Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 25, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tom Blumer's blog
  • Networks Give Three Times More Quotes to Supporters of Gay Scout Admittance Than Opponents
  • State Dept. Official Who Altered Benghazi Talking Points Promoted; Only Fox Covered
  • MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Gushes Over Obama Speech, Claims the President is ‘Reining In His Own Power’
  • NBC Fails to Report Its Own Scoop That AG Holder Approved Investigation of Fox's Rosen
  • Video: Bozell's Prediction Pans Out, Media In Full-on 'Move On' Mode in Obama Scandal Coverage
  • The Long Hike: Media’s 13 Years of Bullying Boy Scouts Over Gays
  • Only CBS Notes IRS Official’s Leave, Yet ABC and NBC Have Time to Show Obama’s Prom Photo with ‘Foxy’ Friend
  • Hearing on IRS With Lerner Taking the Fifth? Newspapers Had No Front Page Story Thursday

Labor Secretary Solis Again Politicizes Labor Day With an Error-Riddled, Hilarious Video

By Tom Blumer | September 05, 2011 | 00:05

A  A
Tom Blumer's picture

A year ago (at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog), yours truly wrote up how Labor Secretary Hilda Solis had produced a Labor Day video which was both a propaganda vehicle glorifying the Obama administration's alleged economic accomplishments and a straw-man attack piece targeting "some who will suggest that, when times are tough, it’s time to get tough on working people."

This year, she's done it again. Working with the thinnest of gruel given the true state of the economy, the video is so pathetic that it's difficult at times to keep from laughing. The political statement I have transcribed after the jump goes from 0:23 to 3:57 of the 4:45 video (bolds and numbered tags are mine):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Now there were times in our history when we had great prosperity during Labor Day. But today, I'm talking to you when many workers feel anxiety and uncertainty.

I've heard from many of you in my travels across the country, and more than anything else, no matter where I go and who I hear from, you've told me: "We need more jobs."

So I want to talk to you about that. I want to talk to you not only about the jobs we've saved, but more importantly about the jobs we're working to create. [1]

We're at a turning point in our history. We've been forced to take bold action to address the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and put the brakes on an economic downturn.

Our economy is showing signs of steady progress, [2] but I know we aren't there yet.

We were losing 750,000 jobs a month -- a total of 8 million jobs -- before President Obama took office. [3] And although we've created 2.2 million jobs over the last year and a half, [4] and that's very good news, our nation's unemployment rate remains too high.

So the President and I will not stop working until every American is back on their feet, and we have fulfilled our goal to provide good and safe jobs for everyone.

To do that, our social safety net must remain strong. In challenging economic times, our unemployment insurance system serves as a crucial lifeline, not just to those who have lost a job through no fault of their own, but for our entire economy as well.

Last year we provided 23 million unemployed workers with help, [5] to pay their rent, to put food on the table, and keep local and small businesses afloat. This is the help they needed to seek new employment, or to get training in marketable new skills.

But that's not enough. We must make smart, targeted investments in our future. [6] That means training, education, research and technology that will lead to new ideas and new industries we haven't even thought of yet.

We must build new roads and bridges [7] and manufacture new products products right here in America. That's why we acted quickly to save the automobile industry, which has come roaring back in the last year, adding thousands of jobs.

And that's why this administration is bringing business, education and community leaders together to invest in emerging technologies that will create high-quality manufacturing jobs [6] that will allow us to sell our products all over the world. I've seen what's working, and it's amazing.

And while we've done the work to keep and create jobs, we've also ramped up our enforcement agencies to make sure workers stay safe and healthy, [8] and that employers are held accountable if they are not.

A workplace fatality is something no working family needs. [9] What they do need, however, is a voice, to ensure fair wages, safe workplaces, dignity, and respect. And that voice can only be guaranteed when they have the right to organize and bargain collectively.

We are at a turning point in our history. As we move forward, the debate about our economic recovery will only get more intense.

Some will argue that we need to cut back on unemployment benefits, cut back on worker training, cut back on giving workers an important voice on the job. [10]

On this Labor Day, I want you to remember: Your Labor Secretary will continue to fight for those things.

Notes:

  • [1] -- This is a leftover line from last year's video which seems to have no direct tie-in to this year's. You will search in vain for any reference to jobs "saved" in this year's script, which is just as well.
  • [2] -- A similar line was also used in last year's video. This year, with 0.7% annualized growth during the first half of the year, and an average of 35,000 seasonally adjusted jobs added during the last three months, the statement is beyond embarrassing.
  • [3] -- This is the same discredited statement Harry Reid made in early August, and it of course remains as false now as it was then:

    SAjobs2007to2011

    The red box represents the high-water mark for seasonally adjusted employment while George W. Bush was President as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is part of Solis's Department of Labor. The blue box is where total employment stood in January when Barack Obama took office. The difference is 4.433 million, not 8 million. Solis's statement is a flat-out falsehood, and anyone in BLS could have told her that if asked.

  • [4] -- The difference between the green boxes isn't 2.2 million; it's 1.886 million. The 2.2 million to which Solis is the increase in private-sector employment between December 2009 and June 2011. She should have said so. As it stands, the statement she made is also false.
  • [5] -- This is how they measure success. To paraphrase the old McDonald's slogan: "Over 23 million unemployed served."
  • [6] -- These two statements constitute another incredible embarrassment. It's as if the news of Solyndra, Evergreen Industries and other stimulus and green jobs "investment" failures have never broken through DOL's walls.
  • [7] -- Last year's video (I'm not kidding) said: "As a result of our quick and bold actions, millions of people are at work, building and rebuilding America’s roads, bridges, ports, and high-speed rail." This year, building "new roads and bridges" is something that we apparently need to start doing. You can't make this stuff up.
  • [8] -- I suppose this is impolite, but I must point out that in 2010, the first full year during which an Obama appointee was in charge (Bush's successor stayed until September 2009), there were 48 coal-mining deaths. That's was up from 18 in 2009, and was highest number recorded since 1992. Maybe cooperating with employers to improve safety, which was the guiding philosophy during the Bush 43 years, instead of promising to beat them up if every "i" isn't dotted and every "t" isn't crossed, which is the new guy's attitude might work better.
  • [9] -- (jaw hitting floor) Who writes this stuff? Who let it get through?
  • [10] -- Call this "The Return of the Straw-Man Argument."

If a Republican Labor Secretary had engaged in such an error-riddled, self-congratulatory production, I daresay that the establishment press would (correctly) have raked him or her over the, uh, coals.

Solis's 2011 sequel is so bad that the Republican National Committee ought to run snippets of it. That would serve two purposes. First, it would show the nation just how out of touch a key member of Obama's cabinet really is. Second, it would hopefully convince her to make this year's video her last.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Double Standards
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Unions
  • Unemployment
  • Economy
  • Government Agencies
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Political Groups
  • Hilda Solis
  • Online Media
  • Tom Blumer's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

If only truth were a requirement in publishing news articles.

Submitted by Scout Finch on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 12:11am.

Hilda would, too, be another unemployment statistic. We should only hope.

  • Login to post comments

Why do these idiots lie and say we lost more jobs under

Submitted by gmaniac1 on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 12:21am.

Bush than Obama? First of all their math is a little fuzzy as 4.5% unemployment compared to almost 9% unemployment doesn't add up. They are just lying morons and only the welfare babies who don't work will believe this nonsense.

  • Login to post comments

Propaganda aimed at the weak

Submitted by passingruffian on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 12:44am.

Propaganda aimed at the weak minded useful idiots. Joseph Goebbels would be quite proud of Ms. Solis.

“But resist, we much… we must… and we will much… about… that… be committed.” – Al Sharpton, August 9, 2011
  • Login to post comments

Oh, good grief!

Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 7:13am.

That means training, education, research and technology that will lead to new ideas and new industries we haven't even thought of yet.
How the H do you train and educate people to come up with ideas you can't conceive of?  How do you create technology that will lead industries you haven't thought of?

  • Login to post comments

Um, that's a defining goal of education

Submitted by mamabear on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:54am.

Educators actually spend a lot of time thinking about what skills they can teach students to help prepare them to innovate, think up new solutions, come up with brilliant solutions to world problems, etc.

It's incredibly hard, but it isn't like we have no idea how it could happen. We can't teach them information that we don't already know, but we can teach them how to use information in new ways and find new information. Critical thinking, systems-thinking, practice in interdisciplinary work, writing skills as a tool for organizing thought, etc etc.

It is the whole point of a liberal arts education as opposed to vocational training. One isn't more important that the other, but we do want some people in our economy who are broadly educated, well-rounded thinkers who can pull from different disciplines.

Now, I am happy to admit before the flaming starts that we could do a lot better with that goal, but we are working all the time to improve at it.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

but we are working all the time to improve at it.

Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:20am.

You, in particular should quit. As far as I can tell, what the libtard educators are doing to our children is nothing short of abuse!

"Well rounded thinkers" What a freakin joke, more like simple minded numbskulls

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Hey!

Submitted by mamabear on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 1:33pm.

Don't talk about my students that way

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

Kerry redux

Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:30am.

Good grief, you sound like John F'ing Kerry with what you've said.  Usually a bunch of nonsense.

Having people go to school doesn't mean a damn thing, be it vocational or liberal arts or whatever, if there is NO JOB out there for them to go to.  People are graduating from higher education with extremely little chance of finding a job that fits their degree.  I know someone who graduated with some medical degree involving cosmetic surgery and the like, and guess what, he can't find a job to save his life in that field!  He said he's got some great ideas that he wants to pursue in that field, but he can't if no one's hiring.

Right now and I'm loathe to say this, education isn't as important as having a climate that helps businesses to grow and expand and meet supply and demand.  That's the problem that we have right now, this government is so quick and eager to punish success that big businesses are hiring far fewer people than ever before, and of course we just had that jobs report that PROVES that.

These punitive government regulations that have been coming out en masse are a big part of the problem, causing businesses to shut down or relocate to other countries and who can blame them?   For God's sake, they are illegally shutting down power plants because of the global warming hoax and people will die as a result(it's already happened before) even though they claim they are "saving lives" doing this.  That's like cutting the feet off a track runner and then expect him to go jump hurdles!  It's STUPID and that can only mean one thing, this government has NO intention of helping improve anything, they are trying to destroy this country.

If the education system really did its job and taught the history of dictators who have taken the path that this bogus potus has taken, we wouldn't be in this problem right now.  Instead, America's been severely dumbed down enough to where we are where we are today.

This government needs to be tossed out on its ear and rebuilt in accordance with the Constitution.  Then this country might have a chance of getting back on its feet.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Well, I personally can't do much about business climate

Submitted by mamabear on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 1:32pm.

I can tell you that if you poll employers about what they are looking for when they go to fill the few jobs that are out there, they say they want well-rounded people who have critical thinking skills, communication skills, can work in teams, and have some real-world or hands-on experience like internships, apprenticeships, etc. A liberal arts education can't guarantee you a job, but it can help prepare you to do better when you get one.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

MB, ...... those who can do.

Submitted by upcountrywater on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 3:19pm.

Time for you to open a retail store in a near by mall.

You could sell the next upcoming pollution device, not required in cars, until '12.

At a discount.

Don't wait till '12 you will be paying full mandated prices.

Or recycle some of many Carters ideas....Pack that fiberglas, hard and tight.

Insulation and the labor to pack it in, been required to be in all new buildings since the 70's.

Whatever..

What a lovely retail space for the mall walkers to stroll by. Gosh the retail space would be the cheapest to modify...Could be packed with pupils sitting in wood and tan colored metal chairs. Happy workerpupils Soo eager to go out into the world as they were taught. What else could you sell, that wasn't shoved down the throats of the people?

Bump it up a notch, borrow the Census Bureau, OSHA er whatever SWAT, team and have them guide some unlucky taxpayer into your store, and with the help of the workerpupils reams of required forms, shall be filled out.

10% Commissions would be paid to, workerpupils who catch the missed, FEE and/or FINE and/or TAXABLE event.

The next big franchise. A KFC like mascot is needed.

Spatula City , & locations....

Try and dream up something and be sure to use your own money.

Long past the time bureaucrats and want to be's to be hijacking the role of some green dream industrialist .

(replying to this mb post also)

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

upcountrywater*

Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 3:39pm.

Someone agrees with your conjecture on possibilities

  • Login to post comments

cajun2, funny clip, Here is a real life China restaurant.

Submitted by upcountrywater on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 3:59pm.

Capitalism in commie land.

Where are the fleets of lawyers to snare this business.
Guess they were turned away before docking.
Or they went away like the landlords of yesteryear.

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

I don't know...

Submitted by mamabear on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:54pm.

The "Franchise Wars" sounds like free market forces at work!

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

Mamabear*

Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:23pm.

Upcountrywater got the point of the funny I was trying to make with that link. You have to watch the entire movie to understand what is meant by "the francise wars".. Excuse all the violence and things that got blowed up but try to get the the overall idea of the movie.  It was Sylvester Stalone and The Demolition Man...  Sci fi , remember...;-)

  • Login to post comments

correct mamabear,

Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:33am.

From the Conservative point of view - Teach the students how to think and give them the foundation of basic education. DO NOT indoctrinate with ideologies.

As one who went to college in the 80's and then back during the last decade I can attest to the fact that while I wouldn't personally call what my professors were doing indoctrination (except for one history teacher who professed that nothing important happened from the time President Carter left office until US actions in Serbia) but there was significantly more emphasis on the subjective ideas and feelings of events and history.  While I understand how this allows students to learn how to express their own thoughts and to think past the simple facts it gives an incredible amount of influence to the opinions of the professors which is a major problem.

Because students by their very defined status of being students do not have the basis to make an argument against a studied instructor and also by definition are there to learn from this instructor - the introduction of interpretation into the classroom in realms outside of literary interpretation are detrimental to the students ability to establish their own opinions.   Basically the student is primed to be receptive, put in an inferior posture and given the prospect that to do well relies upon their ability to agree with the professor in a meaningful way. 

Personally it was great for me - especially history - because I had a solid reservoir of experiences to relate to several of the instructor's hypothetical situations.  However, half the class left the American History class thinking that President Nixon was the reason the world hated the US - because he was a power hungry ego maniac.  Whether you believe that to be true or not, it is most definitely not the reason parts of the world hate the US.  BTW, I also had an instructor (actually Professor though he didn't deserve the title) tell me I was wrong about a world event that I was actually attended: no interpretation - just that it didn't happen.

I agree, it is a difficult balance to be able to teach how to learn.  However, it seemed that the schools did much better when they simply taught information, displayed contrasting examples and allowed the student to grow into learning how to apply that information.  Of course that would mean some would do better than others and we know how much liberals hate the inequality of outcome.

I don't really blame teachers so much even though there are quite a few bad apples.  The problem lies in the bloated administrations that come up with programs and texts that are little more than social experiments and the fact that there is little accountability in educational management.  The inability for education administrators to be held accountable, the limitations created by fear of the unions and the supposed need for government money that generally only aids the administrators and their bloated staffs hamstrings the teachers, students and the parents.  The problems of educating the children of this nation is a multifaceted problem with enough blame to go around.  The one main consistency related to the downfall of the American Education System has been that the more the government has tried to help - the worse the conditions have become. 

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Oooh, I'd love to hear more

Submitted by mamabear on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 1:22pm.

... particularly about how trying to encourage students to make interpretations for themselves caused them to adopt the instructor's interpretations. That's something we are trying to avoid in those sorts of exercises.

Students come into college wanting to absorb information passively from an authority figure. However, when they graduate we want them to be able to generate knowledge, find new connections, and be active participants in learning. Research has shown that we can help them reach that developmental stage-- they don't necessarily just naturally "grow" into it. They may, but we can have some affect on that. The role of the instructor should slowly change from disseminating information to helping students find and then create it for themselves. Foundational courses should be about learning facts and concepts, but advanced classes should be about applying that knowledge, generating knowledge, doing new things with it.

It's a fine line to walk, and students are often frustrated because no one explains how we expect their role to change or does enough to prepare them to move towards that goal.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

mamabear's fine line

Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 09/06/2011 - 9:25am.

... particularly about how trying to encourage students to make interpretations for themselves caused them to adopt the instructor's interpretations. That's something we are trying to avoid in those sorts of exercises.

IMHO, the students are no longer ready for this at a collegiate level and a great deal of that problem lays in the earlier educators not disseminating an adequate level of information to have the educational background in order to be encouraged to make their own interpretations.  (In some cases it seemed the instructors even had too narrow a grasp on subjects to be open to varying interpretations.)  Some of the problem is the limited amount of time and as always the degree to which a student is actually interested in developing his/her skills.  For example: my last course I took in Western Philosophy the students in the class had at best a geographical grasp of where Greece is physically located but had no idea of what else was close enough to influential around the Mediterranean (learned this when we split into groups).  So when presented the opportunity to think for themselves and discuss cultural influences on ancient Greece not a single student could add to the conversation and therefore what the professor said was complete gospel to these students.  Not a major point in this case but as would be expected the instructor only taught what he thought was important for his class which is perfectly natural but the problem is that what he taught was all the students ever learned.  They didn't have the basic knowledge to expand upon in the class room and there was no way there is enough time to teach the basics and then teach the students how to use that knowledge.

The problem doesn't start in college it starts long before.  The problems are further exasperated by college professors that don't have the time to fix the multiple years of failed schooling so they are forced to dump their point of view on students that only have the ability to regurgitate the professors subject matter in order to get the passing grade they need.

As a theory, it seems the more encompassing schools become the lower their standards of achievement.  Good or bad intentions aside, I don't think anyone is going to agree that education is better now than when the Department of Educations was created nor is it better than when the unions moved into education.  It would be too simplistic to suggest that these two icons of education in America are the sole problems but they are a problem and the most key factors in the issue of change.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Agree

Submitted by mamabear on Tue, 09/06/2011 - 8:23pm.

Writing skills is another area. I end up spending time in my science classes trying to teach writing, which I'm not trained to do, because the problems students come into college with can't be fixed in one or two comp courses.

But we've discussed problems with the educational system at length elsewhere. The only solution people seem to have is to go backwards, but you can't. Students are exposed to universes of information that they weren't 50 years ago. You can't undo that, and I think important information get lost in the noise.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

mamabear,

Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 9:31am.

Yes you can go backwards and we are at a very fast rate.  But I understand your point.  However, by starting at first grade and limiting (going backward) the schools focus, the children would learn that they are to be exposed to a limited frame of reference in order to achieve a higher level of competency.  This competency would then allow them the ability to process and use the additional information available at a functional level.  The 'universe of information' will still be there but it is not the realm of primary education to deal with the universe - it is to supply the tools required to process, use and make sense of the universe.

There is no complete answer but the schools not producing a product that has at least approached the mastery of the basic tenets of education is the absolute worst case scenario that would still allow the existence of a school system.  An absolute focus on mastering the skills involved in writing, reading, history, economics and math (up to entry level algebra) through the sixth/seventh grade would provide high schools and colleges with at least students prepared for the expansion of their knowledge by programs designed to help them to think for themselves.  Without that background they are only being taught to agree with their teacher, at least until they get out of class, to get an acceptable grade. 

It is my opinion that you can not use more advance methods of learning because the students are not adequately prepped because they are spread too thin in their earlier years.  In the work place we don't allow apprentices to do jobs they are not prepared to preform without expecting disaster - why should be do it in our schools?

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Your grammar is beyond poor. So you're a product of this

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:35am.

wonderful edjucashion? How about the US spends the second most of any country on education and are ranked twenty two? Do you think we need to spend more? Along with your language skills how are your mathematics skills?

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

What mistake did I make?

Submitted by mamabear on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 1:07pm.

I'm not perfect or anything, but other than a sentence fragment where I listed examples, I'm not seeing any grammatical errors in that post.

When a man makes up his mind without evidence, no evidence disproving his opinion will change his mind- Robert Heinlein
  • Login to post comments

Obama to spend Labor Day at Detroit AFL-CIO rally

Submitted by ctyankee on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:03am.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-spend-labor-day-detroit-afl-cio-rally-081422...

Makes sense, since he owns Government Motors and the United Autoworkers are in his pocket.

  • Login to post comments

Their priorities

Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:15am.

Yeah, and to hell with everyone else.  That's pretty much his game plan at this point.  And this is pathetic, he's doing this stupid speech thing (which is all he really does) for a bunch of people that already have jobs that are basically with the government.  Who cares about the private sector as long as they keep paying their fair share of taxes(read: more than what's sustainable in being able to hire people)?

I can't think of a more anti-business socialist president ever.  At this juncture, I can only compare him to dictators because that's what he is.  So many to choose from, take your pick.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

From what I saw, Jon,

Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:11am.

this looks more like a street fair, than anything else.  But, Trumka is involved, and I'm sure that he went out and rounded up enough street people, to fill out the crowd. 

OF course, those who were on the bubble when the business model that GM and Chrysler were living became unsustainable, will be happy to see President Zero, he insured that their feather bed will be maintained.  And, in the bargain, the workers council became part owners, much like the Soviet system.   And the rest of the crowd?  They have their hands out for some of the  "Obama Stash" , so they'll be ecstatic, too. 

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

Yup. That Hoffa-On-A-Stick foodstand was a dead giveaway.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:53am.

.

  • Login to post comments

What a nice guy!

Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:52pm.

I read about this on Drudge:

Hoffa threatens GOP

What scares me is that they would do it too.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

wow

Submitted by Hoosier Conservative on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:58am.

"A workplace fatality is something no working family needs."

What, like a wealthy family does need it? Why the class warfare on a subject like that??

Marxists can't be good scientists? -troglodyte
  • Login to post comments

Because, everyone knows the wealthy

Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:23am.

Dont work, they just take advantage of everyone else.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Boudin---

Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 8:27pm.

odd that libs don't apply that definition where it belongs - on the lifelong welfare class.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Hoosier,

Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:37am.

Is she implying that a fatality occurring away from work is somehow better? We could go on, but we've got to give her some credit, she managed to cram all kinds of stupidity into just nine words.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

What does that word mean?

Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:53am.

You would have to ask the question "what is a fatality at work?"  If someone has a heart attack at work, does that mean everyone else would get a heart attack at work?  I bang my knee against my desk once in a while, but that doesn't mean I'm not in a safe environment at work.  It happens because I get a little careless in swiveling in my office chair.  Ban office chairs!  Ban office desks!

These liberals/communists have some strange ideas.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Watch out Texas

Submitted by ricklail on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 9:36am.

Your days of job creation are over according to Solis. It is because Texas is a right to work state which the Obama administration hates.

A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
  • Login to post comments

Solis ! also in another place mentioned federal stimulus funds.

Submitted by upcountrywater on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 3:31pm.

It I was Rick Perry, I would a demand a state wide audit of federal stimulus funds flowing into Texas... bet that stimulus total is much less than what went into just one company GM.

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

What our government schools are really designed to do...

Submitted by MPH on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:03am.

For years my wife had been saying that the government run schools weren't intended to educate, they were intended to produce happy little factory workers. They teach you to get up the same time each day, go someplace where your schedule isn't yours, do what you're told by the authority figures there, and then be allowed to leave at the same time each day. I didn't believe her. Until...

I saw a show on, if I recall correctly, the History Channel. It covered the history of government run education. Back 100 years or so ago, when the Carnegies and Rockefellers and others of their ilk were lobbying for government run education, they spent time and money researching other countries' educational systems. They chose to model our system after the Prussian system.

What was the Prussian education system designed to do? Produce happy, marginally educated, productive serfs that would do what they were told to do by the nobility. Indoctrinating our youth to be government-controlled zombies is what the government run education system is DESIGNED to do. It's doing it far too well. And while there are doubtless some number of teachers who want to actually educate children, they fight an uphill battle because the system isn't designed to support such goals.

Education of our young is far too important to leave to government paid time servers. The only way to improve education will be to get the government out of it. Don't think so? I'll leave you with this question: When 90% of parents send their children to government run schools, what does it say about the schools when, of those with children, nearly half of public school teachers and over half of all politician's don't?

  • Login to post comments

Hilda

Submitted by milootoole on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:56am.

Hilda is a complete Hispanic--anything for her blood line, nothing for America.

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-phoenix/latino-group-claims-aztl...

  • Login to post comments

She served ,,,,,,,

Submitted by Richard.Halavais on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 10:58am.

Hilda Solis hails from the San Gabriel valley of California, the land of fruits and nuts, and she served in the California state legislature before being jerked to Washington. She has always been an ignorant left wing political hack as is clearly evidenced by her record and the horrible condition of California.

Richard Halavais
  • Login to post comments

Hildabeast Is A Nut And A Flake

Submitted by stratman on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 1:20pm.

Richard:

Enjoyed the Boeing 707 barrel roll on your web site.  Sent it to my uncle who knew a lot of people in the industry back when.  Cleveland has the traditional  Air Show this weekend.  Jets make their turn near my home to go back to the show grounds.  Magnificent! 

Best wishes.

  • Login to post comments

DDSS

Submitted by misterbee241 on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:56am.

different day, same stuff. Solomon was right there is nothing new under the sun. same old lies to keep the base agitated and voting democrat.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

Hilda Solis is a profoundly stupid incompetent boob

Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:14pm.

Which makes her a perfect fit for this hideous administration from Hell.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Though I bet Hell is better

Submitted by Jack Bauer on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:57pm.

Though I bet Hell is better run than this administration.


All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
  • Login to post comments

Jack,

Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 3:21pm.

LOL - You're probably right.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Did she drive off in her

Submitted by Jack Bauer on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 2:56pm.

Did she drive off in her Canadian made SUV?


All of the above Mr Obama? --- How about ALL OF THE BELOW, instead.
  • Login to post comments

Anybody catch that Drudge headline on Hoffa?

Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 5:40pm.

It's my understanding that Obama did not acknowledge Hoffa's remarks in his speech which could be deemed tacit endorsement. Biden in Cincy seemed to be on the same message. I guess if that's the word de la semaine, we'll see and hear it repeated often leading up to "the speech."

Can anyone remember a time when the party in power called for a war against the minority party. Union boss orders union members to "take these [SOB's] out!" Interesting phrasiology. There's not a lot of ambiguity in a statement like that. Makes a website with little targets on it seem kind of tame.

Ah well. Unions.

  • Login to post comments

Just ...

Submitted by Tom Blumer on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 7:30pm.

... posted.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use