AP Acts As If Misunderstood 'Minnesota Nice' Is at Stake in State Govt. Shutdown Battle
I had to do a double take when I looked over this afternoon's dispatch out of St. Paul, Minnesota from Patrick Condon of the Associated Press.
Readers unfamiliar with the Gopher State budget impasse to this point would fail to learn from the AP report that the dispute is all about raising taxes. Democratic Governor Mark Dayton wants tax increases on "the wealthy" (which really means high income-earners, whether or not they happen to be wealthy). The state's top marginal tax rate is already a very high 7.85%.
Dayton has chosen to shut down the government because the Republican-controlled legislature won't pass a budget containing his desired tax increases. It really is that simple. Minnesota's government is closed (actually, partially closed) because Mark Dayton chose to close it. Period.
Having premised his story on spending cuts instead of tax increases, Condon cynically invoked something known as "Minnesota Nice" -- as if imposing tax increases on roughly 7,700 taxpayers to pay for increased spending fits that definition. What's really amazing is that if one digs into what "Minnesota Nice" really means, it's not at all complimentary.
Here are several paragraphs from Condon's concoction:
Minn. shutdown a battle over big-spending legacy
Facing Republican demands to limit enrollment in assistance programs and trim historically generous state benefits, Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton has a frequent response: "That is not Minnesota."
The remark sums up one side of the wildly diverging views between Dayton and Republicans about whether Minnesota should preserve its reputation as a progressive state where taxes are high but the vulnerable are protected. That dispute underlies a government shutdown that hit its seventh day Thursday.
What Democrats see as the popular local saying "Minnesota Nice," Republicans see as unchecked and irresponsible government growth fueled by taxes they say are crippling to businesses that create jobs.
"I don't think that Minnesota Nice is going to go away," said state Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, the lead budget writer for House Republicans. "But I certainly would like to see our business climate get out of the bottom 10."
Ms. Holberg should never have accepted the premise of whatever question she was asked about preserving "Minnesota Nice." From all appearances, its use is an artificial contrivance which had nothing to do with politics until the Democrats and the establishment press decided to make it so.
Here, from an audio transcript at Minnesota Public Radio, a place Mr. Condon would be likely to consider unimpeachable, is Syl Jones in December 2009, explaining what "Minnesota Nice" is:
Tracing the origin of "Minnesota Nice"
Minnesotans know it's not nice to call someone "Minnesota nice." It's a synonym for phoniness and passive aggression. And Minnesota playwright Syl Jones says he's uncovered the roots of Minnesota nice. He traces it all back to the Scandinavian immigrants who settled here more than a century ago. Jones argues in this essay that his discovery goes a long way toward explaining all kinds of strange Minnesota phenomena.
Syl Jones: In the 1930s, a Danish-Norwegian novelist, Aksel Sandemose, described the unwritten laws that governed his fictional town of Jante. He listed 11 so-called Janteloven, or Jante laws, but three are enough to give you an idea:
Don't think that you are special.
Don't think that you are good at anything.
Don't think that you can teach us anything.
Sound familiar? It should. Jante Law explains a lot of what goes on in Minnesota. Former Gov. Wendell Anderson met his downfall because people thought he'd forgotten to act like he wasn't anything special. Former Gov. Jesse Ventura enjoyed initial success because he appealed to people who thought the political establishment had nothing to teach them. Unfortunately, he also forgot to act like he wasn't anything special. These principles, which may have been intended to maintain a measure of egalitarianism back in the old country, find their cultural expression in what we call Minnesota Nice. People who have grown up with it know that Minnesota Nice doesn't have all that much to do with being nice. It's more about keeping up appearances, about keeping the social order, about keeping people in their place.
Those who are curious about all 11 Jante laws will find them here.
Dang. It would be reasonable to conclude based on Jones's riff that Mark Dayton and Gopher State Democrats are more interested in keeping up "progressive" appearances than they are in competently running state government. It takes a special degree of hubris to take something clearly considered uncomplimentary and try to turn it into a supposed desirable feature. Nice try, Mr. Condon and Minnesota Democrats. No sale.
Someone ought to ask Mark Dayton what would happen if he gets his way and a just a few hundred of the 7,700 income tax increase burden-carriers decide that the state isn't being nice enough to them any more and move to another state. People, especially excessively taxed people, have been known to vote with their feet.
Though one never knows how things are going to turn out, it's hard not to think that when the establishment press and Democrats (but I repeat myself) have to resort to arguments normally reserved for spending cuts which in essence try to say, "You're not a nice person if you don't want to increase taxes," it's not looking good for Minnesota's Democratic Farm Labor partisans.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Another
Submitted by grammajane on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 11:00pm.
Just another radical Lib voted in by MN voters. MN nice amounts to handing out money, housing, education, medical help and food to anyone who never worked a day in their life. Those who don't recieve any help are those who worked hard all their life, paid their taxes and provided for their families. The Dayton family are one of the richest families in the state and never had any money problems dating back to the 1920's. Heard tonight he wants to add a buck tax to cigarettes and the Repub. said nay
This is ...
Submitted by Tom Blumer on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 11:06pm.
... true.
Thanks
Submitted by grammajane on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 11:54pm.
Thanks for posting the article. I heard it on the radio and the article is very interesting
dayton
Submitted by Huapakechi on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 9:26am.
dayton got elected by pandering to the welfare class in Minneapolis/St Paul, the twin cesspools on the Mississippi, along with the assistance of his friend and co-conspirator Sec State Mark Ritchie. The same guy who recounted the votes enough times to bless us with that failed comedian in the Senate. (See george soros sec state project)
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/the_soros_connection_in_the_mi.html
At least two entities funded by Soros and his plutocrat wannabe pals have prepared the soil for the contentious and suspicious process of tabulating and recounting the vote totals of incumbent Senator Norm Coleman and challenger Al Franken.
a project called the Secretary of States Project. The goal has been to help elect Secretaries of State in targeted states across the nation. The SoSP was successful in, among other places, Ohio and Minnesota. Secretaries of state are crucial in elections, since these officials are charged with ensuring the integrity of the voting and counting process. They are the gatekeepers: helping to decide who is entitled to vote and who is not. In Ohio, the Democrat Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner was widely criticized (at least among Republicans) for her efforts in the last few months, which were perceived to favor Barack Obama.
Those of us who live outside the people's republic of Minneapolis/St. Paul would just as soon fence 'em off from the more sane and productive parts of the state.
For those who have short memories, dayton campaigned on a promise to never shut down the state government. Imagine that, a DFL candidate lying to get elected......
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/03/is-a-shutdown-the-democratic-plan-...
Did Dayton intentionally try to provoke a shutdown? We can only say that if he had wanted to, he would have acted precisely as he has in recent months.
Throughout the budgetary process, Dayton refused to give legislators the details they needed to take his priorities into account in crafting their own budget bills. He refused to negotiate on individual bills until he had seen them all.
The Legislature sent its bills to Dayton six weeks before the session ended, but he frittered away the time for negotiation. He vetoed all nine bills at the end of the session, so legislators had no chance to rework them to address his concerns.
As shutdown loomed, Dayton refused to resolve small differences and sign major portions of the budget, such as K-12 education, judiciary and public safety, on which agreement was close. The Pioneer Press called this “hostage taking,” not “compromise.”
I'll take bets that dayton avoids sticking his head out of his mansion during deer season this year, and he'd better check for an extra anchor in the boat if he goes on the traditional walleye opener next Spring.
I like my beer dark, my cigars strong, and my politicians at the end of a rope. Mark Twain
Dayton won because two GOP'ers split the vote in 2010
Submitted by merly1 on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 11:18pm.
Also, even accounting for the federal stimulus "bonus" in the last budget, the GOP still, slightly increased spending in this budget. Dayton vetoed a balanced budget, and also just rejected a "lights-on" budget.
Even better, most of his money is stored in a SoDak trust fund. In 2009, he had about 170k income but paid only low 20k for federal tax because he paid mainly dividend tax rates AND wrote off about 50 k selling a painting at a loss. Last year, he made alot more money, I think about 600k+ so paid more taxes but still donated only about 8000 to charity despite his huge income. People here laugh that he wants to increase income taxes but has benefited greatly from his dividends. He IS a charlatan.
Increased spending ..
Submitted by Fredy on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 1:47am.
... and the Democratic Governor is not happy.
Is this 'issue' about the budget or Pawlenty's Presidential bid? Seems like the Democrats were trying to claim Pawlenty had wrecked the state and left a monsterous debt that could never be paid! Is this stunt simply the current governor, and a willing propagandist press, trying to somehow blame Pawlenty?
Could be ...
Submitted by Tom Blumer on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 7:23am.
... but I think it's more about making sure a Democrat executive gets his tax increases as a precedent for Obama getting tax increases in DC.
It is actually shrewd politics
Submitted by merly1 on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 8:28am.
With the census redistricting, MN has a rare 2 year Senate election in 2012, so Dayton doesnt face voters until 2014 but BOTH MN GOP-held chambers will be up in 2012. Obviously, Gov Fife has been talking shutdown since his State of the State speech and it does make political sense even though he inflicts human misery to achieve a short term political goal. He lives a life of luxury, his state union buddies may be suffering with his shutdown, but, oh well.............;oD
Wish I could feel bad...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 11:36pm.
...for the state that elected Jesse Ventura and Al Franken...
We've got them here in Illinois too.
Submitted by Boil It Down on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 11:40pm.
We call them elitist Swedes here in West Central Illinois. They're pretty sure they are meant to be the ruling class since they think they're a cut above and "smarter" than the hicks that they must suffer. My own particular town has lost a fair percentage of it's population from those who "voted with their feet" and all due to these progressives. My business dropped off a bit more than that percentage. -bidn-
Minnesota nice?
Submitted by big.league.slider on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 1:00am.
Do these Libs mean "nice" like the Paul Wellstone memorial?
Dayton's Money in the Dakotas
Submitted by rsbarc011 on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 3:26pm.
Dayton saying he wants the wealthy to pay their fair share is a hypocritical joke. In his financial statements submitted to run fir office it was discovered his money (he gets over $600,000 per year) is in a Dakota bank where there is no state income tax. So no matter how high he wants to tax the rich he will not feel the hike his money is safely tucked away.
Also the Republicans had balanced the budget without losing any programs without raising taxes. Republicans also asked Dayton to call for special session so they could pass a "keep the lights on" bill while they worked on the budget. Dayton refused.
I would like the whole story told for change.