Fascism?

Photo of Avatar.

In reference to the recent Huckabee ad with an apparent cross in the background, the illustrious Ron Paul is reminded of Sinclair Lewis saying fascism will come "wrapped in a flag, carrying a cross".  While Rupaul confesses he hadn't thought about it completely (surprise, surprise), it's most curious that this is the first thing that jumps into his scattered mind.

He then tried to backpedal saying that huckabee's trying to use it to show that he's the only christian, and that he would never use the cross in that fashion.  Bad recovery, maybe you should have THOUGHT before being reminded of Sinclair Lewis.  Huckabee is a christian and he's not afraid to show the cross in his add.  I'm not certain why this scares Rupaul so much, but to instantly have fascism come to mind?  I wonder if George Washington would agree with Rupaul's assessment.

Has political correctness so permeated everything that the symbol of the Cross of Christ is a political obscenity?  That a United States presidential candidate instantly thinks of fascism in relation to the cross being shown in a campaign ad?  I'm appalled that it's come to this.  I expect this from the liberals and democrats, but not this so-called 'constitutionalist', of all people, he should be praising Huckabee for his use of the first amendment and not being ashamed to run as he is.  Nope; fascism.

Disgraceful and enlightening at the same time.

 


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm just curious...

Why is telling the truth "disgraceful"? Paul's not the first to see this, you know...Huckabee is obviously a big-government guy trying to cloak that view with religion, and big government's exactly what Sinclair Lewis was describing.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

There's a big difference

There's a big difference between big government as we know it and fascism, and you know it. It's disgraceful that Rupaui chose to attack Huckabee's faith by saying something so ridiculous, by relating the display of the cross to facism. I know he's not the first to see it, but to my knowledge, he's the first to allege fascism. I think he even beat the DUmmies to the punch.

The Avatar

No there isn't.

It's just creeping fascism, no matter how others want to label it. And you know very well that he's not attacking Huckabee's faith, he's attacking Huck's use of religion in this election, as displayed against Mitt Romney already. If anything, that should qualify as 'disgraceful,' yet for some reason no-post from you...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

Romney's different. 

Romney's different.  Romney is trying to display his particular religion as mainstream, like other christian religions, when it is not.  Thats the difference.  Huckabee is free to use his faith as a basis for ads if he so pleases, and to my knowledge, he hasn't tried to soft-pedal what his beliefs are in order to turn political favor.

 

The Avatar

to answer your overall

to answer your overall question yes the cross has become obscene in popular culture - not sure why (cough-MSM-cough)...

The root here is, i want ot

The root here is, i want ot know why Rupaul's first thought upon the sight of the cross was someone's view on Fascism?  Can you answer that?  This isn't about big government, this isn't about social programs, it's about the cross being viewed as a symbol for fascism in the wee beady eyes of RuPaul

The Avatar

Ron Paul is a big government guy.. 10 earmarks in one bill

He puts in earmarks and then votes against the bill because he know it will pass without his vote. Cool way to stay elected and stand for your principles.

 

So, Daniel, one could say

So, Daniel, one could say that ron paul "actually did vote for the 87 billion dollars, before he voted against it?"

The Avatar

The horse's mouth.

On the earmark/spending problem.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

Ok, so Rupaul th champion of

Ok, so Rupaul th champion of small government says in that statement that "Well, they're already budgeted for, so I might as well use them", that strikes me as a little two-face, not much of an idealogical stand, don't you think? I'm sorry, but that makes him as guilty as every other big-government spender out there.

The Avatar

Yeah, and note the horrid stuff he tries to get for his district

Bridge REPAIR instead of new bridges to nowhere. And inspection of shrimp from hormone-filled Asian farms before all sorts of pets-not-humans (thank God...) died from contaminated food. Oh, the horror of a congressman who tries to get some tax-money back for his district. And worse, how could he ever fool all those military guys into supporting him??
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

But don't you see? he's

But don't you see? he's using the system he rails against constantly to do things that he rails against constantly. Sounds like a politician to me.

The Avatar

Yeah. Who denies that?

He's a politician, but the nutty part is he won't take that sweet pension, which is akin to refusing a winning lotto ticket IMO. Sounds a bit like a statesman to me.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

but back to the question

but back to the question isn't the fascism accusation kind of like the bigot accusation...?

i think ron stepped in it a little, sarc...

in the grand scheme of things i think it may go just away, but...

its kinda telling

ron really needs the conservative relgious vote to win...

and this kind of commentary sticks in our brains pretty good...

i still remember similar comments from McCain ten years ago...

I'll never vote for him for anything now... 

Look at the link

From this comment. And we're even, because at this point I'd never vote for Huckabee, either. I still say Elmer Gantry comes to mind for a damn good reason, given all I've seen of Huckabee, and I said that first BEFORE RP's comment. Ever even read the book??
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

i'm not to worried for ron

i'm not to worried for ron - but I'm a pretty forgiving fundie too:)

again I don't think it's going to kill ron - but he really needs to stay away from these kinds of "anti-Christian" rumors and accusations...

he doesn't even need to actually say this stuff...

just the rumor mill accusations can do alot of damage - in which case all he can do is vehemently deny it and try to beat it back down - not fair I know but its the nature of the political beast...

So you avoid his spending

So you avoid his spending habits by saying he won't take a pension?  A lousy arguement. 

The Avatar

Nope

More like I'll put up his spending habits against anyone running, bar none. Who is repeatedly "the taxpayer's best friend"? Ron Paul earned the title, repeatedly.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

So what you're saying is,

So what you're saying is, he's the less of other evils?  That's what it comes down to.  In your eyes, he is the less of evils, in my eyes, he is a danger to national security.  Isolationist policies are self-destructive in today's world. 

Besides which, I'm still unsatisfied by your explanation of RuPaul's knee-jerk Christianity = Fascism response.  All you've done is side-step it with other issues.

The Avatar

If you try to put words in his mouth

It's not worth talking to you. Huckabee isn't "Christianity," and you know it. I'm not impressed. This comment says it pretty well on fascism.

And I think the other candidates are a danger to our national, and fiscal, security. Ron Paul is still not an isolationist, that's one of the lies listed below, so please quit repeating it, it's boring to keep having to reference my sigfile, but I will...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

Ah, but he IS

Ron Paul IS an isolationist and an appeaser.  It is not a lie as you love to whine.  (Name-calling?  Hardly.  Adjectives are my friends...)  

If he isn't, perhaps you can explain why he wants to cut and run from the Middle East even more badly than the Leftists do.   

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

"...Oh, the horror of a

"...Oh, the horror of a congressman who tries to get some tax-money back for his district..."

Hmmmm. What is an earmark? Typically, legislators seek to insert earmarks which direct a specified amount of money to a particular organization or project in his/her home state or district.

 Isn't that what EVERY politician tries to do? You have just marginalized your Lord and Master's biggest asset by agreeing he is no different than most every other politician out there. Way to go, Pumpkin! How many implosions is that for you this week? We are losing count.

 

Shahinshah

Well, so long as they aren't making campaign contributions to the Shahinshah's campaign...that is against regulations, at least in the AF...

Oh, and by the way, how do we know that ALL of them are military?  Yes, yes, I know, you'll send me two or three links to those who are in the military who support your Reactionary God.  Fine.  I'm not asking about them; I have seen three cars on bases with the Shahinshah's bumper sitckers on them.  How do you know that ALL of them are military?   

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Exactly Avatar

Isn't including an earmark saying you support a bill enough to try and make it better, but then voting against would have to mean something substanstial changed.

So now Rupauls gone from

So now Rupauls gone from being a 'model statesman' to 'better than the other guys because he only spends this much instead of that much'.

The Avatar

 

For all Ron Paul supporters...

Looks like we can figure out who his running mate will be.

Paul/Byrd 08'

The kind Senator from WV loves RP. 

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

stupid twice???

Why do you persist?? Sooo dimwitted... But to make this post have SOME usefulness, he's on Glenn Beck's CNN show now.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

Peace bro!

 "As Michael Medved observed, Paul’s campaign has attracted “an imposing collection of Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, Holocaust Deniers, 9/11 “Truthers” and other paranoid and discredited conspiracists.” It may not be a case of birds of a feather, but it’s at least a case of lying down with dogs and getting up with fleas. Moreover, “the behavior of Ron Paul supporters (spamming blogs that reference their candidate with fund-raising appeals and flaming anyone who actually dares to express substantive disagreement) frequently alienates far more potential friends than it attracts.”

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

Ron Paul has lovely supporters...

http://64.233.169.10... http://209.85.173.10...

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

I 'm guessing you're a

I 'm guessing you're a Huckabee fan?

 

Is it true that Tax Hike Mike never met a new Tax that he didn't like?

No, not especially. I'm

No, not especially. I'm just expressing my revulsion to a knee-jerk clown.

The Avatar

Fair enough. And I agree

Fair enough.

And I agree about the clown.

Another double standard in play

It seems to me that Romney has been portrayed a lot as a victim because some people don't like his religion, and yet the media seems to be dragging out every cliche about evangelicals regarding Huckabee, and Drudge seems to highlight every one of those stories, and there's no outrage about that.  I haven't decided whom I will support, but if talking about Romney's faith is out of bounds, so are the endless cheap shots against evangelicals in general and Huckabee in particular.

BTW, the "cross" in that commercial appears to be part of a window.  I don't know if they were trying to invoke the cross, but it seems like overkill when the spot openly mentions the birth of Christ.  It would be like a sledgehammer to kill a fly.  So IMHO, a sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes a window is just a window, and I think it's just a window. 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

I believe huckabee said it

I believe huckabee said it was a book case, which makes sense.  But still, why all the hype?

The Avatar

viking, please show me "all" the cliches against evangelicals

...and the cheap shots "against evangelicals in general and Huckabee in particular."  Heck, just show me a few.   I hear lots of whining about them, but still haven't seen any.

Have you read Peggy Noonan's column?  Regarding the "cross" ad, she said "I wound up thinking this: That guy is using the cross so I'll like him. That doesn't tell me what he thinks of Jesus, but it does tell me what he thinks of me. He thinks I'm dim. He thinks I will associate my savior with his candidacy. Bleh."

You'll probably whine and call that a cheap shot, but that quote and her entire column gives a pretty thoughtful look at how Huckabee is disingenuously using his religion.

At least Peg didn't

At least Peg didn't immediately think of tanks rolling into Tieneman Square...lol.

The Avatar

14 characteristics of...

14 Characteristics of Fascism.  I don't want to waste your time Avatar, so just tell me which of the 14 don't apply, if you would.


"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

Apply to what?The

Apply to what? The cross of Christ?

Let me add:

If you think that the US is under fascist rule or even close to it, you cannot intelligently debate here.

The Avatar

I read your reply 3 times,

I read your reply 3 times, but I still can't find where you told me which of those 14 characteristics don't apply to us (or this election, and your boy Huck).

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

And how was your comment

And how was your comment relevant to the topic?  How many people do you know of are 'victim' of the fascist Bush regime?  Have you been harassed or otherwised threatened by the government for your backward views? 

What I want to know is, why fascism is the first thing that jumps to mind when Rupaul sees the cross of Christ.  Answer that question, rather than making hollow and paranoid comments.

BTW, I don't accept Mr. Britt as the absolute authority on what is and what is not fascism.  Not all 14 points are accurately relevant and represented in that little list of yours, and you know it.  You cannot draw relevant comparisons from Nazi germany to 2007 USA.  You can try, but you'd be wrong.

The Avatar

So again, I ask how many DO

So again, I ask how many DO NOT apply. And once you've read those 14 and other ideas of what constitutes fascism, how could you not think of fascism when you see Huckabee and now McCain's latest ads? (BTW, I never mentioned Bush, that was you, so don't try pinning it on me later.)

I admire you for your persistence in refusing to see the point being made by Mr. Paul. Who, by the way, is also a man of faith, just not one that decides to include it in his political campaign.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

how many misapplied

twisted points are not relevant here?

are you stupid or just slow?

 are you a thief or a conservative?

"how would i know? if i knew everything i'd run for God" ----crpl Klinger

There is one thing that

There is one thing that Britt ignores that the US has that all of these others didn't.

Benevolence. The US is a protectorate force and a liberating force, not a conquering force. One thing that facism carries that the US does not?

Malevolence. Hatred of ALL others, a conquering goal.

Nationalism, A strong military, strong national security, at least half of that list every nation on earth bears. That doesn't make them fascists or even comparable to fascists, it's the same with the US. The US is the most free nation on earth, thanks largely to our nationalism and our "overfunded" military. How pitiful that to prop your candidate up, you must bring your country down. If America ever falls to it's enemies, it will be because of a lack of national pride, a lack of military might, a lack of national security, and we will have you to thank for it, for enabling the enemy, for selling them the rope with which to hang us.

Think of it, everyone! A nation full of whichwings, where we all needlessly fear the government and the black helicopters, while the real enemy penetrates our borders and begins to spread, encouraged by the constant calls of 'injustice' against our government by the basement-dwellers. Just remember, should that day ever come, the enablers will be the first to hang.

Now that i'm done re-iterating the lowly slime that i think you are, tell me HOW each of the 14 so-called characteristics applies to the US. I will, (or someone will) proceed to whoop your paranoid, basement-dwelling rear end with your own argument. You won't know it, but it will happen.

The Avatar

The vision...

Avatar - Be warned. In WhichWhine's world, the United States is THE locus of all that is evil.  The fact that we have a powerful military that keeps bad things from happening to us here at home horrifies him.  In fact, he believes we create more terrorists doing that. 

It is much better, in his view, for the United States to be as whiny and pathetic a nation as possible. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

which wing,

which wing,

Where exactly is the fascism in huckabees or mccain's ad? Because they have crosses? The nazis thought fascism was "superficial" (socialism being the end result) and weren't christian (having a "church solution" and all) I just see two goofy political ads. Although mccain's did tug my heartstrings a little more : )

MOD, you gotta go here to

MOD, you gotta go here to get what he's saying. In reading this paranoid, anti-american political scientist, you'll find that he has sprinkled truth with liberal fantasy.

To summarize, Britt's analysis of fascism is accurate, but misapplied.  Britt is known to be a paranoid basement dwelling liberal, therefore this is NOT an objective analysis, it IS a hit piece on both the nation and the President.

 The Avatar

Does it bother you that his

Does it bother you that his piece resembles our country? Yep, me too.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

Self-loathing

It only bothers me that you so deeply, intensely, passionately hate the United States, your own country.   

And why?  Because it is NOT a backwards, whiny, powerless nation with 300 million burnouts, er, sheep just WAITING to be slaughtered. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

I hate what America is

I hate what America is becoming. We have pundits making the case for torture, and declaring those who oppose it as un-American. But, as long as people with your radical view of America and the world don't become the majority, I think we will be alright. (And if we aren't able to help ourselves, at least we were able to help Israel.)

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

Whichwing I read your list

Whichwing I read your list and I'd have to say that several apply to the US - but who made this list? Sounds like a liberal to me...

Here's my take on it...

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

 Is this a conservative phenonemon? I see liberals plastering their "flags" and mottos all over their cars, and they own the popular music industry - Dixie Chicks et al are celebrated...

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

Libs have no sympathy for human rights regarding Christian or conservative persecution here or abroad, also no concern for the right to life of unborn children...

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

The scapegoat enemy, according to libs, is the radical religious right (a minority) and/or the "neocons," white men in general as well...

4. Supremacy of the Military
Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

This I grant you tends conservative in the US - my question is does this automatically equate to fascism? Military service is mandatory and celebrated in several passive countries...

5. Rampant Sexism
The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.

The liberal feminists are incredibly sexist. I have worked for several institutions managed and dominated by women. We have several women running our governments right now. Rice runs the state department. Michigan has a female governor. As far as gender roles the left is just as rigid about ambiguity as the right is about tradition, opposition to abortion opposes the worst holocaust in history, anti-gay policy simply mirrors anti-ped policy - which libs also universally oppose...

6. Controlled Mass Media
Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

This is NB's niche - and it's the left that owns the media in this country, the government has virtually no control over content other than a few swear words - and also the recent supression of conservative ads just prior to elections, smoking ads are banned by fascist libs as well - there has been more MSM censorship of the right then the left as undeniably archived here by NB

7. Obsession with National Security
Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

Libs seem just as obsessed about US security - from their point of view - they fear the demise of their liberal America that sprang up out of the 60's...as a radical righty I do not fear the demise of America - our "national security" lies in the kingdom of Heaven...

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

Libs are constantly justifying social government policy to me as a Christian value, they have also used religion and religious leaders to attack so-called "US torture" as well as supporting radical leftwing environmental policy and other liberal government efforts, "hate" crimes (against libs only) are outlawed, most PC policy is pro-liberal... 

9. Corporate Power is Protected
The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
 

There is plenty of fiercly protected lib industry out there - some of our biggest industries - including the entertainment industry, pro-sports, also unions (yes they are a form of "corporate power" as well), even public schools and universities are run in corporate manner by libs with products and profits - universities make tons of money from research patents, college sports championships, etc - and viciously protected by libs...

10. Labor Power is Suppressed
Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

Unions (who are 99% Democrat-controlled) have been kicking ass here for decades - while corporations are heavily suppressed via massive government regulation and taxes... 

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.

I've seen plenty of disdain from the left for Christian and conservative art and music - find me just one major modern art museum in the entire US featuring this kind of work, or art schools teaching this kind of art - if you can...

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

Liberal obsession with crime and punishment: corporate corruption, "separation of church and state," environmental laws, protection of abortion clinics...

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

Again check out the entertainment industry and schools - shaping the vast majority of American's thoughts and opinions - all predominantly LIBERAL cronies - some even routinely from the same damn FAMILIES...

14. Fraudulent Elections
Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

Kennedy was voted in by how many deceased voters from Chicago? The libs wrote the book on election fraud a long time ago - but it's barely a blip on the conservative election radar screen...

IMHO when fascism comes to america it will be wearing a Dixie Chicks or che guivera t-shirt...

I'm not sure exactly what

I'm not sure exactly what point you are making. I'm not really interested in the Liberals vs Conservatives and Republicans vs Democrats game anymore. That game is a big part of the problem as far as I can tell. If there are people in our government and society that are leading us to fascism, do we really care if they are Conservative or Liberal? I think not.

This same mentality should be applied to all things we discuss.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

fascism is hard to pin down

fascism is hard to pin down i guess is my point - civilization requires fascisms of all sorts...

so it's maybe just a tool - which can be used for good or ban - like a gun - it can protect you, get you food - both good, or murder someone (bad)...

same deal with fascism

which leads me to concluse that God and Jesus are good fascists...

Hitler and American Liberals - bad fascists:)...

Ok, I understand what you

Ok, I understand what you are saying, don't agree, but understand. Thanks for the clarification.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

Idiocy

 We have pundits making the case for torture  And the same people who constantly whine that the United States engages in torture are the same ones who turned their heads and shrugged at the Hanoi Hilton.  You should be more thankful.  Sixty+ years ago, there would be no Gitmo.  They would all be dead, shot as unlawful enemy combatants.

Besides, WhichWhine, if we put them all up in the Waldorf Astoria, and completely pamper them as all of its guests are, you'd still bitch it is torture.  If these guys are so harmless, why don't you adopt one or two to live with you?  Perhaps if you gave them a hug once a day, at minimum, they'll ALL be our best friends!

But, as long as people with your radical view of America and the world don't become the majority, I think we will be alright.  Hmmm...radical view of America and the world...um, where have you been the last 60+ years?  I realize that when it comes to history, you are an idiot, but why do you insist on constantly making it obvious?

And if we aren't able to help ourselves, at least we were able to help Israel.  You clearly grapple with literacy as well. By supporting Israel - and our other allies - we DO help ourselves.  As Kennedy once said (something to this effect), when we protect freedom in Berlin, we protect freedom in London and New York as well. 

Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

You are an extremist,

You are an extremist, simple as that. You are the type of person that I fear the most. You think your views are 100% correct all the time. And that's not really a problem, the problem is that I'm pretty sure you would force them on anyone and everyone else if given the power to do so. You are subconsciously opposed to freedom, and I pity you for that.

You say you are an athiest, and I just don't see how that can be so when you see yourself as God.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

Pitiful WhichWhine

 You are an extremist, simple as that.  You haven't the slightest clue of what you are talking about, simple as that.  Let's see here.  You have called me a Nazi, a Socialist, a supporter of Nanny States, a Chicken Hawk (which I forced you to back down from), and seemingly everything in between.  In fact, I think you type just to see yourself type.  You post on here just because you can.

You are the type of person that I fear the most. You think your views are 100% correct all the time. And that's not really a problem, the problem is that I'm pretty sure you would force them on anyone and everyone else if given the power to do so.  You would be incorrect.  If voted into power, I would carry out my agenda, until such time as the voters wished to replace me with someone else more to their liking (which they have the right to do).  You know, as is common in representative democracies. 

Maybe your fear is rooted in the fact that I exude confidence in what I believe, whereas you are a wishy-washy idealist at BEST?

You are subconsciously opposed to freedom, and I pity you for that.  You are overtly an idiot and I pity YOU for that.  if I was opposed to freedom, you can explain why I am weeks from a deployment during which time I will be defending your freedom to whine, bitch, and moan about how much you deeply, passionately hate YOUR OWN COUNTRY for DARING to:

1) Be proactive and snuff out the bad guys before they can harm us or our allies.  (We let the bad guys fester and get out of hand in Europe and Asia in the 1930s.  We really don't need to have that happen again.)

2) Be a nation built on international trade,

3) Be a nation that is thus very much part a participant in worldwide economics, commerce, and finance,

4) Be an aspirant nation though it has reached the pinnacle of success, still wants to push onward.

Oh, but in spite of your freedom to whine, bitch and moan about all of this, you greedily suck the tits of freedom and capitalism.  And heaven forbid that ANYONE suggest to you that those tits DO have a COST. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

You know what? YOU ARE NOT

You know what? YOU ARE NOT DEFENDING MY FREEDOM BY GOING TO IRAQ! Spin all you want, its just not the case. In fact, you may very well be jeopardizing it.

I'm all for free trade, which is why I'm opposed to GIVING Israel money. Or any nation for that matter.

I have absolutely NO RESPECT for you. NONE. You ARE an extremist with a very small mind. But then I guess ignorance is bliss.

Now enjoy your stay in the desert, where you can tell yourself every night how much good you are doing in the world. Truth be damned!

P.S.  I see you've trotted out many half-truths again in your first paragraph, but I've decided to let them stand since they inch closer to whole truths with every passing day. 

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

freedom

Actually Unsane is protecting your freedom even if you don't believe in the virtuous aspects of the war on terror. The military, anywhere in the world, as a show of military force, work force and mercy; these men and women protect the freedom of all Americans by their mere existence.
As far as extremism goes I would have to say that I lump all those that can't see the good in with extremist along with those who refuse to see the bad. Even if the Democracy fails but the schools, hospitals and utilities provide the Iraqis with a better way of life then America will win a small part of a major battle. We have proven in this country you cannot just hand people the means to succeed and money to hold them over and expect all people to make the right decisions with the opportunities provided. Sometimes you just have to give people the opportunity and hope for the best but you must do so in a manner responsible to you (US), your family (Allies) and what is best for both (economics).

I respectfully disagree with

I respectfully disagree with you. I don't want you to think I hold contempt for the military, though I do hold contempt for the way it is being used, and I really don't want to hash out the Iraq war right now, but how is invading and occupying another nation, that did us no harm and posed no threat to our national security, protecting our freedom? If we are all so concerned about our national security, why don't we have our troops here to defend it?

BTW, my lack of respect for Unsane has nothing to do with his military service and everything to do with his inability to carry on a decent discussion about anything.


"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

WW,

You may disagree with every point in the Iraq war if you wish, as I alluded to earlier that is extremism as well, and you may disagree with members of the military and their opinions on their mission but to not recognize that regardless of where they are and under whose orders they are following their mission is to protect the freedoms of American citizens. This can be accomplished drinking a soda in GITMO or fighting in foreign lands. The mere fact that they exist and are seen by the world is protecting America. I'm not arguing the validity of the measures we are taking in Iraq but I would point out that it is not 100% bad and while we know where good intentions lead the leaders that got us into Iraq may have been using the opportunity Iraq offered (a battle ground in the ME where attempts could be made to unify the enemies fighting forces in an already hostile territory)but there are good intentions in bringing a democracy to the region. And let us not forget that unless the country implodes it will end up with new schools, media, hospitals and improved utility systems thanks to that same military and people around the world will always see that and know the US military stands for not only protecting the rights of Americans but attempting to provide a better way of life for everyone. I'm not niave enough to believe that there are not those out there that would exploit the very same positives as proof of invasion but this is one case that history will have to judge because all this speculation is only hurting people attempting to do what is right in their opinion and giving propaganda weapons to those we oppose in that battle.

WW

A large percentage of Americans opposed our fighting WWII, as they did the Revolutionary and Civil Wars.  Now, those are nearly universally called "good wars".... (well, except by Ron Paul.)

The point is, wars for freedom are usually opposed by significant numbers who refuse to accept that freedom must often be won at terrible cost...and that it's worth it.

This is directed to you, and

This is directed to you, and everyone else with this mentality, including Unsane and Agnostic. OUR FREEDOMS ARE NOT BEING DEFENDED IN IRAQ. It is true the world can see our troops all over the world, I just don't see the positive side of that. Is there some other nation with 700 bases around the world? What would we think of such a scenario? We are spending ourselves into bankruptcy. We are the AGGRESSORS in this war. We are the occupying army. This is not what we stand for. At least not until relatively recently. We have abandonded our ideals. We have no duty to spread democracy, our only duty is to preserve ours!

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

 

I can see why...

"It is true the world can see our troops all over the world, I just don't see the positive side of that."

That's an easy one....you've never served and are apparently clueless. Since you've never served you convieniently leave out all (hundreds) of humanitarian missions accomplished by U.S. Forces every year in addition to the hundreds of Joint Support and Training missions in exchange programs with other countries. 700 bases around the world, really? I would like to see that listing...As far as supporting democracy, yes we do have a duty to support it. It's easy for those that don't contribute to assume this. How do you think we maintain relations with our allies as well as emerging countries? It has to be more than symbolism over substance. You're thought process makes absolutely no sense. I suppose then I should be pitching a fit over paying taxes for emergency services that cover where you live. Paying for cops where you live doesn't help support my safety where I live, so I don't see the positive side of that. Again with the "occupying army", yea that doesn't get old and worn out. Just how is this when there is an elected government in place?

"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"

WW,

Please permit me one question before I reply to this. How many countries have officially asked the US to remove our base and the had the US say "No". I know there are a couple, though I can only think of one, but they are not in the part of the world we are talking about right now.

It is true the world can

It is true the world can see our troops all over the world, I just don't see the positive side of that.  Try our allies, many of them representative democracies just like us, being appreciative that the United States is squarely in their corner.  That's ONE positive side I see. 

 Is there some other nation with 700 bases around the world?  You need to back that number up, little one.  When I returned to Europe close to a decade ago, in the part of Germany I grew up, there were tons of abandoned bases that I once frequented. 

What would we think of such a scenario?  Well, we didn't bitch a whole lot (though occasionally) when the sun didn't set on the British Empire.  And you should remember that the British actually occupied territories that they had to be forced out of in some instances (such as India).  In the case of the United States, when the French asked us to leave, we did.  When the Phillipines asked us to leave, we did.  We once had bases in Morocco and Libya; but no longer.

We are spending ourselves into bankruptcy.  And we needn't do so, but since we have a Congress that uses the treasury like a patronage machine, we have problems.  Part of that is your fault.  We are getting PLENTY of revenue to fund our defense and our approach to international relations, AND with TONS left over for lots of different things.  But really, does Congress need to fund midnight basketball programs when the YMCA can do it just as well (for but one example)?

 We are the AGGRESSORS in this war. We are the occupying army. This is not what we stand for.  Actually, we are not.  The United States can and will leave when things there are stabilized and when the Iraqis ask us to.  And oddly enough, we leave lots of things to the Iraqis to hammer out.  So much for an occupying army.  Besides, were we the aggressors against the Third Reich?  They never attacked us.  And boy, did we EVER occupy Germany!  Read After the Reich sometime; it has lots of dirty little details of our occupation of Germany.  So, if this isn't what we stand for, what say you about our actions from 1945-1949? 

At least not until relatively recently. We have abandonded our ideals.  When?  The United States, since day one, has been about spreading liberty and democracy to the far ends of the earth.  We have no duty to spread democracy, our only duty is to preserve ours!  Actually, we DO have a duty to spread democracy.  That is how we preserve ours.  Unless of course you can name the last time the United States went to war with a representative democracy.  Or, even better, the last time two representative democracies went to war. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Yep. Ignorance IS bliss,

Yep. Ignorance IS bliss, Pumpkin. Thank you for the fine example.

The more you hate me the more you will learn

 

You know what? You are a SPOILED, WHINY BRAT who hasn’t the slightest inkling of just how good he has it here in the United States...or how much it costs. You want ALL the freedom in the world, but are totally unwilling to earn it or even acknowledge that it HAS to be earned.

GIVING Israel money? I had NO IDEA that all those folks in Ft. Worth were working gratis when they built the F-16s the IDF uses!!!

I have absolutely NO RESPECT for you. NONE. You ARE an extremist with a very small mind. But then I guess ignorance is bliss. I am SO HURT!!! THIS is coming from a confused little boy who can’t make up what side of the spectrum I am on. THIS coming from one who thinks an ICB is privately owned, never met a conspiracy he didn’t like, and thinks that as long as the United States just sits around and waits to be attacked, we’ll be okay! If the Mall of American gets leveled tomorrow (may that never ever happen)in the middle of the shopping day, I know what your response will be - recite the shehada and turn MN into a little caliphate, just so we can show the world just how super-nice we all are!!!

The flake, whining that I am an “extremist”. If that doesn’t peg the irony meter, I don’t know what does.

Now enjoy your stay in the desert, where you can tell yourself every night how much good you are doing in the world. Truth be damned! Yep, I know you are very allergic to the truth: that it is better for the military to kill the terrorists in Baghdad than sit around and wait like sheep for the cops to do it, AFTER said terrorist has mown down a hundred or so.

 

I see you've trotted out many half-truths again in your first paragraph, but I've decided to let them stand since they inch closer to whole truths with every passing day. That’s why you should never pass up a free education, courtesy of Prof. Unsane. It’s a public service of mine.

Finally, you say you have no respect for me? Well, as GySgt Hartman once said, “YOU WILL NOT LIKE ME! BUT THE MORE YOU HATE ME, THE MORE YOU WILL LEARN!!!”

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.