Yes, In theory, Supreme Court Justices can be removed by Congress in a process virtually identical to impeachment of the President. But in practice, Congress has never removed a Supreme Court Justice in this manner and has only tried to once. Here is what it takes:

The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the power of impeachment (the constitutional equivalent of an indictment) and gives the Senate the power to try all impeachments. The first step in removing someone is the approval of articles of impeachment by the House Judiciary Committee. A majority vote of the full House is then needed to impeach and send the case to trial in the Senate. A two-thirds majority of those senators present is needed to convict. Conviction results in automatic removal from office.

To me the impeachment process is too difficult to begin and too difficult to obtain a conviction. The Constitution says

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States,
shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,
Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

It doesn't really address the problem of Justices legislating from the bench, perverting the law or the precedents, or of incompetence or senile dementia. We need a better system that keeps justices in line under fear of removal, and one that better checks the power of the Judiciary and their clever abuses.

This idea reflects my knowledge of the system used for judges in Florida. I know some other states have elected judges, but I don't like the idea of making judges run for office, take campaign donations, and pander to interest groups. I prefer Presidential appointment, but with some sort of of recall option if the judge goes bad or turns out to be incompetent or corrupt. I would also entertain the idea of term limits for Justices. Perhaps eight or ten years and then out. But there has to be something to stop the abuse.

---
Communist vs. Statist '08

Q. Is Panamanian born John McCain a "Natural Born Citizen"