Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Tom Segel's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Voices on the War

By Tom Segel | November 22, 2005 | 00:19

Change font size:  A |  A
An Associated Press article dated Saturday, November 19, 2005, quotes Representative John P. Murtha (D-PA) as saying “Our troops have become the enemy. We need a change of direction in Iraq.” The article went on to report that his “call a day earlier for pulling out troops sparked a nasty, personal debate over the war.”

Washington Post writer Charles Babington wrote on Saturday, “Democrats physically restrained one colleague, who appeared as if he might lose control of himself as he rushed across the aisle to confront Republicans with a jabbing finger. They accused Republicans of playing political games with the war.”

Commander Adam G. Alexander, USN (ret), or Whitefish, MT sees more villainy than child play in the political arena. He explains that he had a combat role in two wars, which were lost, naming Korea and Vietnam. He says they were lost, “…not by the military, but by the politicians. The politicians allowed themselves to be controlled by the actions of protesters. It is well understood that the large number of them were using the war for their own good, pushed by a very few people and the Communists. What we have now are the same type of people who are using this war only (in an) attempt to take over Congress and the White House.”

Jay Lagree is a retired Air Force colonel from Meridian, TX. His impression of the current dialog in Washington is that both congress and the mainstream media are guilty of serious misconduct. “When our liberal mainstream media and their counterparts in congress impede the war in Iraq, it gives the terrorists more time and more weapons to defeat the Iraqi people. Similarly, the Iraqis know that without the United States military they have no chance of defeating the terrorists in the immediate future. When we tell the Iraqi people that we are going to quit the battle and go home like we did in Vietnam, we are killing their hopes of freedom.”

Lieutenant Colonel Charlie Revie, a retired Army officer living in LaCruces, NM thinks the remarks of some congressional members are traitorous. He further explains, “Demanding a timetable based on calendar events to extract ourselves from Iraq is tantamount to giving aid and comfort to the enemy. That is the same as handing them our operations plan.” He concludes his comments saying “I firmly believe that if we exit based on a time table, that we will get our butts kicked in the process and that withdrawing to ‘Fortress America’ will only bring the conflict to our borders.”

But, not all veterans are in lock step with the administration. Rear Admiral B. J. Lehman, a retired Navy flag officer living in Stateline, NV says, “Of course we support our troops. I and everyone else I know, believes we must do that. But, starting this mission was and the mission continues to be a mistake.

“Would you support a mission to invade North Korea? How about invading Iran? They have both declared their readiness to fight us and many of our friendly nations. If you would not support these missions, why not? We have plenty of information. Why not go after them now?”

He ends saying, “ If your answer to these questions is ‘Yes’, I think you are wrong!”

Retired Army Sergeant Major Paul Pritchett of Nixa, MO says, “I do support the troops because they are loyal to their country and leaders and do what they are told. I think they are doing a superb job, notwithstanding the early failure of the Defense Department to provide them with every available method of individual protection, such as protective vests, armament on vehicles, etc. What I cannot support is an administration that starts a war by fabricating intelligence, such as was proven by the Downing Street Memos.”

Bill Lyster, a retired Air Force Master Sergeant from Panama City, FL is angry over how he perceives Representative John Murtha is being treated. He says, “Colonel Murtha, USMCR (Ret) carries two Purple Hearts from a war Bush and Chaney avoided. He deserves respect. One other clue as to what they think of us who went, and go to war when our country calls is that they are trying hard to reduce retirement pay, benefits and health care for veterans and survivors. They have no shame and history will not treat them gently.”

Many veterans have a mixed message on the war, as is the case with retired Marine Sergeant Major Leo Robert, of State College, PA. “I support the president and our troops in the war of terrorism”, he says. “That does not mean I cannot ask questions or be critical of this administration. You can support the troops by asking the administration hard questions. For example, why was there not enough body armor for our troops or reinforced HUMVees? Why are folks returning from the war zone and not getting proper treatment?” He ends his remarks saying “Rumsfeld and many in this administration are derelict in their duties when it comes to supporting our troops.”

The consensus view of veterans could very well be found in the words of Lieutenant Colonel Chris Sheffler, USAF (Ret) of Camby, IN. “Sadly, there is extremely little personal connection between the service and congress. Unlike after WWII, now you can count military veterans in congress on one hand. My thoughts exclude those few.

“Because of the distance of military/congress, there is no military experience (to draw upon) in each congressperson’s decision. They don’t see the sacrifice. They only see and hear the loudest voice – our media. As an example, on TV I only hear about the failures and deaths in Iraq. I don’t hear or see the success stories or jobs well done as those told in the emails coming home from our service people in Iraq. Why aren’t the success stories given equal time? Is it because there is a different political party in the oval office? How did pessimists get in charge of the media?”

Sheffler recalls “Several years ago, when our President stood before the nation and warned America that this would be a long and costly war, congress, almost to the last person, agreed and voted for the declaration. Nothing has changed in my mind that justifies the congress starting to whine other than the media keeps pounding us with negative news. I have not seen the President change his mind. He is persistent and continues on the same road. I am ashamed of the majority of our congress. They were elected to lead, not be weathervanes.”

Share this
  • Iraq
  • Tom Segel's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Samuel L. Jackson's 'I Voted for Barack Because....
    1 min 29 sec ago
  • Yyyeah, I was talking about
    6 min 23 sec ago
  • Then some conservatives are apparently slacking, ---
    12 min 38 sec ago
  • All I gathered from that "sketch"
    17 min 24 sec ago
  • ~What's that?
    20 min 11 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.