Conspiracy 101: the CIA DOES run drugs

By ThoughtPolice | March 20, 2008 - 17:51 ET

http://joeplummer.co...

Hey, I'm no conspiracy theorist, so we better prove this guy wrong! I know he is lying! I mean, what does Robert Bonner, ex head of the DEA know anyway? It's not like he has any evidence..

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

1. Yes, you are.2. Yes,

1. Yes, you are.
2. Yes, evidence WOULD be nice. It begs the question of "Would the DEA know about such operations being done by the highly secretive CIA, or is this grandoise speculation?" Since it can neither be proved nor disproved, it would be easy to say something like this and get off scott-free, because it's unverifiable. Which makes it even easier to believe, because human nature shows us that we naturally distrust something we don't understand or know anything about (i.e. the CIA). Evidence would be a welcomed addition to your posts.

The Avatar

Uh, did you watch the

Uh, did you watch the video? I guess 15 minutes is to much time to learn something that goes against all that you believe.

Anyway, yes there is TONS of evidence. I guess first hand testimony doesn't count for anything these days. Ex dea agents and the ex head of the DEA don't hold enough credence in your court, huh?

http://video.google....

Here is the full movie. You should watch it.

 

early release

You get an early release for the Easter Weekend TP ?

 

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

yea, I'm out for "Good

yea, I'm out for "Good Friday" behavior...

(drum roll)

LOL... Uh-Oh TP...does

LOL...

Uh-Oh TP...does that mean you have a full week-end pass?

Have a nice Easter anyway though... 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

This is another of those "off limits" subjects...

Despite the fact that, if you look deeply, the criminality of that era was bipartisan, so the scandal should have been, too. Instead, corrupt politicians, law enforcement & the news media totally dropped the ball.

Expect what you just saw: 0 meaningful discussion of the actual issues/criminality here. It's not convenient, and an antiLibertarian (yes, folks, I deliberately used a large "L" just then, thanks for noticing) biased media managed quite well to ignore the scandal before the 'net got as strong as it is today. Recent history is obvious, which makes it funny that both sides would try so-hard to deny banana-republic style corruption when the evidence stares them in the face. As always, Drugwar Uber Alles.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Sarc, have you seen Spike TV

Sarc, have you seen Spike TV is going to do a show called DEA? It will be like COPS except they're following the DEA instead of City/State Police.

 

Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!

First hand testimony is

First hand testimony is excellent, provided the man can provide documentary proof, rather than just saying it is so.

The Avatar

Haha.. "We, the

Haha..

"We, the undersigned CIA members, have been drug running for many years now. This is our oath and testiment to that cause."

Is that the kind of "documentary" proof you need? Lol