Mexican official welcoming North American Union.

By alamojb
October 28, 2007 - 19:12 ET

Quote from a Mexican mayor: 

"Asked why he chose the conference to promote the idea of a North American Union, Perez told WND, "It's as good as any place and the right people are here."

"This is not a new idea," he said. "In fact when there are border meetings between border governors or border legislatures this is a topic that continually comes up."" (emphasis mine)

Did you read that "Unsane"?  Let's quote that last part again:

"This is not a new idea," he said. "In fact when there are border meetings between border governors or border legislatures this is a topic that continually comes up."

I do not care if he is just a City mayor, what is important is that he is giving us a peek into discussions that are being held elsewhere.

From this article here:  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57762

(Article from "World Net Daily" website; 21 SEP 2007 article entitled "Mexican Official Urges North American Union" by Michael Howe.)

 

 

 

‹ Westboro Church Ignoring Huckabee ›

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Lol...I posted that a few

October 29, 2007 - 14:10 ET by ThoughtPolice

Lol...I posted that a few months ago to no avail.

I recently posted the comments by vicent Fox on Larry King and some other show where he says there will be a NAU and a new currency "long term." What a pompous ass.

Unsane will give you no satisfaction. Check this movie trailer out. I guess this many people are fighting against an invisible enemy!?!

http://www.youtube.c...

Too many people are asleep in this country. Our ignorance will be our downfall.

Awesome video!!   I was

October 29, 2007 - 17:26 ET by alamojb

Awesome video!!   I was thinking someone had posted the thing I  posted before. In reality, when I started this particular blog I was going to put another link and this one as just a supporting one.  Then I changed my mind and decided to focus in.  I want to get involved with Stopping the TTC in a more focused way.  Any suggestions?

Alamo...Watch this video,

October 29, 2007 - 20:57 ET by ThoughtPolice

Alamo...Watch this video, its Alex Jones latest production (released 10/26/07). It deals with the Bilderberg group, NAU, TTC, NAFTA, and One World Gov't and how they will get it if we don't do something. It has a LOT of good info on the NAU that I didn't know.

http://video.google....

As far as what to do, all you can do is fight against these anti-US propositions. Don't let ANYONE tell you your crazy or a conspiracy theorist (Unsane, etc.). You and I both know this is happening. While Unsane is reading his copy of "Debunking NAU conspiracy theories" by Pop Culture Mechanics, we will be deep in the fight to save this country.

 

 

Thoughtpolice:I watched

October 30, 2007 - 01:44 ET by alamojb

Thoughtpolice:

I watched the video.  I have mixed reaction to it.  They could have spent less time outside the Bilderberg conference in the first half. The second portion of the film was much more informative.  Some of it I can see, some of it I doubt.

There do seem to be multiple threats to the U.S. that may have different long term goals, but in the short to mid term need the same thing.

For example- the open borders between the US and Mexico. Who needs it?

1. Left wing wanting cheap votes.

2.Right wing and left wing wanting cheap labor.

3. The various versions of Reconquista (MEChA's AZTLAN, Mexican Nationalist and the Mexica Movement.)

4.The Globalist -which your film covered.

5. Various Religious groups.

6. Average poor Mexican just wanting a job.

Same thing in Europe, with the massive immigration of Muslims to Europe.  Who is behind it?

1. Left wing Multiculturalist- who are really Anti-western Communist.

2. Globalist- seeking to destroy Nations by mixing the populations to such an extent that there is little loyalty to a nation within its borders. (Overlap with number 1.)

3. Muslims seeking to take over Europe through demographic shift and incremental advances in sharia law.

4. Muslims not meaning any harm, just wanting to come to Europe.

To ignore any of these threats is dangerous. They may have different long term goals, but have short term mutual needs.

 The one thing that concerned me about the film is though it never said it, I wondered if the maker of the film was a Truther.  He did show a picture of some people with "911 inside job shirts".  I have to ask, are you 911 conspiracy guy? I know Al Qauida did 911.  But I do not doubt that there are some powerful forces at work trying to destroy the concept of nations and replace it incrementally with one world government. This "Law of the Seas Treaty" that the press mostly ignores is one aspect of it.  The open borders is another.

2 Thessalonians 2: 3-12

Revelation: 13: 11-18 (especially verse 16-17)

 

 

 

 

Alamo, I agree with you.

October 30, 2007 - 10:54 ET by ThoughtPolice

Alamo, I agree with you. The first half was pretty week. The Bilderberg stuff was really slow and boring. The 2nd half though, was much better and informative like you say.

Yes, both Alex Jonex and myself are "9/11 truthers." I thought you knew ;). I hope your opinion doesn't change about the information though. You say you "know al-qaeda did 911." But I say, I know our gov't was involved. Check out Michael Rupert's Geo-political book "Crossing the Rubicon." It gets a 5 star rating from one of Amazons top raters Robert D. Steele which you can read here.

If you don't think our gov't "did it", once you look at the info you will believe they knew about it and at least let it happen.

Read this article about Sibel Edmonds, the "most gagged woman in history."

http://www.bradblog....

Thanks for listening. Most here won't even do that.

Thoughtpolice, Look there

October 30, 2007 - 15:27 ET by alamojb

Thoughtpolice, Look there were certainly errors leading up to 911.  Big ones. But that does not mean it was intentional on the U.S government part.  Let me tell you as someone who once worked in military intelligence that one of the hardest things to do is to determine the reliability of a given piece of information.  Then when someone does realize it is reliable, trying to convince others who have their doubts.  Hindsight is 20/20.  It is easy to say , ahh we had this!

Our current situation is like WW2.  In that war we were fighting both the Japanese,the Germans and the Italians (and a few of their minor allies).

Those people like Unsane who refuse to see the globalist / NAU threat to our sovereinty are like someone in WW2 saying we are only fighting the Germans. (Think of the Mexican reconquistadores as a tool of the Globalist, who have their own agenda as well. Mexican reconquistadores = WW2 Italians in this scenario.))

Those Truthers who refuse to see the Islamic threat for how bad it really is, are like someone in WW2 saying we are only fighting the Japanese.

People like myself and misterbill understand that there are multiple threats that are equally dangerous in their own way. 

The globalist are mostly internal to the West.  They are allowing the infiltration of large numbers of muslims into Europe , as I mentioned a couple of post up, for their own agenda.  The Muslims also have their own agenda. Which one will come out on top in Europe?  Will they eventually have to reach some compromise, where the common people live under sharia while the ruling class live western? It is possible. (Substitute Mexicans for Muslims in North America. The longer mass illegal immigration continues, the harder it will be to stop, and the border will increasingly mean nothing.  Also, note the growing use of dual citizenships by Mexicans)

One issue I did take with that film was the insistance that the Superhighways were part of a "rewilding scheme".  I understand there are those dangerous radicals on the left that would push us all onto human reservations if they could.  But the TTC is supposed to be 400 yards across.  This is not something that group would support. As a matter of fact, some of the enviros will probably be our allies against the TTC because of its size. That does not mean I trust them in the long term.

There are many players here who will use shifting alliances for their own purposes.  The Globalist are dangerous.  So are the Jihadists.

Thoughtpolice, Look there

October 30, 2007 - 16:31 ET by ThoughtPolice

Thoughtpolice, Look there were certainly errors leading up to 911. Big
ones. But that does not mean it was intentional on the U.S government
part.

It all depends on what you know and how you look at it. Go read Crossing the Rubicon (or many other books on the subject for that matter) then come back and tell me the same thing. You may be startled by what you find. Our CIA and the Israeli Mossad were definitely involved...the FBI probably was at the highest levels (read about John O'neill).

Remember the story of the "5 dancing isrealis"? Watch this video about it..here (be sure and watch the whole thing, it is very incriminating).

There are many players here who will use shifting alliances for their
own purposes. The Globalist are dangerous. So are the Jihadists.

I think your conception of "truthers" is a bit off. I know that there is terrorism and islamic extremism, but I also know the history of false flag terror (look up operation gladio in Italy; or operation Northwoods here in the U.S.). These guys get infiltrated pretty early on (OKC, WTC '93, 9/11 etc.) and are used and actually coaxed into commiting the crimes.

Don't believe me? Search for Emad Salem and listen to his taped conversation with FBI officers. He was the '93 mole inside the terrorist cell that set off a bomb the FBI built for them. It's all on tape.

Nice post..I like having civil debates on here for once. It's quite refreshing!