All scientists opposed to the theory of the green house effect were paid by the petrolum companies if I remember right reading in Scientific American many years ago. They only publish peer- reviewed and approved articles.
I have a plot of US tornadoes , they were 100 or so per year in the 1910s raising to 1200-1400 in the end of the 90's. Then Bush ordered silence on their numbers or did he ?
I got interested in the trend in hurricanes so I gathered data from the web best sites to plot the number my self, obody wants to hel you see.. Amaizingly analyzing the numbers in Excell by whatever method gave me a total statu quo, meaning absolutly no movement. I do not beleive it at all, the chances of having no changes is less than 1% according to my serious math noze. So they have the nerves to cheat on the numbers ?
I guessed the number of hurricanes doubled at least 3 times and that it now takes one or 2 year to double. In Canada the guys measuring the water pH are being told to lye and put it less acidic or else loose their job, The boss takes this report , adds his own lie and gives it to his boss... etc
A friend of mine dong this job noticed that a mountain was more yellow then the year before, so he wrote a report to Orrawa about it, a guy told him they could verify with calibrated picturesw, that they would do it and get back to him wiyh results wich they did and indeed my friend Maxime had it right, Sutton was yellower.Next morning 2 guys form the US governement went to ABercorn without the knowledge of any governement, they got out of their car and they called Maxime by his name without ever knowoing them before.
Maybe I am the only guy who noticed the contradictions streched to the limit in every report ? I beleive in my self for one I was affraid since 1980 of tyhe green house effect and for second I am much more honets then the CIA the NSA and Bush lying together.