Salon.com: Limbaugh Cousin Whines About Tough Life Being a Limbaugh


For years now American TV audiences been constantly accosted with the overblown drama, feelings, and theatrics of people we don't care about. It is given the exalted genera title of "reality TV." Now Salon.com brings that drama queen sensationalism to journalism! Oh, joy.

Enter Julie Limbaugh whining and complaining in the pages of Salon.com that her life is just oh, so hard because her cousin is famed radio yacker Rush Limbaugh.

Commiserate as she wails about the many times her ultra rich cousin flew the whole family to a resort for Thanksgiving and bought her Chanel sunglasses. Life is so hard. Feel her pain as she is introduced to famous people like Ann Coulter. Gosh what a trial. Assume her sadness as she reveals mistreatment by ignoramuses on the left that call her names because of what Rush has said merely because she carries the same last name. Oh, the humanity.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

And yet, after reading this whole long lament over her last name, one wonders... why? Why should we care? Why should anyone care? What reason is there that the whole world should be treated to the hard feelings that some silly little girl from Missouri harbors because she has a famous family member? After reading the screed one can't help but to have a desire to grab this little twerp by the shoulders and yell, "suck it up, kid."

The whole sorry episode, though, is an indicator of the trivialization of American culture. When the bleatings of people with nothing to add to the culture are elevated to places of prominence we know we have arrived at a time when priorities have been lost.

Aside from the petty warbling of young Miss Limbaugh, another recent example of this cultural foolishness was seen during Bill Mahr's TV show. Recently on Whatevertheheck With Bill Mahr the empty headed actor Mos Def -- not his real name, surprise, surprise -- was teamed with Salman Rushdie and Christopher Hitchens for a discussion about the evils of al Qaeda, of all things.

Rushdie, a man for decades intimately involved with exposing Islamic extremism and a world renowned intellectual, and Hitchens, also one of the world's smartest notables and detractors of radical Islam, were trying to inform Mr. Def about the political goals of al Qaeda. Apparently, Def wasn't having any of it.

Def began his humiliation by asking what that political "manifesto" of al Qaeda might be? While asking he interchangeably used the words Taliban and al Qaeda, apparently unaware that, while they work together, the two are distinctly different groups. This revealed a basic ignorance right off, not that said ignorance would prove to humble Def.

Hitchens and Rushdie were flabbergasted. Apparently, after all the world has gone through with radical Islam since 9/11, Mr. Def was completely uninformed about the radical's political goals. Hitchens and Rushdie began to wonder if Mr. Def had an Internet connection and if he'd ever bothered to try and find out?

Then Def went off into uncharted territory seeming to imagine that radical Islam was some movie-lot conspiracy created by the white folk to keep him down. Essentially, Def proved he thought the world was flat despite recent scientific advances from the last several hundred years.

Then Def began to proudly proclaim that he is secure enough in his self-esteem to hold an "unpopular idea." I would suggest that thinking the world is flat might be unpopular, and Mr. Def might have enough self-esteem to believe such a theory, but it still makes him an idiot and does not speak well for his perspicacity and intellectual curiosity.

There is an old saying: "don't sit quietly by and let people think you are a fool. Open your mouth and prove them right." Def proved it quite handily that night.

Anyway, the whole point is, we have trivialized intellectual efforts to the lowest point imaginable when we team some of the most intellectual men in the world today with a dolt like Mos Def and treat Def as if he is their equal on an intellectual level.

Mr. Def may very well be smarter than Christopher Hitchens about the names of street drugs or the ins and outs of the rap music scene in L.A. Mr. Def may even be an affecting actor that brings enjoyable film experiences to audiences everywhere. But let's not be so foolish as to imagine his opinion is on par with some of the smartest men in the world.

As with half wit Def, there is no reason whatever that the world should have the whiny Miss Limbaugh foisted upon it. A culture that raises up the inane and commonplace above its most accomplished citizens is a foolish culture, indeed.

And what does Salon get out of this display of "reductio ad cultura," if you will? Can anyone think it is anything other than a way to poke Rush Limbaugh in the eye? Can anyone seriously believe that Salon imagined that Miss Limbaugh had something prescient and interesting to say? I don't see how anyone could.

So, I ask Miss Limbaugh to continue her studies. Maybe some day she'll have something of note to offer the world. But as of right now, being miffed that her last name is Limbaugh is not a worthy offering.

So, suck it up, kid.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Warner... I have some

Warner...

I have some extra space in my basement for Julie if she has wearied of holidaying at Uncle Rusty's Palm Beach estate.

Jer

LOL

I know. Didn't that whole piece of hers just seem so childish?

Play Date with Meagan McCain

I suggest she have a play date with Meagan McCain. They can "you know" get their hair and nails done and commiserate about who "uncool" it is to have Republican parents. The other kids don't like us.

BRA Members

Meagan and Julie are both members of the BRA club (Bash Republican Associations). BRA members seek publicity and liberal public approval by complaining about their Republican (Conservative) relatives, connections etc.  Every BRA member is a RINO in disquise.

Megan and Julie are not conservatives

Megan and Julie are a disgrace. They sound spoiled and misguided. I'd rather hear Andrea Tantaros or Laura Ingraham anyday.  Rinos aren't really conservatives. This is why Newt Gingrich said today that if things don't change with the Republicans then Conservative will leave the party and create their own. I don't doubt it.

Newt Gingrich reportedly said that conservatives might bolt the GOP if the party doesn't stop "being the right wing party of big government."

 

She's a dope who never grew

She's a dope who never grew a spine and mouth to defend her family without which no one would even have heard of her.  She should be grateful and thankful daily that because of her last name anyone even bothered to print her bitching, moaning and whining.

Cool!

Ball gag optional?

:p

life is so hard because of Rush

Waaahhhhh......

You are preaching to the choir Mr. Huston.

  I am not familiar with any of Mr. Def's work, don't watch Maher, don't watch any reality shows, and don't read Salon.

  I do spend hours out of my day staying informed, updating my knowledge, and finding that one true right path.

 But what has it gotten me? Powerlessness and frustration. I have one RINO rep in Congress (he voted for the  a retro 90% tax on AIG execs) , 2 Dem Senators, and 1 far left POTUS.

  I have the feeling we can rail and rant and possibly win some battles here and there. But what will it get us, the uninformed will be just as uninformed tomorrow and will cast the same uninformed votes next time.

  The only way these people will learn is to get hit with the same kind of stuff we got with the last far leftist President. High unemployment, high inflation, high taxes, and a wimpy role on the world stage.  Unfortunately, it will hit us, the informed, just as hard. Hence, all the frustration.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

PS: Life is just as tough NOT being a Limbaugh, so tell Miss Limbaugh to give it a rest. 

That was written by a

That was written by a teacher?

Perhaps if she would have ever learned enough to debate with people she would have felt more comfortable with her name.

She is a teacher and admits it with that attitude toward learning? That is the true joke of this article, a teacher that shies away from people when they make incorrect or exaggerated points and would rather 'fit in' without controversy than to correct someone.

A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections

Uh, why doesn't poor Julie

Uh, why doesn't poor Julie just change her name?  "Julie Def" has a nice ring to it.

 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

She'll never change her last

She'll never change her last name because she'd be a nobody without the "Limbaugh" name.  It's free publicity for this malcontent.

Eugenia

  When I read the title of your post I was thinking the rest of it was going to say "Because who would marry such an ungrateful wench" or something like that.

Your sentence ending would

Your sentence ending would fit as well!  :)

Warner, I love your phrase

Warner, I love your phrase "reductio ad cultura."  ROFL

That is so appropriate!

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

I hate

I hate to say I want to pat myself on the back, but I amused myself with "redictio ad cultura."

Well I liked her story.

Contrary to Mr. Huston and several who have replied in this thread, I liked her article. Did any of you actually read it? Considering it was written by a Liberal to Liberals I thought it slammed them pretty good. It appeared to me the main point was how the Liberal hatred of Rush is inappropriately and irrationally directed toward her, affecting her life and career...and she loves him anyway. Indeed she questions the whole Liberal idea of hating who you are told to hate, you know, that group think herd mentality thing.
I'm I alone in seeing this?

I agree, it can be looked

I agree, it can be looked at both ways.

Parts of it are self-pitying....she is eager to let people know she doesn't agree with him.  Why should she care?  And she doesn't like the fact that she may be judged for being related to him.

But I think the money quote is her thought when she doesn't want to meet Ann Coulter.  "I've become the person I hate"

(Judging a person without knowing her, and confusing disagreement with hatred.)

That is definitely an indictment of liberals.

 

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

Defending Julie

One thing you do when writing is to consider your audience. I believe Julie was writing to fellow Liberals. Liberals eat up that self-pitying stuff.

We need more Liberals taking deep introspective looks at themselves and seeing the ugliness. Coming from "their side" Julie may reach them in ways we can't.

Optimist.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

what surprised me

What surprised me is that, especially after so many years, she doesn't have an automatic response when other people automatically judge her because of her last name. Instead, she meekly shies away from defending herself or her family.

You think Mary Matalin or James Carville would cower if their spouse were being unfairly criticized?

I feel sorry for her

She's obviously very young and impressionable, and is willing to be part of her pack (liberals) even though she knows in her heart it is wrong to take their side.  After all, her cousin has done nothing but treat her like a princess since she was a child, she obviously loves him and finds him funny and wonderful, yet she is unable to beat the pack mentality to say what is obviously in her heart.

The second thing I noticed in reading her whine is that liberals feel free to express their inappropriate opinions without a second thought.  Stupid.  It's like asking a female someone you haven't seen in a while who has gained weight..."when are you due"?  D'oh, just thoughtless and ignorant, which describes liberals to a tee.

I hope Miss Limbaugh grows a spine (and better yet a brain) and becomes the good conservative she ought to be.  And then tells these meddling know-nothings to be quiet.  And I truly hope she learns to proudly say, "Yes, Rush is my cousin, he's a great American, and you'd be wise to keep your opinions of him to yourself while you're around me".  With a smile, of course. 

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

but if that doesn't happen

"I hope Miss Limbaugh grows a spine (and better yet a brain) and becomes the good conservative she ought to be."

But if that doesn't happen, Julie should at least check out Camille Paglia's blogs at the Salon website. Camille is a fan of Rush, though she does not agree with him on many things. She does a good job of separating the wheat from the chaff, especially when it comes to calling out certain liberals on their hypocrisy.

She's not even smart enough

She's not even smart enough to realize Rush is right about the self-loathing libs.  These hateful, spiteful people are showing her to her face that her cousin is right about them, but she still doesn't get it. Apparently the smart gene skipped over her.

Well, she's young

And I think she's beginning to get a glimmer of "liberal tolerance".

Rush being Rush, he'll never mention it to her.  He has too much class for something so pedestrian.  I hope she someday comes to understand her cousin and what he actually represents.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Cry me a river

If not for nothing, a liberal was able to admit that a students grades would suffer if they are conservatives. But what she really needs to be taught is there are a lot more people have it a lot tougher because they arent a Limbaugh.

Yes, I suppose you could postulate

 that Miss Limbaugh was saying she didn't like the person she had beome, however, I didn't notice anywhere in the piece, (yes, i even read it twice, must like torture), where she had decided that this behavior had changed her mind, and she was no longer going to be a liberal, especially one who doesn't pre-judge others. I found her tale to be vacuous, ridiculous, and completely unwarranted. Sorry, Miss Julie, I think you failed. Only slightly more compelling than Paris McCain. 

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Yes, Childish

And not just in what she said but in how she said it.  This woman is a highschool teacher and an MFA candidate in the writing program at Columbia?  Her screed read like it had been written by a fourth grader.

See comment below

Look at the present public education system.  Home schoolers blow the public schoolers out of the water.  The anointed one sends his little lovelies to private school for a reason.  Miss Julies needs to ask Uncle Rush for money for a good private university.  She might learn something.

All Julie has to do is change her last name to Obama

Problem solved.

-Dave

This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.

Let me get this straight...

     Poor Julie is depressed because she is treated badly by liberals for having the same last name of a famous conservative relative.  So, instead of telling the liberals who treat her badly to go and get bent, she whines about being related to a man who is conservative and his friend(s), e.g. Ann Coulter; who never said a dispariging word against her.  Got it! 

"Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head." - Francois Guisot

In the classic words of the

In the classic words of the Governator: STOP WHINING!

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

Rush is a good guy

I couldn't help but notice how completely unselfish and generous Rush Limbaugh is.  She complains about his holding parties where she might be "forced" by her mother to talk to someone she doesn't agree with, but it's almost an after mention when she talks about his flying THE WHOLE FAMILY to resorts for holidays, and then basically giving them a free credit card.  He may come across as a bombastic blowhard on his radio show, but that's just a charactor he plays.  I find more and more every day that he's just a kind, generous man, who wants nothing more than for everyone in this country to succeed.  (Even Obama, personally, just not as the Pres. to get his socialist agenda passed.) (My take on the controversy) 

Who does care?

Mr Huston says: And yet, after reading this whole long lament over her last name, one wonders... why? Why should we care? Why should anyone care?

And I was wondering the same thing. So why is Huston responding to this trivial matter in such a harsh way?

It might help

It might help if you get some reading comprehension lessons because there was a greater point in the piece and THAT is what I was addressing, not necessarily little Limbaugh. Sadly, it was way, way over your head. But, amusingly, you fit in quite well with the sort of un-intellectual level I was decrying.No wonder people like Julie become famous with folks like you out there.

A grater point?

You had a grating point. It was grating because you had to get personal with the young Limbaugh in a demeaning way before possibly wandering into some greater point after 500 words of vitriolic nonsense. You took so long and were so tedious in getting to that greater point that any sensible reader wouldn't have bothered. If you're going to do crock-pot writing, it had better be amusing. Yours isn't. 

Thanks for your opinion.

Thanks for your opinion. When looking for prescient commentary, though, I find yours isn't.

Be sure and visit my home blog PubliusForum.com.

You are welcome

Let me know if you need an editor. I will consider doing some freelance editing of your work to try to save you from further embarassment and to keep you from having to change your work after posting.

Grisley

  Just a minor point...

When doing editing work, it is usually best if it is done in the same month that the original work was written.  You are over a month "overdue" on this one. 

That is a trivial point . . .

There is no due date for going back and forth with Mr. Huston on this forum. I have not yet contracted for the editing work. Unbelievable, really, that I have to point this out. Hope this response meets your timeliness requirements.

No problem really

  I just thought it was odd that you were busting his chops over something he wrote over a month ago.  Of course you should be looking for that editing gig to come through any time now.  Have a great day.

Mr. Shy chimes in

The timing of these posts and the exchange aside, Warner DID sort of bite his head off to a rather normal and not out-of-line critique/question regarding his article.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

The timeline

My original comment was posted 4/2 . . . the same day Mr. Huston wrote his commentary. He responded to my comment that same evening, but because I had no expectation that Huston would respond, I didn't return to the post for about two weeks. When I finally read his infantile response attacking me in the same style that he attacked the young Limbaugh, I fired back. Once again, I didn't think much of this whole thing and figured that would be the end . . . but Huston surprised me once more. Huston is the gift that keeps on giving.

Smooth move Exlax.

Insulting the contributors and authors. A sign of true class.

Who hurleth the first insult?

JWF  -- In examining my exchange with the author you may note that my first posting offered a pointed question -- not an insult. The point being that his insulting of the young Limbaugh was gratuitous. Mr Huston could have let this comment / question go if he thought it was invalid or he could have simply restated in a concise way "the grater point" . . . Instead he chose to hurl insults at me just as he had hurled insults at the young Limbaugh. So your point would be better applied to Mr. Huston. Rephrase it this way: How dare you, Mr. Huston, insult your beloved readers who care enough to offer questions and criticisms regarding your writing? You should be thankful there are people who care enough to not only read what you write, but to also offer feedback.

Huston posted "It might help" 4/2, edited it sometime after 4/15

It seems that Mr. Huston isn't a very good sport. For a writer who puts himself out there every day, it's a little surprising he is so sensitive to some unknown who throws a little criticism his way. Particularly when he pulls no punches when going after others. All who read this missive, note the following: Mr Huston changed his April 2 comment after I responded to him in my April 15 comment. So more than two weeks after making the comment, Huston is permitted to edit himself to take the sting out of my response. He originally posted on April 2 that " . . . there was a grater point . . . "  Hence my word play in response to him. More disturbing than Mr. Huston's inability to take a shot is this site (Newsbusters is one of my favorites) allowing an edit to a comment that has already been responded to and that is also more than two weeks old. And this is allowed with no notation that the comment had been edited. If Newsbusters doesn't have some policy against this, I am surprised. This is a basic integrity issue. If you are going to be the place to go to find out about media malpractice, you should have your act together regarding how and when edits may be made . . . and they certainly shouldn't be allowed without being noted, especailly after there are responses to those comments. On this very site I have read criticism of news sites that edit posted stories without notating those edits . . . apparently this is an ethical problem Newsbusters shares with some of the news outlets it critiques. 

Wow, Julie. What I get from

Wow, Julie. What I get from reading your whining novella is that liberals are dicks. They really arent tolerant. They dont respect other opinions. They are shallow and vindictive.

You should spend more time listening to your uncle Rush's show. You might learn something. Sounds like he has been nothing but good to you. 

I'd marry Limbaughs male cousin

just to talk to him    lol

 

Paul, thanks for the laugh.

;)

Warner, even Mos Def

Warner, even Mos Def realized he was in way over his head. Because he eventually turned on Bill Maher, accusing him of some sort of a set-up.

Re Def Debate

I watched a few minutes of the video on the Def/Hitchens/Rushdie 'debate'. It is really painful to watch; Def is so out of his league with the other two. It reminds me of the America's Funniest Videos' where they show children talking to their pets.

Public schooling at work.

Miss Julie's poorly written screed is a direct example of the destitution of the public school system.  It is broken, the teachers are poorly educated but paid extremely well thanks to the NEA.  I say paid well because their skills don't equal what they are paid.  Just look at the products they produce.

Oh Julie...cry me a

Oh Julie...cry me a river.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart