Satchmo, the troll
- Login to post comments
it's Independence Day. Do your part, and free us from the waste of oxygen named Incestmo, er, Pervmo, uh, Satchmo. The list of his trolling and threadjacking is long and not distinguished, at all. There's more than enough to get rid of this fool.
A perfectly innocent feel-good thread: Gary Sinese is a very patriotic guy. How could that stir any controversy whatsoever? Who could find fault with that?
Why, Incestmo could, of course. In this classic example of threadjacking, Incestmo takes Mr. Noel Sheppard to task for his use of the seemingly innocuous phrase "giving back."
And as usual, the focus of the thread changes from what you would normally expect (attaboys to Mr. Sinese) to people responding to Incestmo's idiotic baiting. Another thread sullied by the infamous, deplorable Incestmo.
Please ban this troublemaking troll.
Either he is stupid and deliberately engaging in historical revisionism.
This guy is gumming up the NewsBusters databases with utter trash like this that turns blog after blog here into Satchmo posting storms. Do we really expect the boys and girls to just ignore crap like that?
There's no way he could be that "stupid." Time after time, he's been refuted with links and info to prove it, yet he continues posting garbage which are more in line with "historical revisionism" as you say.
Definitely deliberate on his part. Take "sluggo" for instance, that guy was trying his damnedest but was beaten back with reason and truth, but the same can't be said for this weird dude, which is why it has to be deliberate. You could tell from sluggo's writing that he didn't have a whole lot working up in that cranial cavity. Not 'mo, he's a twister.
Look at the same thread below your posted example where he asks Dave that he thought Dave was a libertarian after Dave comments about how different history would be if certain things happened. I said it was about "survival" and it was if we didn't do anything, but he twists what I said and makes it about freezing Japan's assets....I'm like "whiskey tango foxtrot??"
At this point, it seems like no matter what we say or do, he twists it around to his fantasy world, the best thing to do is to at least ignore him. No matter what he says, no matter what he asks, no matter what kind of requests he makes, hell, no matter how outlandish or nutty a statement he makes, he should be just plain ignored. Think of it as those of you on Facebook, click on "ignore." Or make a game out of it and say it outloud after you see a post by him, "Ignore!" and go to the next one. For that Ellison pledge thread, I'm not going to keep checking on it anymore because it'll be more of the same stuff from him and that's about it, he's successfully hijacked that one.
Sluggo was worth the time that was spent on him in that global warming mess, this guy is not.
Just my two cents.
-Jon
no matter what the topic, is 100% guaranteed to quickly devolve into a sh*tstorm. I challenge anyone to show me just one time where this has not occurred.
His continued presence here is a net negative for Newsbusters, no matter how you look at it.
Plus, it's official - he's a bona fide whackjob.
Move my workspace here.
Fourth time now. I have been working on the satchmo troll for a few months now. There is ---
The botched forum where I hit the return accidentally (we can't edit our forums any more)
The lost forum when my computer decided to update instead of hibernate.
The half formed forum I dumped because I thought satchmo was banned for good.
I am currently requestless on the banning of trolls. My last one bsny has been banned. Only the Stupid of garlock remains. But that is in the woodshed, not a request for banishment. Time to get cracking on the satchmo troll once again. I will use this as my workspace since we can't edit our own forums.
DON'T REPLY TO THIS. IT WILL LOCK IN ALL EDITS. THIS IS A WORKSPACE.
The Collected Stupid and Lies of Satchmo.
1. ...a 24-year old is not a child.--- define child: 4. A son or daughter; an offspring
2. Under the FairTax, taxes would come out of everyday purchases by all black market participants...
3. Poor people will rejoice at a 30% sales tax.
a. And no, I did not claim that I don't have a problem with incest as long as it was consensual. --- The actual quote --- I couldn't care less if Palin or anyone else were screwing their adult son. As long as it's consensual, it's none of my business.It certainly isn't government's. And it doesn't affect my life one bit, nor does it affect yours.
5. The U.S. does not have a 2 party system.
8. There is no such thing as public airwaves.
11. People exchange gifts on Thanksgiving too.
12. Executions should be televised.
14. ...SCOTUS is an appeals court... Oh yeah, the 14 court of appeals. Wait --- Although the Supreme Court may hear an appeal on any question of law provided it has jurisdiction, it usually does not hold trials. ... In almost all instances, the Supreme Court does not hear appeals as a matter of right; instead, parties must petition the Court for a writ of certiorari.
15. There is no such thing as greed.
16. Only nwahs is allowed to use the word retard.
17. Saddam Hussein was facilitating the flow of weapons from Iran, HIS ENEMY, to Syria.
18. A 24 year old is not a child, even though said non-child had a mother and a father (who said non-child was sleeping with).
19. "Disturbing the Peace" laws are phony.
21. Necrophilia is a victimless crime, penalties are too stiff
Who is a Liar and/or a troll? MrShy. Unsane. The Vet. Wrathful Brunette. Cobraman matthewdean
24. Busted in a lie by the contributor Mr. Bob Parks.
26. Just because you said someone is correct does not mean you support them
27. Gerrymander is a difficult word to understand.
28. Adoption is a transfer of property.
31. ...you can tell sexual jokes and make racial comments anytime and anyplace you want. ... There is no law against telling an off-color joke, whether it's racial, sexual, or whatever else, or saying anything offensive. --- There are no laws. Harassment Laws. Don't you dare click on those links.
a. If you told sexual jokes and make racial comments at work? ...no, your employer would not be subject to sexual harrassment charges.
b. Don't you tell Satchmo you would be fired for making those types of comments in front of coworkers, that is injecting public vs. private into the conversation. Hey, shut up , you are an injector. And a lot caster. And a subject changer. And you are a not difference knower. .
c. I never said there wouldn't be any consequences in a private workplace... Whoops. Don't look at item a. Not a contradiction. Honext!
d. Serious. You are a subject changer. Stop changing the subject to Satchmo saying stupid things like a workplace with 100 people being private so you can say anything you want to anyone you want. Just because there are 100 people on the floor of a private factory don't make it public. There is only one definition for public and it ain't 1a: exposed to general view. The only acceptable definition is 2b: of or relating to a government. You are a subject changer and ignorant if you think there is more than one definition to a word.
e. Yes. Yes. Yes. There is no laws against saying the N word either on a factory floor. Did you click on those links above and see the actual laws? Why then you are a subject changer and a lot caster..
f. No laws against saying the actual N word on NewsBusters either. Satchmo did.
g. I never said there is free speech in the workplace. OK. OK. Except for the part where you can make sexual jokes and racial comments anywhere anyplace anytime. Except for that, yeah and saying there ain't no laws against it. Except for that.
h. Now don't get all truthie on us and tell Satchmo there are State and Federal Laws, including those which govern sexual harrassment, wherein innappropriate speech by employers and employees falls under the Civil Rights act as it pertains to a hostile workplace. (post from Blonde)
I. Fudge. I told you not to. And there you went and did it. Now for the last time, Look what letter we are on, I, the ninth letter of the alphabet. So once again, ...we were not talking about workplace law... Well, except for that whole conversation spread over 2 days and 2 forums part. Except that...
j. Time to change the subject! No one is going to jail for making an off-color joke, be it sexual, ethnic, or racial in subject... Yeah, there is no such thing as civil penalties, only jail. Wikipedia lies! --- A civil penalty or civil fine is a term used to describe when a state entity, government agency, or private party seeks monetary relief against an individual as restitution for wrongdoing by the individual.
k. Damn you dirty monkeypeople. The subject is hate speech. Why oh why won't you talk only about what Satchmo wants to talk about.
l. It is unbelievable that someone would believe an off-color joke is illegal. Yeah, except when people don't want to hear the off-color jokes because they are just trying to make a living and don't want to be harassed. Yeah, except for that...
m. I never said there wouldn't be consequences (that is, potentially being fired) for telling sexual/racial jokes or making sexual/racial comments at work. Well, except for that anywhere anytime anyplace, but work don't count when you say anywhere anytime anyplace.
a. That whole Israel's term thing - off limits! We will not discuss that. Only the quote part. Hey, Satchmo makes the rules here. What part of off limits don't you understand? The rest of the sentence? That's a different matter. Oh and Tom Blumer sucks. He sucks bad.
36. Journalism does not often comply with strict, traditional grammar rules.... ...journalism is not a repository of proper English grammar. Far from it.
a. I've never once said grammar isn't important in journalism... Whoops.
b. ...journalis is not the shining example of proper grammar. Whew. Back on track.
37. Punctuation is only for the written word. --- Really question mark I don apostrophe e think I ever heard that before period You learn something new every day exclamation point
38. The Islamic revolution in Iran was our fault. Pretty much any act against us by any Islamist is our fault.
39. Lincoln was one of the worst Presidents.
a. He suspended Habeus Corpus and that was unconstitutional. Just ignore that part where the constitution says “the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it".
b. The Civil War had nothing to do with slavery.
c. Lincoln's actions in having the Union at war were not about slavery or freeing the slaves... Ignore that whole Emancipation Proclamation. Nothing to see here folks...
40. It was the Unions's fault the South attacked Fort Sumter. They refused to surrender.
a. No, really, none of the revenue goes to pay interest on U.S bonds.
43. The Police are murderers. Serious. Tyrannical murderers. Honest. Without warrants. Really. Paramilitary thugs. You are policeman that posts here? You're a thug with a badge; an excuser, enabler, and footsoldier of tyranny. Nothing more.
44. Placeholder for Uncle Jer.
47. Got a mortgage? Ever get a loan from a bank? You are a slave. Yes. That is how bank lending works.
48. The financial crisis of 2008? Fake. Manufactured by the government. Why? They prolly go bored covering up 9/11.
49. Wall St. is not necessary for any company. Except if the want to borrow money, sell stock, buy/sell deriviatives, merge/buy/sell other companies, pay dividends, blah blah blah.
50. Catholics don't claim to be christians.
53. Tom Blumer called him a jerk and demanded an apology after yet another series of nasty posts.
55. Again, every attack on our citizens, military, and soil is our fault. Phweet.
56. The NAZI party is our fault too.
64. Neo-Cons. All of you. Only Ron Paul can save you from your neo-con ways. Ron Paul Rules!
65. Bush signed unconstitutional acts into law. Example? Nah, just throw anything out there. Ain't like Satchmo has made one unsupported statement after another.
The irony throughout this little forum is quite massive.
66. All abortion laws should be removed. That includes abortion laws against late term abortions as well.
Satchmo: ...fetuses are the property of the mother.
Satchmo again: ...the fetus is the property of the mother.
Hear that? The fetus is the property of the mother and the government cannot interfere should she want to abort in the 8th month.
Mike Bratton: ...do developing children shed the status of "property" and become sovereign individuals? Third trimester? Birth canal? Birth? A month after being born?
Satchmo's answer: Birth.
So only birth ends the mother's right to throw away the property inside her.
Mike Bratton: If a child is eight-and-a-half months into gestation, able to live outside the womb if necessity required it? Still property?
Satchmo: ...ask youself if your hypothetical is in utero or not, and you'll have your answer.
Satchmo: Birth is birth.The condition is in utero versus not in utero.
An eight and a half month old fetus is still property as long as it is in utero. And property can be sold or thrown in the trash.
Sadly, it will probably take months to get rid of him. As far back as Dec 2010 bsny was makng horrific comments about Brent Bozell and Newsbusters only recently banned bsny, so I imagine it will be at least as bad trying to get rid of The Creepy Incest Apologist known as Satchmo.
Now, criticise one of the syndicated RINO bloggers (such as Katheryn Jean Lopez) and you can expect an Editor to complain(oh yeah, they notice *that*), but it takes a lot to get rid of a Troll around here.
- Login to post comments
And yet the sissy troll refuses to act like a man and say exactly what is wrong with a single stupid and/or lie I posted here.
Everyone enjoying this troll yet?