Evolution and name calling
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 4:17pm.
I stand by my earlier comment- you're so dense. Read the words. Consider both versions a storyline, and tell me how they substantially differ.
I don't know when Genesis was written, but I can be pretty sure it was well before the science of evolution was derived. The fact is that evolution, if true, could substantiate creationism. As hydro said, creationism adds the element of the supernatural to the process- an element that is otherwise ignored or remains unexplained in the science of evolution. Your either purposefully ignoring this or too dense to pick up on it- your call.
Finally, I'm not going to discuss this further with you on this thread (you can create a forum if you like to continue, though I suspect that won't happen), but I saw your little comments to agnostic about insults. Because I believe you to be what you've claimed in the past as a California family man, I find it increasingly curious that you come across on these pages more like a 10 year old girl. You need to get some thicker skin there Teddy- stop channeling your daughter or your niece or the little girl next door -it's embarrassing.
Let's have at it. You can start by calling me names and I'll reply with scientific facts. Or you can go back to the main thread and see how agnostic and I can have a conversation without being immature about it.