AP's Borenstein Insists on Citing Guide to Year's Coldest Days as Proof of Global Warming
Even when someone who helped prepare a new guide for gardeners on the coldest temperatures seen annually in different parts of the country says that their output doesn't fit the global warming template, an AP reporter decides that it really does.
In preparing his write-up last week on the release of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's revised the official guide for gardeners, the Associated Press's Seth Borenstein, the infamous writer of reports claiming that the Climategate scandals were no big deal, buried the following quote from a USDA official at Paragraph 17 of 24:
USDA spokeswoman Kim Kaplan, who was part of the map team, repeatedly tried to distance the new zones on the map from global warming. She said that while much of the country is in warmer zones, the map "is simply not a good instrument" to demonstrate climate change because it is based on just the coldest days of the year.
Seems pretty clear to me. Something which only addresses "the coldest (few) days" in a year doesn't have much relevance to what temperatures are like during the rest of the year.
But not to good old Seth, whose under-the-breath response to Ms. Kaplan must have been along the lines of "What the heck do you know?" Borenstein almost waxed poetic about the impact of global warming on the gardening guide:
New map for what to plant reflects global warming
Global warming is hitting not just home, but garden. The color-coded map of planting zones often seen on the back of seed packets is being updated by the government, illustrating a hotter 21st century.
It's the first time since 1990 that the U.S. Department of Agriculture has revised the official guide for the nation's 80 million gardeners, and much has changed. Nearly entire states, such as Ohio, Nebraska and Texas, are in warmer zones.
The new guide, unveiled Wednesday at the National Arboretum, arrives just as many home gardeners are receiving their seed catalogs and dreaming of lush flower beds in the spring.
It reflects a new reality: The coldest day of the year isn't as cold as it used to be, so some plants and trees can now survive farther north.
"People who grow plants are well aware of the fact that temperatures have gotten more mild throughout the year, particularly in the wintertime," said Boston University biology professor Richard Primack. "There's a lot of things you can grow now that you couldn't grow before."
... The 1990 map was based on temperatures from 1974 to 1986, the new map from 1976 to 2005. The nation's average temperature from 1976 to 2005 was two-thirds of a degree higher than it was during the old time period, according to the National Climatic Data Center.
Wow. A whole two-thirds of a degree. Would somebody break it to poor Seth that there hasn't been any global warming since 1997?
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
even Fairbanks, Alaska, are in newer, warmer zones.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 12:37am.
Bitter cold records broken in Alaska – all time coldest record nearly broken, but Murphy’s Law intervenes
Murphy strikes twice.
The NWS in Fairbanks moves quickly to disavow the temperature report. I suppose the Drudge link has the phones ringing off the hook. But here’s the interesting thing, the nearest other “official” station, PAPR at Prospect Creek Airport, AK only 0.9 miles away, is also offline.
AT FAIRBANKS...THIS JANUARY WILL LIKELY GO DOWN IN THE RECORD BOOKS AS THE 5TH COLDEST ON RECORD WITH AN AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OF -26.7 DEGREES THROUGH YESTERDAY. TEMPERATURE DATA AT FAIRBANKS DATES BACK TO 1904.
You Didn't Build That.
Ever notice Murphy
Submitted by Injest on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 7:25am.
Ever notice Murphy is the first one to clock and the last to clock out at work?
A Real Discussion on Climate
Submitted by scottyusmc on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 8:46am.
I'd love to engage in a real discussion on climate and the proper methods to adapt to a constantly changing world. What I can't handle is a one-sided fraud based analysis that says the only solution is to give up all our liberties and ecomonic freedom and hand all our money over to idiots like Al Gore, so they can buy huge homes on the coast, fly private jets, get motored around in SUV convoy's, and sell me BS Carbon Credits. All this and pay more for almost every item in the grocery store and energy at the pump and electrical socket.
Their concern seems to be more toward the money they can make off climate change instead of the health of the planet... I'm a climate conscience conservative who doesn't see the answer as handing over my future to pay for the lifestyles of the climate elite.
Health of the planet
Submitted by Ben Blankenship on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 4:21pm.
It was parochially comforting to learn that Virginia has enjoyed its warmest January ever. Of course, we must add, “on record.” Weather calculations were most likely not recorded on a monthly basis back in the old days when the Brits ruled here, and everyone attending Aquia Church had to pay up something each Sunday to the Crown. Or even before, when Indians quarreled over things locally, like the fate of Pocahontas.
Even so, one would think, based on historical measurements of the weather, that some kind of agreement could be reached about our world and its climate—other than “things change.” They do indeed. It’s pretty clear that our globe has had several major coolings and warmings. Things have tended to stay awfully cold and then quite warm for extended periods.
Some folks claim that today’s warm periods here on earth have lasted a long time and threaten to get even hotter unless we do something.They argue that the main remedy is to stop breathing out CO2. I exaggerate, but in essence the CO2 increase in the world is claimed to be making us warmer—and too warm for our own good.
I don’t know about that. Fact is, when it’s been warm our world has seemed to prosper more than when it’s been cold.
The planet underwent terrible cooling during the Little Ice Age that lasted centuries, ending about 1900, and we’ve done better being warmer ever since. History books tell us that warmer temperatures have correlated with greater human prosperty and bountiful harvests.
During today's long warm spell, we see crop yields per acre reaching new highs never before hardly even contemplated. Is that cause and effect? Maybe not totally, for science has produced yield-enhancing technology apart from the prevailing climate from season to season. But could crop production have been nearly so abundant if the weather had stayed cold as all get-out?
I would guess not. Cold climates, not warm, correlate with harm to mankind. So relax.
Never expect truth from a liberal
Submitted by John21 on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 9:17am.
Mr. Borenstein has two strikes against him.
1. He is a died in the wool far left liberal which means he is incapable of independent thought, he merely follow along with the other sheep in the herd. Until the liberal socialist elite determines that once again they can not defend their scam any longer and moves off to the next one.
2. He works for Associated Press a leading socialst propaganda rag, who do not even bother to edit the wording of the talking points before providing the propaganda to the masses.
They will continue to cover for the liberal scams in the name of socialist advance. Nothing between the ears but air.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill
teach
Submitted by angelann1 on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 4:03pm.
You can't teach liberals anything !!!!