Can we please ban the 9/11 truther troll WhichWing.
- Login to post comments
I respectfully request the truther WhichWing troll be banned. My reasons are as follows:
1. He is a 9/11 truther.
He posted a link to a truther video. He posted a link to a truther website. He won't stop harrassing us with his truther drivel -
Not the first time he linked to the truther video Speaking of WTC7, have you seen this video? It's apperently a clip of a BBC reporter on 9/11, in New York, reporting that WTC7 has collapsed.
A couple times a year I dive into the 9/11 conspiracy theories to see what's being said.
My main motivation is not 9/11 and the theories surrounding it. I know my thoughts on 9/11 bother many of you, but my life in no way revolves around it. I firmly believe that there is more to 9/11 than we are being told by our gov't. Whether it be the "made it happen" theory, or the "let it happen" theory, both of which are much more convincing to me than the official explanation.
You'll argue all day about how impossible it would be for the government to carry out the attacks of 9/11, can you make the same arguement about them not letting it happen? I trust you won't ask why they would want to do that.
First, I don't take the side of America's enemies. I may play devil's advocate on occasion, but I have never defended their actions. Second, I don't cling to my 9/11 conspiracy like religion, but I certainly do question the account put forth by the government.
Can you say that the collapse in that video doesn't look like a controlled demolition?
Planting of explosives is a given, the question is who? I suppose people might think it was an "inside job" because of logic like yours. How could anyone plant that many explosives without having special clearance or something, right? Well I don't know, but I guess anything is possible. Maybe they the guy in charge of security.
This is extremely frustrating here. Firefighters stop fighting fires all the time do the danger to themselves. This happens a lot in fires of industrial buildings. I will post more on this in a comment below - Next, had there been an investigation instead of a rush to destroy evidence (intentional or not, that's exactly what happened), we might know more about how or why the buildings collapsed. The only steel framed buildings to collapse due to fire, before or since 9/11, by the way. Since I won't be able to prove a negative, perhaps you could show us that to be false. Steel framed building collapsing due to fire, never before or since, but three times in one day, tell me more about your coincidence theory.
2. He takes our refusal to discuss his idiotic 9/11 truther theories as evidence that we cannot refute them. It has been 8 years. We are sick of truthers. This is maddening.
You can not answer to the subject at hand. You must resort to name calling. You are very un-American as well. The way you handle yourself here, the way you conduct a discussion. You hate dissent. You don't like free and open speech. You don't seem to like America at all, nor what she stands for. Sad. Very sad.
See, you chose to reply to the comment and video, but soon found that you couldn't handle the situation. You got in over your head and decided the best tactic was to call someone liberal, an American hater, Arab apologist or truther.
I like how you mention someone running away as soon as they are confronted with hard evidence that calls into question their entire world view. Though I wouldn't consider this video to be 'hard' evidence, you are doing exactly what you accuse others of. You are runnig away, refusing to confront the video and it's contents, only because it would call your world view into question.
3. He is anti-military. This posted to a active duty member that announced he was deploying.
His link to an anti-war screed on Memorial Day, the day we honor those who have made the ultimate sacrifice for this country was about as dishonorable and loathsome as it can get. Here
He found this signature of a member sickening -
"You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't
support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops."
How ridiculous is that? You should get some sort of award for that one. Sickening.
4. He created a forum where he posted an article from Oct 2001 that contained these fun little gems.
they (9/11 hijackers) weren't committing suicide or murder but instead engaging in self-defense in a holy war against aggression, that is, against the U.S. government's continual 10-year war against the Iraqi people.
Since the U.S. government's bombs and embargo have killed tens of thousands of Iraqis (a point hardly anyone disputes), in the minds of bin Laden and his followers they have the "right" to come to the assistance of the Iraqis by counterattacking the United States.
He (Bin Laden) openly said that since the U.S. government's embargo was killing tens of thousands of Iraqi children (a point confirmed by the United Nations),...
...how killing tens of thousands of Iraqi children with an economic embargo...
There is an obvious way to pull the rug out from the terrorists' own "justification" for more terrorist attacks against Americans: Immediately withdraw all U.S. troops from Saudi Arabia and end the bombing and embargo against Iraq,
5. Like all trolls, he thinks it is ok to accuse a sitting President of murder.
I said: DO YOU MAKE WAR WITH THOSE THAT MURDER IN THE NAME OF CHRISTIANITY?!
Timothy H said: Please, inform us. Name one.
I say: George Bush.
6. I have posted much more in a humorous way of his arab apologist, anti-Israel, anti-military, troll-like ways in a forum in the woodshed if this has not convinced you - Is WhichWing possibly the most loathed user on NewsBusters that has not been banned?
