Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 13, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Forums » Latest News
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Another Lost Opportunity

  • Login or register to post comments
No replies
Wed, 10/05/2005 - 5:55pm
The Toddfather
User offline. Last seen 6 years 16 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 09/16/2005

Like Yogi Berra said “It’s deja vous all over again.”  We’ve been had.  We put our trust in a candidate named Bush, voted for him based on a campaign promise only to be disappointed.

You remember George Herbert Walker Bush telling us to read his lips, and then when the democrats exerted a little pressure, he caved.  He caved like every country club republican before him by raising our taxes and grinding the economy to a halt.  But we knew W was different.  He cut our taxes.  We pointed to the war and we were positive he was different.  This man would do what he promised, after all he learned from his father’s mistakes, the mistakes that cost him the presidency.

We overlooked the tell tale signs of another mediocre, can’t-we-all-just-get-along republican.  We thought “compassionate conservative” was cute and might buy a few votes.  We looked the other way when Bush courted Ted Kennedy and continued throwing more money at a broken education system.  We winced but ignored the “I looked into his soul and saw a man I found trustworthy” comment about former KGB’er Putin.  We told ourselves that the richest segment of our country, our senior citizens, needed to throw out their private prescription plans for the effective government funded plan that will cost our children and their children hundreds of billions of dollars.  We were mute when the president decided the geniuses that check our baggage at the airport should be brought under the umbrella of the U.S. Government and be given the tools to become as effective as the Postal Service or the many governmental bureaucracies we are so proud of.  We looked away as Bush refused to veto the pork laden Farm and Transportation bills.  We even ignored his appeasement of the far left by promising hundreds of billions of dollars to the historically corrupt politicians of Louisiana because he felt guilty about being called a bigot.

But ignorance has a price.  The most important issue to conservatives since January 22, 1973 is the reversal of judicial activism of the Supreme Court.  George W. Bush promised at every opportunity during the campaign of 2004 to nominate a justice “in the mold of Scalia and Thomas” if given the opportunity and millions of Christians cast their vote for the president based on that promise alone.  In a surprise announcement July 5, 2005, Sandra Day O’Connor, the reported swing vote on the Court, gave W the opportunity to make good on his promise.  He disappointed many conservatives by nominating John Roberts, an intelligent litigator with limited judicial experience and an even more limited paper trail.  Judge Robert’s nomination was elevated to that of Chief Justice with the passing of Chief Justice Renquist and the concerns of the right were assuaged by the extraordinary display of intellect by Judge Roberts during Senate hearings.  Once again, George W. Bush was given a pass.

With another opportunity to keep his word regarding the Supreme Court, George Bush has done the unforgivable, he has chosen appeasement over honesty.  During a press conference following his nomination of Harriet Meier, he looked at the American public (ala Bill Clinton) and knowingly lied.  He said with a straight face that the former Texas lottery commissioner was the most qualified person in the country for the open post on the Supreme Court.  Of the thousands of lawyers in the country, the President once again asked us to ignore common sense and believe Ms. Meier was the best our country has to offer.  Instead of picking someone with a record of standing up to liberals and a history of being pro-life, Bush picked friendship over experience.  Are we to believe the same eyes that deemed Vladimir Putin as being trustworthy are able to see the heart and soul of this unqualified nominee?  After being told Ms. Meier has changed her religious beliefs, and changed from a Democrat to a Republican, we are asked to believe that she will not change for the next twenty years.  Even if this woman turns out to be the most conservative justice in the history of the Supreme Court, it will be by chance.  

 

I no longer trust George W. Bush.  He has not earned a pass regarding court appointments, or anything else.  His choices are embarrassing and he should be ashamed.  It’s like deja vous all over again.

 

 

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Pffft...give me a break
    1 min 27 sec ago
  • worse and worser
    5 min 4 sec ago
  • hypocrisy
    9 min 27 sec ago
  • No problem, Timothy H, ---
    17 min 24 sec ago
  • Excuse the delay, Kramer...
    47 min 41 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Breitbart Warns MSNBC: 'We’re Watching You to Play the Race Card'
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.