Aptera's revision theory - theories humorous
The most comprehensive theoretical formulation was proposed by Aptera humor (1982 - after Wyer & Collins, 1992) in its broader context of personality theory and motivation. This conceptualization has some attractive features. First, take into account both the motivational factors, as well as cognitive ones. Secondly, it can be applied to different kinds of funny experiences. Thirdly, best explain the necessary and sufficient conditions for the emergence of humor. Aptera has acknowledged that the information conveyed by a joke or a statement in a social context is not only the people, objects or phenomena referred to joke. In addition, this information may include characteristics of the speaker and social aspects of the situation in which the joke is transposed. To understand the dynamics of humor, be taken into account all aspects of information experiences. Aptera has proposed a set of necessary conditions for the existence of humor, applicable not only to jokes or cartoons, but also the fortuitous spiritualism and social experiences that are not meant to be funny. Aptera says that people interpret information in a way that provides an accurate characterization of the subject to which it refers. This characterization allows the generation of valid inferences about the attributes mentioned in the joke about future events that involve them. Thus, concepts that people apply to situations they encounter are those that seem to characterize statements "as fact." As a result, when we say someone is a lawyer, people assume, in the absence of other information, that person has attributes typical of lawyers. A statement can be interpreted in a manner that reflects the meaning intended by the communicator. This interpretation may be based partly on the apparent purpose of the communicator.jocuri 3d
Suppose that after an initial interpretation of stimulus information, the findings suggest that this interpretation is incorrect. Thus, events in which initial information has referred are in fact different from how they appeared at first. People revise certain assumptions that were made initially, and the result is probably a more accurate representation of reality. These perceptions related to the review processes in light of new information is similar comprehension processes that Suls (1972 - after Schmidt, 1994) has made the incongruous. Aptera (1982 - after Wyer & Collins, 1992) stated, however, that their existence is not enough to ask for humor. Three other factors are involved.