http://www.dailypaul... has it all, I'm busy elsewhere lately, but in between my other bust of Faux (I get to use the epithet in this case until I see a coherent counter-argument!) News bias and this, let's just say NB's got no monopoly...And now that the NH GOP itself (to the deafening-silence of the NB masthead) de-sponsored the Faux Forum, I'd say I have the right to just sit back & crow a bit about just how well the Daily Paul busts media-bias. :) Have fun -- gotta love those young supporters!!
JMR
|
|
home blogs about forum contact search account 
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Frank Luntz busted... |
Editors’ Picks
Poll
MastheadEditor
Senior Editors Managing Editor Associate Editor Contributing Editors Contributing Writers Publisher 
|
|
[ Home | Blogs |
Forum |
About |
Contact
]
| |
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Fergus Cullen has balls.
January 7, 2008 - 08:54 ET by sarcasmoI'd have stood up to obvious Fox-bias, too, just like any other media-bias. It's the morally right thing to do in the face of bias, whether or not anyone seems to want to notice it around here... Nice going, sir.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
}}---> Luntz busted?
January 7, 2008 - 09:06 ET by Cool ArrowLuntz, in your video projected Paul to get 11% in Iowa.
Didn't Ron Paul get 10%? How is this "getting busted"?
Luntz claimed America won't elect Paul because of Iraq. He's right. Paul would pull much higher numbers if he weren't so urgent in his demand to cut and run.
Is Luntz not supposed to talk to voters?
I ♣ My Seal
Luntz isn't supposed
January 7, 2008 - 09:23 ET by sarcasmoTo slant "undecided" panels. Watch the video & decide for youselves...This bust of Faux is the biggest of the year on NB whether or not the masthead wants to take-notice, unless you think the state GOP is wrong to fight this bias. Do you???
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Please explain how Fox News
January 7, 2008 - 17:42 ET by BDPlease explain how Fox News is busted.
Sorry, BD
January 7, 2008 - 17:53 ET by sarcasmoThe explanation is up-top, but you'll have to click on one of those dreaded & horrible "link" things you're constantly-whining about, because Luntz explains the bust himself in the video as far as he goes. The rest of the bust is the cricket-fest I've mentioned over and over, including here in this thread, but once-again it requires clicking on another of those horrid "link" things...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Please explain... 1.) How
January 7, 2008 - 18:09 ET by BDPlease explain...
1.) How luntz busts himself.
2.) Cricket fest.
Easy
January 8, 2008 - 06:28 ET by sarcasmo1. Watch the video where Luntz is busted. As Alexa shows, it's not like the Daily Paul needs the traffic, but it's gonna require clicking on one of those dreaded "link" things. (I'll keep saying this as long as you keep-on not-doing it.)
2. See below. Or just watch Jay Leno, since if this BIAS BUST hadn't happened, Ron wouldn't have gotten on the show again last night. Face it, this is a slam dunk bust, whether you or RJ or any of the others like it. IMO it's the biggest of the year so-far, and the fact that the NB masthead doesn't wanna notice it makes it that-much-funnier to me.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
You could simply perform
January 8, 2008 - 17:23 ET by BDYou could simply perform some analytical work and say "Frank Luntz was busted when he......"
But relying on someone elses work is easier and allows you to not think...
C'mon Sarc, lets see some of
January 9, 2008 - 11:02 ET by BDC'mon Sarc, lets see some of that "Chess honed " thought...simply perform some analytical work and say "Frank Luntz was busted when he......" And tell us in simple terms what you can prove.
And ANOTHER Daily Paul bust...
January 7, 2008 - 09:33 ET by sarcasmoBSNBC competes with Faux.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
*crickets*
January 7, 2008 - 10:51 ET by fosstenSure is quiet in here. Is Faux News the darling of NB? Of course it is, that's where the biggies on NB get to go speak on camera. Why bite the hand that feeds you?
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
Wanna see the REAL cricketfest?
January 7, 2008 - 10:59 ET by sarcasmoThis one's only been up for a bit, but check out what happened on a recent open-thread! Sometimes, it feels more like a slam-dunk must feel (not that I'd ever know personally, I sucked at basketball!!) than a mere bias-bust...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Good stuff. I copied it
January 7, 2008 - 11:28 ET by fosstenGood stuff. I copied it all down. Thanks.
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
And now, Patrick M. Byrne
January 7, 2008 - 11:32 ET by sarcasmoCEO of Overstock.com, has piled-on too (page down for his words). Like I said, the deafening silence on this majorleague bias-bust must be gettin' humiliating at this point. :)
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
...a slam dunk, sarky? More like.....
January 7, 2008 - 20:32 ET by RJ...you tried to throw a Ron Paul party, but no one showed up.
I suspect that on most days people have no more interest in the antics of Ron Paul and his band of merry cultists than they do in Britney Spears. Watching either one is like watching a slow-motion train wreck.
I might point out that
January 7, 2008 - 20:46 ET by AvatarI might point out that watching a train wreck in slo-mo is pretty cool. I get your analogy, but even watching a train wreck in slo-mo is far more interesting, RJ.
The Avatar
Yeah, for a minute or two, Avatar
January 7, 2008 - 22:34 ET by RJbut boredom sets in pretty quickly and the eyes glaze over when someone asks if you want to see it again. (and in sarky's case, again....and again....and again.....and again.....ad infinitum) :^)
Funny, Jay Leno wasn't bored.
January 8, 2008 - 06:51 ET by sarcasmoHe saw an opportunity to bust media bias, and as I keep having to say around here, NB certainly has nothin' resembling a monopoly on THAT!!!
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
No one
January 8, 2008 - 06:29 ET by sarcasmoExcept various major-league conservatives along with the NH GOP. Nice try, RJ, but you're even funnier than usual. Jay Leno proves it. We got on that show last night for a 2 word reason. Media bias.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Boo hoo sarky
January 8, 2008 - 10:08 ET by RJ"whinewhinewhinewhimper" -sarcasmo
Hey, facts are facts, RJ
January 8, 2008 - 14:13 ET by sarcasmoNo whining needed. Jay Leno busted bias the NB masthead tried, desperately, to ignore. I just love how I'm on the side of the state GOP -- a fact that none of you haters wants to mention for some strange reason during the cricket-fest! ;)
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Back to the "hate" mantra, sarky?
January 8, 2008 - 14:19 ET by RJYou're just being silly....but what else is new?
Having trouble with the hateful-truth, RJ
January 8, 2008 - 14:23 ET by sarcasmoNothin' new, but I'll keep tellin' it. I still say this must be quite humiliating for the NB masthead...I mean, a late night comic just outdid them on busting the biggest bias bust of the year, which they'd been desperately-trying to ignore. And note you STILL don't address the position of the NH state GOP, only adding to the humor factor because, as we all know, they agreed with me about the Faux "News" blatant bias, just as Jay did.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
sarc
January 8, 2008 - 15:03 ET by misterbillIf Focks is so bare and valenced, why are they not letting me see/hear what Paul and Hunter have to say??? They are trying to force the public to choose from their list of candidates. Why have we heard little to nothing about Duncan Hunter??? Why are the bloggers on this site so ferocious in their attacks on Ron Paul??? We have more formidable threats to America on the left than on the right. Save your vitriol for those who would give away America. I thought this was an honest site , predominantly interested in ensuring that the media presented the truth. This includes NOT reporting or elision of the news. I have not turned Focks on since I heard this.
Sarc-- I admire your tenacity in the face of the strong opposition from about 6-7 bloggers here. I sincerely hope either Duncan or Ron gets the chance to be heard. Most of the others are bags of wind with the same tired old campaign rhetoric!
To the rest of you-if one could say that certain types of blogging were loud--you are noisier than the Paulites. The dems will win because of Focks and you!
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.
Author:
You almost have me welling
January 8, 2008 - 17:43 ET by AvatarYou almost have me welling up in tears. Almost.
The Avatar
avatar
January 9, 2008 - 00:51 ET by misterbillI am sorry, but I have decided that I do not want to here your opinion. You are polling very low and I am leery of some of your positions, thus--I will not allow you to voice your opinion.Tata.
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.
Author:
At some point a responsible
January 8, 2008 - 18:42 ET by BDAt some point a responsible media organization must limit participation in the debates.
After all, the crazed dude on the street corner carrying the banner is not sitting in on the debates moaning about how Red Lobster is immoral and that is his first party platform plank.
Duncan Hunters absence is regrettable. Pauls absence is understandable.
BD
January 9, 2008 - 00:56 ET by misterbillYou show your narrowmindedness--you are willing to snub Duncan because you are opposed to Ron--throw the baby out with the bath water, so to speak.
No fair organization would make the cut this early in the game. It is an infringement on the liberty of many citizens.
"After all, the crazed dude on the street corner carrying the banner is not sitting in on the debates moaning about how Red Lobster is immoral and that is his first party platform plank."
Sorry, I am not into psychonanalysis. Your statement is less sane than any I have heard , including Kucinik. Perhaps you are being followed by little green men also.
No, just that any
January 9, 2008 - 11:06 ET by BDNo, just that any organization who will sponsr a debate must make the cut line of who will participate SOMEWHERE.
As long as that cutline is reasonable (Paul, Keyes, the nut on the street corner with the sign about Red lobster ((Actual example out here I am afraid))
The people sponsoring the debates cannot have twenty or thirty people on the stage as it would water down the process to the point of absurdity.
As I said, I like Duncan Hunter (Particularly since I am in the military and live along the US/Mexico border) and find his absence regrettable. But the line must be drawn somewhere.
Hey Sarc? Where's RuPaul
January 7, 2008 - 18:06 ET by AvatarHey Sarc? Where's RuPaul in the polls?
The Avatar
Four percent and DROPPING.
January 7, 2008 - 18:12 ET by BDFour percent and DROPPING.
Oh, Ok. See to me this
January 7, 2008 - 20:13 ET by AvatarOh, Ok. See to me this post looked like an excuse for poor polling. And I thought Paul was the unblemished candidate, the candidate that has tons of support. It's unbecoming to whine about media coverage, since as an isolationist, he's not liable to receive favorable coverage any time. I just thought that Ron Paul would poll high regardless. Thats the impression his supporters have left me with.
The Avatar
Nope, you need to read (it's fundamental...)
January 8, 2008 - 06:36 ET by sarcasmoThe post is a bust of Frank Luntz, which also references my cricket-fest bust of Faux "News" which has been going-on for days. I find it funny that NB has effectively sided with the media outlet here, and against me, the heavyweight conservatives who kept piling-on, and the NH GOP itself, as Dr. Paul mentioned on last night's Jay Leno show. It's telling as to the quantity of Ron Paul hate that's here & being-denied on NB.
And I may point it out when BD's full of crap again, but I've said nothing this time about how I think he'll do in NH, just as I didn't know how Dr. Paul would do in Iowa. And you're also still full of crap about the "isolationist" slur (see sigfile, again).
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
"BD's full of crap
January 9, 2008 - 11:09 ET by BD"BD's full of crap again."
How?
Please explain in your own words. No links (Especially since I know of no webpage written with the subject of "BD's full of crap.")
Still awaiting SARC to
January 10, 2008 - 17:20 ET by BDStill awaiting SARC to perform some analysis in support of his statement of
"BD's full of crap again."
BD...
January 10, 2008 - 17:25 ET by Clear thinkerI think sarcs out buying gas for the blimp, or creating it himself.
Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/
Speaking of sarc...Ron Paul
January 10, 2008 - 17:31 ET by bigtimerSpeaking of sarc...Ron Paul is going to be on with Wolfie (The Situation Room) in a minute being questioned about some of his writings years ago...I heard about some of it yesterday I think it was or day before from someone working at The New Republic, seems to have racist leanings or somesuch in them all....this is not new news for some of us though.
Will be interesting what he has to say about this....
Please keep us posted, so we
January 10, 2008 - 17:45 ET by BDPlease keep us posted, so we can prepare for the expected SARCASMO significant religious event.....
Reid/Paul
January 10, 2008 - 17:55 ET by bigtimerI just wanted to let anyone interested that the interview with Paul is going to be in Wolfie's second hour somewhere...earlier he said in a minute before going to break, then he said later it would be in his second hour, guess you call that a tease....don't know that I will be watching/listening him by then.
Also heard where Wolfie is going to be interviewing the Fearless Leader Reid about the support from others in his party supporting Obama ect...ought to be a comedy right there.
Oh, no!
January 9, 2008 - 12:25 ET by UnsaneAnd you're also still full of crap about the "isolationist" slur Is Sarcasmo upset because people DARE to question his Reactionary God?
Face it, your little Reactionary God is a total ISOLATIONIST. It isn't a slur, it is what is called a adjective. Grammar is fundamental. Hell, he thinks that Iran is a Third World nation totally incapable of producing nuclear weapons!
As for your precious sigfile: do you ever think for yourself? Or do you wait for the Daily Paul of other Paul-worship websites to do your thinking and analysis FOR you?
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Got a cite on that one?
January 8, 2008 - 06:32 ET by sarcasmoNot everyone here's gonna swallow what you claim hook, line, and sinker, especially since you're once-again full of crap...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
I do have to credit RuPaul
January 8, 2008 - 14:47 ET by AvatarI do have to credit RuPaul for one thing. his poll numbers prove to me that just because you have the money, doesn't mean you have the votes. Renews my faith in American Republic Democracy. Contrast with the shill of past years that the candidate with the most money wins.
The Avatar
Or hell, the shill of "money matters"
January 8, 2008 - 14:52 ET by sarcasmoBefore our campaign started breaking money records with a Blimp to spare. But I maintain, this thread & others like it must be pretty-damn-humiliating for the NB masthead... Outdone by a Hollyweird-lefty comic. Will they ever live it down?? :)
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Sure they will. I don't
January 8, 2008 - 14:57 ET by AvatarSure they will. I don't think FNC is unbiased, there's no such thing as unbiased reporting anymore. I think FNC has a good balance of right and left, exactly as they claim. I'm not going to get worked up about it.
The Avatar
Not impressed
January 9, 2008 - 12:27 ET by UnsaneYour campaign can break money records and have a FLEET of blimps, but until you can grab at least ONE electoral vote, it doesn't mean one damn thing.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
learn syntax
January 9, 2008 - 23:47 ET by j17ghsYou obviously are a defective product of the flaming leftist education establishment. Stick to rap. It's all you can handle safely.
Take em down
January 10, 2008 - 00:39 ET by Jerry MackI followed your link. Read Jane Aitkens' article. I did not go any farther. Knowing that their is a continuos " gotcha wars" between the cable networks this truth should be running continuosly on Msnbc and Cnn by tomorrow. (Thursday)
Ron Paul IS a Cricket fest...
January 14, 2008 - 16:30 ET by Six String SpiffHE is unelctable and thereofre cannot win. He can't beat Hillary. End of Story. Why push a candidate that has zero chances? Cmon
Islamic Religious Services Will Be Held at the Firing Range At 0800 Daily.