are getting somewhere

I will talk about some of the points you addressed"mainly the ones you disagreed" and then i will move on.

I feel and the President has admitted this that the plan was flawed. There was not enough troops to secure the peace and Americans lost the support of many of civilians because we could not protect the properly from insurgents. I have said this many times before, the Dems voted for the war. I also thought that they had wmd as well, so no, I do not blame Bush for invading.

30 percent rating for Bush, Tom Delay and Bill Frist and Duke Cunningham and someone I did not mention yet.Mark Foley all have relevance because it made voters weary of the leadership of the GOP. If these scandals did not happen, I bet the GOP would still be in controll of both he house and senate.

I did not like the way George Bush handled the Libby and attorney firings. He should have pardenned Scooter at the very beginning or at least the end of his trial, but he let it drag on too long. He should not have said the attorney firings were not political and said it was nobodys business.

Larry Craig never should have plead guilty if he was innocent and he also never should have said he was resigning, then change his mind.

Anyways FS, one point you are right about is these things are in the past. I am talkin about the present and even though the msm is biased, it is not the msm that voted in McCain, it was registered republicans. It is not the msm fault people like you and CT are most likely not going to vote for RHINO. The GOP has self destructed and many conservatives should look at themselves and try to fix their party instead of pointing fingers.

shawn, again (I'm on a roll...)

This thread more deals with how the Conservatives want to blame so much on the msm, when much of their destruction came from their own hands.

You're flat-out wrong. Or, okay, I flat-out disagree with this statement, Shawn.

The MSM's determined and relentless pounding of any and all negatvies, many of which are fabricated or trumped up, day in and day out, have had such a profound impact on the current weakness of the GOP, and on public opinion everywhere (as Cool Arrow has stated spot-on, below.) Mainly, I believe, it's pulled the moderates more to the left.

Also, when you say "much of..." are you saying it's been a "majority" of their own undoing? or just a larger percentage than many here believe?

 

We bid a fond farewell to Professor Talking Points & Cheetos

Hi Shy...I had been

Hi Shy...I had been considering filing a missing persons report on you with NB.  Good to have you around again, even if you brought those same tedious talking points along with you.

Your comment about the "MSM's determined and relentless pounding of any and all negatives, many of which are fabricated or trumped up...." is exactly the same explanation/excuse I heard from the Clinton people a decade ago.

Anyway, hope things age going well for you.

Jer