Oh, and there have been quite a few answers to those questions already. But I see some are a bit dodgy. A few are even outright illogical rationalizations.
So prepare to be challenged if you plan on nipping someone else's homework. I'm going over those as well.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
These are spiritual steps we are talking about, ANY human can make them if they hear the gospel and the Holy Spirit tugs at their heart. I have seen it hundreds of times! Some times it takes several times for them to step forward. I did it as a teenager, and I am now in my 50's. If God forces people to be saved is that free will? Or is there no free will? How do you explain Adam and Eve?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."MM says...
MM:These are spiritual steps we are talking about, ANY human can make them
if they hear the gospel and the Holy Spirit tugs at their heart.
Okay. Hold up here. Which comes first? You're clearly qualifying things at the outset, and I wanna keep you honest here.
MM:I have
seen it hundreds of times!
o_O <?!?? You can actually see the very moment the fallen human will becomes regenerate?
MM:Some times it takes several times for them
to step forward.
Then how do you know which one is the "real one?" You've seen it hundereds of times!
MM:I did it as a teenager, and I am now in my 50's. If
God forces people to be saved is that free will?
1. Is God dragging people kicking and screaming to Hell? Is there one person in Hell that loves God? And if you asked them while they were in Hell, how do you know it's truly a contrite love they're confessing, since they simply might be willing to say anything to get them out of Hell at that point?
2. Did I say somewhere that we did not have free will? Right now I'm willing myself to shoot lasers from my eyeballs, wouldn't that be neat? Now I'm willing myself to grow a third arm. I'd be able to type 50% faster. Why didn't I think of that?
3. Assuming we have a free will, what are the limits of it? Some? None?
MM:Or is there no free
will? How do you explain Adam and Eve?
Which of the 3 points did you accept again? Surely you believe in Total Depravity. Or was Adam simply responsible for his own sin and we're all born with some inherent good within us?
One or the other. I of course, believe Adam passed a curse upon humanity called sin.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"Okay. Hold up here. Which comes first? You're clearly qualifying things at the outset, and I wanna keep you honest here."
Well of course the gospel comes first and then salvation.
"
o_O <?!?? You can actually see the very moment the fallen human will becomes regenerate?"
No I have just seen multitudes come to Christ in invitations, but of course I don't know their hearts.
MM:I did it as a teenager, and I am now in my 50's. If
God forces people to be saved is that free will?
Your two points are spurious, God is casting people to outer darkness because they have not accepted His son as their savior.
And, Yes as a Strict Cavlinist you do believe that people do not have free will. Hence TULIP (you may want to explain to some readers who do not know the Achronym).
And finally I do believe in Total Depravity, but not the way you do, which is that man is incapable of accepting redemption. We do, however agree on your last point.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."MM says...
MM:Well of course the gospel comes first and then salvation.
So a man is saved by believing someone else's story about Jesus? Is it therefore possible to reason someone into the Kingdom?
MM:No I have just seen multitudes come to Christ in invitations, but of course I don't know their hearts.
Okay, just checking. Because the heart is deceitful above all things.
MM: Your two points are spurious, God is casting people to outer darkness because they have not accepted His son as their savior.
No, that would assume they had an option to choose between good and evil. And this then brings up the question as to where the ability to "choose" to do good came from. Do you believe that man is born with a little tiny island of righteousness that makes him capable of "reaching out" for salvation? Do you believe there are "seekers" to warrant the creation of a "Seeker Sensitive Movement"? Are there any that seek after God?
MM:And, Yes as a Strict Cavlinist you do believe that people do not
have free will.
No, that's an incorrect definition. I am quite the strict Calvinist, and I was taught both from my Calvinist teachers, and the founders thereof, that man is indeed born with a free will. We do not reject that.
MM:Hence TULIP (you may want to explain to some readers
who do not know the Achronym).
No. There's no need. NB doesn't exist in a vaccum. If they truly "want" to know, they're a couple clicks away.
I place high expectations on the members of NB here and give credit for the brains God gave them. I find it rather patronizing when I feel forced to "spoon-feed" information to someone that has it almost literally right there in their laps. That verse in Proverbs about the sluggard too lazy to lift the food from the dish to his mouth? I thought that was just crazy talk prior to 1995 or so.
MM: And finally I do believe in Total Depravity, but not the way you do,
which is that man is incapable of accepting redemption. We do, however
agree on your last point.
Then where do you think we differ on Total Depravity? I completely missed that. Please clarify.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"Is it therefore possible to reason someone into the Kingdom?
No, I have only spoken of the Word of God and the Holy Spirit.
Okay, just checking. Because the heart is deceitful above all things
And the only thing you can rely on when The Holy Spirit tugs on it.
"
No, that would assume they had an option to choose between good and evil." Stop there, check Genisis.
No, that's an incorrect definition. I am quite the strict Calvinist,
and I was taught both from my Calvinist teachers, and the founders
thereof, that man is indeed born with a free will. We do not reject
that.
But you do reject man's ability to choose Salvation.
Then where do you think we differ on Total Depravity? I completely missed that. Please clarify.
Quite simply: You believe God controlls everything (even though he does not have to) there is a possibilty that God allows man to decide is own destiny, which you reject. Salvation is a free gift, not the directive of a dictator.
Why did Christ suffer on the cross? To save those who whould come to him for salvation, not for those who were forced to salvation.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."MM says...
MM:No, I have only spoken of the Word of God and the Holy Spirit.
Okay. So then who is in charge then, the preacher of the gospel, or the Holy Spirit? Are we relying on men or on God to save?
MM:And the only thing you can rely on when The Holy Spirit tugs on it.
Now then, is that "tug" one that can be resisted? By "tug" do you mean a literal "pull" here?
MM:[No, that would assume they had an option to choose between good and evil."] Stop there, check Genisis.
Which part of Genesis are you referring to?
MM: But you do reject man's ability to choose Salvation.
The heart of the question is where the "will to choose" this Salvation comes from. If you truly believe that all humanity is born in trespasses and in sin, then who moves on who first? Who takes the initiative?
MM:Quite simply: You believe God controlls everything (even though he does not have to)
As a matter of fact, He does have to. You're not a deist, are you? But it's not such a difficult task for a God that is truly omnipotent, right?
MM: . . .here is a possibilty that God allows man to decide is own destiny, which you reject.
Because that decision was already made in Eden. I know. It upsets me too. Not much we can do about it.
MM:Salvation is a free gift, not the directive of a dictator.
Yet all who are offered the gift come to him. See John 17:12. All who were given to Christ were first given by the Father. All except Judas, but even he was set aside, it clearly states, so that the God's word would be fulfilled. Is that cruel? Is that the same as a human dictator?
MM:Why did Christ suffer on the cross? To save those who whould come to him for salvation, not for those who were forced to salvation.
Then the atonement is nothing more than mere symbolism. There would be no real effective power in the death and resurrection of Christ. Why would Jesus die for those who already had the innate ability or will to choose righteousness? Because they needed a little boost with the righteousness they already had? But that flies in the face of Romans 3:10-12, which is also quoting Psalms. This line of reasoning contradicts the "dead" of Ephesians 2. How dead is "dead" anyway?
Does the word "draw" in John 6:44 mean to "woo" or to "entice"? If you look it up in a Strongs I think you'll be surprised.
I think you're just hung up on God's sovereignty is all.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
MM:Your two points are spurious, God is casting people to outer darkness because they have not accepted His son as their savior.
In this statement, does the word "accepted" mean they "chose" God's son? Would it be unacceptable to you if I were to substitute the word "accepted" in favor of "surrendered to"?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
The hearing of the gospel. The Holy Spirit and the preaching of the Gospel, even if it is the first time! The Holy Spirit tugs at a sinners heart, you know, you've been there!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."MM says...
MM:The hearing of the gospel. The Holy Spirit and the preaching of the
Gospel, even if it is the first time! The Holy Spirit tugs at a sinners
heart, you know, you've been there!
Oh okay. Cool. So God gets 100% of the credit for salvation. "I planted, Apollos watered but. . ." what?
So no tango or whatever you call it.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
God, loves man soooo much that he WANTS unconditional love from man.(free will again)
From man this is love towards God... Man has only faith and the desire to be sinless to offer God, Man will of course fail in this.. The man who sees the evil he could do and does it not, is almost worthy of salvation. But of course he is not. But that is the man who may come to Christ.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."MM says...
How do you know I'm wrong? How about a little more Bible here to back you up? Or else I'll start thinking this is based on nothing more than your own "say so" argument. This isn't a difficult thing to get your head around.
MM:God, loves man soooo much that he WANTS unconditional love from man.(free will again)
You're mixing up A, B, C, D in their proper order. What did we lose at Eden again?
MM:From man this is love towards God...
This statement is a denial of total depravity. So that only makes you what. . .just a 2 pt. Calvinist then?
MM:Man has only faith and the desire
to be sinless to offer God, Man will of course fail in this..
Show me in the Bible where it ever says that prior to the intervention of the Holy Spirit of God, that man begins with the "desire to be sinless."
MM:The man
who sees the evil he could do and does it not, is almost worthy of
salvation. But of course he is not. But that is the man who may come to
Christ.
You are speaking at prior to salvation when man is still dead in his trespasses and sin. So either he's "not really dead" and Paul's been exaggerating twice in one chapter, or man is 100% absolutely incapable of saving himself.
You have a lot of statements floating around now that at this point demand some backing up.
I held up my end of it. Fair is fair. Show me in the book.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Well for one, walking, or the step forward as you put it (I assume during an altar call), is an act of the will. Action of the will = works. Not matter how small the effort.
Therefore, the stepping forward is either a profession of faith, an action which does not save you (since you're declaring what has already come before).
OR
The stepping forward is the very act which saves you. Then you have something to boast of.
MM:So going forward, in front of the world is works? Sounds like faith to me...
"For you have been saved by grace through faith. . ." and what? Is that faith yours? Is that faith generated of yourself?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Real question here, so don't take this wrong, but I understand that you are saying that faith alone, not works, saves. Right? Doesn't having faith, or acknowleging faith, take someone having the initiative to do so? Is this not a work? Otherwise, what are we in this for? Good works, such as feeding the poor, or raising an abandoned child, without faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour, will not afford one Heavenly bliss. God gave us free will to love Him. Why would he want it if it were forced, or predestined?
I know you've answered these before, but could you dumb it down a little for me?
MM:Real question here, so don't take this wrong, but I understand that you
are saying that faith alone, not works, saves. Right? Doesn't having
faith, or acknowleging faith, take someone having the initiative to do
so?
No. What does Ephesians say? Did you read it?
MM: Is this not a work?
Clearly states that faith is not of works. We are fully relying upon Christ's substitutionary atonement to bail us out of the penalty and judgement that we face.
My goal, or my calling, is to de-mystify faith. We do not have faith in faith. That is contradiction and absurdity. That is an empty hope and a "pie in the sky" mentality. No one can have faith in faith.
The very word "faith" always and absolutely requires an object to avoid mysticism and absurdity. Ours is not a mystery religion. We have so many faith contracts in our life. Just think of the word "fidelity" and count all the fidelity contracts you have. Think of the faith you place in the very chair you sit in. You are not assisting that chair in the act of sitting. You are 100% relying on it to not fall apart and break your tailbone or dislocate a vertebrae.
That's all faith is! So then what do you rely on God for? What do you yourself hold back that you should be relying on Him for? How much credit do you give Him for your salvation?
All of it. 100%. Jesus paid it ALL. All to Him I owe. Sin hath left a crimson stain. He washed it white as snow.
MM:Otherwise, what are we in this for? Good works,
such as feeding the poor, or raising an abandoned child, without faith
in Jesus Christ as Saviour, will not afford one Heavenly bliss.
The works are confirmation of your salvation. The works are the fruit. Jesus said, "If you love Me, you'll keep My commandments." No one can please God except through Christ. All our righteousness is as filthy rags. And though we show works as evidence of our faith in Him, do we obey Him perfectly? No.
Therefore, what is the sole hope of our salvation? Our works? No. God's grace. But at the same time the works are necessary as our testimony before men and a confirmation in and of ourselves that we are truly His children.
MM:God
gave us free will to love Him. Why would he want it if it were forced,
or predestined?
We were born with the free will to do anything within our power to please ourselves. We could willingly run anywhere we wanted, but not towards Him. Not on our own. Can you surprise God? Can you?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
I think I'm almost there. So, but for God's grace, we are all unworthy of Heaven. Agreed. I guess my only question is, is faith without works good enough? If we are only capable of faith through the death of Christ for our sins, which I agree with, then do we forfeit what he gives us without works? Is just not being evil, and murdering and raping, and simply being apathetic to others, without the good deeds going to get one to Heaven. I think not. So while we are not saved through works, aren't they at least expected by God?
I might be stepping out of my bounds, but allow me to humbly give my two cents.
Good behavior, in my mind, is a natural result of walking in relationship with God. It's the fruit we end up bearing by the Spirit's work inside of us. So if people are struggling with selfishness or bad behavior, it means they simply haven't surrendered everything to God in their life yet. It doesn't mean you're not a Christian, it just means you still need some work on the potter's wheel.
The only thing we ever have to "do" is submit to His guidance and everything else will fall into place.
I'm sure Trake will say that my thesis is too simplistic, but maybe it will give you some kind of comfort.
No Candance, this is the third time I've given you credit where credit was due. You're on the right track and nothing more really needs to be said.
But then I'm a creature of habit.
Yes. It is as I've stated before. First faith, then the works will always follow the genuine faith. The good fruit will grow from the good tree. The only thing I'd probably add to it would be one question. . .
How can you say that you're truly a believer in Christ, and not surrender absolutely everything to Him?
So then, "examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith." I Cor 11:28, 13:5 (test yourself), Gal 6:4.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
In a perfect world Christians would find Christ, obey Him perfectly, and never look back. But our flesh is so corrupt that it's impossible for us to reach the point of acting perfect every day. Even pastors sometimes make mistakes.
I'm not saying we can go around doing whatever because our flesh is so hopeless - Paul challenges us to break the flesh every day by submitting it to God.
We are told that as we learn more and more about God, we move from baby's milk to eating solid food, and that's a process of learning.
I don't think it's fair to look at a sincere Christian who struggles with something and tell them they really don't believe in Christ. Even Paul had a thorn in his flesh to keep him humble.
Candance, in a perfect world we would never have disobeyed Him to begin with.
But I'm not preaching a perfectionist gospel. It's called the doctrine of sanctification. We are first declared righteous before God, then the Holy Spirit goes to work on us (with us) in the lifetime task of cleaning out our closet. This process of sanctification and daily examination as above, prayer, worship, "crucifixion of the flesh," and study of His word, will eventually result in increasing obedience, fruit, and then as promised. . .our glorification.
That is, if the soil is right. The parable of the sower is in fact the parable of the human heart. Which soil is that guy over there at this point in time?
We don't know. All we are given is, as my pastor used to say, a license to inspect fruit and to encourage the growth of it. The wheat and the tares of the church are sown together.
Candance:I'm not saying we can go around doing whatever because our flesh is so
hopeless - Paul challenges us to break the flesh every day by
submitting it to God.
Correct. True believers are not antinomians, who believe that salvation is merely a "get out of jail free" card and a licence to sin as much as they want. The works are absolutely vital in so many ways.
Candance:We are told that as we learn more and more about God, we move from
baby's milk to eating solid food, and that's a process of learning.
Correct. This is the sanctification of the believer. All the age groups referred to are believers. Because the natural man does not receive the things of God (no kind of food at all) for they are foolishness to him.
Candance:I don't think it's fair to look at a sincere Christian who struggles
with something and tell them they really don't believe in Christ. Even
Paul had a thorn in his flesh to keep him humble.
Therefore, you must ask them to examine themselves. Correct. We do not know their hearts, but only that they "appear" sincere.
Paul tells us to test ourselves as Christians to see whether or not we are truly in the faith.
John tells us to test those who claim to be Christian teachers.
Even you do it yourself here already. So what's to dispute?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
I was simply disputing your question about someone not really believing in Christ if they have trouble surrendering everything. I agree that we should point it out to them and encourage them to search their hearts, but not to question their entire relationship with God.
You are right that we don't know a person's heart. They could be pretending to repent. Or they could be struggling to understand and just need more time. Or they could be coming to God with a tremendous amount of scars and insecurities. No one ever truly knows what someone else is thinking, or how God is dealing with them, so we should offer advice in a positive way.
That's all my point was.
But here is a little nitpicky point - is not the act of searching ourselves an act we do to draw closer to God?
C: I agree that we should point it out to them and encourage them to
search their hearts, but not to question their entire relationship with
God.
Why not? I do it several times a month. Even more when I'm feeling depressed. I do it instantly when an unclean thought enters my mind. We should be doing this at the very least when we take communion as stated in scripture.
C:No one ever truly knows what someone
else is thinking, or how God is dealing with them, so we should offer
advice in a positive way.
But what do we do with the bad news?
C:But here is a little nitpicky point - is not the act of searching ourselves an act we do to draw closer to God?
Correct. That is the "seek, find, knock" of Matt 6. Are we purely self-reliant where we can deceive ourselves, or are we Christ reliant on everything pertaining to life; even and up to our eternal relationship with Him? For He is our life.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Just because it behooves us to "act" by drawing to God doesn't mean that's an act we can boast of, and it doesn't take anything away from God's grace. It's like a child whose mother calls him to come to the table for dinner - he gets no credit for cooking the food or providing anything in the house, but if he doesn't come to the table he doesn't get any supper.
Like I said above, the only act we have to do is submit to God's voice. We allow the Spirit to cultivate our hearts. Obedience is only the act required.
Of course I search my relationship with God routinely and especially before communion. But I didn't like your insinuation that someone doesn't believe in Christ if they struggle to surrender.
Your right, this guy is good. I thought I knew the bible, but I had no idea God advocated killing people that worked on Sunday or that girls that had sex before marriage should be killed as well.
You, botg, TM and candance know the Bible better than most, does God really say those things?
S: You, botg, TM and candance know the Bible better than most, does God really say those things?
In those passages, yes. For the most part. If one were prone to the habit of cherrypicking, they could almost completely mischaracterize God's mercy and grace.
That is, if those two words are really in the Bible as well. And if they are, you need to ask yourself, "mercy and grace" from what?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
...too busy to sit through the whole video - but in terms of the firs question - I've tried to explain this to trach many times...
We can't answer most of these "God" questions - because only God knows the answers...and it's not our purpose to answer these questions anyway...
but God also knows trach insists on trying anyway...
why does God not re-grow amputated limbs for all praying amputees?
to this I could say many things - how do you know He hasn't? Maybe he just hasn't done it YET?
but we really don't know
maybe when we get to heaven we will
As an intelligent college educated person I don't have to "rationalize" this "constant" so-called "lack" of healed amputees - all I have to say is - God's grace is sufficient
Jesus prayed for the crucifixion to be avoided - this was God's son
God let the crucifixion go forward anyway, His grace was sufficient...
And believers are supposed to be doubting prayer because an amputee doesn't get a limb back...? The believers I run into don't have this problem at all..
God is a giver - he gives us many things - most of us have limbs that work, eyes that see, ears that hear, food, clothes, shelter, electicity, cars, TV yadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayada
God give us all of these things - but mainly our time and our love - to do with as we please...
He has given us these things for a purpose - but we don't have to do the purpose if we don't want to - free will
Imagine you own a mansion, and it requires 100 servants to maintain, you give the 100 servants each the special tools they need to do the job - but only about 20 or so are doing the work - the rest are out partying and doing whatever they want - and 18 of the 20 are always PRAYING TO YOU FOR MORE THINGS TO HAVE...
they don't like their job - they want a better one, they are lonely - they want a companion, they are sick - they want to be healed, they don't like the car they drive - they want a new one
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want, all of these want prayers - I want this, I want that
So how would you feel about these ingrates who always want more but hardly ever say thanks for what they have and never seem to want to do their jobs for which they were created
You send your only dear son to do the work for them, and die on their behalf - because you are God - and you love them
We are not here to ask for more things - we are servants with specific jobs to do
trying praying for peace, try praying for all of us to help each other more
trying praying for the bigots around here that sow hatred - pray for love to enter their hearts and replace their fear
maybe even go out and help someone yourself - volunteer for a soup kitchen once a week, on the way to work - today I emptied my wallet into the hands of a begger on the roadside, wished her well, prayed for her - not to find a home - just prayed for her - Jesus was homeless - we don't need homes - we need God - that girl was Jesus standing there - what I do to the least of my bretheren I do to Jesus, and she blessed me greatly as I helped her
God answers those actions and prayers in a very quick, visible, and dramatic fashion - because that's the primary mission around here on planet Earth
after all that everyday, then maybe He will get you a new arm - when He find's the time
TM: We can't answer most of these "God" questions - because only God knows
the answers...and it's not our purpose to answer these questions
anyway...
TM:but we really don't know [. . .] maybe when we get to heaven we will
This is really sad to look at, because it could almost be a sound argument if it weren't for TM's priorities once more floating to the top.
In the very process of clinging so tightly to his private doctrine of "absolute non-assurance" here, he logically cancels out the rest of the content of his entire post.
This tragedy is further exacerbated when you realize he has no idea he's doing it. Not even when just about anyone can observe the assertions he makes about God that contradict himself in the same post.
TM:He has given us these things for a purpose - but we don't have to do the purpose if we don't want to - free will
TM:God answers those actions and prayers in a very quick, visible, and
dramatic fashion - because that's the primary mission around here on
planet Earth
Everyone but TM, that is. =(
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
I'm open to comparing my MO with yours any day TM.
TM:usurping God's role as judge of our souls
I'm often accused of that here.
As if I were claiming the final authority.
Or to have written the book on it.
Or. . .something. =^\
TM:and his stubborn refusal to accept the inherent un-provability of faith
"Our team of specialists here at Truthmonger Inc., would like to assure you of our commitment to putting the mystery back into 'mystery religion,' and where a mystical faith is job #1!"
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"sure" could really just be another word for "faith" if you like, old buddy:)...
in that case I'd happily be "sure" of my faith in Jesus - I just couldn't "prove" it - and neither could you
my theology - and yours - will never be more than just barely on display here - we hardly even understand our own theologies ourselves, and we contradict ourselves all the time - we are truly pathetic teachers in the eyes of God - but each of us is made perfect in Christ - and Him alone
TM:my theology - and yours - will never be more than just barely on
display here - we hardly even understand our own theologies ourselves,
and we contradict ourselves all the time. . .
That's for you to actually prove.
My posts speak for themselves and we've been through this before. Time to put up or shut up.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
don't like being lumped in with the rest of us, eh? feeling a bit superior? humility dude - humility
yeah we've been through this before - and if I remember - it's you that needs to "put up or shut up" now
if you are so sure of your faith you need to be out walking on water, healing lepers, and raising the dead
but you can't do that can you
you don't have to answer here
answer your conscience - none of your extremely boring and pointless BS is allowed there - hee-hee-hee
in the meantime I'll be out volunteering for a handful of ministries if you're looking for me - it's not our purpose as servants of Christ to waste all of this time parsing what the meaning of the word "is" is from this scriptural translation or that scriptural translation ad nauseum
TM:don't like being lumped in with the rest of us, eh?
Who's this "us" TM? You and who else?
TM:feeling a bit superior? humility dude - humility
"My soul shall make her boast in the LORD: the humble shall hear thereof, and be glad." Ps 34:2
TM: yeah we've been through this before - and if I remember - it's you that needs to "put up or shut up" now. . .if you are so sure of your faith you need to be out walking on water, healing lepers, and raising the dead. . .but you can't do that can you. . .you don't have to answer here
You don't want me to. In regards to that other thread, what exactly is the "part" that Paul is speaking of in 1st Corinthians 13:12? And who are the "we" he was also referring to?
TM:in the meantime I'll be out volunteering for a handful of ministries if you're looking for me
- it's not our purpose as servants of Christ to waste all of this time
parsing what the meaning of the word "is" is from this scriptural
translation or that scriptural translation ad nauseum
And you're hating on and making comparisons to the various gifts of the Spirit.
This is old news and you were finally dealt with nearly 2 months ago. It was confirmed by most of the regulars here on March 6. Now you're just hanging around trying to bury the rep you created for yourself.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Let's get a little perspective on God's words regarding these issues.
In Deuteronomy God instructs that if a man does the hanky panky with a female, he must pay her family a penance, marry the girl, and be forbidden from ever divorcing her.
Fornication was punishable by death if the girl was engaged or married to another man - and if the girl cried rape at the time of the attack she would be spared.
The book of Exodus instructed that men who worked on the Sabbath could indeed be put to death. In Jesus' time, he made an exception for work that had to be done out of necessity.
Thanks Mighty. I see we're getting closer to the heart of it now.
MM: Mat 6:33 "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness..."
The Bible tells us much about seekers. First, God has
commanded that all people seek him (Is. 55:6; Matt.
7:7). However, the person that seeks God seeks his name
(Ps. 83:16), his face (Ps. 105:4), and his strength (1
Chr. 16:11). A seeker pursues God's word (Is. 34:16),
his commandments (1 Chr. 28:8), and his precepts (Ps.
119:45). People are to seek the kingdom of God, his
righteousness (Matt. 6:33), his honor (John 5:44), and
his city (Heb. 13:14). The seekers of God are to look
for the Christ (Mal. 3:1) and his justification (Gal.
2:16,17). A true seeker seeks diligently (Heb 11:6),
earnestly (Job 8:5), and with all his heart and soul
(Deut. 4:29). If a seeker does all these things, the
question is: Does a non-Christian do these things? -h/t David Block
[Now, the contrast. . .]
An unbeliever is also described in detail in the
Bible. An unbeliever is dead in trespasses and sins, a
son of disobedience and a child of wrath (Eph. 2:1-3).
Their hearts are deceitful and wicked (Jer. 17:9) and
their minds are enmity against God (Romans 8:7,8). In
fact, they are conceived in iniquity (Ps. 51:5) and go
astray as soon as they are born (Ps. 58:3). They love
their darkness (John 3:19-21) and they won't receive the
things of God because, to them, they are foolishness (1
Cor. 2:14). Are we to believe that these people seek
God? -h/t David Block
- In the passage you quoted MM, who is Jesus addressing, believers or
non-believers? This passage is part of the wider scope of the sermon on
the mount, which includes Matt 5:11-16. So who then is Jesus teaching?
Who is this sermon for?
- I notice you cited only a partial verse there. Did you include the
promise attached to that very same verse? How then do we have access to
these things that "shall be added unto" us if we're not first allowed access to the Kingdom to begin with?
- The above verse is mostly referring to the daily physical
worries/needs of Matt 6:19-34. But in John 6:64-66, many of His
followers abandon Jesus. Why? They were "seeking" Him too, right? In
that same chapter in John they sought to be fed by Him "always" and
they were certainly following/seeking Him as well, right? So then why
didn't Christ follow through as you interpret Matt 6:33? (see John 6:65
for answer)
- Is the prayer of 6:9-13 a prayer given to the unregenerate? Same sermon.
MM:Mat 7:8 "For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to whom that knocketh it shall be opened."
This one also applies to what was already covered above. It is also a
part of the same sermon as above. Look at the connecting verses 8-11.
This is a guarantee. But you yourself clearly stated MM, that you do
not know man's heart; only God does. Who are those who "ask" the Father
in verse 11? Is it the unregenerate? How can we even obtain something
Holy to give indiscriminately in verse 6, or even fulfill the Law and
the Prophets in v.12 here, if we are not His in the first place?
MM:Acts 17:27 "That they [all nations of men] should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him and find him..."
This is the general call. A true Christian does not give up the call of
the gospel for the sake of the elect only. Do you believe everyone who
hears the gospel will 100% obey it? How about if you sugar-coat it
enough, or package it up real neat? How about if we take the gospel and
make it look worldly, and then bait-and-switch the pagan? Will that
work? Is our gospel based on a doctrine of pragmatism?
The answer to all of that is no. You yourself admitted MM, that you do
not know man's heart. Neither do I. That's the beginning of
understanding the theology I follow. Just like the Matthew passage
above, you need to ask yourself who's POV you're reading in this
passage. This is Paul, and this time he's addressing the Areopagus (non-believing Gentiles).
Then why does he tell them to "seek"? Will God require something from
someone that they do not have the ability to do in the first place? But
that's the argument of the Semi-Pelagian! That's the argument that
someone can at least partially merit or work their way into heaven with
God's "assistance" and not utter dependence. It appeals to human pride.
In reality though, we are telling all men to "repent" and "seek" when
God knows the hearts of those who will and those who won't.
So then we also are guilty of asking something from someone
that does not have the ability to do so in the first place! How to
solve that little mess. . .hmm?
But in reality, there is none. Romans 1:18-32 covers this. We are all
inexcusable for what little knowledge of God we have already. The truth
is we are all born in rebellion to God. I have said before that even if
God saved no one ever in the history of mankind and allowed the entire
world to die eternally in their sin. . .He would be no less just. God
would be totally fair to do this.
Yet John 3:8 states those born of the Spirit are born by a Spirit that moves wherever and upon whomever He wills. Mercy and Grace are not justice, but neither are they unjust. <-- Not a contradiction.
MM:Rev 3:20 "Behold I stand at the door and knock; if any man hear my voice, and open the door I will come in to him..."
And "he who has ears to hear, let him hear." Once again, is this
written for believers or non-believers? This IMO, is one of the most
mishandled verses in the Bible. Look who He's talking to! This church
has literally closed Christ off from fellowship with them. What was
their error in v.17? What is the door in v.20? It's clearly not the
"door of one man's heart" as the tracts might tell you, though the
element of a deceitful heart is in play.
But is it to the unbelieving pagan in the street? Who are the members
of Laodicea? If you attended their church, I'm sure they would all
readily claim they were Christians. But it's like you said MM, you do
not know the hearts of men.
MM:So if man is so incapable of seeking God, why does Jesus constantly insist on that very thing? Need to see more of the book?
I think I did enough of that on my own. I'd answer that if Jesus
insists on that very thing, we are all without excuse in regards to our
guilt in not seeking after God, but the ability to actually do so was
lost in Eden. Therefore the urge to "seek" is a welcome to fellowship
for believers and a warning to non-believers who will be held
accountable.
The book of Jude states that Enoch preached the same gospel of
repentance way back in the time of Noah, but was God somehow cruel or
unfair that he would send a prophet, but save only about 8 or 9 in the
entire world?
But then MM, I think the very heart of the matter is whether or not we
agree on the definition of the gospel. I'm wondering if your gospel is
different from mine.
- Is it a merit-based gospel that says something like, "Follow these
prescribed laws and ordinances of the faith, and you will have access
to the Kingdom." (?)
- Is it a gospel that says something like, "Pray this prayer, reach
out to God, step forward, and He'll take care of 99% or so of the rest,
and then you will have access to the Kingdom." (?)
- Or is it a gospel that says "Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at
hand. Rely 100% upon His mercy, His grace, and surrender your will to
Him. For you may be within a single heartbeat away from facing His
judgement, where you will be found completely ineffective, blind,
naked, and spiritually dead before the Holy One, unless you have a
substitue to stand in the face of His Holy wrath!" (?)
Hehe, where'd everyone go?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"
But then MM, I think the very heart of the matter is whether or not we
agree on the definition of the gospel. I'm wondering if your gospel is
different from mine."
Don't try to play dueling gospels with me. The gospel is "the good news" and simply; the preaching of Christ and Him crucified.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."MM says...
Comments Policy
Oh, and there have been
April 28, 2008 - 19:03 ET by tracheostomyOh, and there have been quite a few answers to those questions already. But I see some are a bit dodgy. A few are even outright illogical rationalizations.
So prepare to be challenged if you plan on nipping someone else's homework. I'm going over those as well.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Oh, this guy's good.
April 28, 2008 - 19:23 ET by tracheostomyOh, this guy's good. Super-quick on the uptake. Took some digging to find him too.
http://www.youtube.c...
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
TULIP
April 28, 2008 - 19:31 ET by MightyMouthAren't the flowers beautiful?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM: Aren't the flowers
April 28, 2008 - 20:05 ET by tracheostomyMM: Aren't the flowers beautiful?
Ahhh. . .yes. All five of them.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Ha my friend...
April 28, 2008 - 20:10 ET by MightyMouthbut three of them are real and two of them are plastic! :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Oh, okay. Is this where
April 28, 2008 - 20:13 ET by tracheostomyOh, okay.
Is this where the thread gets hijacked to another topic?
Isn't it a little early for this? Why haven't you brought this up sooner?
. . .on your own initiative?
. . .with your own thread?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
God is not playing a game.
April 28, 2008 - 20:29 ET by MightyMouthLike..."Ha ha I know the future and you don't". I believe salvation takes two (like the tango) God AND man!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Synergism = God needs my help in this!
April 28, 2008 - 20:32 ET by tracheostomyMM: "I believe salvation takes two (like the tango) God AND man!"
Wonderful. Then, as Paul would say, you have something to boast of. Correct?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Ok, ask Paul if..
April 28, 2008 - 20:36 ET by MightyMouthI DON'T step foward, will I be saved? Check Romans on that one.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
How many steps?
April 28, 2008 - 20:45 ET by tracheostomyMM: Ok, ask Paul if..I DON'T step foward, will I be saved? Check Romans on that one.
Then you're saying that a quadriplegic cannot be saved?
The Bible says that "stepping forward" or "walking" is a work. Especially on the sabbath. It's an act of the will.
Edit: My bad. You need a load for it to count as an actual work.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
You are reaching...
April 28, 2008 - 20:52 ET by MightyMouthThese are spiritual steps we are talking about, ANY human can make them if they hear the gospel and the Holy Spirit tugs at their heart. I have seen it hundreds of times! Some times it takes several times for them to step forward. I did it as a teenager, and I am now in my 50's. If God forces people to be saved is that free will? Or is there no free will? How do you explain Adam and Eve?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Oh, he's typing more to get his point across. . .good.
April 28, 2008 - 21:07 ET by tracheostomyMM: These are spiritual steps we are talking about, ANY human can make them
if they hear the gospel and the Holy Spirit tugs at their heart.
Okay. Hold up here. Which comes first? You're clearly qualifying things at the outset, and I wanna keep you honest here.
MM: I have
seen it hundreds of times!
o_O <?!?? You can actually see the very moment the fallen human will becomes regenerate?
MM: Some times it takes several times for them
to step forward.
Then how do you know which one is the "real one?" You've seen it hundereds of times!
MM: I did it as a teenager, and I am now in my 50's. If
God forces people to be saved is that free will?
1. Is God dragging people kicking and screaming to Hell? Is there one person in Hell that loves God? And if you asked them while they were in Hell, how do you know it's truly a contrite love they're confessing, since they simply might be willing to say anything to get them out of Hell at that point?
2. Did I say somewhere that we did not have free will? Right now I'm willing myself to shoot lasers from my eyeballs, wouldn't that be neat? Now I'm willing myself to grow a third arm. I'd be able to type 50% faster. Why didn't I think of that?
3. Assuming we have a free will, what are the limits of it? Some? None?
MM: Or is there no free
will? How do you explain Adam and Eve?
Which of the 3 points did you accept again? Surely you believe in Total Depravity. Or was Adam simply responsible for his own sin and we're all born with some inherent good within us?
One or the other. I of course, believe Adam passed a curse upon humanity called sin.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"Okay. Hold up here.
April 28, 2008 - 21:24 ET by MightyMouth"Okay. Hold up here. Which comes first? You're clearly qualifying things at the outset, and I wanna keep you honest here."
Well of course the gospel comes first and then salvation.
"
o_O <?!?? You can actually see the very moment the fallen human will becomes regenerate?"
No I have just seen multitudes come to Christ in invitations, but of course I don't know their hearts.
MM: I did it as a teenager, and I am now in my 50's. If
God forces people to be saved is that free will?
Your two points are spurious, God is casting people to outer darkness because they have not accepted His son as their savior.
And, Yes as a Strict Cavlinist you do believe that people do not have free will. Hence TULIP (you may want to explain to some readers who do not know the Achronym).
And finally I do believe in Total Depravity, but not the way you do, which is that man is incapable of accepting redemption. We do, however agree on your last point.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM: Well of course the
April 28, 2008 - 21:43 ET by tracheostomyMM: Well of course the gospel comes first and then salvation.
So a man is saved by believing someone else's story about Jesus? Is it therefore possible to reason someone into the Kingdom?
MM: No I have just seen multitudes come to Christ in invitations, but of course I don't know their hearts.
Okay, just checking. Because the heart is deceitful above all things.
MM: Your two points are spurious, God is casting people to outer darkness because they have not accepted His son as their savior.
No, that would assume they had an option to choose between good and evil. And this then brings up the question as to where the ability to "choose" to do good came from. Do you believe that man is born with a little tiny island of righteousness that makes him capable of "reaching out" for salvation? Do you believe there are "seekers" to warrant the creation of a "Seeker Sensitive Movement"? Are there any that seek after God?
MM: And, Yes as a Strict Cavlinist you do believe that people do not
have free will.
No, that's an incorrect definition. I am quite the strict Calvinist, and I was taught both from my Calvinist teachers, and the founders thereof, that man is indeed born with a free will. We do not reject that.
MM: Hence TULIP (you may want to explain to some readers
who do not know the Achronym).
No. There's no need. NB doesn't exist in a vaccum. If they truly "want" to know, they're a couple clicks away.
I place high expectations on the members of NB here and give credit for the brains God gave them. I find it rather patronizing when I feel forced to "spoon-feed" information to someone that has it almost literally right there in their laps. That verse in Proverbs about the sluggard too lazy to lift the food from the dish to his mouth? I thought that was just crazy talk prior to 1995 or so.
MM: And finally I do believe in Total Depravity, but not the way you do,
which is that man is incapable of accepting redemption. We do, however
agree on your last point.
Then where do you think we differ on Total Depravity? I completely missed that. Please clarify.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Sorry I am a little behind...
April 28, 2008 - 22:18 ET by MightyMouth"Is it therefore possible to reason someone into the Kingdom?
No, I have only spoken of the Word of God and the Holy Spirit.
Okay, just checking. Because the heart is deceitful above all things
And the only thing you can rely on when The Holy Spirit tugs on it.
"
No, that would assume they had an option to choose between good and evil." Stop there, check Genisis.
No, that's an incorrect definition. I am quite the strict Calvinist,
and I was taught both from my Calvinist teachers, and the founders
thereof, that man is indeed born with a free will. We do not reject
that.
But you do reject man's ability to choose Salvation.
Then where do you think we differ on Total Depravity? I completely missed that. Please clarify.
Quite simply: You believe God controlls everything (even though he does not have to) there is a possibilty that God allows man to decide is own destiny, which you reject. Salvation is a free gift, not the directive of a dictator.
Why did Christ suffer on the cross? To save those who whould come to him for salvation, not for those who were forced to salvation.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM: No, I have only spoken
April 29, 2008 - 00:10 ET by tracheostomyMM: No, I have only spoken of the Word of God and the Holy Spirit.
Okay. So then who is in charge then, the preacher of the gospel, or the Holy Spirit? Are we relying on men or on God to save?
MM: And the only thing you can rely on when The Holy Spirit tugs on it.
Now then, is that "tug" one that can be resisted? By "tug" do you mean a literal "pull" here?
MM: [No, that would assume they had an option to choose between good and evil."] Stop there, check Genisis.
Which part of Genesis are you referring to?
MM: But you do reject man's ability to choose Salvation.
The heart of the question is where the "will to choose" this Salvation comes from. If you truly believe that all humanity is born in trespasses and in sin, then who moves on who first? Who takes the initiative?
MM: Quite simply: You believe God controlls everything (even though he does not have to)
As a matter of fact, He does have to. You're not a deist, are you? But it's not such a difficult task for a God that is truly omnipotent, right?
MM: . . .here is a possibilty that God allows man to decide is own destiny, which you reject.
Because that decision was already made in Eden. I know. It upsets me too. Not much we can do about it.
MM: Salvation is a free gift, not the directive of a dictator.
Yet all who are offered the gift come to him. See John 17:12. All who were given to Christ were first given by the Father. All except Judas, but even he was set aside, it clearly states, so that the God's word would be fulfilled. Is that cruel? Is that the same as a human dictator?
MM: Why did Christ suffer on the cross? To save those who whould come to him for salvation, not for those who were forced to salvation.
Then the atonement is nothing more than mere symbolism. There would be no real effective power in the death and resurrection of Christ. Why would Jesus die for those who already had the innate ability or will to choose righteousness? Because they needed a little boost with the righteousness they already had? But that flies in the face of Romans 3:10-12, which is also quoting Psalms. This line of reasoning contradicts the "dead" of Ephesians 2. How dead is "dead" anyway?
Does the word "draw" in John 6:44 mean to "woo" or to "entice"? If you look it up in a Strongs I think you'll be surprised.
I think you're just hung up on God's sovereignty is all.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
MM: Your two points are
April 28, 2008 - 21:48 ET by tracheostomyMM: Your two points are spurious, God is casting people to outer darkness because they have not accepted His son as their savior.
In this statement, does the word "accepted" mean they "chose" God's son? Would it be unacceptable to you if I were to substitute the word "accepted" in favor of "surrendered to"?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Yes agreed, "surrenderd" is the proper word.
April 28, 2008 - 21:57 ET by MightyMouthBut in no way diminishes the hearing of the gospel first... without the gospel there can be no "surrender".
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Good. We're making progress.
April 28, 2008 - 22:00 ET by tracheostomyMM: But in no way diminishes the hearing of the gospel first... without the gospel there can be not "surrender".
Okay then, what exactly are we surrendering and how did we first know to surrender it to begin with? Where did that knowledge come from?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
You are playing with me...
April 28, 2008 - 22:22 ET by MightyMouthThe hearing of the gospel. The Holy Spirit and the preaching of the Gospel, even if it is the first time! The Holy Spirit tugs at a sinners heart, you know, you've been there!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM: The hearing of the
April 28, 2008 - 23:40 ET by tracheostomyMM: The hearing of the gospel. The Holy Spirit and the preaching of the
Gospel, even if it is the first time! The Holy Spirit tugs at a sinners
heart, you know, you've been there!
Oh okay. Cool. So God gets 100% of the credit for salvation. "I planted, Apollos watered but. . ." what?
So no tango or whatever you call it.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
You are so wrong dude!
April 28, 2008 - 23:56 ET by MightyMouthGod, loves man soooo much that he WANTS unconditional love from man.(free will again)
From man this is love towards God... Man has only faith and the desire to be sinless to offer God, Man will of course fail in this.. The man who sees the evil he could do and does it not, is almost worthy of salvation. But of course he is not. But that is the man who may come to Christ.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM,
April 29, 2008 - 00:22 ET by tracheostomyHow do you know I'm wrong? How about a little more Bible here to back you up? Or else I'll start thinking this is based on nothing more than your own "say so" argument. This isn't a difficult thing to get your head around.
MM: God, loves man soooo much that he WANTS unconditional love from man.(free will again)
You're mixing up A, B, C, D in their proper order. What did we lose at Eden again?
MM: From man this is love towards God...
This statement is a denial of total depravity. So that only makes you what. . .just a 2 pt. Calvinist then?
MM: Man has only faith and the desire
to be sinless to offer God, Man will of course fail in this..
Show me in the Bible where it ever says that prior to the intervention of the Holy Spirit of God, that man begins with the "desire to be sinless."
MM: The man
who sees the evil he could do and does it not, is almost worthy of
salvation. But of course he is not. But that is the man who may come to
Christ.
You are speaking at prior to salvation when man is still dead in his trespasses and sin. So either he's "not really dead" and Paul's been exaggerating twice in one chapter, or man is 100% absolutely incapable of saving himself.
You have a lot of statements floating around now that at this point demand some backing up.
I held up my end of it. Fair is fair. Show me in the book.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Ok buddy...
April 29, 2008 - 21:40 ET by MightyMouthMat 6:33 "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness..."
Mat 7:8 "For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to whom that knocketh it shall be opened."
Acts 17:27 "That they [all nations of men] should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him and find him..."
Rev 3:20 "Behold I stand at the door and knock; if any man hear my voice, and open the door I will come in to him..."
So if man is so incapable of seeking God, why does Jesus constantly insist on that very thing? Need to see more of the book?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Moved. .
April 30, 2008 - 14:43 ET by tracheostomyMoved. . .
http://newsbusters.o...
-PJ
All strawmen being considered. . .
April 28, 2008 - 20:34 ET by tracheostomyMM: God is not playing a game. Like..."Ha ha I know the future and you don't".
Who ever said that He is?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
You know...
April 28, 2008 - 20:39 ET by MightyMouthI look forward to having this discussion in Heaven with you some day. Then we can ask the Teacher, and one of us will gladly say: "I was wrong" :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Leaving so soon?
April 28, 2008 - 20:53 ET by tracheostomyMM: I look forward to having this discussion in Heaven with you some day.
Then we can ask the Teacher, and one of us will gladly say: "I was
wrong" :-)
When we ask the Teacher, He'll say, "Which part of 'not works' didn't you understand?"
Since it's allegedly His word and all. . .
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
When did I say...
April 28, 2008 - 20:58 ET by MightyMouthWorks? So going forward, in front of the world is works? Sounds like faith to me...
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM: When did I
April 28, 2008 - 21:14 ET by tracheostomyMM: When did I say...Works?
Well for one, walking, or the step forward as you put it (I assume during an altar call), is an act of the will. Action of the will = works. Not matter how small the effort.
Therefore, the stepping forward is either a profession of faith, an action which does not save you (since you're declaring what has already come before).
OR
The stepping forward is the very act which saves you. Then you have something to boast of.
MM: So going forward, in front of the world is works? Sounds like faith to me...
"For you have been saved by grace through faith. . ." and what? Is that faith yours? Is that faith generated of yourself?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"For you have been saved
April 28, 2008 - 21:30 ET by MightyMouth"For you have been saved by grace through faith. . ." and what? Is that faith yours? Is that faith generated of yourself?
Now you get it! Yes, not generated but accepted! Hence: FREE WILL!!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM: Now you get it! Yes,
April 28, 2008 - 21:50 ET by tracheostomyMM: Now you get it! Yes, not generated but accepted! Hence: FREE WILL!!
*facepalm*
No. . .you're not looking at the whole passage. There are a few specific and oft-repeated qualifiers in Eph 2 that you are ignoring.
Whether deliberately or unintentionally so. . .I cannot say.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Trach
April 28, 2008 - 23:51 ET by RESTLESS 1Real question here, so don't take this wrong, but I understand that you are saying that faith alone, not works, saves. Right? Doesn't having faith, or acknowleging faith, take someone having the initiative to do so? Is this not a work? Otherwise, what are we in this for? Good works, such as feeding the poor, or raising an abandoned child, without faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour, will not afford one Heavenly bliss. God gave us free will to love Him. Why would he want it if it were forced, or predestined?
I know you've answered these before, but could you dumb it down a little for me?
MM: Real question here,
April 29, 2008 - 00:41 ET by tracheostomyMM: Real question here, so don't take this wrong, but I understand that you
are saying that faith alone, not works, saves. Right? Doesn't having
faith, or acknowleging faith, take someone having the initiative to do
so?
No. What does Ephesians say? Did you read it?
MM: Is this not a work?
Clearly states that faith is not of works. We are fully relying upon Christ's substitutionary atonement to bail us out of the penalty and judgement that we face.
My goal, or my calling, is to de-mystify faith. We do not have faith in faith. That is contradiction and absurdity. That is an empty hope and a "pie in the sky" mentality. No one can have faith in faith.
The very word "faith" always and absolutely requires an object to avoid mysticism and absurdity. Ours is not a mystery religion. We have so many faith contracts in our life. Just think of the word "fidelity" and count all the fidelity contracts you have. Think of the faith you place in the very chair you sit in. You are not assisting that chair in the act of sitting. You are 100% relying on it to not fall apart and break your tailbone or dislocate a vertebrae.
That's all faith is! So then what do you rely on God for? What do you yourself hold back that you should be relying on Him for? How much credit do you give Him for your salvation?
All of it. 100%. Jesus paid it ALL. All to Him I owe. Sin hath left a crimson stain. He washed it white as snow.
MM: Otherwise, what are we in this for? Good works,
such as feeding the poor, or raising an abandoned child, without faith
in Jesus Christ as Saviour, will not afford one Heavenly bliss.
The works are confirmation of your salvation. The works are the fruit. Jesus said, "If you love Me, you'll keep My commandments." No one can please God except through Christ. All our righteousness is as filthy rags. And though we show works as evidence of our faith in Him, do we obey Him perfectly? No.
Therefore, what is the sole hope of our salvation? Our works? No. God's grace. But at the same time the works are necessary as our testimony before men and a confirmation in and of ourselves that we are truly His children.
MM: God
gave us free will to love Him. Why would he want it if it were forced,
or predestined?
We were born with the free will to do anything within our power to please ourselves. We could willingly run anywhere we wanted, but not towards Him. Not on our own. Can you surprise God? Can you?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Trach
April 29, 2008 - 12:52 ET by RESTLESS 1While I agree with MM on most of his posts, I must admit that I am not he. However, thanks for the response. ;>)
Okay Trach,
April 29, 2008 - 23:54 ET by RESTLESS 1I think I'm almost there. So, but for God's grace, we are all unworthy of Heaven. Agreed. I guess my only question is, is faith without works good enough? If we are only capable of faith through the death of Christ for our sins, which I agree with, then do we forfeit what he gives us without works? Is just not being evil, and murdering and raping, and simply being apathetic to others, without the good deeds going to get one to Heaven. I think not. So while we are not saved through works, aren't they at least expected by God?
hey restless
April 30, 2008 - 10:11 ET by candanceI might be stepping out of my bounds, but allow me to humbly give my two cents.
Good behavior, in my mind, is a natural result of walking in relationship with God. It's the fruit we end up bearing by the Spirit's work inside of us. So if people are struggling with selfishness or bad behavior, it means they simply haven't surrendered everything to God in their life yet. It doesn't mean you're not a Christian, it just means you still need some work on the potter's wheel.
The only thing we ever have to "do" is submit to His guidance and everything else will fall into place.
I'm sure Trake will say that my thesis is too simplistic, but maybe it will give you some kind of comfort.
No Candance, this is the
April 30, 2008 - 14:08 ET by tracheostomyNo Candance, this is the third time I've given you credit where credit was due. You're on the right track and nothing more really needs to be said.
But then I'm a creature of habit.
Yes. It is as I've stated before. First faith, then the works will always follow the genuine faith. The good fruit will grow from the good tree. The only thing I'd probably add to it would be one question. . .
How can you say that you're truly a believer in Christ, and not surrender absolutely everything to Him?
So then, "examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith." I Cor 11:28, 13:5 (test yourself), Gal 6:4.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
well trake
April 30, 2008 - 14:21 ET by candanceIn a perfect world Christians would find Christ, obey Him perfectly, and never look back. But our flesh is so corrupt that it's impossible for us to reach the point of acting perfect every day. Even pastors sometimes make mistakes.
I'm not saying we can go around doing whatever because our flesh is so hopeless - Paul challenges us to break the flesh every day by submitting it to God.
We are told that as we learn more and more about God, we move from baby's milk to eating solid food, and that's a process of learning.
I don't think it's fair to look at a sincere Christian who struggles with something and tell them they really don't believe in Christ. Even Paul had a thorn in his flesh to keep him humble.
Candance, in a perfect
April 30, 2008 - 15:19 ET by tracheostomyCandance, in a perfect world we would never have disobeyed Him to begin with.
But I'm not preaching a perfectionist gospel. It's called the doctrine of sanctification. We are first declared righteous before God, then the Holy Spirit goes to work on us (with us) in the lifetime task of cleaning out our closet. This process of sanctification and daily examination as above, prayer, worship, "crucifixion of the flesh," and study of His word, will eventually result in increasing obedience, fruit, and then as promised. . .our glorification.
That is, if the soil is right. The parable of the sower is in fact the parable of the human heart. Which soil is that guy over there at this point in time?
We don't know. All we are given is, as my pastor used to say, a license to inspect fruit and to encourage the growth of it. The wheat and the tares of the church are sown together.
Candance: I'm not saying we can go around doing whatever because our flesh is so
hopeless - Paul challenges us to break the flesh every day by
submitting it to God.
Correct. True believers are not antinomians, who believe that salvation is merely a "get out of jail free" card and a licence to sin as much as they want. The works are absolutely vital in so many ways.
Candance: We are told that as we learn more and more about God, we move from
baby's milk to eating solid food, and that's a process of learning.
Correct. This is the sanctification of the believer. All the age groups referred to are believers. Because the natural man does not receive the things of God (no kind of food at all) for they are foolishness to him.
Candance: I don't think it's fair to look at a sincere Christian who struggles
with something and tell them they really don't believe in Christ. Even
Paul had a thorn in his flesh to keep him humble.
Therefore, you must ask them to examine themselves. Correct. We do not know their hearts, but only that they "appear" sincere.
Paul tells us to test ourselves as Christians to see whether or not we are truly in the faith.
John tells us to test those who claim to be Christian teachers.
Even you do it yourself here already. So what's to dispute?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
trake
April 30, 2008 - 15:33 ET by candanceI was simply disputing your question about someone not really believing in Christ if they have trouble surrendering everything. I agree that we should point it out to them and encourage them to search their hearts, but not to question their entire relationship with God.
You are right that we don't know a person's heart. They could be pretending to repent. Or they could be struggling to understand and just need more time. Or they could be coming to God with a tremendous amount of scars and insecurities. No one ever truly knows what someone else is thinking, or how God is dealing with them, so we should offer advice in a positive way.
That's all my point was.
But here is a little nitpicky point - is not the act of searching ourselves an act we do to draw closer to God?
C: I agree that we should
April 30, 2008 - 15:43 ET by tracheostomyC: I agree that we should point it out to them and encourage them to
search their hearts, but not to question their entire relationship with
God.
Why not? I do it several times a month. Even more when I'm feeling depressed. I do it instantly when an unclean thought enters my mind. We should be doing this at the very least when we take communion as stated in scripture.
C: No one ever truly knows what someone
else is thinking, or how God is dealing with them, so we should offer
advice in a positive way.
But what do we do with the bad news?
C: But here is a little nitpicky point - is not the act of searching ourselves an act we do to draw closer to God?
Correct. That is the "seek, find, knock" of Matt 6. Are we purely self-reliant where we can deceive ourselves, or are we Christ reliant on everything pertaining to life; even and up to our eternal relationship with Him? For He is our life.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
seek and find
April 30, 2008 - 15:58 ET by candanceJust because it behooves us to "act" by drawing to God doesn't mean that's an act we can boast of, and it doesn't take anything away from God's grace. It's like a child whose mother calls him to come to the table for dinner - he gets no credit for cooking the food or providing anything in the house, but if he doesn't come to the table he doesn't get any supper.
Like I said above, the only act we have to do is submit to God's voice. We allow the Spirit to cultivate our hearts. Obedience is only the act required.
Of course I search my relationship with God routinely and especially before communion. But I didn't like your insinuation that someone doesn't believe in Christ if they struggle to surrender.
Moved. .
April 30, 2008 - 16:25 ET by tracheostomyMoved. . .
http://newsbusters.o...
Correction. I meant to
April 30, 2008 - 16:40 ET by tracheostomyCorrection.
I meant to type "2 Cor 13:5" in this post. . .
http://newsbusters.o...
If you PMed me noting this error, I congratulate you. Indeed, you are the true Bereans and truly the more noble.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Hey Mighty!.... Speaking
April 28, 2008 - 20:19 ET by bigtimerHey Mighty!....
Speaking of flowers...You Don't Bring Me Flowers ring a bell from way back.....good to see you here you ol' rogue you...don't stay away so long.
Now I'm off to fixing dinner, hope to catch ya' later...
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
cheers bt!
April 28, 2008 - 20:21 ET by MightyMouth"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Don't be such a stranger,
April 29, 2008 - 13:59 ET by Roger the ShrubberDon't be such a stranger, MM!
Good to read your words again, my friend.
Thanks Rog..
April 29, 2008 - 21:16 ET by MightyMouthbeen missin my NB buddies too, specially the Shrub Report® :-)
Sorry to hear about poor hater..er..Leon ..hehe..
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
bt
April 28, 2008 - 23:39 ET by shawn228I guess you are a bigger Neil Diamond fan, than Barbara Streisand? :-)
Woman that have sex before marriage should be killed
April 28, 2008 - 23:40 ET by shawn228Your right, this guy is good. I thought I knew the bible, but I had no idea God advocated killing people that worked on Sunday or that girls that had sex before marriage should be killed as well.
You, botg, TM and candance know the Bible better than most, does God really say those things?
No sugarcoating here.
April 28, 2008 - 23:45 ET by tracheostomyS: You, botg, TM and candance know the Bible better than most, does God really say those things?
In those passages, yes. For the most part. If one were prone to the habit of cherrypicking, they could almost completely mischaracterize God's mercy and grace.
That is, if those two words are really in the Bible as well. And if they are, you need to ask yourself, "mercy and grace" from what?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
...too busy to sit through
April 29, 2008 - 13:22 ET by TruthMonger...too busy to sit through the whole video - but in terms of the firs question - I've tried to explain this to trach many times...
We can't answer most of these "God" questions - because only God knows the answers...and it's not our purpose to answer these questions anyway...
but God also knows trach insists on trying anyway...
why does God not re-grow amputated limbs for all praying amputees?
to this I could say many things - how do you know He hasn't? Maybe he just hasn't done it YET?
but we really don't know
maybe when we get to heaven we will
As an intelligent college educated person I don't have to "rationalize" this "constant" so-called "lack" of healed amputees - all I have to say is - God's grace is sufficient
Jesus prayed for the crucifixion to be avoided - this was God's son
God let the crucifixion go forward anyway, His grace was sufficient...
And believers are supposed to be doubting prayer because an amputee doesn't get a limb back...? The believers I run into don't have this problem at all..
God is a giver - he gives us many things - most of us have limbs that work, eyes that see, ears that hear, food, clothes, shelter, electicity, cars, TV yadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayadayada
God give us all of these things - but mainly our time and our love - to do with as we please...
He has given us these things for a purpose - but we don't have to do the purpose if we don't want to - free will
Imagine you own a mansion, and it requires 100 servants to maintain, you give the 100 servants each the special tools they need to do the job - but only about 20 or so are doing the work - the rest are out partying and doing whatever they want - and 18 of the 20 are always PRAYING TO YOU FOR MORE THINGS TO HAVE...
they don't like their job - they want a better one, they are lonely - they want a companion, they are sick - they want to be healed, they don't like the car they drive - they want a new one
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want
they want, all of these want prayers - I want this, I want that
So how would you feel about these ingrates who always want more but hardly ever say thanks for what they have and never seem to want to do their jobs for which they were created
You send your only dear son to do the work for them, and die on their behalf - because you are God - and you love them
We are not here to ask for more things - we are servants with specific jobs to do
trying praying for peace, try praying for all of us to help each other more
trying praying for the bigots around here that sow hatred - pray for love to enter their hearts and replace their fear
maybe even go out and help someone yourself - volunteer for a soup kitchen once a week, on the way to work - today I emptied my wallet into the hands of a begger on the roadside, wished her well, prayed for her - not to find a home - just prayed for her - Jesus was homeless - we don't need homes - we need God - that girl was Jesus standing there - what I do to the least of my bretheren I do to Jesus, and she blessed me greatly as I helped her
God answers those actions and prayers in a very quick, visible, and dramatic fashion - because that's the primary mission around here on planet Earth
after all that everyday, then maybe He will get you a new arm - when He find's the time
TM: We can't answer most
April 29, 2008 - 18:16 ET by tracheostomyTM: We can't answer most of these "God" questions - because only God knows
the answers...and it's not our purpose to answer these questions
anyway...
TM: but we really don't know [. . .] maybe when we get to heaven we will
This is really sad to look at, because it could almost be a sound argument if it weren't for TM's priorities once more floating to the top.
In the very process of clinging so tightly to his private doctrine of "absolute non-assurance" here, he logically cancels out the rest of the content of his entire post.
This tragedy is further exacerbated when you realize he has no idea he's doing it. Not even when just about anyone can observe the assertions he makes about God that contradict himself in the same post.
TM: He has given us these things for a purpose - but we don't have to do the purpose if we don't want to - free will
TM: God answers those actions and prayers in a very quick, visible, and
dramatic fashion - because that's the primary mission around here on
planet Earth
Everyone but TM, that is. =(
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
this is trach's MO
April 30, 2008 - 14:23 ET by TruthMongerthis is trach's MO people...
usurping God's role as judge of our souls
and his stubborn refusal to accept the inherent un-provability of faith
such a tragedy - given trach's fine penchant for detail:)
but I'm sure he'll come around - in a decade or two - like I did:)
TM: this is trach's MO
April 30, 2008 - 14:58 ET by tracheostomyTM: this is trach's MO people...
I'm open to comparing my MO with yours any day TM.
TM: usurping God's role as judge of our souls
I'm often accused of that here.
As if I were claiming the final authority.
Or to have written the book on it.
Or. . .something. =^\
TM: and his stubborn refusal to accept the inherent un-provability of faith
"Our team of specialists here at Truthmonger Inc., would like to assure you of our commitment to putting the mystery back into 'mystery religion,' and where a mystical faith is job #1!"
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"I'm often accused of that
April 30, 2008 - 15:04 ET by TruthMonger"I'm often accused of that here."
no kidding
maybe try some of Truthmonger, Inc’s new and improved Christian humility™…:)?
TM: maybe try some of
April 30, 2008 - 15:23 ET by tracheostomyTM: maybe try some of Truthmonger, Inc’s new and improved Christian humility™…:)?
Hmm, it sure looks like a good value. . .but are you absolutely sure it will really work?
*sarc off*
That's why you got a Bible there to keep me humble. I never claimed I was THE Oracle, as many of you accuse me of.
And you have no place to endorse anything if you're not sure of it. I'd buy a used car from you sooner than your theology.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"sure" could really just
April 30, 2008 - 17:16 ET by TruthMonger"sure" could really just be another word for "faith" if you like, old buddy:)...
in that case I'd happily be "sure" of my faith in Jesus - I just couldn't "prove" it - and neither could you
my theology - and yours - will never be more than just barely on display here - we hardly even understand our own theologies ourselves, and we contradict ourselves all the time - we are truly pathetic teachers in the eyes of God - but each of us is made perfect in Christ - and Him alone
What's this "we" crap?
April 30, 2008 - 22:34 ET by tracheostomyTM: my theology - and yours - will never be more than just barely on
display here - we hardly even understand our own theologies ourselves,
and we contradict ourselves all the time. . .
That's for you to actually prove.
My posts speak for themselves and we've been through this before. Time to put up or shut up.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
don't like being lumped in
May 2, 2008 - 17:43 ET by TruthMongerdon't like being lumped in with the rest of us, eh? feeling a bit superior? humility dude - humility
yeah we've been through this before - and if I remember - it's you that needs to "put up or shut up" now
if you are so sure of your faith you need to be out walking on water, healing lepers, and raising the dead
but you can't do that can you
you don't have to answer here
answer your conscience - none of your extremely boring and pointless BS is allowed there - hee-hee-hee
in the meantime I'll be out volunteering for a handful of ministries if you're looking for me - it's not our purpose as servants of Christ to waste all of this time parsing what the meaning of the word "is" is from this scriptural translation or that scriptural translation ad nauseum
TM: don't like being
May 2, 2008 - 18:24 ET by tracheostomyTM: don't like being lumped in with the rest of us, eh?
Who's this "us" TM? You and who else?
TM: feeling a bit superior? humility dude - humility
"My soul shall make her boast in the LORD: the humble shall hear thereof, and be glad." Ps 34:2
TM: yeah we've been through this before - and if I remember - it's you that needs to "put up or shut up" now. . .if you are so sure of your faith you need to be out walking on water, healing lepers, and raising the dead. . .but you can't do that can you. . .you don't have to answer here
You don't want me to. In regards to that other thread, what exactly is the "part" that Paul is speaking of in 1st Corinthians 13:12? And who are the "we" he was also referring to?
TM: in the meantime I'll be out volunteering for a handful of ministries if you're looking for me
- it's not our purpose as servants of Christ to waste all of this time
parsing what the meaning of the word "is" is from this scriptural
translation or that scriptural translation ad nauseum
And you're hating on and making comparisons to the various gifts of the Spirit.
This is old news and you were finally dealt with nearly 2 months ago. It was confirmed by most of the regulars here on March 6. Now you're just hanging around trying to bury the rep you created for yourself.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"...none of your extremely
May 2, 2008 - 19:08 ET by Roger the Shrubber"...none of your extremely boring and pointless BS is allowed there..."
If anybody knows a thing or two about writing boring and pointless BS, it's Truthie, that's for sure.
yikes Shawn
April 29, 2008 - 13:38 ET by candanceLet's get a little perspective on God's words regarding these issues.
In Deuteronomy God instructs that if a man does the hanky panky with a female, he must pay her family a penance, marry the girl, and be forbidden from ever divorcing her.
Fornication was punishable by death if the girl was engaged or married to another man - and if the girl cried rape at the time of the attack she would be spared.
The book of Exodus instructed that men who worked on the Sabbath could indeed be put to death. In Jesus' time, he made an exception for work that had to be done out of necessity.
Thanks for the
April 29, 2008 - 18:29 ET by tracheostomyThanks for the clarification Candance. I dropped the ball on this one, since I'm never sure if anyone really cares about the details or not.
Edit: Wow, that's two in one day that I owe ya.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
LOL Trake
April 29, 2008 - 20:50 ET by candanceIt's all bacon.
Thanks Mighty. I see we're
April 30, 2008 - 14:42 ET by tracheostomyThanks Mighty. I see we're getting closer to the heart of it now.
MM: Mat 6:33 "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness..."
- In the passage you quoted MM, who is Jesus addressing, believers or
non-believers? This passage is part of the wider scope of the sermon on
the mount, which includes Matt 5:11-16. So who then is Jesus teaching?
Who is this sermon for?
- I notice you cited only a partial verse there. Did you include the
promise attached to that very same verse? How then do we have access to
these things that "shall be added unto" us if we're not first allowed access to the Kingdom to begin with?
- The above verse is mostly referring to the daily physical
worries/needs of Matt 6:19-34. But in John 6:64-66, many of His
followers abandon Jesus. Why? They were "seeking" Him too, right? In
that same chapter in John they sought to be fed by Him "always" and
they were certainly following/seeking Him as well, right? So then why
didn't Christ follow through as you interpret Matt 6:33? (see John 6:65
for answer)
- Is the prayer of 6:9-13 a prayer given to the unregenerate? Same sermon.
MM: Mat 7:8 "For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to whom that knocketh it shall be opened."
This one also applies to what was already covered above. It is also a
part of the same sermon as above. Look at the connecting verses 8-11.
This is a guarantee. But you yourself clearly stated MM, that you do
not know man's heart; only God does. Who are those who "ask" the Father
in verse 11? Is it the unregenerate? How can we even obtain something
Holy to give indiscriminately in verse 6, or even fulfill the Law and
the Prophets in v.12 here, if we are not His in the first place?
MM: Acts 17:27 "That they [all nations of men] should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him and find him..."
This is the general call. A true Christian does not give up the call of
the gospel for the sake of the elect only. Do you believe everyone who
hears the gospel will 100% obey it? How about if you sugar-coat it
enough, or package it up real neat? How about if we take the gospel and
make it look worldly, and then bait-and-switch the pagan? Will that
work? Is our gospel based on a doctrine of pragmatism?
The answer to all of that is no. You yourself admitted MM, that you do
not know man's heart. Neither do I. That's the beginning of
understanding the theology I follow. Just like the Matthew passage
above, you need to ask yourself who's POV you're reading in this
passage. This is Paul, and this time he's addressing the Areopagus (non-believing Gentiles).
Then why does he tell them to "seek"? Will God require something from
someone that they do not have the ability to do in the first place? But
that's the argument of the Semi-Pelagian! That's the argument that
someone can at least partially merit or work their way into heaven with
God's "assistance" and not utter dependence. It appeals to human pride.
In reality though, we are telling all men to "repent" and "seek" when
God knows the hearts of those who will and those who won't.
So then we also are guilty of asking something from someone
that does not have the ability to do so in the first place! How to
solve that little mess. . .hmm?
But in reality, there is none. Romans 1:18-32 covers this. We are all
inexcusable for what little knowledge of God we have already. The truth
is we are all born in rebellion to God. I have said before that even if
God saved no one ever in the history of mankind and allowed the entire
world to die eternally in their sin. . .He would be no less just. God
would be totally fair to do this.
Yet John 3:8 states those born of the Spirit are born by a Spirit that moves wherever and upon whomever He wills. Mercy and Grace are not justice, but neither are they unjust. <-- Not a contradiction.
MM: Rev 3:20 "Behold I stand at the door and knock; if any man hear my voice, and open the door I will come in to him..."
And "he who has ears to hear, let him hear." Once again, is this
written for believers or non-believers? This IMO, is one of the most
mishandled verses in the Bible. Look who He's talking to! This church
has literally closed Christ off from fellowship with them. What was
their error in v.17? What is the door in v.20? It's clearly not the
"door of one man's heart" as the tracts might tell you, though the
element of a deceitful heart is in play.
But is it to the unbelieving pagan in the street? Who are the members
of Laodicea? If you attended their church, I'm sure they would all
readily claim they were Christians. But it's like you said MM, you do
not know the hearts of men.
MM: So if man is so incapable of seeking God, why does Jesus constantly insist on that very thing? Need to see more of the book?
I think I did enough of that on my own. I'd answer that if Jesus
insists on that very thing, we are all without excuse in regards to our
guilt in not seeking after God, but the ability to actually do so was
lost in Eden. Therefore the urge to "seek" is a welcome to fellowship
for believers and a warning to non-believers who will be held
accountable.
The book of Jude states that Enoch preached the same gospel of
repentance way back in the time of Noah, but was God somehow cruel or
unfair that he would send a prophet, but save only about 8 or 9 in the
entire world?
But then MM, I think the very heart of the matter is whether or not we
agree on the definition of the gospel. I'm wondering if your gospel is
different from mine.
- Is it a merit-based gospel that says something like, "Follow these
prescribed laws and ordinances of the faith, and you will have access
to the Kingdom." (?)
- Is it a gospel that says something like, "Pray this prayer, reach
out to God, step forward, and He'll take care of 99% or so of the rest,
and then you will have access to the Kingdom." (?)
- Or is it a gospel that says "Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at
hand. Rely 100% upon His mercy, His grace, and surrender your will to
Him. For you may be within a single heartbeat away from facing His
judgement, where you will be found completely ineffective, blind,
naked, and spiritually dead before the Holy One, unless you have a
substitue to stand in the face of His Holy wrath!" (?)
Hehe, where'd everyone go?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Please trach...
May 1, 2008 - 21:15 ET by MightyMouth"
But then MM, I think the very heart of the matter is whether or not we
agree on the definition of the gospel. I'm wondering if your gospel is
different from mine."
Don't try to play dueling gospels with me. The gospel is "the good news" and simply; the preaching of Christ and Him crucified.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM: Don't try to play
May 2, 2008 - 00:38 ET by tracheostomyMM: Don't try to play dueling gospels with me.
LOL, he's onto me!!! XD
MM: The gospel is "the good news" and simply; the preaching of Christ and Him crucified.
1. The good news of what? What's so good about it?
2. Does this mean that I can freely preach the (super popular) "Ransom to Satan" theory and call that the gospel?
3. Howabout if I claim that the gospel of Christ and Him crucified was merely symbolic, but had no real meaning other than that?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
tsk, tsk
May 2, 2008 - 00:53 ET by MightyMouth#1 The good news that THE Savior has come and died for our sins, rose on the third day.
#2 no.
#3 no.
I am sorry you met your match brother, maybe we should say godspeed.. at least in this thread?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."