Why Don't Most People on NewsBusters Like Bill O'Reilly?


Though I am a NB fan, I noticed that there are a lot of people who don't like Bill O'Reilly. Sure, I know he believes in Global Warming and supports REASONABLE gun control, but I see nothing wrong with that. I would rather agree with O'Reilly than with Al Gore or any of those environmental terrorists. As a self-proclaimed neoconservative, I just happen to have read Culture Warrior, his superb book, and I agree with him 100% on the ongoing culture war. Can't you guys just go soft on O'Reilly? Please feel free to give me your opinions.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

}}---> OReilly

I don't know the answer to that one.  I think he's ready, willing, and able to defend traditionalists regardless of the political fallout.

I DVR O'Reilly and Glenn Beck every night so I can watch them next morning after work.

I don't have to agree with either 100% to know they are genuinely looking out for the interests of Americans.

I think there is that faction that dislikes OReilly and Beck and Rush as an antiestablishment statement.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

He's an authoritarian "populist"

He is clueless on economics (at least, when it comes to drug prohibition and big oil). He's pompous and paternalistic, and he often interrupts guests on his show. And he's constantly hawking premium membership on that website of his, as if viewers should pay him. I'd rather watch Laurie Dhue apply makeup and yak than watch O'Reilly, but that's not an option, unfortunately.

One thing I do like about him is Steven Colbert's show...Both mens' appearances on the other's show were classic comedy.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

O'Reilly

I agree with Sarc about big Oil. I haven't followed enough of O'Reilly's comments on "drug prohibition" to have an opinion.

Although if you read what some of the ignorant DKos trolls post here, we all love & obey O'Reilly.

BOR is OK with me - just

BOR is OK with me - just OK - he's frequently off the mark - either not very important stuff or he goes liberal once in a while - he's fine occasionally

jesus

you hit the nail on the head.  I agree with you completely.  He's pompous and rude.  I'm trying to decide whether Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'reilley is the "Prothero" from "V for Vendetta".

I agree that he is very

I agree that he is very annoying when he interrupts guests (though many deserve it). You are wrong, however, on his premium membership drive. All proceeds go to charity (verified fact). And BOR does the best job on TV in making morons, from the left or the right (usually left) look like the idiots they truly are on international TV. That alone earns himn a pass on many of his foibles.

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

I have no problem with giving to charity

But why do it through Bill O'Reilly? It seems to be a way to allow him to grandstand while promoting himself, and I just find it unseemly. (It's definitely proof Steven Colbert needs to exist in this media marketplace, though!)

For me, it would be better PR if The Vibrator Factor just sold the name-branded stuff for a profit & trusted viewers to figure out which charities to support. And who takes the potentially-huge tax-write-off on all this donatin' that's goin' on, huh? THAT is the "Imus cancer-ranch" question for me on all these third-party donation schemes.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

I know, the sex-stuff's a LOT more-fun...

But does ANYONE have an answer to my tax-write-off question? A substantial charitable contribution = a substantial tax-writeoff for someone, right? Am I overly cynical to suggest that someone might be a guy with a large salary in control of the charity?

Thanks in advance to BOR fans who may be able to enlighten suspicious souls like me...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

I agree. There's

I agree. There's nothing more despicable than someone trying to make money selling a product.

 

Bill is an MSM attack machine..what's not to like ?

O'Reilly is carrying the attact to the NYT and MSM...what's not to like about the guy ? 

Bill does interrupt, but he also lets people have the last word..most of the time.

I like the guy, ...but... I don't have to take him home with me every night and bum around with him......some NB'ers act like they have to live with him, and don't like him personnally.

You hear Bill's opinion, some you like, others you don't, but he has a good heart......besides, if someone agrees with "everything" that you do, it's a boring life.      

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

}}---> Agreement

Good point 

If two people agree on everything, the case can be made there is no need for one of them.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Bill O'Reilly is basically an old school Democrat

The kind that don't exist anymore like Dick Gephart (sp?). I don't dislike O'Reilly and the thing I like most about him is that he's the only one who ever talks about all the crazy things that judges are doing.

I think his economic thinking is completely flawed and he tries too hard to be fair to liberals to the point of being unfair to conservatives. At least he was during the 2004 election. That's when I completely quit watching him.

I've watched a couple of times recently and he hasn't been so bad, but I think when the general election heats up - he will do the same thing (bend over backwards for liberals).

Is it a matter of like?

I once defended O'Reilly to a liberal cabby. The driver said, "I don't like O'Reilly, he always interupts people."

I responded with, "What's the premise of his show? The 'No Spin Zone' & 'The Spin Stops Here.' "

Come to think of it, unless he's passionate about something said, the only time I've heard him interupt was when he gets an unqualified, non answer.

Could I see myself sitting down to have a drink with O'Reilly? Probably not. He seems a bit too self-absorbed and I don't need the rivalry. 

I've watched TOF for years now

Most of what I feel about BOR has already been mentioned by someone else earlier: The only two issues that I think he's out to lunch on is global warming and oil companies. I watched Neil Cavuto try in vain to explain to him that Big Oil doesn't and can't willfully manipulate the price of a barrel, it's all supply and demand econ 101. But for whatever reason, Bill, who is usually pretty logical and reasonable, doesn't or can't understand that. "BUT THE FOLKS! THE FOLKS ARE GETTING SCREWED!" OK, Bill, take it easy. Also, he tends to be an alarmist. I can count three different times over the last couple of years that he's proclaimed that "If such-and-such happens/doesn't happen in Iraq, then it's over and we've lost". And during the run up in gas prices in 2003, he was yelling to someone that "If Bush doesn't get these prices under control, the other guy is going to walk right in!" referring to whoever was the Democratic nominee for president. As we saw, that didn't happen.

 All that aside, I do think he's a man with heart who means well and for the most part, does good work. I latched on to his show around 1999 when he was the only person I ever heard who wasn't afraid to take on Jesse Jackson. Sometimes he trys so hard to be fair, that he lets BS slide. That annoys me too. But I try to never miss his show, and he has wayyyyy more class and credibility than his crazy wanna-be rival Keith Olbermann. Poor Keith, no matter how hard you try to provoke a war with BOR, he just goes on ignoring you and your dumb show.

Because BOR dissed the Swift Boat guys as well as Boortz.

Oh, and did I mention he is a pompous ass?

'nuff said.


When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.
-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.

BOR

I am not crazy about Bill O'Reilly.  I don't hate him, though.   

That being said, especially in light of his view on oil companies (see the tagline below), I find him to be a Right-leaning populist. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

I generally like Bill O.

But he does get some things wrong...ie. Global Warming and Big Oil.

Having said that, I truly admire the man for taking on idiot judges and pushing "Jessica's Law".

And he does put his money where his mouth is.

Oh....the big negative about BOR....he's nice to that moron Geraldo, even when Geraldo is at his smarmiest & most over-the-top (immigration).  Bill should just tell old Gerry to shut up.   Better yet, not have him on at all.

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

He's arrogant.

He's arrogant. Self-righteous.  

True, I agree, however, he

True, I agree, however, he does have a selling point, that being his tireless manhandling of judges when children are being abused.  I consider BOR to be on the liberal side (of me, maybe right of you), but on the issue of children I agree with his position.  Holding incompetent judges accountable in the public eye is the only way these arrogant jerks get to taste public dissapproval of their actions.  If it were not for BOR, these creeps would get a free pass on their PC ignoring of the Law and the public demand that justice be done.  Some of these judges are just as bad as the perverts who are brought before them.  I consider enabling behavior equally as offensive and contemptable as the act itself.

I usually don't watch the guy, like Hannity and Colmes they grate on my nerves.  However, I would be inclined to watch them over any of the other talking heads.

Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.

Yup

What you stated is his one redeeming quality.He looks after the kids.Other that that I agree with balboa about him

"He's arrogant. Self-righteous."

Wow scary agreeing with balboa on something.Anyways never ceases to amaze me when BOR or others invite guests on and then talk over them.I can understand if someone doesnt answer the question but goes off on tangent that has nothing to do with the topic.Michelle should replace him.She can think on her feet and doesnt take no garbage from anyone.Also she lets someone have their say as long as their on topic.

His bombastic style

is tiresome. 

I don't like O'Reilly b/c I

I don't like O'Reilly b/c I don't like to get news or opinions from a sexaul deviant.

Let's take a moment and get all hot & bothered courtesy of BOR:

"Well, if I took you down there then I'd want to take a shower with you right away...yeah, we'd check into the room, and we would order up some room service and uh and you'd definitely get two wines into you as quickly as I could get into you I would get 'em into you...maybe intravenously, get those glasses of wine into you...

You would basically be in the shower and then I would come in and I'd join you and you have your back to me and I would take that little loofa thing and kinda' soap up your back...rub it all over you, get you to relax, hot water....and um..."

Click here for the rest of BOR's deviant, steamy, disgusting sexual harassment.  Yum!

Yeah that's pretty much the main reason I dislike O'Reilly.  This scumbag is pretending to fight for Christmas?  Please, Jesus doesn't love sexual harassers.  He doesn't want his B-Day associated with a perv like BOR.  Disgraceful.

}}---> Excellent, Leon

Wow, you're linking the same website that says kids are sniffing doodoo to get high.

We know why you really don't like OReilly.  I'm LMAO over this one.

Take another huff.

Uh Cool, You realize the

Uh Cool,

You realize the Smoking Gun writes about police reports right? 

They didn't say anything about sniffing doodoo.  The Collier County police department did.

And if you even read your link you'd realize the article is ripping on the police force that released the report in Collier County Florida.

Might want to read your links before posting them.

Ha what a joke you are.

}}---> Whiff some more Leon

If it's your belief every allegation ever made against anybody is true, you must live a very paranoid life.

Keep on huffing poster.

Your limited instincts just can't realize the MSM (who would just love this story) haven't even touched it.

Cool, Look at you

Cool,

Look at you backpeddling.  You posted a link and had no idea what it was.  Haha too funny.  How lame of you.

I don't believe every allegation, just ones that are backed up by taped conversations (aka tangible evidence) and an out of court settlement.

Aren't you happy I taught you about The Smoking Gun.  It's a great site for finding primary source police documents. 

I'll keep on huffing so long as you keep posting links to websites without having a clue about what's on them.

haha. 

}}---> No, Leon

I don't.

And yes, you do.

And if it's a police report, there is a criminal investigation.  What are the results of this criminal investigation you claim?

Cool, Stubborn and

Cool,

Stubborn and moronic.  Dangerous combo tiger.

A police report can be a variety of things.  I suppose in this instance it would be more apt to call it a memo.

It was an information bulletin released by Lieutenant Al Ganich of the Collier County Sheriff's Department.

Nice try on the semantics tip though.  The Smoking Gun takes a look at and compiles all forms of police reports.  I particularly like their mug shot collection.

Keep spinning although I'd back out now if i was you.

Leon

If you believe taking a shower together is sexually deviant, I feel very, very sorry for you.  In fact, you have just destroyed whatever shred of credibility that you have ever had on this site.

Forget 911, I dial 10MM.

Fossten, Taking a shower

Fossten,

Taking a shower together is not sexually deviant.

Calling one of your employees and leacherously engaging in phone sex is deviant.

Get it?  Good.

Leon

Just curious...

Did your mama teach you that all sex was bad?

Forget 911, I dial 10MM.

No but she did teach me

No but she did teach me that uninvited sexual harassment is bad, especially in the work place.

You really don't see anything wrong with an employer calling his employee while spouting his sexual fantasies about her?

You're a strange bird.  We're not talking about sex, we're talking about harassment.

PS They weren't having sex, BOR was forcing his fantasy of them having sex on her.  She recorded the conversation for evidence.

Did you vote for Clinton? 

Did you vote for Clinton?  If you did, you're a hypocrite.  Do you believe hiding cigars in interns you're not married to is sexually deviant?  What about exposing oneself to a coworker?

Forget 911, I dial 10MM.

Fossten, A consensual

Fossten,

A consensual relationship between two adults is not comparable to workplace sexual harassment.

One is legal, one is not. 

I'm not a hypocrite at all.  You just clearly think it's ok to engage in sexual harassment in the workplace. 

Boy, I'd be scared with you as an employee.

You think the Paula Jones

You think the Paula Jones exposure was consensual?  You think Kathleen Willey was consensual?  You think Juanita Broaddrick was consensual? 

Boy, I'd hate to see you as a sex crimes caseworker.

Forget 911, I dial 10MM.

Fossten, We're talking

Fossten,

We're talking about BOR not Clinton.

I fail to see how Clinton's behavior in any way excuses O'Reilly's behavior.

Stay on topic or move along.

We're talking about BOR not Clinton.

Nice try at dodging.  But

Nice try at dodging.  But whether or not you approve of Clinton's behavior goes to your credibility over the BOR issue.  If you approve of and voted for Clinton, an accused sexual deviant, then you are a hypocrite.  End of story.

Forget 911, I dial 10MM.

Fossten, I never voted

Fossten,

I never voted for Clinton.

I was born in 1981.

Actually, there are 2 standards.

One for Packwood, the other for Slick. But Leon, like it or not, feminist orthodoxy pre-Monica preached no possibility of real consent in patriarchal power structures like the one between a President of the United States and one of his interns. Face it, the left has a double-standard here. It's not like the right doesn't have plenty of 'em, too, but it IS dishonest to deny this one.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

}}---> No water Leon

You claim she has damning tapes and didn't use them to both bring him down and get a large settlement?

If she really believed she was being harrassed, she could've had both.

So give me a link to this taped evidence, would you?

Uh Cool, The tapes are

Uh Cool,

The tapes are the reason he settled. 

Otherwise, BOR and his unparalleled stubborness would have fought this woman in court to the death.

She did use them & she did get a large setllement.

Cool, seriously think before you speak.  Research the topic at hand before opening your mouth.

}}---> Not how I read it Leon

This from your CBS source 

O'Reilly's lawyer, Ronald Green, said he believes there are tapes of conversations between the two and asked a court to compel Mackris to produce them so they could be played publicly.

"I know that he does not fear what is on the tapes," Green said.

Morelli would not comment on whether any taped phone conversations exist.

So, are these tapes public yet?  You, Leon, claim they exist, so I'm just asking you to give me a link to them.

Cool, Obviously the tapes

Cool,

Obviously the tapes aren't public.  And what did you read differently than me?   

Don't you think that would have been one of the major stipulations of the settlement?

BOR's lawyer was willing to publicly say he believed they existed and the report clearly shows segments taken directly from the tapes. 

Knowing BOR's stubborness, you really think he would have settled if it was as simple as her word vs. his word?

The tapes are real and they're non-release was part of the settlement.

I'm loving your persistence.  Wrong again and again but you keep coming back for more, trying new angles, anything to get me.  Your desperation is so cute.

}}---> Obviously?

No, it's not obvious.

You've never engaged in sexual banter with a woman, or a man? (I almost forgot to be gender neutral in your presence) 

Really?

Cool, Not in my workplace

Cool,

Not in my workplace where it's illegal.

How are you not making this distinction?

It's not okay for a superior to sexually harass a subordinate.

Do you sexually harass women at your workplace?

}}---> Right Leon

The allegation news clip I read said "at dinner" and "phone conversations"

Sounds like there was something extracurricular and consensual going on at some point.

Are you alleging this took place at the workplace?

Oh my God, You are

Oh my God,

You are absurd.  Desperation cha cha cha.

If you are my employer, you are always my employer.

A business dinner does count as a workplace incident.  For example, If you are out for business at a dinner and you get injured, you can claim Workers' Compensation.  Fact.

You don't ever go out to dinner for work related purposes?  I'm out all the time with clients and my boss.  And if he were to do something inappropriate at that meeting, you can be damn sure it would be considered sexual harassment.

Sexual harassment doesn't have to necessarily take place within the actual physical workplace environment. 

But your comment is immaterial since, if you would slowly but surely continue to read the report, you will notice that there was at work sexual harassment as well.

Why are you defending this behavior?  What if it was your daughter and her boss was calling her to try to force phone sex?

Good God man have some principles. 

}}---> Poo Huffer

You are absurd if you believe office romances don't exist in today's world.  Check the stats.

There is absolutely no law preventing consenting adults from becoming an item.

Cool, I never said there

Cool,

I never said there was.

Unfortunately for BOR, this employee didn't consent to his creepiness.

Wow.  You're trying soooo hard. 

You're calling me poo huffer by the way?  You're the one that thought it was real.  Haha.

Go back and read your own

Go back and read your own post and Arrow's response to it. You're wrong, and I'm done. Nice try, though.

I have no idea what you're

I have no idea what you're talking about.

Thanks for playing though.

Don't give up, with practice you can learn to make a rational argument/contribution too!

This should have appeared

This should have appeared below, which is what I was commenting on.

Meh, It's wrong and weird

Meh,

It's wrong and weird no matter where you place it Uncle John.

Is that what you used to say

Is that what you used to say when you were a little boy, Hater? It would explain quite a few things.

Haha that's hilarious

Haha that's hilarious Rog.

Zing of the day no doubt.

I agree Leon.

No doubt.

.

.

Oh and Cool, Wrong

Oh and Cool,

Wrong again.  The MSM did cover this story.

1)  Washington Post

2)  CBS News

3)  CNN

4)  MSNBC

5)  People Magazine 

6)  US TODAY

and the list goes on and on...in fact, every major player in the MSM covered this story.

The MSM haven't touched this story?  Do you know anything or do you just speak the first thing that comes into your mind?  You literally just make things up.  It's wacky.

Be real about it Leon.

Be real about it Leon. There obviously had to be a relationship here before this kind of conversation could come up. So let's realistically look at what happened here. Chicky got pissed about something in the relationship and decided to destroy O'reilly. There is literally not one person at that level of business stupid enough to speak like that to a subordinate without prior precedent being set. You don't have to like BOR but you have to engage rational thought. And I wonder just how much scrutiny you'd apply to him if he was on the other side of the aisle.

You can't save the Earth unless You're willing to make other people sacrifice. Dogbert the Green Consultant summing up the elite left.

TWC, Not true at all. 

TWC,

Not true at all.  There is no evidence of a prior relationship.

There are people stupid enough to speak like this.  Sexual impulses are extremely hard for some people to control as we see time and time again.

Just watch to Catch A Predator, we see teachers, rabbis, upstanding members of their communities throwing their lives away, throwing everything away for a sexual impulse.

We see guys cheating on their wives for a one night fling.

Sexual drive is a strong motivator.  It makes people do things they wouldn't normally do.  As is the case with many sexual harassment incidents, a person in power feels invincible, feels they are untouchable and can do whatever they want.

My guess is that BOR thought this chick was into him, figured as the boss man he could give it a shot and have a good chance, the problem was she wasn't into it (as I suspect most women would react to workplace sexual harassment)

You're argument that he wouldnt' do this without a prior relationship b/c it doesn't make any sense otherwise is absurd based on the myriad of examples of people behaving bizarrely in the name of sex.

There are literally thousands of people at that level stupid enough to speak like that to a subordinate.  I wish it wasn't true, but sadly it is.  Why do you think companies take out massive Employment Practices Liability insurance policies? 

I'm agreeing with you in part Leon...

The obvious question for me then is, who the hell has a tape recorder ready to go on their phone? Unless they're planning on "stinging" someone. Other than that I actually agree with you. Relationship or not the pig is married and therefore a sexual deviant. It angers me then that someone carrying the conservative banner makes some people think of conservatives as hypocrites because of his behavior. Much like a Ted Haggard or Jim Baker, you can be forgiven but you lose your place at the podium. In keeping with the "no deviant" standard Leon would you agree with me that Bill Clinton should not be allowed to hold any public office?

You can't save the Earth unless You're willing to make other people sacrifice. Dogbert the Green Consultant summing up the elite left.

TWC, My simple guess

TWC,

My simple guess would be that something creepy happened on the first innappropriate phone call.

She realized it was wrong and wanted to have evidence to get justice and to get left alone.  So the next time BOR called she got the tape recorder out.

Which was smart b/c it's hard to win these sexual harassment lawsuits, esp. with the insurance companies backing the executives.  You can rest assured they aren't interested in taking a huge claim.

I'm glad we agree, BOR is a scum bag and everything you've said is dead on.

Clinton is off-topic and I want to focus on BOR on this thread.  Again, I don't see what Clinton's behavior has to do with BOR's behavior.  Unrelated incidents.  I'm not going to comment on Clinton on this thread and I was wrong to even respond to Fossten's first Clinton question.

BOR is the focus of this thread, all other persons are off-topic and nothing but trolling.

 

Reading Comprehension

Unless my reading comprehension is out of whack, and it's not, the story CA was referring to as the MSM "not touching" was the poop huffing story, not what you're linking to above. And CA's right about the MSM not touching the poop story.

Uncle John, You're

Uncle John,

You're reading comprehension is out of whack.

Since you're obviously

Since you're obviously having trouble with this, I've re-captured the relevant part of the "discussion", which is what I am talkinig about. This is what you were responding to with the numerous links to coverage of the BOR sex story. Show me where there's any reference to the BOR sex story in those posts. You can't. You're just plain wrong, and apparently unable to recognize or acknowledge it. Have fun with the unconsious incompetence thing.

Later. Much.

November 12, 2007 - 09:46 ET by Cool Arrow

Wow, you're linking the same website that says kids are sniffing doodoo to get high.

We know why you really don't like OReilly. I'm LMAO over this one.

Take another huff.


November 12, 2007 - 09:56 ET by Leon

Uh Cool,

You realize the Smoking Gun writes about police reports right?

They didn't say anything about sniffing doodoo. The Collier County police department did.

And if you even read your link you'd realize the article is ripping on the police force that released the report in Collier County Florida.

Might want to read your links before posting them.

Ha what a joke you are.


November 12, 2007 - 10:02 ET by Cool Arrow

If it's your belief every allegation ever made against anybody is true, you must live a very paranoid life.

Keep on huffing poster.

Your limited instincts just can't realize the MSM (who would just love this story) haven't even touched it.

 

Right Uncle John, As your

Right Uncle John,

As your cutting and pasting clearly shows, Cool was talking about the allegations against BOR:

If it's your belief every allegation ever made against anybody is true, you must live a very paranoid life.

Cool then goes on to say that the MSM would love this story b/c it's about a guy they hate.  BOR.

Your limited instincts just can't realize the MSM (who would just love this story) haven't even touched it.

How else can you read his post?  Why would the MSM love a story about huffing poo?

Wow that's a lot of effort you went to to show us that you have ZERO reading comprehension.

haha.  Nice work Uncle John. 

Asshattery at it's finest

And yet it takes almost no effort on your part to show everyone yet again what an asshat you are. Back to your bridge.

Unfortunately for you Uncle

Unfortunately for you Uncle John,

My 'asshat' status doesn't change the fact that you can't read.

You got put in your place and your response is some lame personal attack?  Haha. 

 

Uncle John: 5 Troll: 0

Uncle John: 5

Troll: 0

Free, Do you even have

Free,

Do you even have any idea what we're talking about?

Based on your scoring you clearly haven't even read the conversation between Uncle John and I.

I knew there was a reason I was in the shade all of the sudden.  You're gigantic head was blotting out my sun.  Could you please put your picture back up?  You look so cool with your little boy's haircut, your croakies, and your massively fat head.

Now, back to your Bridge Trolleon!


your response is some lame personal attack?

This coming from the guy who insults my picture. Nice to see you admit it's the sunglasses that really piss you off.

Could you please put your picture back up?

It hasn't gone anywhere.

Based on your scoring you clearly haven't even read the conversation between Uncle John and I.

He gets one point for using an accurate adjective to describe you, and four points for correctly identifying the fact that you've left a bridge with no toll collector.

Wow Free, Look at you

Wow Free,

Look at you back to using words.

1)  Of course I insult your picture.  Have you seen it?  If you didn't want to get blasted you should have (a) never put it up & (b) never started worshipping me & (c) never started following me around with your juvenile scoreboard 'hilarity'

2)  I mean everytime you post.  Not just in your profile.  Although it would be great if you could get a more panned out shot and perhaps put an item we all recognize next to your head for context.  While it looks massive now, I'd love to see it next to some common items for reference.  Perhaps a watermelon or hot air balloon.

3)  The 'asshat' craze on this site is weak as hell.  Where did that word even come from?  Guys that use 'asshat' are the same guys that put man in front of everything to be funny.  You know, manscaping, mandate, mandals, etc. etc. etc.  AKA 30 - 40 year old dorks that still read Maxim & FHM.

4)  Thank you for trolling in order to call me a troll.  Your hypocrisy is hilarious.

Leon what is wrong with you?

Are you that jealous of Free's good looks? How can you be so immature? I wish the mature Leon would come out once in awhile.

Trolleon

There is a mature Leon?

Where?

...says the guy that

...says the guy that follows me around posting a nonsensical scoreboard.

ha.

How are those psych classes helping you out with your low score?

How are those psych classes helping you out?

(update) LOL!

Hi vrwc13! ;-)

Free: 4Dee: 1Leon:

  • Free: 6
  • Dee: 5+ (she scores a big one, and another, whoa!)
  • Leon: -8 (down for the count...10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3.....2, 1....ding!!!)

(rev. 7)

IT'S A KNOCKOUT!!! Dee/Free trounce leon/jasonC as JasonC is nowhere to be found in this classic tag-team match.  leon was no match to the wit of Dee yet alone the logic of Free.  Even if jasonC had shown up, the result would have been the same.

update: leon has left the building ) :

v

"At least I am a guy and not desperately trying to be one." Leon

vrwc - don't you guys like Jason C?

He seems decent to me. I can't imagine him sticking up for Leon's crude name calling bully tactics.

Dee...

...he's ok. except for a number of times that he has jumped in to leon's defense.  Made me think of the tag-team thing.  They appear to both be from the NW and kind of think along the same lines.

v

That is interesting Vrwc - because I know Leon knows how

to be reasonable.

..leon knows how to be reasonable...

...that's true but too often he insult's, puffs up and hardly ever (never?) admits he is wrong.  He is young (26-27) and full of himself right now, maybe if he lasts here long enough, we will see him mature.

v

V, The Northwest? I've

V,

The Northwest?

I've been very open about where I live. 

New York City & more recently, Philadelphia.

That's the NorthEAST.

It's cool, I can never figure that whole compass thing out.

...meant NE, just typed the

...meant NE, just typed the wrong thing...my mistake, thanks for pointing it out.

v

Dee, If name calling is

Dee,

If name calling is so crude, then why do you engage in name calling?

You're an amazing hypocrite.