Iranian Mob's Storming, Sacking of British Embassy Not In AP World News Top 10 Stories
If you don't hear much about the Iranian mob which stormed the British embassy earlier today in future news reports, you can probably at least partially blame the Associated Press, which considers the event so unimportant that it's not even part of its main U.S. site's top ten world stories as of 10:25 p.m. (saved here at host for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes).
For those who are curious as to the identification of the ten stories considered more important, here they are:
- Greece gets $10.7 billion but rescue plan stalls
- Plane believed carrying Ivory Coast's Gbagbo lands
- $4.8 billion Peru gold mine project suspended
- US man leaves jail in Aruba missing case
- Officials extend voting to 2nd day in Congo
- Zimbabwe militants call for restaurant boycott
- Border staff, teachers join major UK strike
- Norway killer found insane, unfit for prison
- Chilean judge charges ex-US military officer
- Jamaica investigator probing troubled gov't agency
Geez, only two stories (#1 and #8, which is about Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik, who committed and has confessed to the murder of 77 children earlier this year) are even in the neighborhood of being as important or more important than the Iranian mob's attack on the British embassy. There's no conceivable way that it doesn't belong in the top ten stories.
There is a related AP story time-stamped at 3:48 PM ET. Here are several paragraphs from it:
Iranian protesters storm British Embassy in Tehran
Hard-line Iranian protesters stormed British diplomatic compounds Tuesday, hauling down the Union Jack, torching an embassy vehicle and pelting buildings with petrol bombs in what began as an apparent state-approved show of anger over the latest Western sanctions to punish Tehran for defiance over its nuclear program.
The hours-long assault on the British Embassy and a residential complex for staff - in chaotic scenes reminiscent of the seizing of the U.S. Embassy in 1979 - could push already frayed diplomatic ties toward the breaking point.
... Calling Tuesday's attack "outrageous and indefensible," British Prime Minister David Cameron said that Iran's failure to defend the embassy and its staff was a disgrace and would have "serious consequences."
He said all embassy staff had been accounted for and praised Britain's ambassador to Iran for handling a "dangerous situation with calm and professionalism."
Sorting out who to blame may be difficult.
Sorting out who actually did the storming may be difficult, but there's little doubt that the Iranian government, though it has gotten matters mostly back under control, didn't mind seeing it happen.
And it wouldn't be an AP report without a backhanded attempt to excuse what happened:
Tensions with Britain date back to the 19th century when the Persian monarchy gave huge industrial concessions to London, which later included significant control over Iran's oil industry. In 1953, Britain and the U.S. helped organized a coup that overthrew a nationalist prime minister and restored the pro-Western shah to power.
In recent years, Iran was angered by Britain's decision in 2007 to honor author Salman Rushdie with a knighthood. Rushdie went into hiding after Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini issued a 1989 fatwa, or religious edict, ordering Muslims to kill him because his novel "The Satanic Verses" allegedly insulted Islam.
In March 2007, Iran detained 15 British sailors and marines for allegedly entering the country's territorial waters in the Gulf - a claim Britain denies. The 15 were released after nearly two weeks in captivity.
In 2006, angry mobs burned the Danish flag and attacked Danish and other Western embassies in Tehran to protest the reprinting of a cartoon deemed insulting of the Prophet Muhammad in the Nordic country's newspapers.
Yeah, you read that right. The AP used Danish cartoons as a historical excuse for a mob to break into the British embassy. Zheesh.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Don't know if this has been...
Submitted by zenman1661 on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 12:37am.
used before but AP should stand for the Always Progressive News Service.
Hey Radical Islam douchbags
Submitted by compguytracy on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 9:16am.
Lame, no pictures allowed? i so wanted to post the cartoon of lala to p "off the religion of peace" Well here is the link.
http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&um=1&hl=en&biw=1600&bih=775&tbm=isch...
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?" Orwell, 1984
Ceteris paribus
AP
Submitted by NewLife56 on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 7:34am.
Iranian Mob's Storming, Sacking of British Embassy Not In AP World News Top 10 Stories
Of course not, it could be a story that damages Obama
Can someone -- anyone -- tell me
Submitted by ThisnThat on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 7:55am.
why today we aren't using the large bunker-busters we just purchased from Boeing? You know -- the ones specially designed to destroy weapons of mass destruction buried underground. The Pentagon says "these bombs are not designed to target Iran, the only country known to have buried its nuclear weapons program." What the Pentagon ought to be saying this morning is "Our field tests over Iran have been successful. We're putting in another order to Boeing today".
January 2009: "We will talk to Iran without pre-conditions". - o'bama. [No word yet on whether our embassy has to be burned, first]
January 2009: "We set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons, and we will pursue it. Our first step -- U.S. production of nuclear weapons has been stopped". - o'bama [it's ok for Iran to continue with their program, apparantly]
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
One must live outside the USA
Submitted by dr-go on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 7:52am.
to get the more important stories. Here in Argentina, which is still no fan of the British, the burning of the embassy was front page news. Not surprisingly, there is more substantial news of value to be heard and read once one is outside the realm of the dysfunctional US media and its airhead newsreaders. Sad but very true.
dr- go
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:26am.
As an air head I may not be able to make a comprehendible statement so please bear with me. The US media is without a doubt useless but the news media through out the world has serious issues and especially when those issues are international. The political slant seems to written before the facts of the stories are even know.
I remember listening to some of the stories when I was in Corfu talking about what was happening in the US - amazing. I actually had one gentleman read me an article that was blaming Americans in NY and DC for being selfish and lazy for not physically responding to brush fires in the Southwest.
AP's attempted defense
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 7:57am.
makes it clear that Iran is the global equivalent of a petulant child that responds to perceived insult with violence. It's time to spank, not coddle.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
That's because all their
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 8:44am.
That's because all their reporters are busy tracking down the details of the Herman Cain allegations.
motherbelt
Submitted by 26CX on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 9:00am.
Here's a handy chart for predicting which GOP candidate the media will be focused on. If you scroll down past the table of data to the graph, you will note that as soon as a candidate's popularity exceeds Romney's, that candidate is attacked by the media and suffers a steep decline.
Gingrich is the green line on the graph. Guess who's next in the barrel?
The voters won't decide who the GOP candidate is, the media will.
It is abundantly clear...
Submitted by BBallleaper on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 9:27am.
that the top priority for the media in United States of America is to find every possible bimbo willing to reveal their sensuous scorching sexual escapades with Herman Cain. Second most important is filing every possible story about Moochella Obama's new hair style; boob belt; and what vegetables she'll be growing next spring. Following in random order are stories on Mitt's hair, Newt's three wives, Perry's latest flub, the latest stupid thing from Bachman's mouth, and how incredibly smart Obummer is, Moochell's next vacation, Obummer's feeling on the NBA agreement, and why Sarah Palin is still a stupid bitch. Iran? Israel about to be hit by Iranian nukes??? Muslims targeting US cities with plutonium bombs? Nah, forget about it. Politico is where the REAL action is. Journalista's forever!!!!
British Embass Attack
Submitted by jacket06 on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 8:59am.
Another example of the fine and dedicated work of this administration's Joseph Goebbels Propaganda Machine controlling the news!
Obama's on it, guys, not to worry!!
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 9:15am.
Obama stumbles through condemnation of attack on "English" embassy.
The invasion and sacking of
Submitted by stratman on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 4:03pm.
The invasion and sacking of the British Embassy was green-lighted by the Iranian government. It probably was thought up by the Iranian government. Regardless of which Islamonazi came up with the idea, no one in Iran does anything in public without government approval under extreme threat of life and limb.
Were any of the mob arrested? If some are never seen again then the event may not have been staged, though I do not doubt the Iranians would kill or incarcerate some of their own lemmings to make it appear the government had no involvement. The government there is truly evil on earth.
More disturbing about the idiot Obama's comments on the event is that he lamely condemns the totalitarian Iranian government for not following international rules on protecting a diplomatic embassy knowing full well the same Iranian government was responsible for the invasion and hostage taking of the US Embassy in November 1979 in a show of power. (What is it about November that the Iranians like to invade embassy's?) Odumbo is redux Jimmy Carter - impotence and ignorance in dealing with very bad people.
Does anyone believe a stuttering, poorly worded condemnation said in a sleepy, even apathetic, demeanor means beans to the Iranians? Why would the Iranian government feel frightened now when in the past they were beating, incarcerating and killing peaceful citizens during the "green revolution" following suspect elections, and Obama personally congratulated Imadinnerjacket for his "victory" and simultaneously limp-wristed the slightest of support for the citizen protesters?
Obama = Pathetic
Deja vu all over again - I
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:51am.
Deja vu all over again - I noticed this months ago, with *Climate* *Oil* *Financial* *Poor* *Enviroment* *Social Security* what did I leave out?
It's all come full circle, though not in the same order - to the top concerns of the time when I was a teen.
Band aids. That's why we MUST limit gov't. all the "solutions" were nothing but band aids.
Ronald Reagan