Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 27, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Forums » Off-Topic Discussion
  • Krugman: Scientists Should Falsely Predict Alien Invasion So Government Will Spend More Money
  • Ashley Judd to NBC: Republicans Are 'Really Dumb,' Obama Has 'Flowered'
  • Bozell Column: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
  • CBS: 'Troubling Signs' For Obama, Like Bush in '92, But President 'Cannot Control' Economy
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’

"Thoughtcrimes": Not just for 1984, anymore.

  • Login to post comments
No replies
Wed, 05/06/2009 - 11:05pm
Cortillaen
Cortillaen's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 years 7 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 09/07/2007

About a week ago, a particular bill in the House came to my attention.  To wit, they want to create a number of "protected classes", against which the committal of a crime would carry greater punishment via prosecution as a "hate crime".  I won't get into the specific classes protected because I realized that they really are irrelevant.  The clamor over the rejection of an amendment that would exclude pedophiles from the protected classes?  Irrelevant.  My satire, at the time, of the rejection of amendments to protect the elderly, our troops, pregnant women, and the unborn; avoid excessive federal interference; and require an element of proof for conviction?  Irrelevant.  The fact that this bill, should it become law, will be selectively applied to single out and further punish anyone who attacks the protected classes, regardless of actual motivation?  Irrelevant.  All of these issues serve only to hide the terrifying reality.

The subject came back up today, and I took a moment to reread my own comment.  It was then I noticed something that had slipped past me before:  “7. An amendment by Mr. King to rename the bill `Local Law Enforcement Thought Crimes Prevention Act of 2009.’ Defeated 15 to 10. ”  I'd taken that as a joke at the liberals' expense, but the more I thought about it, the more I understood that Mr. King was likely not kidding at all.  Everything else in the bill, the protected classes, the lack of proof, the easily-twisted application, is irrelevant in the face of one overwhelming reality:  This bill intends to punish people for their thoughts.  "Thoughtcrimes" are knocking at the gates, ladies and gentlemen.  This bill sets the incredibly dangerous precedent of allowing the (federal, no less) government to dictate what thoughts are and are not acceptable and arbitrarily punish anyone that is deemed to have had "illegal thoughts".  Not only will they gain the power to punish people for mere thoughts, they will be able to do so regardless of whether or not those thoughts really existed.

I used to consider the rants claiming that we are living a prelude to 1984 hyperbolic.  That's not to say I considered Obama and the Democrats' efforts anything short of disastrous for our nation.  I was simply in the “O’-'n'-Co. are wrecking the country and attempting to rewrite the Constitution, but 1984 was worse than that” camp.  However, with this bill apparently headed for passage, the beginnings of a true Orwellian nightmare may soon be in place.  Realizing that, I get the impression that I’ve severely underestimated the ambition of our current government and the apathy of all too many of the people. It’s rather like the sensation of realizing that the guy who sleeps with a gun is, unfortunately, quite sane.

I strongly advise everyone to contact your senators and demand that this bill be crushed.  When the government gains the power to punish you simply for thinking, they have acquired the power to erase all vestiges of liberty.

More of my thoughts

"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." - Miyamot

Top
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version

  • 'This is the Supreme Court, not middle school' (Power Line)
  • The Neal Boortz Faux Commencement Speech (Nealz Nuse)
  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Why Kerry's wealth wasn't covered
    15 min 4 sec ago
  • Dear Prognosticators Extraordinaire:
    1 hour 6 min ago
  • Fortutious Misreading
    1 hour 8 min ago
  • Will it happen?
    1 hour 16 min ago
  • Are you sure
    1 hour 49 min ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • NYT Media Reporter Touts PBS, MSNBC's 'Up,' Brian Williams
  • Howard Stern Hasn't Been 'King of Prime Time'
  • All Purpose Weekend Open Thread
  • Female GOP House Members Are 'Literally Battered Women,' Democrat Tells Ed Schultz
  • NPR Celebrates Transgender Olympics Hopeful as Hammer-Throwing 'Jackie Robinson'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.