Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Forums » Latest News
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
  • Rachel Maddow Trumpets Inane 'Amish Bus Driver' Analogy for Obama Contraception Rule
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'

Nafta--Just being tenacious

  • Login or register to post comments
14 replies [Last post]
Fri, 03/21/2008 - 12:26am
misterbill
User offline. Last seen 36 weeks 15 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 06/12/2006

I know there is not a lot of interest at NB about SPP and NAU. In fact, I guess because most of the folks here are so nice, I have been ignored instead of publicly scorned. I respect the courtesy, but I must continue, from time to time, to share information that I hope will alert others.

Here is yet another article on SPP, NAFTA etal. I see my country disappearing before my eyes each day. I see most of it via the internet because the MSM will never show it.

On occasion a newspaper will publish something of interest regarding SPP, but basically SPP/NAU is ignored. This from the LA Chronicle (excerpt only):

 "The results of NAFTA were not accidental," said Jeff Faux of the Economic Policy Institute early on in the conference. "In Mexico it was about getting people off the land, into the city, to become labourers in new factories. It's no surprise it actually happened."

Faux said that NAFTA was a deal among elites, a class issue from the beginning, and fighting it will require some kind of cross-border consensus on what is wrong with the agreement and how it should be changed.

While the bulk of the conference focused on NAFTA's impact on farmers and the link between U.S. trade policies and migration, there was recognition from most presenters that the SPP represents a dangerous next phase in the NAFTA saga -- one that not only privileges big business interests but locks them in through institutions like the North American Competitiveness Council, essentially privatizing public policy.

So in my mental illness and advancing senility, my mind's logic still sees a tremendous threat to our country. I am comforted to know that there are some rather well-respected and knowledgable people who believe as I do. Why they even see the illegal immigration problem as a key to what some of those mythical people I talk about have supported as a step in the direction of "wage normalization." I am so happy to see the numbers of people who are leery about SPP/NAU grow. Even though not on this site.

But then again, I am a Conspiro. I am getting senile. I just can't help myself.

 

PS

I ask you kindly to humor me and provide information as to why the USA and Canadian military signed a joint support treaty to control civil unrest. Perhaps to keep the Americans who are losing their jobs and homes from celebrating their joy too widely???

This description, believe it or not, from a teen age blog site. (there is hope for some of our youth.

"On February 14 2008, the president of the USA and Canada’s prime minister met secretly to sign a treaty basically guaranteeing that there will be no problems with “civil unrest” in the future.

The treaty says that if the USA has any problems with “civil unrest” that Canada’s military will come down and help our military out, and if Canada has any problems with “civil unrest” then we will help them with our military.

Senate’s (or whatever Canada has) in both countries were furious when they heard about the treaty, especially since they were not notified about ANY of it until now.  Canada is upset because it does not want to give us any military help, and actually they are not to keen on the whole North American Union thing anyways.

Does this not scream police state?  Our government (and Canada’s) has basically guaranteed that if we simple citizens try to protest and fight for freedom that we will have not just one, but TWO armies ready to arrest us.  I will NOT be going to any rallies or protests anytime soon with that promise.

Just thought you should know about the new step towards police state and New World Order,"

Right on kiddo. One day, if there is an America left, you will be a leader.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Completely terrifies? I have one word...
    1 min 52 sec ago
  • How many decades back?
    19 min 2 sec ago
  • Nah, Jer................I
    20 min 33 sec ago
  • Right
    22 min 54 sec ago
  • A little, but seein' as how kilrod
    31 min 47 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
  • Newt Gingrich: As President I'll Repudiate 40% of Obama's Government on Inauguration Day
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.