Jeffrey Dahmers speeding conviction

“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts 

You seem to be a child molester, based on your comments...

 Accorn uses these tactics as well, we aint falling for it WitchWay.

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

 There is a very key word there.  It does have a large impact on the statement.  That word?  UNCONDITIONALLY.  We should not support any foreign nation UNDCONDITIONALLY.    Really?  Then he could have bitched about a country we support more unconditionally than Israel.  See, we have disagreements constantly with Israel, and they have disagreements with us.  Right there, the whole "unconditionally" thing?  Crap.

If we "unconditionally" supported Israel the way he insists we do, than YOU can explain why the Saudis are flying E-3s and F-15s after the Israelis begged the United States NOT to sell them to the Saudis.  Or why Jonathan Pollard is still in the slam; you see, Israel constantly asks for his release.  We tell them "go to Hell" every single time. 

As for having this allegedly "close alliance" with the Likud Party, you can explain to me Operation Nickel Grass, which supported a government under a Labor PM. 

If not anti-Semitic, both you and your hero are at least guilty as all hell of plain stupidity, which could be cured with just a little research. 

You some how came away with the thinking that I had a "very severe problem with the existence of Israel."  This is why I call you a hypocrite for accusing me of being intellectually dishonest.  Nah, you call me a hypocrite because that is much easier for you than facing my counter-argument outlined above squarely.  If you don't have a severe problem with the existence of Israel, then why do you scream at posters like myself for "supporting Israel more than your own country"?  Why don't you actually read what I posted here? 

By the way, the one country we support more "unconditionally"?  The United Kingdom.  But do I hear any bitching about that unconditional support?  NO!  It's all about how we "unconditionally" support Israel, which is garbage, as I have outlined above.   

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

This truther train departed Reality Station years ago.

All that's left is a blind, irrational, desperate burning hatred of Israel and America.

Psychotic is the term I'd normally use for someone who watches two jetliners full of people fly into two skyscrapers then tells people there were no planes and blames the collapse on someone actually pulling off a picture perfect demolition job involving tons of high explosives without detection.

I mean...if CNN says it was airliners then the Mossad must be really, really good. 

Nationalized Healthcare is a DEATH SENTENCE.

5 to 10 floors covered with 20,000 gallons of fuel is to much to put out. All fire supression piping is also torn out.. The thing to remember is that the steel is TEMPERED (wingding has no science education) If he did he'd know that all the fire needs to do is remove the tempering @ 650 F ...NO MELTING NECESSARY.

The B-29 was planning on landing so it's speed was close to stall speed with full flaps.Even so some parts of that aircraft went through the building.

As you are aware the jets that whacked the WTC were at full throttle moving at about 3 times landing speeds.

What part about islamofascists  does wing ding  skip?

Reagan VS Liberalism

 Nevermind that the towers were designed to withstand such an event.  No they were not, WhichWhine.  Not for the aircraft of today.  When the towers were designed in the 1960s, planes the size of 767s were almost science fiction.  When the towers were under construction, Boeing introduced plans for the 747 - a plane so audaciously big that it was called the "Jumbo Jet" by the media. 

The largest passenger aircraft in the world at the time were the Boeing 707 and the smaller Douglas DC-8 - and these were a far cry from the 747, and the 767, which was first flown on commercial routes in 1982.  If the aircraft that hit that day were 707s or DC-8s, you might have had a point, as is indicated in City In The Sky, page 131.  It quotes a study indicating that "The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707 - DC-8) travelling at 600 miles per hour."  But that's cold comfort in the modern era. 

Will you admit to the same about my statement -- a steel framed high rise had never collapsed due to fire.  I don't see how that matters.  Steel structures are as subject to the possibility of structural failure as anything else, as demonstrated in many a warehouse fire.  It's just another example of your reaching and moving the goalposts. 

You mentioned that you had "several pictures of areas covered with paper ejected from the towers by various means."  Do you think any of those papers came from within the plane?  A plane that was, as you said, "full of jet fuel that ignited upon impact."   Are you willing to say that a report of one of the hijackers' passports surviving the plane impact and fireball is a credible story, or even a plausible situation?  Don't forget, you contend that this was an impact and fire great enough to eventually lead to the collapse of the towers.  Yet you figure the passport survived?  (And you call me a conspiro!)   Yes, WhichWhine.  Why you insist on arguing this point with a former firefighter is beyond me.  Keep moving the goalposts.  Have you ever seen any footage or photography of plane crashes, even fiery ones?  Not every damned thing burns.  You can still get baggage undamaged from some sections of the plane, even in fiery crashes. This is 100% entirely possible. 

You simply have to do something that your posts over the years indicate you have an extremely severe problem with - accept reality. 

You just stuck the goalposts way out in leftfield by trying to pretend that a passport from inside the plane was just as likely to survive as papers from floors adjacent to the impact area.  Nope.  Not at all.  Your refusal to accept reality is really not my problem.  The paper can come from the plane, the paper can come from the towers - it's not guaranteed to burn just because of a fiery impact.  If that were the case, lots of fire investigators around the world would have a huge uphill battle on their hands every time a blaze occurred. 

Now, WhichWhine, go move the goalposts again in your constant war against reality. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)